The controversy of the treatment of critically ill patients with thyroid hormone.

There is currently a vast literature available on the changes in thyroid function tests that occur during non-thyroidal illness. The aetiology of these changes is, however, controversial, especially with respect to whether they play an adaptive role for the organism in order to cope with stress or whether they represent primary pathology of the pituitary-thyroid axis. This is particularly true for critically ill patients, in whom the most significant changes in thyroid function are observed. The changes include low levels of thyroxine and very low levels of tri-iodothyronine, which would, on the surface, appear to indicate hypothyroidism. Therapy with thyroid hormone, as either L-T4 or L-T3, has therefore been suggested because of these low values for thyroid hormones in the blood. It is, however, unclear whether treating these patients with thyroid hormone is beneficial or harmful. Multiple studies have addressed this issue with patients with cardiac disease, sepsis, pulmonary disease (e.g. acute respiratory distress syndrome) or severe infection, or with burn and trauma patients. In spite of a very large number of published studies, it is very difficult to form clear recommendations for treatment with thyroid hormone in the intensive care unit. Instead, we find the evidence far from compelling, and would advise withholding thyroid hormone therapy in the critical care setting in the absence of clear clinical or laboratory evidence for hypothyroidism.

Hospital management of diabetes.

The degree of hyperglycemia may be an important predictor of morbidity and mortality among patients with MI or stroke, and in those undergoing surgical procedures including coronary artery bypass. Hyperglycemia should be aggressively controlled from the time of hospital admission regardless of the patient's primary medical problem or previous diabetes status. Innovative systems for monitoring glucose and for delivering insulin coupled with new pharmacologic therapy, such as long-acting insulin analogues, may help reduce the morbidity and mortality occurring in the estimated 6 million annual hospitalizations that are accompanied by hyperglycemia in the United States.

Effect of physician specialty on outcomes in diabetic ketoacidosis.

OBJECTIVE: More than 100,000 people are hospitalized annually in the U.S. with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Outcome differences have not been examined for these patients based on whether their primary care provider is a generalist or a diabetes specialist. The objective of this study was to investigate hospital charges and hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients with DKA according to the specialty of their primary care provider. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We investigated all patients with a primary diagnosis of DKA during a 3.5-year period (n = 260) in a large urban teaching hospital. Hospital charges and LOS were studied regarding the specialty of the primary care provider. Demographic factors, severity of illness, laboratory data, and readmission rates were compared. RESULTS: Patients cared for by generalists and endocrinologists had a similar case mix and severity of DKA. The age-adjusted mean LOS for patients of generalists was 4.9 days (95% CI 4.5-5.4), and the mean LOS for patients of endocrinologists was 3.3 days (2.6-4.2) (P < 0.0043). Mean hospital charges differed (P < 0.0001) with an age- and sex-adjusted mean for patients of endocrinologists of $5,463 ($4,179-7,141) and a mean for patients of generalists of $10,109 ($9,151-11,166). The additional charges incurred by generalists were due in part to patients undergoing more procedures. No differences in diabetes-related complications occurred during admission, but the endocrinologist-treated group had a lower readmission rate for DKA during the study period than the generalist-treated group (2 vs. 6%, respectively) (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Endocrinologists provide more cost-effective care than generalists do when serving as primary care providers for patients hospitalized with DKA.

Unrecognized diabetes among hospitalized patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hospital care rendered to hyperglycemic individuals who did not have a diagnosis of diabetes before admission. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 1,034 consecutively hospitalized adult patients at a 750-bed inner-city teaching hospital were evaluated. Patients with one or more plasma glucose values > 200 mg/dl were identified by the laboratory data system on a daily basis. Patients without a diagnosis of diabetes at the time of admission were evaluated to determine if and how physicians addressed the hyperglycemia, whether a new diagnosis of diabetes was made during admission, and whether follow-up was planned to address the hyperglycemia. RESULTS: After excluding patients who were admitted for a primary diagnosis of diabetes, 37.5% of all hyperglycemic medical patients and 33% of hyperglycemic surgical patients were without a diagnosis of diabetes at the time of admission. These patients had a mean peak glucose of 299 mg/dl, and 66% had two or more elevated values during their hospitalization. Fifty-four percent received insulin therapy, and 59% received bedside glucose monitoring, yet 66% of daily patient progress notes failed to comment on the presence of hyperglycemia or diabetes. Diabetes was documented in only three patients (7.3%) as a possible diagnosis in the daily progress notes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite marked hyperglycemia, most medical records made no reference to the possibility of unrecognized diabetes. Given the average delay of a decade between the onset and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, further evaluation of hyperglycemic hospitalized patients may present an important opportunity for earlier detection and the initiation of therapy.

