Clay modeling as a learning tool for medical trainees in urology: a narrative review and pilot study.

Background and Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) necessitated a transition to virtual education which limits hands-on opportunities and student engagement. To adapt, a pilot study investigating clay modeling as an alternative educational tool for medical students was incorporated in a virtual and in-person sub-internship for prospective urology applicants. We aim to review the literature supporting the use of clay modeling in medical education as well as describe our experience with the activity as a way to engage trainees and evaluate early surgical skills. Methods: The current literature on clay modeling in medical and early surgical education was reviewed using multiple search queries in PubMed. A total of thirteen publications were identified and analyzed, with zero articles specifically discussing urological anatomy or surgery. The pilot study was conducted through the traditional in-person sub-internship as well as through a novel virtual sub-internship at a single academic U.S. Urology residency program. Students were instructed to create a three-dimensional model of a genitourinary organ using modeling clay. Anonymized surveys were collected. Responses of virtual and in-person students were compared. Key Content and Findings: Clay modeling has been shown in the literature to be beneficial in medical and early surgical education through the use of active learning. Twenty-five total virtual (N=6) and in-person (N=19) students participated in the clay modeling activity. Survey ratings were mixed, with 100% positive responses amongst the virtual group in the areas of "relevance" and "creatively challenging" compared to the in-person cohort, 31.6% of whom responded positively to "relevance" and 47.4% for "creatively challenging" respectively. Overall, students responded positively for the exercise being "creatively challenging" (n=15, 60%) and "enjoyable" (n=16, 64%). Positive results echoed the student perspectives described in the current literature on clay modeling. Conclusions: Clay modeling has previously been used in the in-person classroom setting as a learning supplement or replacement for dissection classes but has not been previously described for use in the virtual learning environment or within the field of Urology. With ongoing need to develop novel teaching modalities, clay modeling may be a unique tool to enhance learning, and evaluate technical skill, and boost engagement for medical trainees.

The Utility of Social Media on Urology Residency Doximity Rankings.

Background Social media has been more widely used by urology residency programs since the COVID-19 pandemic. There are no studies on the relationship between Doximity residency ranking and social media usage in urology. Objectives In this study, we aim to investigate the relationship between social media usage and the academic prestige of urology residency programs. Methods Residency reputation data was acquired from the Doximity Residency Navigator website. Twitter and Instagram activity in 2019 and 2021 was analyzed by collecting data on the total number of posts and followers. Data on residency virtual recruitment was obtained from Twitter and UroResidency website. Results By the end of 2021, 122/139 (87.8%) urology residency programs had a Twitter account and 61/139 (43.9%) had an Instagram account. A significant linear regression was found between Doximity ranking and the number of Twitter followers (p<0.001), Twitter posts (p=0.005), and Instagram followers (p=0.026). Virtual recruitment events were held by 107/139 (77%) programs in 2021. There was a significant linear regression between Doximity rankings and the number of virtual events (p<0.006). Conclusions Social media use by urology residency programs has increased since the COVID-19 pandemic. A program's higher Doximity ranking was correlated with the presence of Twitter and Instagram accounts as well as the number of Twitter followers, Twitter posts, and Instagram followers. There was a significant relationship between Doximity rankings and the number of hosted virtual events. Programs should consider increasing social media visibility to potentially improve their Doximity rankings.

Awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of adolescents and young people regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of young people regarding long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs). DESIGN: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines of MEDLINE-Ovid, Embase, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed with formal tests for heterogeneity and publication bias. Additional outcomes were summarized using thematic analysis. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): Adolescents and young adults (aged 12-25 years) with a uterus. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient-reported outcomes related to awareness, knowledge, and misconceptions of LARCs (including intrauterine devices, subdermal implants, and injections) were analyzed. RESULT(S): Of the 4,077 database citations, we included 40 studies encompassing 10,470 adolescents and young people. Twenty studies were eligible for meta-analysis. The pooled prevalence described that only 65.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 51-78) of participants were aware of at least 1 type of LARC (I2 = 100). The meta-regression noted that the region, risk of bias, gravidity, sexual history, previous LARC experience, and postsecondary education were not associated with awareness. There were numerous misconceptions regarding eligibility, safety, and usage. Notably, 62% (95% CI, 20-91) did not understand that LARCs could be used in nulliparous individuals, and 37% (95% CI, 21-56) believed that LARCs could cause infertility. CONCLUSION(S): There are notable knowledge gaps among adolescents and young people regarding LARCs, such as eligibility criteria, the reversibility of long-acting options, and misconceptions regarding infertility. Clinicians should specifically counsel regarding the suitability for LARCs in nulliparous populations and that LARCs do not cause infertility.

