Dual plating in the metastatic distal humerus: Benefits may outweigh the risks.

Background: Impending and complete pathologic fractures of the distal humerus are rare complications of metastatic cancer. Surgical treatment aims to quickly restore function and minimize pain. Plate and screw fixation (PSF) is a common method for addressing these lesions, but unlike in orthopaedic trauma, there are no clear guidelines for best management. While dual PSF theoretically provides better support and reduces the chance of reoperation due to tumor progression, single PSF is currently the more common choice. Materials and methods: Between March 2008 and September 2021, 35 consecutive patients who underwent PSF for distal humerus metastasis or multiple myeloma were retrospectively reviewed. The proportion of patients who developed various postoperative complications, including infection, nonunion, deep vein thrombosis, tumor progression, and radial nerve palsy, as well as those requiring reoperation, was calculated. Mann-Whitney U test, Pearson's chi-squared, and Fisher's exact test were used to investigate differences between the single and dual PSF groups with statistical significance defined as p ≤ 0.05. Results: There was no significant difference (p = 0.259) in revision rate, although 3 of 21 (14.3 %) single PSF patients required reoperation compared to 0 of 14 (0.0 %) dual PSF patients. The revisions were performed in one patient due to refracture and in two patients due to tumor progression. Although not statistically significant, a larger percentage of single PSF patients developed a postoperative complication compared to dual PSF patients [odds ratio 0.42 (95 % confidence interval 0.071 to 2.5); p = 0.431]. Single PSF did lead to shorter operative time compared to dual PSF [p < 0.001]. Conclusion: Dual PSF is non-inferior to single PSF and potentially results in fewer reoperations and postoperative complications in distal humerus pathologic lesions, although it leads to longer operative time. The current study is limited by small sample size due to the rarity of distal humerus metastatic lesions.

Genomic identification of sarcoma radiosensitivity and the clinical implications for radiation dose personalization.

BACKGROUND: Soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) are heterogeneous with variable response to radiation therapy (RT). Utilizing the radiosensitivity index (RSI) we estimated the radiobiologic ratio of lethal to sublethal damage (α/ß), genomic-adjusted radiation dose(GARD), and in-turn a biological effective radiation dose (BED). METHODS: Two independent cohorts of patients with soft-tissue sarcoma were identified. The first cohort included 217 genomically-profiled samples from our institutional prospective tissue collection protocol; RSI was calculated for these samples, which were then used to dichotomize the population as either highly radioresistant (HRR) or conventionally radioresistant (CRR). In addition, RSI was used to calculate α/ß ratio and GARD, providing ideal dosing based on sarcoma genomic radiosensitivity. A second cohort comprising 399 non-metastatic-STS patients treated with neoadjuvant RT and surgery was used to validate our findings. RESULTS: Based on the RSI of the sample cohort, 84% would historically be considered radioresistant. We identified a HRR subset that had a significant difference in the RSI, and clinically a lower tumor response to radiation (2.4% vs. 19.4%), 5-year locoregional-control (76.5% vs. 90.8%), and lower estimated α/ß (3.29 vs. 5.98), when compared to CRR sarcoma. Using GARD, the dose required to optimize outcome in the HRR subset is a BEDα/ß=3.29 of 97 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrate that on a genomic scale, that although STS is radioresistant overall, they are heterogeneous in terms of radiosensitivity. We validated this clinically and estimated an α/ß ratio and dosing that would optimize outcome, personalizing dose.

Intramedullary rod failure in metastatic breast cancer: Do triple negative cancer patients have more revision surgery?

