Addressing Disparities in Acute Stroke Management and Prognosis.

There are now abundant data demonstrating disparities in acute stroke management and prognosis; however, interventions to reduce these disparities remain limited. This special report aims to provide a critical review of the current landscape of disparities in acute stroke care and highlight opportunities to use implementation science to reduce disparities throughout the early care continuum. In the prehospital setting, stroke symptom recognition campaigns that have been successful in reducing prehospital delays used a multilevel approach to education, including mass media, culturally tailored community education, and professional education. The mobile stroke unit is an organizational intervention that has the potential to provide more equitable access to timely thrombolysis and thrombectomy treatments. In the hospital setting, interventions to address implicit biases among health care providers in acute stroke care decision-making are urgently needed as part of a multifaceted approach to advance stroke equity. Implementing stroke systems of care interventions, such as evidence-based stroke care protocols at designated stroke centers, can have a broader public health impact and may help reduce geographic, racial, and ethnic disparities in stroke care, although further research is needed. The long-term impact of disparities in acute stroke care cannot be underestimated. The consistent trend of longer time to treatment for Black and Hispanic people experiencing stroke has direct implications on long-term disability and independence after stroke. A learning health system model may help expedite the translation of evidence-based interventions into clinical practice to reduce disparities in stroke care.

Informed consent practices for acute stroke therapy: principles, challenges and emerging opportunities.

IMPORTANCE: Informed consent (IC) plays a crucial yet underexplored role in acute stroke treatment, particularly in the context of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This narrative review examines data on current IC practices in acute ischemic stroke management, specifically for patients treated with IVT or EVT, with the aim of identifying areas for improvement and strategies to enhance the IC process. OBSERVATIONS: IC practices for IVT vary significantly among hospitals and physicians with the frequency of always requiring consent ranging from 21 to 37%. Factors influencing IC for IVT include patient decision-making capacity, standard of care, time sensitive nature of treatments, legal and moral obligations, risk of complications, physician age and speciality, treatment delays, and hospital size. Consent requirements tend to be stricter for patients presenting within the 3-4.5-h window. The content and style of information shared as part of the IC process revealed discrepancies in the disclosure of stroke diagnosis, IVT mechanism, benefits, and risks. Research on IC practices for EVT is scarce, highlighting a concerning gap in the available evidence base. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This review underscores the significant variability and knowledge gaps in IC for EVT and IVT. Challenges related to decision-making capacity assessment and the absence of standardised guidance substantially contributes to these gaps. Future initiatives should focus on simplifying information delivery to patients, developing formal tools for assessing capacity, standardising ethical frameworks to guide physicians when patients lack capacity and harmonizing IC standards across sites. The ultimate goal is to enhance IC practices and uphold patient autonomy, while ensuring timely treatment initiation.

Current and Emerging Endovascular and Neurocritical Care Management Strategies in Large-Core Ischemic Stroke.

The volume of infarcted tissue in patients with ischemic stroke is consistently associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Initial studies of endovascular thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion excluded patients with established large-core infarcts, even when large volumes of salvageable brain tissue were present, due to the high risk of hemorrhagic transformation and reperfusion injury. However, recent retrospective and prospective studies have shown improved outcomes with endovascular thrombectomy, and several clinical trials were recently published to evaluate the efficacy of endovascular management of patients presenting with large-core infarcts. With or without thrombectomy, patients with large-core infarcts remain at high risk of in-hospital complications such as hemorrhagic transformation, malignant cerebral edema, seizures, and others. Expert neurocritical care management is necessary to optimize blood pressure control, mitigate secondary brain injury, manage cerebral edema and elevated intracranial pressure, and implement various neuroprotective measures. Herein, we present an overview of the current and emerging evidence pertaining to endovascular treatment for large-core infarcts, recent advances in neurocritical care strategies, and their impact on optimizing patient outcomes.

Posterior circulation cerebral infarction: A review of clinical, imaging features, management, and outcomes.