Pregnancy and childbirth during incarceration: A qualitative systematic review of lived experiences.

BACKGROUND: Incarcerated individuals who experience pregnancy or childbirth in correctional facilities face unique considerations for obstetric care and consequently are at greater risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To characterise patient experiences regarding pregnancy and childbirth during incarceration via qualitative synthesis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline-OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstracts, Web of Science, Scopus and PsycInfo were systematically searched from inception to 24 December 2020. Supplementary searches were performed using the Scopus database. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only original, peer-reviewed literature was examined. Eligible studies were assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. RESULTS: After screening 4173 original database citations, 24 studies that met inclusion criteria were included and analysed via thematic analysis. The 24 studies included perspectives from 645 female patients who had experienced incarceration, 69 healthcare providers and 70 prison staff. Key patient-reported concerns for the well-being of pregnant individuals during incarceration included mental health challenges, dehumanisation of prenatal care and delivery, lack of privacy, stigma, psychological trauma, lack of emotional support and shackle usage during pregnancy and/or labour. The studies reported a lack of support for patients to access female correctional officers or guards, privacy during intimate examinations, timely medical care and support for breastfeeding. Above all, the psychological trauma of separation from one's newborn after birth was of utmost devastation. CONCLUSIONS: Our systematic review highlights the dire need for accountability and interventions to improve pregnancy and childbirth care for incarcerated individuals. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: This systematic review describes lived experiences of pregnancy & childbirth during incarceration, including dehumanisation, psychological trauma, and use of shackles.

LGBTQ2S+ childbearing individuals and perinatal mental health: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The perinatal period may uniquely impact the mental health and wellbeing of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and Two-Spirit (LGBTQ2S+) childbearing individuals. OBJECTIVES: To characterise and synthesise the experiences of LGBTQ2S+ childbearing individuals regarding perinatal mental health, including symptomatology, access to care and care-seeking. SEARCH STRATEGY: We conducted and reported a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines of eight databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE-OVID, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science: Core Collection, Sociological Abstracts, Social Work Abstract, and PsycINFO) from inception to 1 March 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: Original, peer-reviewed research related to LGBTQ2S+ mental health was eligible for inclusion if the study was specific to the perinatal period (defined as pregnancy planning, conception, pregnancy, childbirth, and first year postpartum; includes miscarriages, fertility treatments and surrogacy). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Findings were synthesised qualitatively via meta-aggregation using the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI), and the ConQual approach. MAIN RESULTS: Our systematic search included 26 eligible studies encompassing 1199 LGBTQ2S+ childbearing participants. Using the JBI SUMARI approach, we reported 65 results, which we synthesised as six key findings. The studies described unique considerations for LGBTQ2S+ individuals' perinatal mental health, including heteronormativity, cisnormativity, isolation, exclusion from traditional pregnancy care, stigma, and distressing situations from the gendered nature of pregnancy. Many participants described a lack of knowledge from healthcare providers related to care for LGBTQ2S+ individuals. In addition, LGBTQ2S+ individuals described barriers to accessing mental healthcare and gaps in health systems. Strategies to improve care include provider education, avoidance of gendered language, documentation of correct pronouns, trauma-informed practices, cultural humility training and tailored care for LGBTQ2S+ people. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy, postpartum, and the perinatal period uniquely impacts the mental health and wellbeing of LGBTQ2S+individuals, largely due to systems-level inequities and exclusion from perinatal care. Healthcare providers should implement the identified strategies to improve perinatal care and address inequities.

Bilateral Ureteral Obstruction Secondary to Papillary Necrosis From Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Use in an Adult Patient.

Prolonged use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) is known to cause renal papillary necrosis and, in rare cases, can cause sloughing of renal papillae with subsequent ureteral obstruction. We report the first documented case of an adult patient presenting with bilateral ureteral obstructions, secondary to bilateral papillary necrosis from chronic NSAID use. He subsequently underwent bilateral ureteral stent placement with rapid recovery of renal function.

Barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening among adolescents and young people: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Though cervical cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death globally, its incidence is nearly entirely preventable. Young people have been an international priority for screening as this population has historically been under-screened. However, in both high-income and low-income countries, young people have not been screened appropriately according to country-specific guidelines. The aim of this systematic review was to systematically characterize the existing literature on barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening (CCS) among adolescents and young people globally. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines of three key databases: Medline-OVID, EMBASE, and CINAHL. Supplementary searches were done through ClinicialTrials.Gov and Scopus. Databases were examined from 1946 until the date of our literature searches on March 12th 2020. We only examined original, peer-reviewed literature. Articles were excluded if they did not specifically discuss CCS, were not specific to individuals under the age of 35, or did not report outcomes or evaluation. All screening, extraction, and synthesis was completed in duplicate with two independent reviewers. Outcomes were summarized descriptively. Risk of bias for individual studies was graded using an adapted rating scale based on the Risk of Bias Instrument for Cross-Sectional Surveys of Attitudes and Practices. RESULTS: Of the 2177 original database citations, we included 36 studies that met inclusion criteria. The 36 studies included a total of 14,362 participants, and around half (17/36, 47.2%) of studies specifically targeted students. The majority of studies (31/36, 86.1%) discussed barriers and facilitators to Pap testing specifically, while one study analyzed self-sampling (1/36, 2.8%), one study targeted HPV DNA testing (1/36, 2.8%), and the remainder (4/36, 11.1%) were not specified. Our systematic review found that there are three large categories of barriers for young people: lack of knowledge/awareness, negative perceptions of the test, and systemic barriers to testing. Facilitators included stronger relationships with healthcare providers, social norms, support from family, and self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: There are unique barriers and facilitators that affect CCS rates in adolescents and young people. Health systems and healthcare providers worldwide should address the challenges for this unique population.

Recurrence and Recovery of COVID-19 in an Older Adult Patient with Multiple Comorbidities: A Case Report.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has become a worldwide public health crisis since December 2019. Reports of COVID-19 recurrences are uncommon but raise the question of whether patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) will develop lasting immunity against or whether there are multiple viral strains that need to be considered. Although severe disease typically occurs in older individuals with comorbidities, this case report describes a patient in this demographic group who presented with COVID-19 recurrence and remained relatively asymptomatic throughout both disease courses. This case highlights how SARS-CoV-2 appears to affect some patients unpredictably, indicating that more research is needed to further understand its viral pathophysiology and disease outcomes.

Cultural competence in fertility care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people: a systematic review of patient and provider perspectives.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the patient and provider perspectives on cultural competence in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) fertility care. DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING: Not applicable. PATIENT(S): LGBTQ+ patients and their partners treated for fertility-related care; fertility providers who treat LGBTQ+ patients. INTERVENTION(S): We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines of six databases: Medline-OVID, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.Gov, and PsycInfo. Citations of full-text articles were hand-searched using the Scopus database. Eligible studies were assessed using the Risk of Bias Instrument for Cross-Sectional Surveys of Attitudes and Practices, as well as the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Qualitative Research. All screening, extraction, and appraisal were completed in duplicate with two independent reviewers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Patient-reported or provider-reported views on LGBTQ+ cultural competence in fertility care, including barriers and facilitators to inclusive care. RESULT(S): Of the 1,747 original database citations, we included 25 studies that met the inclusion criteria. Of the 21 studies that evaluated patient perspectives, 13 studies targeted same-sex cisgender couples while the remainder targeted transgender and gender-nonconforming participants (n = 6) or any individual who identified as a sexual or gender minority (n = 2). Key barriers for LGBTQ+ participants included gender dysphoria, heteronormativity, stigmatization, and psychological distress. The lack of tailored information for LGBTQ+ populations was repeatedly highlighted as a concern. Promising solutions included tailored information, psychosocial interventions, gender-neutral language, and inclusive intake processes. CONCLUSION(S): LGBTQ+ individuals face unique barriers in fertility care, as described by both patients and providers. This review describes a number of implementable solutions for equitable care, which should be given priority for both research and hospital interventions.

Relationship Between Physician Burnout and Patient's Perception of Bedside Time Spent by Physicians.

Although the adverse effect of burnout on physicians has been widely documented, studies have shown an inconsistent relationship between burnout and the quality of patient care. We hypothesized that physician burnout will have an inverse relationship with the time spent at the bedside by physicians. In a cross-sectional study, we surveyed patients on their perception of the time spent by their physician on the day of the survey (4 categories: 0-5, 6-10, 11-15, >15 minutes). Oldenburg Burnout Inventory was used to assess physician burnout; burnout was defined as high levels of both exhaustion (≥2.25) and disengagement (≥2.10). Among the 1374 patients, the most commonly reported time spent at bedside category was 6-10 minutes (n=614, 45%). Among the 95 physicians who saw these patients, burnout was present in 44 (46%), with a higher prevalence in women (61% vs 39%; P=0.04). Using ordered logistic regression, we found no relationship between physician burnout and patient's perception of bedside time spent, without adjustment (odds ratio: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.65-1.16) or with adjustment (odds ratio: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.64-1.12) for potential confounders. Although physician burnout is not associated with patient perception of time spent at bedside, it may be associated with other patient outcomes that require further research.