Radiation therapy of metastatic pheochromocytoma: case report and review of the literature.

Malignant pheochromocytomas are rare tumors, which are considered radioresistant on the basis of little information. We report a patient, with cranial nerve deficits from a pheochromocytoma metastatic to the parasellar region, who promptly responded to radiation therapy (2,500 cGy) with reversal of neurologic deficit. The disease recurred 2 years later and again promptly responded upon treatment to 2,000 cGy. Hepatic metastases were controlled for over 1 year with 3,240 cGy. The radiotherapy of pheochromocytoma and chemodectoma is reviewed, and the similarities between the two kinds of tumor are discussed. We speculate that a higher initial radiation dose might have resulted in a more sustained remission in our patient and recommend doses of 4,000-5,000 cGy if they can be safely administered, in 4-5 weeks for pheochromocytomas.

Impact of endocrine and diabetes team consultation on hospital length of stay for patients with diabetes.

PURPOSE: To determine whether consultation by an individual endocrinologist or by a multidisciplinary diabetes team (endocrinologist, diabetes nurse educator, and registered dietitian) can impact length of hospital stay of patients with diabetes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hospital stays of consecutive patients with a principal diagnosis of diabetes were compared. Forty-three patients were seen by an individual endocrine consultant and 27 were managed by the internist alone. Thirty-four patients were seen in consultation by the diabetes team. All consultations were performed at the request of the primary physician. There were no statistically significant differences among groups with respect to age, duration of diabetes, admitting diagnosis, glucose levels, or concomitant acute or chronic illness. RESULTS: Average length of stay of diabetes-team patients was 3.6 +/- 1.7 days, 56% shorter than the value, 8.2 +/- 6.2 days, of patients in the no-consultation group (P < 0.0001), and 35% shorter than the value, 5.5 +/- 3.4 days, of patients who received a traditional individual endocrine consultation (P < 0.05). The length of stay correlated with time from admission to consultation (regression equation: y = 3.92 + [1.09 x time to consultation]; r = .55; P < 0.0001). The slope (1.09) indicates that each 1-day delay in consultation resulted in a 1-day increase in length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Length of stay was lowest in patients who received diabetes-team consultation. Three million Americans are hospitalized annually with diabetes at a cost of $65 billion. A team approach to their inpatient care may reduce their hospital stays, resulting in considerable health and economic benefits.

A clinical guide to the management of Graves' disease with radioactive iodine.

More than 50 years have passed since radioactive iodine (RAI) was initially demonstrated as a therapeutic modality for the treatment of Graves' Disease. Today, more than a million patients have been treated with RAI. RAI is considered safe and highly effective. Its side-effect profile, ease of administration, and relative cost make RAI the treatment of choice for Graves' Disease of thyroidologists in this country. Questions continue to be raised as to which patients will benefit most from RAI therapy. Marked differences still exist between the practice preferences of thyroidologists as to whom, when, and how to treat with RAI. Factors that influence patient selection for RAI include age, the presence of pre-existing ophthalmopathy, lifestyle, history of previous treatment failure, and goiter size. Treatment goals, dosimetry, use of thionamides prior to therapy, safety recommendations following therapy, and prophylactic therapy with glucocorticoids for patients with ophthalmopathy highlight are some of the controversial issues facing the endocrinologist treating Graves' Disease with RAI. This symposium article reviews the current management of Graves' Disease with RAI.