Implementation of an interdisciplinary tracheostomy care protocol to decrease rates of tracheostomy-related pressure ulcers and injuries.

OBJECTIVES: Tracheostomy-related pressure injuries (TRPI) have been demonstrated to occur in approximately 10% of tracheostomy patients. In this study, we present TRPI outcomes after implementation of a standardized tracheostomy care protocol. METHODS: A tracheostomy care protocol was developed by an interdisciplinary quality improvement program and implemented on July 1, 2016. The protocol was designed to minimize factors that contribute to the development of TRPI. Rates of TRPI over the subsequent 20 months were compared to the year before implementation. RESULTS: 9 out of 85 patients (10.6%) developed TRPI in the pre-protocol cohort compared to 0 of 137 (0%) in the post-protocol cohort, which was a statistically significant decrease by Fisher's exact test with a p-value of 0.0001. Pearson's correlation coefficient demonstrated a negative correlation between age and post-operative day of diagnosis (r = -0.641, p = 0.063), indicating that older patients develop TRPI more quickly. CONCLUSIONS: Interdisciplinary peri-operative tracheostomy care protocols can be effective in decreasing rates of TRPI.

Workup of Suspected Chest Metastases on 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Cancer: Worth the Wait?

The objective of our study is to assess the impact of equivocal or positive positron emission tomography combined with low-dose noncontrast computed tomography (PET/CT) findings in the chest on treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC). We reviewed charts of patients presented at Augusta University's Head and Neck Tumor Board (AUTB) between 2013 and 2016 with the following exclusion criteria: <18 years, Veterans Affairs patients, those with incomplete data, and those without a history of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. The lung/thorax sections of the radiologists' PET/CT reports were graded as "Positive, Equivocal, or Negative" for chest metastases. Patients who underwent workup for suspected chest metastases were assessed for treatment delays, changes in treatment plans, and complications. In addition, we evaluated the time between AUTB presentation and peri-treatment PET/CT to primary treatment initiation were calculated between groups. There was a total of 363 patients with PET/CT prior to treatment, the read was "Negative" in 71.3% (n = 259), "Equivocal" in 20.9% (n = 76), and "Positive" in 5.8% (n = 21). Of 272 patients with complete treatment data, 22 underwent workup for suspected chest metastases. Mean time from PET/CT to treatment initiation was 27.5 days without workup and 64.9 days with workup ( P < .0001), and from AUTB presentation was 29.1 days without workup and 62.5 days with workup ( P < .0001). Five (19.2%) patients experienced a complication from workup. Twenty (76.9%) patients had no changes in their treatment plan after workup. In conclusion, our results for potential chest metastases on PET/CT in patients with HNC are often not clear-cut. Workup of suspected chest metastasis based on PET/CT findings significantly delays primary treatment initiation and may cause serious complications.