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is the most common cancer and second cause of death in women worldwide. Patients with breast cancer are classified into subgroups based on the presence or absence of hormone receptors and the human epidermal growth factor 2-neu (HER-2) marker, the different molecular profiles come with an associated prognosis and variety of possible treatment options. Patients with triple negative cancer have a worse prognosis, a more aggressive behavior, higher likelihood of spreading, a higher risk of recurrence and a poorer outcome overall. Intramedullary rod fixation has proven to provide a good outcome and function in patients with metastatic breast cancer, but no study has addressed the receptor-status potential outcome differences that may affect disease progression at an orthopaedic surgery site. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) Do patients with triple negative breast cancer have a higher revision rate of intramedullary rod fixation of bone metastases? (2) Do patients with metastatic triple negative breast cancer have a higher revision rate of intramedullary rod fixation due to local disease progression? METHODS: This was a single-center, observational, retrospective cohort study. Fifty-seven patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer metastatic to long bones who underwent surgical fixation with an intramedullary rod for a pathological fracture or an impending fracture due to a bone metastasis with a Mirels' score equal or above 8 between January 2004 and December 2016 at our institution were included. All implants used were from the same manufacturer (Stryker Corp., Mahwah, NJ, USA). Patients were divided into two groups based on the receptor status of the tumor and were classified either as triple negative, when the tumor lacked progesterone, estrogen and HER-2 receptors, or as receptor-positive when the presence of one or a combination of either three was proven. In the triple-negative tumor group the mean follow up time was 26 months (SD 29) and median follow up time was 16 months. In the receptor-positive tumor group mean follow up was 27 months (SD 24) with a median follow up of 19 months. To assess possible associations between different factors and the outcomes of interest, we used either the chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and the ANOVA test for continuous variables. For the survival assessment, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed and for the cumulative incidence a competing risk analysis was utilized. RESULTS: The intramedullary rod revision rate for patients in the triple-negative tumor group was 17%, while for the receptor-positive group it was 12%, this was not statistically different for our sample size. The mean time for revision of the intramedullary rod in the whole sample was 19 months (SD 11, range 6-40). The causes of revision were disease progression (43%), nonunion (29%) and surgeon error (29%). The cumulative incidence of revision surgery was 6% (CI 95%, 2-14%) at 12 months and 20% (CI 95%, 8-36%) at 60 months. CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary rodding can be considered for the treatment of long bones metastases in breast cancer patients for an impending or actual pathological fracture. There is no difference in the intramedullary rod revision rate among patients with different receptor-status when comparing triple-negative tumor patients and receptor-positive ones. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

What Is the 10-year Survivorship of Cemented Distal Femoral Endoprostheses for Tumor Reconstructions and What Radiographic Features Are Associated with Survival?

BACKGROUND: Aseptic loosening is one of the most common causes of revision of distal femoral endoprostheses and is considered a mid- to long-term complication. There are not many reports of 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening and all-cause survivorship in cemented stems. To our knowledge, there are no reports on radiographic features that are associated with aseptic loosening of these implants. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What is the 5- and 10-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening in patients undergoing reconstruction with a cemented distal femoral endoprosthesis after a tumor resection? (2) What is the all-cause 5- and 10-year survivorship at in these patients? (3) What radiographic features are associated with aseptic loosening at long-term follow-up? METHODS: We performed a multicenter retrospective study reviewing aseptic loosening in cemented prostheses to determine radiographic features associated with long-term implant survivorship. Patients who underwent a cemented distal femoral reconstruction with a modular endoprosthesis after resection of a musculoskeletal tumor between 1997 and 2017 were reviewed. A total of 246 patients were identified from five institutions and met initial inclusion criteria. Of those, 21% (51) were lost to follow-up before 2 years, leaving 195 patients available for us to evaluate and analyze the survivorship and radiologic features associated with long-term implant survival. The mean (range) follow-up was 78 months (22 to 257). At the time of this analysis, 69% (135 of 195) of the patients were alive. Osteosarcoma was the most common diagnosis in 43% of patients (83 of 195), followed by metastatic carcinoma 13% (25 of 195). Fifty-six percent (110 of 195) of patients received chemotherapy; 15% (30 of 195) had radiation therapy. Aseptic loosening was diagnosed radiographically and was defined as a circumferential radiolucent line on all views, or subsidence around the stem in the absence of infection. We present 5- and 10-year Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from aseptic loosening, 5- and 10-year all-cause survivorship, and a qualitative assessment of radiographic features potentially associated with aseptic loosening (including the junctional radiolucent area, and cortical expansion remodeling). The junctional radiolucent area was defined as a radiolucent area of the bone starting at the bone-endoprosthesis junction to the tip of the femoral stem, and cortical expansion remodeling was defined as an increased cortical thickness at the stem tip. Although we wished to statistically analyze radiographic factors potentially associated with aseptic loosening, we did not have enough clinical material to do so (only nine patients developed loosening). Instead, we will report a few preliminary qualitative observations, which necessarily are preliminary, and which will need to be confirmed or refuted by future studies. We urge caution in interpreting these findings because of the very small numbers involved. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from aseptic loosening of the femoral component at 5 and 10 years were 95% (95% CI 89 to 98) and 93% (95% CI 86 to 97), respectively. Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from revision for any cause at 5 and 10 years were 74% (95% CI 65 to 79) and 64% (95% CI 49 to 70), respectively. Although the numbers were too small to analyze statistically, all patients with aseptic loosening had a junctional radiolucent area more than 20% of the total length of the stem without cortical expansion remodeling at the stem tip. No aseptic loosening was observed if there was cortical ex remodeling, a junctional radiolucent area less than 20%, or curved stems that were 13 mm or greater in diameter. The numbers of patients with aseptic loosening in this series were too small to analyze statistically. CONCLUSIONS: Cemented distal femoral endoprostheses have a relatively low rate of aseptic loosening and acceptable projected first-decade survivorship. The presence of a radiolucent area more than 20% without cortical expansion remodeling at the stem tip may lead to aseptic loosening in patients with these implants. Close radiographic surveillance and revision surgery may be considered for progressive lucencies and clinical symptoms of pain. If revision is contemplated, we recommend using larger diameter curved cemented stems. These are preliminary and provisional observations based on a low number of patients with aseptic loosening; future studies with greater numbers of patients are needed to validate or refute these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