Objective: This narrative review discusses posterior circulation cerebral infarcts (PCCI) and provides an update given recent randomized trials in the management of basilar artery occlusion (BAO). We examine clinical characteristics, imaging protocols, management updates, and outcomes of PCCI. Methods: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for articles on PCCI. We included randomized trials and observational studies in humans. We also reviewed relevant references from the literature identified. Results: PCCI and BAO is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Early assessment and accurate diagnosis of PCCI remains a clinical challenge. Neuroimaging advances have improved early detection, but barriers remain due to costs and availability. Recent randomized trials provide new insights for BAO patients and support the efficacy of endovascular thrombectomy. Discussion: PCCI requires specific diagnostic and management that is distinct from anterior circulation stroke. While further studies are needed in varied populations and in the subset of BAO patients presenting with milder deficits, growing randomized data support the treatment of BAO patients with endovascular thrombectomy.

The Impact of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration on Unruptured Aneurysm Occlusion After Flow Diversion: A Multicenter Study.

OBJECTIVE: Endoluminal flow diversion reduces blood flow into intracranial aneurysms, promoting thrombosis. Postprocedural dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary for the prevention of thromboembolic complications. The purpose of this study is to therefore assess the impact that the type and duration of DAPT has on aneurysm occlusion rates and iatrogenic complications after flow diversion. METHODS: A retrospective review of a multicenter aneurysm database was performed from 2012 to 2020 to identify unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with single device flow diversion and ≥12-month follow-up. Clinical and radiologic data were analyzed with aneurysm occlusion as a function of DAPT duration serving as a primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Two hundred five patients underwent flow diversion with a single pipeline embolization device with 12.7% of treated aneurysms remaining nonoccluded during the study period. There were no significant differences in aneurysm morphology or type of DAPT used between occluded and nonoccluded groups. Nonoccluded aneurysms received a longer mean duration of DAPT (9.4 vs 7.1 months, P = 0.016) with a significant effect of DAPT duration on the observed aneurysm occlusion rate (F(2, 202) = 4.2, P = 0.016). There was no significant difference in the rate of complications, including delayed ischemic strokes, observed between patients receiving short (≤6 months) and prolonged duration (>6 months) DAPT (7.9% vs 9.3%, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: After flow diversion, an abbreviated duration of DAPT lasting 6 months may be most appropriate before transitioning to low-dose aspirin monotherapy to promote timely aneurysm occlusion while minimizing thromboembolic complications.

2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

AIM: The "2023 Guideline for the Management of Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage" replaces the 2012 "Guidelines for the Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage." The 2023 guideline is intended to provide patient-centric recommendations for clinicians to prevent, diagnose, and manage patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. METHODS: A comprehensive search for literature published since the 2012 guideline, derived from research principally involving human subjects, published in English, and indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline, was conducted between March 2022 and June 2022. In addition, the guideline writing group reviewed documents on related subject matter previously published by the American Heart Association. Newer studies published between July 2022 and November 2022 that affected recommendation content, Class of Recommendation, or Level of Evidence were included if appropriate. Structure: Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a significant global public health threat and a severely morbid and often deadly condition. The 2023 aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guideline provides recommendations based on current evidence for the treatment of these patients. The recommendations present an evidence-based approach to preventing, diagnosing, and managing patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, with the intent to improve quality of care and align with patients' and their families' and caregivers' interests. Many recommendations from the previous aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke due to Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease: Identification, Medical and Interventional Treatment, and Outcomes.

Large vessel occlusion stroke due to underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD-LVO) is prevalent in 10 to 30% of LVOs depending on patient factors such as vascular risk factors, race and ethnicity, and age. Patients with ICAD-LVO derive similar functional outcome benefit from endovascular thrombectomy as other mechanisms of LVO, but up to half of ICAD-LVO patients reocclude after revascularization. Therefore, early identification and treatment planning for ICAD-LVO are important given the unique considerations before, during, and after endovascular thrombectomy. In this review of ICAD-LVO, we propose a multistep approach to ICAD-LVO identification, pretreatment and endovascular thrombectomy considerations, adjunctive medications, and medical management. There have been no large-scale randomized controlled trials dedicated to studying ICAD-LVO, therefore this review focuses on observational studies.