A Communication Model to Bridge Adolescent Patients, Caregivers, and Physicians in Transitions of Care.

A transition of care (TOC) process from pediatric to adult medicine ensures that adolescents receive ongoing care into young adulthood, a time of high risk for preventable morbidity and mortality. We explored patient, caregiver, and physician perspectives on ways to improve TOC communication with healthy adolescents. Two researchers conducted key informant interviews with healthy 12- to 18-year-old adolescents, their caregivers, and primary care physicians working in pediatric, internal, and family medicine. Data saturation was reached after interviewing 12 adolescents, 10 caregivers, and 36 physicians. Three themes were identified: perceptions of TOC; effective communication among the triad of adolescents, caregivers, and providers; and early communication about TOC preparation. From these themes, a model of communication was identified and adapted, outlining the communication skills and responsibilities for physicians and patients during TOC. Physicians must understand how to use strong, consistent, adolescent-centered communication to execute effective TOC.

Improving Transitions of Care for Healthy Adolescents and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the gaps in care within the transition process from pediatric to adult medicine for healthy and noncomplex adolescents and young adults and to highlight the importance of identifying and adapting interventions to improve transitions for this population. METHODS: Three researchers independently completed searches in PubMed, PsychINFO, and CINAHL Complete. The review used the following inclusion criteria: English-language original research articles published between January 2007 and January 2018 involving care transitions for male and female patients ages 13 to 24 years with diagnoses that may be managed only by a primary care provider. Studies were excluded if they were reviews or commentaries, included only specialist providers, or primarily investigated children with special healthcare needs. The articles selected based on these inclusion and exclusion criteria, as well as those identified through review of references of included articles and known articles not found through those searches, were analyzed for suitability. RESULTS: Nine studies were included in the review. Limited consensus existed on how transitions of care should be approached for healthy and noncomplex adolescents, despite the 2002, 2011, and 2018 policy statements and clinical reports providing guidelines on transition processes. Perceptions about when to initiate the process, what to discuss about transitions, and how to approach those conversations varied among providers. CONCLUSIONS: The literature is limited regarding transitions of care from pediatric to adult medicine for healthy and noncomplex adolescents and young adults. Areas for intervention were identified from these studies and have yet to be explored. Additional research is needed to overcome transition obstacles and to tailor interventions to help healthy and noncomplex adolescents and young adults at this vulnerable time of their lives.

Transitions of Care for Healthy Young Adults: Promoting Primary Care and Preventive Health.

The transition of care between pediatric and adult medicine is a challenging time for patients and physicians. This longitudinal process encompasses much more than the physical transfer of a patient between providers. Established transition of care processes and literature exist for many chronic disease populations, but little focus has been directed toward the transition of care and the delivery of preventive medicine for healthy young adult patients. The 18- to 30-year-old age group is a heterogenous population that often engages in high-risk behaviors and has high rates of preventable morbidity and mortality. A significant number of these patients do not receive routine primary care and are high users of costly emergency services. Without a continuous source of care, many young adults do not receive age-appropriate screening or preventive health guidance. Structured transition practices improve outcomes in the chronic disease population, and anticipatory guidance has a positive effect on patient lifestyle modification. Adult providers should use these practices to ensure the successful integration of healthy young adult patients into an adult medical home. By establishing an ongoing source of preventive care, providers could reduce morbidity and mortality in this vulnerable population.

Women's Preferences for Penis Size: A New Research Method Using Selection among 3D Models.

Women's preferences for penis size may affect men's comfort with their own bodies and may have implications for sexual health. Studies of women's penis size preferences typically have relied on their abstract ratings or selecting amongst 2D, flaccid images. This study used haptic stimuli to allow assessment of women's size recall accuracy for the first time, as well as examine their preferences for erect penis sizes in different relationship contexts. Women (N = 75) selected amongst 33, 3D models. Women recalled model size accurately using this method, although they made more errors with respect to penis length than circumference. Women preferred a penis of slightly larger circumference and length for one-time (length = 6.4 inches/16.3 cm, circumference = 5.0 inches/12.7 cm) versus long-term (length = 6.3 inches/16.0 cm, circumference = 4.8 inches/12.2 cm) sexual partners. These first estimates of erect penis size preferences using 3D models suggest women accurately recall size and prefer penises only slightly larger than average.

Three knocks on the door .

Shannon Leung is a third year medical student at Georgia Health Sciences University in Augusta, Georgia. In this essay, she writes about her experience in a summer research project and the parallels she found between communicating with pediatric patients and their parents/guardians in settings of academic research and clinical interview. She analyzes the process, outcomes, characters and reflections from both situations.