A Direct Comparison of the Clinical Practice Patterns of Advanced Practice Providers and Doctors.

BACKGROUND: Rising health care costs, physician shortages, and an aging patient population have increased the demand and utilization of advanced practice providers (APPs). Despite their expanding role in care delivery, little research has evaluated the care delivered by APPs compared with physicians. METHODS: We used clinical patient simulations to measure and compare the clinical care offered by APPs and physicians, collecting data from 4 distinct health care systems/hospitals in the United States between 2013 and 2017. Specialties ranged from primary care to hospital medicine and oncology. Primary study outcomes were to 1) measure any differences in practice patterns between APPs and physicians, and 2) determine whether the use of serial measurement and feedback could mitigate any such differences. RESULTS: At baseline, we found no major differences in overall performance of APPs compared with physicians (P = .337). APPs performed 3.2% better in history taking (P = .013) and made 10.5% fewer unnecessary referrals (P = .025), whereas physicians ordered 17.6% fewer low-value tests per case (P = .042). Regardless of specialty or site, after 4 rounds of serial measurement and provider-specific feedback, APPs and physicians had similar increases in average overall scores-7.4% and 7.6%, respectively (P < .001 for both). Not only did both groups improve, but practice differences between the groups disappeared, leading to a 9.1% decrease in overall practice variation. CONCLUSIONS: We found only modest differences in quality of care provided by APPs and physicians. Importantly, both groups improved their performance with serial measurement and feedback so that after 4 rounds, the original differences were mitigated entirely and overall variation significantly reduced. Our data suggest that APPs can provide high quality care in multiple clinical settings.

Computer navigation and distal femoral reconstruction in the oncologic patient.

OBJECTIVES: As adjuvant treatments for musculoskeletal malignancies improve expectations of preserved function increase. We questioned whether computer navigation for distal femoral reconstruction would improve outcomes. METHODS: Twenty oncology patients were reviewed after distal femoral reconstruction using navigation. Outcomes included local recurrence, implant revision, patient function, patellofemoral complications and leg-length inequality. RESULTS: Implant survivorship was 85% at 26 months. There were no local recurrences and 3 failures for aseptic loosening. Good functional outcomes were observed in remaining cases. CONCLUSION: Computer navigation for distal femoral reconstruction resulted in acceptable functional outcomes and implant survivorship. Reduced local recurrence were observed at intermediate follow-up. Level of Evidence: Level IV.

Implications of staged reconstruction and adjuvant brachytherapy in the treatment of recurrent soft tissue sarcoma.