Ideal Foundational Requirements for Stroke Program Development and Growth: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Stroke center certification has evolved at a rapid pace and is now available at 4 different levels of service in the United States. Although certification standards provide guidance on stroke center process elements, lack of guidance on structural components such as workforce, staffing, and unit operations has resulted in heterogeneous services among hospitals credentialed at the same stroke center level. Such heterogeneity challenges public expectations and transparency about actual service capabilities within American stroke centers and in some cases may foster leniency in credentialing agency certification methods. Standards for other time-dependent diagnoses, including trauma, provide detailed guidance on structural elements that has improved patient triage and resuscitative care while enabling practitioners and administrators to more accurately gauge and plan service development to better support their communities. This scientific statement aims to provide similar structural guidance defined by each level of hospital stroke center services to reduce operational inconsistencies, to foster planning for service development, and to improve the interprofessional care of patients with acute stroke.

Spoke-administered thrombolysis improves large vessel occlusion early recanalization: the real-world experience of a large academic hub-and-spoke telestroke network.

Introduction: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke is increasingly controversial. Recent trials support MT without IVT for patients presenting directly to MT-capable "hub" centers. However, bypassing IVT has not been evaluated for patients presenting to IVT-capable "spoke" hospitals that require hub transfer for MT. A perceived lack of efficacy of IVT to result in LVO early recanalization (ER) is often cited to support bypassing IVT, but ER data for IVT in patients that require interhospital transfer is limited. Here we examined LVO ER rates after spoke-administered IVT in our hub-and-spoke stroke network. Methods: Patients presenting to 25 spokes before hub transfer for MT consideration from 2018-2020 were retrospectively identified from a prospectively maintained database. Inclusion criteria were pre-transfer CTA-defined LVO, ASPECTS ≥6, and post-transfer repeat vessel imaging. Results: Of 167 patients, median age was 69 and 51% were female. 76 received spoke IVT (+spokeIVT) and 91 did not (-spokeIVT). Alteplase was the only IVT used in this study. Comorbidities and NIHSS were similar between groups. ER frequency was increased 7.2-fold in +spokeIVT patients [12/76 (15.8%) vs. 2/91 (2.2%), P<0.001]. Spoke-administered IVT was independently associated with ER (aOR=11.5, 95% CI=2.2,99.6, p<0.05) after adjusting for timing of last known well, interhospital transfer, and repeat vessel imaging. Interval NIHSS was improved in patients with ER (median -2 (IQR -6.3, -0.8) vs. 0 (-2.5, 1), p<0.05). Conclusion: Within our network, +spokeIVT patients had a 7.2-fold increased ER relative likelihood. This real-world analysis supports IVT use in eligible patients with LVO at spoke hospitals before hub transfer for MT.

Mechanical thrombectomy decision making and prognostication: Stroke treatment Assessments prior to Thrombectomy In Neurointervention (SATIN) study.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is the standard-of-care treatment for stroke patients with emergent large vessel occlusions. Despite this, little is known about physician decision making regarding MT and prognostic accuracy. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort study of patients undergoing MT was performed at 11 comprehensive stroke centers. The attending neurointerventionalist completed a preprocedure survey prior to arterial access and identified key decision factors and the most likely radiographic and clinical outcome at 90 days. Post hoc review was subsequently performed to document hospital course and outcome. RESULTS: 299 patients were enrolled. Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2) was obtained in 38% of patients. The most frequently identified factors influencing the decision to proceed with thrombectomy were site of occlusion (81%), National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (74%), and perfusion imaging mismatch (43%). Premorbid mRS score determination in the hyperacute setting accurately matched retrospectively collected data from the hospital admission in only 140 patients (46.8%). Physicians correctly predicted the patient's 90 day mRS tertile (0-2, 3-4, or 5-6) and final modified Thrombolysis in Ischemic Cerebral Infarction score preprocedure in only 44.2% and 44.3% of patients, respectively. Clinicians tended to overestimate the influence of occlusion site and perfusion imaging on outcomes, while underestimating the importance of pre-morbid mRS. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study to evaluate neurointerventionalists' ability to accurately predict clinical outcome after MT. Overall, neurointerventionalists performed poorly in prognosticating patient 90 day outcomes, raising ethical questions regarding whether MT should be withheld in patients with emergent large vessel occlusions thought to have a poor prognosis.

