Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Population-Wide Genomic Screening Program: Building the Base to Reach a Diverse Cohort of 100,000 Participants.

Background and Objectives: Genomic information is increasingly relevant for disease prevention and risk management at the individual and population levels. Screening healthy adults for Tier 1 conditions of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia using a population-based approach can help identify the 1−2% of the US population at increased risk of developing diseases associated with these conditions and tailor prevention strategies. Our objective is to report findings from an implementation science study that evaluates multi-level facilitators and barriers to implementation of the In Our DNA SC population-wide genomic screening initiative. Methods: We established an IMPACTeam (IMPlementAtion sCience for In Our DNA SC Team) to evaluate the pilot phase using principles of implementation science. We used a parallel convergent mixed methods approach to assess the Reach, Implementation, and Effectiveness outcomes from the RE-AIM implementation science framework during the pilot phase of In Our DNA SC. Quantitative assessment included the examination of frequencies and response rates across demographic categories using chi-square tests. Qualitative data were audio-recorded and transcribed, with codes developed by the study team based on the semi-structured interview guide. Results: The pilot phase (8 November 2021, to 7 March 2022) included recruitment from ten clinics throughout South Carolina. Reach indicators included enrollment rate and representativeness. A total of 23,269 potential participants were contacted via Epic's MyChart patient portal with 1976 (8.49%) enrolled. Black individuals were the least likely to view the program invitation (28.9%) and take study-related action. As a result, there were significantly higher enrollment rates among White (10.5%) participants than Asian (8.71%) and Black (3.46%) individuals (p < 0.0001). Common concerns limiting reach and participation included privacy and security of results and the impact participation would have on health or life insurance. Facilitators included family or personal history of a Tier 1 condition, prior involvement in genetic testing, self-interest, and altruism. Assessment of implementation (i.e., adherence to protocols/fidelity to protocols) included sample collection rate (n = 1104, 55.9%) and proportion of samples needing recollection (n = 19, 1.7%). There were no significant differences in sample collection based on demographic characteristics. Implementation facilitators included efficient collection processes and enthusiastic clinical staff. Finally, we assessed the effectiveness of the program, finding low dropout rates (n = 7, 0.35%), the identification of eight individuals with Tier 1 conditions (0.72% positive), and high rates of follow-up genetic counseling (87.5% completion). Conclusion: Overall, Asian and Black individuals were less engaged, with few taking any study-related actions. Strategies to identify barriers and promoters for the engagement of diverse populations are needed to support participation. Once enrolled, individuals had high rates of completing the study and follow-up engagement with genetic counselors. Findings from the pilot phase of In Our DNA SC offer opportunities for improvement as we expand the program and can provide guidance to organizations seeking to begin efforts to integrate population-wide genomic screening.

A pragmatic implementation research study for In Our DNA SC: a protocol to identify multi-level factors that support the implementation of a population-wide genomic screening initiative in diverse populations.

BACKGROUND: In 2021, the Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC) partnered with Helix, a population genetic testing company, to offer population-wide genomic screening for Centers for Disease Control and Preventions' Tier 1 conditions of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch syndrome, and familial hypercholesterolemia to 100,000 individuals in South Carolina. We developed an implementation science protocol to study the multi-level factors that influence the successful implementation of the In Our DNA SC initiative. METHODS: We will use a convergent parallel mixed-methods study design to evaluate the implementation of planned strategies and associated outcomes for In Our DNA SC. Aims focus on monitoring participation to ensure engagement of diverse populations, assessing contextual factors that influence implementation in community and clinical settings, describing the implementation team's facilitators and barriers, and tracking program adaptations. We report details about each data collection tool and analyses planned, including surveys, interview guides, and tracking logs to capture and code work group meetings, adaptations, and technical assistance needs. DISCUSSION: The goal of In Our DNA SC is to provide population-level screening for actionable genetic conditions and to foster ongoing translational research. The use of implementation science can help better understand how to support the success of In Our DNA SC, identify barriers and facilitators to program implementation, and can ensure the sustainability of population-level genetic testing. The model-based components of our implementation science protocol can support the identification of best practices to streamline the expansion of similar population genomics programs at other institutions.

Positive predictive value highlights four novel candidates for actionable genetic screening from analysis of 220,000 clinicogenomic records.

PURPOSE: To identify conditions that are candidates for population genetic screening based on population prevalence, penetrance of rare variants, and actionability. METHODS: We analyzed exome and medical record data from >220,000 participants across two large population health cohorts with different demographics. We performed a gene-based collapsing analysis of rare variants to identify genes significantly associated with disease status. RESULTS: We identify 74 statistically significant gene-disease associations across 27 genes. Seven of these conditions have a positive predictive value (PPV) of at least 30% in both cohorts. Three are already used in population screening programs (BRCA1, BRCA2, LDLR), and we also identify four new candidates for population screening: GCK with diabetes mellitus, HBB with ß-thalassemia minor and intermedia, PKD1 with cystic kidney disease, and MIP with cataracts. Importantly, the associations are actionable in that early genetic screening of each of these conditions is expected to improve outcomes. CONCLUSION: We identify seven genetic conditions where rare variation appears appropriate to assess in population screening, four of which are not yet used in screening programs. The addition of GCK, HBB, PKD1, and MIP rare variants into genetic screening programs would reach an additional 0.21% of participants with actionable disease risk, depending on the population.