PURPOSE: Prior studies illustrated a reduction in wound complications with the use of staged reconstruction (SR) and negative pressure wound therapy when treating soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with surgical resection followed by high-dose-rate adjuvant brachytherapy. The purpose of this study is to compare the outcomes of SR and immediate reconstruction (IR) brachytherapy in recurrent STS. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective review of 40 patients with recurrent STS of the local extremity and trunk treated with resection followed by adjuvant brachytherapy alone. Margin status was defined as positive (SM(+)) if there was microscopic involvement (R1) or ≤1 mm margin and negative (SM(-)) if >1 mm margin was obtained. SR and IR were compared regarding toxicity, local control, and limb preservation. RESULTS: Median followup was 27 months. When comparing the SR (n = 22) and IR (n = 18) cohorts, there was a significantly lower final SM(+) rate in SR (32% vs. 83%, p < 0.01). A 2-year local control benefit seen with SR (80% vs. 34%; p = 0.012) and a final SM(-) (81% vs. 39%; p = 0.023). SR was associated with less toxicity on multivariate analysis, including a 90% decrease in persistent edema, an 80% decrease in wound dehiscence, and a 94% decrease in nonhealing wounds, when compared to IR. Ten of 31 (32%) extremity cases required eventual amputation from either chronic wound complications (n = 4) or local recurrence (n = 6). SR predicted for a benefit in 2-year limb preservation (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In our series, the treatment with SR brachytherapy resulted in less morbidity and an improved final SM(-) rate. This technique translated to an improvement in both local control and limb preservation of recurrent STS.

Recurrence and survival analysis of resected soft tissue sarcomas of pelvic retroperitoneal structures.

BACKGROUND: The purpose is to determine the clinicopathologic factors related to survival and recurrence of primary resected pelvic soft tissue sarcomas (STS). METHODS: Demographic/clinical variables were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-five pts were identified. Median follow-up was 24.2 months. There were 23 (65.7%) high/intermediate-grade and 12 (34.3%) low-grade tumors included in the final analysis. Eight patients (22.9%) received neoadjuvant therapy. Margins were grossly negative in 27 (77.1%, 17-R0, 10-R1) and grossly positive (R2) in 8 (22.9%). Adjuvant therapy was used in 13 patients (37.1%). The 2- and 3-year RFS was 56.5% and 51.3%, with 14 patients recurring at a median time of 16 months (6-local, 8-distant). All distant recurrences were in high-grade tumors. There were no differences in RFS for margins (R0 vs. R1), neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy, size (≥10 vs. <10 cm) or gender. High/intermediate-grade tumors had worse RFS (P < 0.008). The 2- and 3-year OS was 80.9%. OS was improved for R0/R1 resection (P < 0.001). Resection to R0/R1 margin was a significant predictor of improved OS (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: High/intermediate-grade lesions were associated with worse OS and RFS. Resection to gross negative margins was the only independent predictor of OS. Adjuvant therapy may be reserved for high-grade lesions due to increased metastatic potential. J

Outcomes and clinical predictors of improved survival in a patients undergoing pulmonary metastasectomy for sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary metastasectomy (PM) for metastatic sarcoma can result in long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to describe factors associated with survival in a series of patients undergoing PM for metastatic sarcoma. METHODS: We reviewed all patients undergoing PM for metastatic sarcoma over a 12-year period (2000-2012). Multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with outcomes. Survival was calculated with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients underwent PM with a median follow-up was 48 months. Among 81 (85%) patients who presented with local disease, the median disease free interval (DFI) was 13 months and median overall survival (OS) was 48 months. Fourteen patients (15%) had synchronous metastasis with a median OS of 21 months. On multivariate analysis, synchronous metastasis (P = 0.005), older age (P = 0.02), and number of lung lesions (P = 0.003) were associated with poor survival. The median OS of patients with a DFI ≥12 versus <12 months following primary resection was 93 and 43 months (P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: While patients with a DFI >12 months have the best OS following PM, patients with a DFI <12 months also have excellent outcomes as compared to systemic therapy and should be considered for PM.

Prognostic significance of soft tissue extension, international prognostic index, and multifocality in primary bone lymphoma: a single institutional experience.

Primary bone lymphoma (PBL) is a rare disease. The literature is inconsistent in regard to definition, stage and prognostic factors. We examined the PBL cases seen at the Moffitt Cancer Center between 1998 and 2013 using the 2013 World Health Organization criteria for bone/soft tissue tumours. Seventy PBL patients were included, of whom 53 (75.7%) patients were histologically classified as primary bone diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (PB-DLBCL). Femur was the most commonly involved site in PBLs with unifocal bone lesions, whereas PBLs with multifocal bone lesions most frequently presented with spine disease. Further analysis of the PB-DLBCL subgroup showed that these patients had 3- and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 61.2% and 46.9%, respectively and 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) of 81.1% and 74.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified soft tissue extension and International Prognostic Index (IPI) score as the most important unfavourable prognostic factors for both PFS and OS. Multifocality was also highly significantly associated with a worse PFS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001), although it was not identified in multivariate analysis due to its incorporation into the IPI. The results warrant further investigation regarding whether PBL with multifocal bone lesions could be considered as a systemic and more aggressive disease rather than a conventional PBL.

