Cancer-related diagnostic and treatment capabilities of hospitals in the context of racial residential segregation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate distribution of hospital-level cancer diagnosis and treatment technologies along dimensions of racial residential segregation. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of residential segregation and availability of technologies associated with cancer diagnosis and treatment. METHODS: American Hospital Association data were merged with American Community Survey data, and hospital was the unit of analysis. Isolation index and Atkinson's index were calculated for racial residential segregation for the census tract in which the hospital is located based on the composite census block groups. Logistic regression was used to model presence of cancer technologies as a function of percent below poverty (scaled 1-10), number of neighboring hospitals, and rural status. RESULTS: Segregation measured by isolation index was associated with the availability of some technologies, independent of percentage below 125% poverty line, number of neighboring hospitals, and rural status. Diagnostic cancer technologies, such as CT scan (odds ratio [OR] = 0.928, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.894, 0.964), ultrasound (OR = 0.961, 95% CI: 0.927, 0.997), mammography (OR = 0.943, 95% CI: 0.914, 0.974), optical colonoscopy (OR = 0.932, 95% CI: 0.904, 0.961), and full-field digital mammography (OR = 0.948, 95% CI: 0.920, 0.977) and therapeutic cancer technology such as chemo therapy (OR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.934, 0.992) appear to be less available in neighborhoods with higher isolation index. However, when segregation is measured by Atkinson's index, CT scan (OR = 1.064, 95% CI: 1.010, 1.121), ultrasound (OR = 1.087, 95% CI: 1.035, 1.141), mammography (OR = 1.094, 95% CI: 1.049, 1.141), and optical colonoscopy (OR = 1.053, 95% CI: 1.012, 1.095) are more available in neighborhoods with higher Atkinson's index. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that cancer diagnostic capabilities in segregated areas are in the pathway between residential segregation and cancer treatment process, and future studies should evaluate individual-level associations.

Accelerant-related burns and drug abuse: Challenging combination.

BACKGROUND: Accelerants are flammable substances that may cause explosion when added to existing fires. The relationships between drug abuse and accelerant-related burns are not well elucidated in the literature. Of these burns, a portion is related to drug manufacturing, which have been shown to be associated with increased burn complications. OBJECTIVES: 1) To evaluate the demographics and clinical outcomes of accelerant-related burns in a Provincial Burn Centre. 2) To compare the clinical outcomes with a control group of non-accelerant related burns. 3) To analyze a subgroup of patients with history of drug abuse and drug manufacturing. METHODS: Retrospective case control study. Patient data associated with accelerant-related burns from 2009 to 2014 were obtained from the British Columbia Burn Registry. These patients were compared with a control group of non-accelerant related burns. Clinical outcomes that were evaluated include inhalational injury, ICU length of stay, ventilator support, surgeries needed, and burn complications. Chi-square test was used to evaluate categorical data and Student's t-test was used to evaluate mean quantitative data with the p value set at 0.05. A logistic regression model was used to evaluate factors affecting burn complications. RESULTS: Accelerant-related burns represented 28.2% of all burn admissions (N=532) from 2009 to 2014. The accelerant group had higher percentage of patients with history of drug abuse and was associated with higher TBSA burns, ventilator support, ICU stay and pneumonia rates compared to the non-accelerant group. Within the accelerant group, there was no difference in clinical outcomes amongst people with or without history of drug abuse. Four cases were associated with methamphetamine manufacturing, all of which underwent ICU stay and ventilator support. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerant-related burns cause significant burden to the burn center. A significant proportion of these patients have history of drug abuse.