Basilar artery occlusion: A review of clinicoradiologic features, treatment selection, and endovascular techniques.

Basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is an infrequent but often fatal subtype of stroke. Predicting outcomes and selecting patients for endovascular therapy (EVT) remains challenging. Advances in neuroimaging and the development of prognostic scoring systems have augmented clinical decision-making over time. Recent randomized trials, BEST (Basilar Artery Occlusion Endovascular Intervention vs. Standard Medical Treatment), BASICS (Basilar Artery International Cooperation Study), BAOCHE (Basilar Artery Occlusion CHinese Endovascular Trial) and ATTENTION (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion), compared EVT and medical management for patients with BAO. These trials yielded mixed results. The former two suggested unclear benefit while the latter two supported a benefit of EVT. While all had limitations, most providers agree caution should be exercised when excluding patients from EVT who may stand to benefit. Further studies are therefore needed to determine the effectiveness, safety, selection criteria, and optimal technical approach for EVT among patients with BAO. Hyperacute-phase advanced imaging can offer several benefits to aid decision making. It is reasonable to exclude patients with low National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), large imaging-proven cores, and evidence of perforator occlusion by branch atheromatous disease. Herein, we review the clinical presentation, imaging work-up, treatments, and clinical outcomes for BAO, while highlighting knowledge gaps in treatment selection and technique.

In a hub-and-spoke network, spoke-administered thrombolysis reduces mechanical thrombectomy procedure time and number of passes.

BACKGROUND: The utility of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) prior to mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion stroke (LVO) is controversial. Some data suggest IVT increases MT technical difficulty. Within our hub-and-spoke telestroke network, we examined how spoke-administered IVT affected hub MT procedure time and pass number. METHODS: Patients presenting to 25 spoke hospitals who were transferred to the hub and underwent MT from 2018 to 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. MT procedure time, fluoroscopy time, and pass number were obtained from operative reports. RESULTS: Of 107 patients, 48 received IVT at spokes. Baseline characteristics and NIHSS were similar. The last known well (LKW)-to-puncture time was shorter among IVT patients (4.3 ± 1.9 h vs. 10.5 ± 6.5 h, p < 0.0001). In patients that received IVT, mean MT procedure time was decreased by 18.8 min (50.5 ± 29.4 vs. 69.3 ± 46.7 min, p = 0.02) and mean fluoroscopy time was decreased by 11.3 min (21.7 ± 15.8 vs. 33.0 ± 30.9 min, p = 0.03). Furthermore, IVT-treated patients required fewer MT passes (median 1 pass [IQR 1.0, 1.80] vs. 2 passes [1.0, 2.3], p = 0.0002) and were more likely to achieve reperfusion in ≤2 passes (81.3% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.01). An increased proportion of IVT-treated patients achieved TICI 2b-3 reperfusion after MT (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.045). There were no associations between MT procedural characteristics and LKW-to-puncture time. CONCLUSION: Within our network, hub MT following spoke-administered IVT was faster, required fewer passes, and achieved improved reperfusion. This suggests spoke-administered IVT does not impair MT, but instead may enhance it.

Direct to angio-suite large vessel occlusion transfers achieve faster arrival-to-puncture times and improved outcomes.