Wee1 inhibition by MK-1775 leads to tumor inhibition and enhances efficacy of gemcitabine in human sarcomas.

Sarcomas are rare and heterogeneous mesenchymal tumors affecting both pediatric and adult populations with more than 70 recognized histologies. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide have been the main course of therapy for treatment of sarcomas; however, the response rate to these therapies is about 10-20% in metastatic setting. Toxicity with the drug combination is high, response rates remain low, and improvement in overall survival, especially in the metastatic disease, remains negligible and new agents are needed. Wee1 is a critical component of the G2/M cell cycle checkpoint control and mediates cell cycle arrest by regulating the phosphorylation of CDC2. Inhibition of Wee1 by MK1775 has been reported to enhance the cytotoxic effect of DNA damaging agents in different types of carcinomas. In this study we investigated the therapeutic efficacy of MK1775 in various sarcoma cell lines, patient-derived tumor explants ex vivo and in vivo both alone and in combination with gemcitabine, which is frequently used in the treatment of sarcomas. Our data demonstrate that MK1775 treatment as a single agent at clinically relevant concentrations leads to unscheduled entry into mitosis and initiation of apoptotic cell death in all sarcomas tested. Additionally, MK1775 significantly enhances the cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine in sarcoma cells lines with different p53 mutational status. In patient-derived bone and soft tissue sarcoma samples we showed that MK1775 alone and in combination with gemcitabine causes significant apoptotic cell death. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and histopathologic studies showed that MK1775 induces significant cell death and terminal differentiation in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model of osteosarcoma in vivo. Our results together with the high safety profile of MK1775 strongly suggest that this drug can be used as a potential therapeutic agent in the treatment of both adult as well as pediatric sarcoma patients.

The use of isolated limb infusion in limb threatening extremity sarcomas.

UNLABELLED: This paper reports a single-institution experience with the use of isolated limb infusion for limb salvage in locally advanced, unresectable, recurrent limb threatening soft tissue sarcomas. BACKGROUND: Locally advanced, limb threatening soft tissue sarcomas (STS) pose a significant treatment challenge. We report our experience using isolated limb infusion (ILI) in patients with unresectable extremity STS. METHODS: A total of 22 patients with extremity STS underwent 26 ILIs with melphalan and dactinomycin. Patient characteristics, intra-operative parameters and toxicity were recorded. Outcome measures included limb-salvage and in-field response rates. RESULTS: Of the 19 lower and 7 upper extremity ILIs, Wieberdink grade III toxicity or less was observed in all. Median followup was 11 months. A total of 17 patients were evaluable at 3 months post-ILI with an overall response rate of 42%. Four (24%) had complete response (CR), three (18%) partial response (PR), three (18%) stable disease (SD) and seven (41%) progressive disease (PD). Twelve of 17 (71%) underwent successful limb preservation at a median of 9 months post-ILI. Two (12%) were downstaged to resectable disease and remain showing no evidence of disease (NED) after surgery at 30 and 22 months post-ILI. CONCLUSIONS: ILI is an attractive modality that provides regional disease control and limb preservation in patients with limb threatening sarcoma. Although short-term results appear encouraging, long-term follow-up is needed to fully assess the role of ILI in unresectable extremity STS.

MK1775, a selective Wee1 inhibitor, shows single-agent antitumor activity against sarcoma cells.

Wee1 is a critical component of the G(2)-M cell-cycle checkpoint control and mediates cell-cycle arrest by regulating the phosphorylation of CDC2. Inhibition of Wee1 by a selective small molecule inhibitor MK1775 can abrogate G(2)-M checkpoint, resulting in premature mitotic entry and cell death. MK1775 has recently been tested in preclinical and clinical studies of human carcinoma to enhance the cytotoxic effect of DNA-damaging agents. However, its role in mesenchymal tumors, especially as a single agent, has not been explored. Here, we studied the cytotoxic effect of MK1775 in various sarcoma cell lines and patient-derived tumor explants ex vivo. Our data show that MK1775 treatment at clinically relevant concentrations leads to unscheduled entry into mitosis and initiation of apoptotic cell death in all sarcomas tested. In MK1775-treated cells, CDC2 activity was enhanced, as determined by decreased inhibitory phosphorylation of tyrosine-15 residue and increased expression of phosphorylated histone H3, a marker of mitotic entry. The cytotoxic effect of Wee1 inhibition on sarcoma cells seems to be independent of p53 status as all sarcoma cell lines with different p53 mutation were highly sensitive to MK1775 treatment. Finally, in patient-derived sarcoma samples, we showed that MK1775 as a single agent causes significant apoptotic cell death, suggesting that Wee1 inhibition may represent a novel approach in the treatment of sarcomas.

Assessment of muscarinic and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor expression in primitive neuroectodermal tumor/ewing family of tumor and desmoplastic small round cell tumor: an immunohistochemical and Western blot study of tissue microarray and cell lines.

The primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET)/Ewing family of tumors (EFT) and desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) portend a grave prognosis. Ongoing research in similar neurocrest-derived neoplasms has implicated both the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) and nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (nAChR) in the pathogenesis of these neoplasms. Acetylcholine has been reported to impart a modulatory effect on chemotaxis and proliferation, an effect ameliorated by anticholinergic drugs. The aim of our study is to characterize the pattern of expression of mAChR and nAChR in PNET/EFT and DSRCT, in hopes of discovering a potential target for therapeutic improvements. We examined 34 cases of PNET/EFT and 2 DSRCT retrospectively by immunohistochemical studies. We found that AChRs are overexpressed in a significant number of PNET/EFT and DSRCT. The Western blot analysis of 3 human Ewing sarcoma cell lines confirms the presence of AChRs. Future studies are planned to confirm these results as well as to investigate their potential therapeutic implications.

Altered expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in benign and malignant bone and soft tissue neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: The binding of cyclins to cyclin-dependent kinases regulates cell proliferation. Overexpression of cyclins is believed to deregulate the cell cycle in human tumors. Here the expression of G1 cyclins D1 and D3, and of Ki-67 in a variety of bone and soft tissue sarcomas was assessed as compared to adjacent normal tissue and to a subset of leiomyomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine human bone and soft tissue sarcomas were evaluated. Tissue sections from each case were subjected to immunostaining for cyclin D1, cyclin D3 and Ki-67 using the avidin-biotin complex method. RESULTS: Cyclin D1 nuclear positivity was detected in 28% of sarcomas and in none of the leiomyomas. Cyclin D3 nuclear positivity was present in 62% of sarcomas and in none of the leiomyomas. Ki-67 nuclear staining was positive in 86% of sarcomas but in only 16% of leiomyomas. In addition, upregulation of cyclin D1 was observed in leiomyosarcomas, pleomorphic sarcomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors, but not in liposarcomas or osteosarcomas. Cyclin D3, however, was expressed in all of the sarcoma types including 2 out of 5 liposarcomas and 1 out of 4 osteosarcomas. The normal soft tissue adjacent to the tumors when present (10 cases) was negative for cyclin D1 and D3, and expressed Ki-67 in 5% of the cell nuclei. The expression of cyclin D3 was also noted in human sarcoma cell lines (SKLMS, MG63, SaOS-2 and HT1080) by Western blot. CONCLUSION: The higher expression of cyclin D1 and D3 and of Ki-67 in bone and soft tissue sarcomas, as compared to leiomyomas and peritumoral normal soft tissue, suggests that high cyclin expression may contribute to deregulation of the cell cycle in bone and soft tissue tumors. These data suggest a role of cyclins in the process of human sarcomagenesis.

Pseudoaneurysm of the superficial femoral artery associated with osteochondroma--a case report.

Osteochondromas, the most common benign bone tumor, often go undetected and seldom cause significant clinical sequelae. Rarely they present as an arterial pseudoaneurysm, usually of the popliteal or superficial femoral artery. The authors present the case of a 14-year-old male with a distal superficial femoral artery pseudoaneurysm accompanied by distal embolization from a femoral exostosis.

Familial gigantiform cementoma with brittle bone disease, pathologic fractures, and osteosarcoma: a possible explanation of an ancient mystery.

We describe four individuals of an African-American family with a predominantly diaphyseal bone disease associated with familial gigantiform cementoma (FGC), a disorder typically seen in Caucasians. The mother and her children presented with deformities of the jaws, abnormalities of the long bones, and pre-pubertal pathologic fractures. The index patient carried the diagnosis of osteosarcoma (OS). In addition, we provide a possible explanation for the jaw abnormalities of King Tutankhamen's father in the 18th dynasty in Egypt around 1350 BC.