Introduction: For patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke, time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is crucial to prevent infarction and improve outcomes. We sought to evaluate the hub arrival-to-puncture times and outcomes for transferred patients accepted directly to the angio-suite (LVO2OR) versus those accepted through the emergency department (ED) in a hub-and-spoke telestroke network. Methods: Consecutive patients transferred for EVT with spoke CTA-confirmed LVO, spoke ASPECTS >6, and LKW-to-hub arrival <6 hours were identified. Our LVO2OR protocol began implementation in January 2017. The LVO2OR cohort includes patients who underwent EVT from July 2017 to October 2020; the ED cohort includes those from January 2011 to December 2016. Hub arrival-to-puncture time and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were prospectively recorded. Results: The LVO2OR cohort was comprised of 91 patients and the ED cohort 90. LVO2OR patients had more atrial fibrillation (AF, 51% vs 32%, p=0.02) and more M2 occlusions (27% vs 10%, p=0.01). LVO2OR patients had faster median hub arrival-to-puncture time (11 vs 92 minutes, p<0.001), faster median telestroke consult-to-puncture time (2.4 vs 3.6 hours, p<0.001), greater TICI 2b-3 reperfusion (92% vs 69%, p<0.001), and greater 90-day mRS <2 (35% vs 21%, p=0.04). In a multivariable model, LVO2OR significantly increased the odds of 90-day mRS <2 (aOR 2.77, 95%CI 1.07,7.20; p=0.04) even when controlling for age, baseline mRS, AF, NIHSS, M2 location, and TICI 2b-3. Conclusion: In a hub-and-spoke telestroke network, accepting transferred patients directly to the angio-suite was associated with dramatically reduced hub arrival-to-puncture time and may lead to improved 90-day outcomes. Direct-to-angio-suite protocols should continue to be evaluated in other regions and telestroke models.

Characterizing reasons for stroke thrombectomy ineligibility among potential candidates transferred in a hub-and-spoke network.

Background: Access to endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is relatively limited. Hub-and-spoke networks seek to transfer appropriate large vessel occlusion (LVO) candidates to EVT-capable hubs. However, some patients are ineligible upon hub arrival, and factors that drive transfer inefficiencies are not well described. We sought to quantify EVT transfer efficiency and identify reasons for EVT ineligibility. Methods: Consecutive EVT candidates presenting to 25 spokes from 2018-2020 with pre-transfer CTA-defined LVO and ASPECTS ≥6 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes of interest included hub EVT, reasons for EVT ineligibility, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2. Results: Among 258 patients, the median age was 70 years (IQR 60-81); 50% were female. 56% were ineligible for EVT after hub arrival. Cited reasons were large established infarct (49%), mild symptoms (33%), recanalization (6%), distal occlusion (5%), sub-occlusive lesion (3%), and goals of care (3%). Late window patients [last known well (LKW) >6 hours] were more likely to be ineligible (67% vs 43%, P<0.0001). EVT ineligible patients were older (73 vs 68 years, p=0.04), had lower NIHSS (10 vs 16, p<0.0001), longer LKW-hub arrival time (8.4 vs 4.6 hours, p<0.0001), longer spoke Telestroke consult-hub arrival time (2.8 vs 2.2 hours, p<0.0001), and received less intravenous thrombolysis (32% vs 45%, p=0.04) compared to eligible patients. EVT ineligibility independently reduced the odds of 90-day mRS≤2 (aOR=0.26, 95%CI=0.12,0.56; p=0.001) when controlling for age, NIHSS, and LKW-hub arrival time. Conclusions: Among patients transferred for EVT, there are multiple reasons for ineligibility upon hub arrival, with most excluded for infarct growth and mild symptoms. Understanding factors that drive transfer inefficiencies is important to improve EVT access and outcomes.

Toward a Better Understanding of Sex- and Gender-Related Differences in Endovascular Stroke Treatment: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.

There are many unknowns when it comes to the role of sex in the pathophysiology and management of acute ischemic stroke. This is particularly true for endovascular treatment (EVT). It has only recently been established as standard of care; therefore, data are even more scarce and conflicting compared with other areas of acute stroke. Assessing the role of sex and gender as isolated variables is challenging because they are closely intertwined with each other, as well as with patients' cultural, ethnic, and social backgrounds. Nevertheless, a better understanding of sex- and gender-related differences in EVT is important to develop strategies that can ultimately improve individualized outcome for both men and women. Disregarding patient sex and gender and pursuing a one-size-fits-all strategy may lead to suboptimal or even harmful treatment practices. This scientific statement is meant to outline knowledge gaps and unmet needs for future research on the role of sex and gender in EVT for acute ischemic stroke. It also provides a pragmatic road map for researchers who aim to investigate sex- and gender-related differences in EVT and for clinicians who wish to improve clinical care of their patients undergoing EVT by accounting for sex- and gender-specific factors. Although most EVT studies, including those that form the basis of this scientific statement, report patient sex rather than gender, open questions on gender-specific EVT differences are also discussed.