Genetic counseling, 2030: An on-demand service tailored to the needs of a price conscious, genetically literate, and busy world.

The practice of genetic counseling is going to be impacted by the public's expectation that goods, services, information, and experiences happen on demand, wherever and whenever people want them. Building from trends that are currently taking shape, this article looks just over a decade into the future-to 2030-to provide a description of how the field of genetics and genetic counseling will be changed, as well as advice for genetic counselors for how to prepare. We build from the prediction that a large portion of the general public will have access to their digitized whole genome sequence anytime, any place, on any device. We focus on five topics downstream of this prediction: public health, personal autonomy, polygenic scores (PGS), evolving clinical practices, and genetic privacy.

Evaluation for Genetic Disorders in the Absence of a Clinical Indication for Testing: Elective Genomic Testing.

The increasing quality and diminishing cost of next-generation sequencing has transformed our ability to interrogate large quantities of genetic information. This has led to a dramatic increase in the number of elective genomic tests performed. In this article, elective test denotes a test that a patient chooses to undertake without a clinical indication. The variety of elective genomic testing options is considerable. Because these offerings provide differing levels of sensitivity and specificity, it can be difficult to choose among them. A simple rubric to compare offerings is not readily available. We propose a framework designated completeness that evaluates both analytical and interpretative components of genomic tests. We then illustrate how this framework can be used to evaluate the expanding landscape of elective genomic testing.

'Your DNA, Your Say': global survey gathering attitudes toward genomics: design, delivery and methods.

Our international study, 'Your DNA, Your Say', uses film and an online cross-sectional survey to gather public attitudes toward the donation, access and sharing of DNA information. We describe the methodological approach used to create an engaging and bespoke survey, suitable for translation into many different languages. We address some of the particular challenges in designing a survey on the subject of genomics. In order to understand the significance of a genomic result, researchers and clinicians alike use external databases containing DNA and medical information from thousands of people. We ask how publics would like their 'anonymous' data to be used (or not to be used) and whether they are concerned by the potential risks of reidentification; the results will be used to inform policy.

Analysis of 589,306 genomes identifies individuals resilient to severe Mendelian childhood diseases.

Genetic studies of human disease have traditionally focused on the detection of disease-causing mutations in afflicted individuals. Here we describe a complementary approach that seeks to identify healthy individuals resilient to highly penetrant forms of genetic childhood disorders. A comprehensive screen of 874 genes in 589,306 genomes led to the identification of 13 adults harboring mutations for 8 severe Mendelian conditions, with no reported clinical manifestation of the indicated disease. Our findings demonstrate the promise of broadening genetic studies to systematically search for well individuals who are buffering the effects of rare, highly penetrant, deleterious mutations. They also indicate that incomplete penetrance for Mendelian diseases is likely more common than previously believed. The identification of resilient individuals may provide a first step toward uncovering protective genetic variants that could help elucidate the mechanisms of Mendelian diseases and new therapeutic strategies.

Toward clinical genomics in everyday medicine: perspectives and recommendations.

Precision or personalized medicine through clinical genome and exome sequencing has been described by some as a revolution that could transform healthcare delivery, yet it is currently used in only a small fraction of patients, principally for the diagnosis of suspected Mendelian conditions and for targeting cancer treatments. Given the burden of illness in our society, it is of interest to ask how clinical genome and exome sequencing can be constructively integrated more broadly into the routine practice of medicine for the betterment of public health. In November 2014, 46 experts from academia, industry, policy and patient advocacy gathered in a conference sponsored by Illumina, Inc. to discuss this question, share viewpoints and propose recommendations. This perspective summarizes that work and identifies some of the obstacles and opportunities that must be considered in translating advances in genomics more widely into the practice of medicine.

Genetic counseling for personal genomic testing: optimizing client uptake of post-test telephonic counseling services.

The field of genetic counseling faces a broad challenge: many potential clients may not be aware of the value and benefit of genetic counseling services, and therefore may not utilize those services. Navigenics is a personal genomic testing company that provides telephonic genetic counseling services for multifactorial diseases and pharmacogenetics. When first offered in 2008, utilization of the Navigenics genetic counseling service was less than expected. To explore the basis for under-utilization and potential mechanisms for increasing uptake, Navigenics initiated a quality improvement study, in which three different methods of engaging clients in the uptake of genetic counseling services were assessed over the course of 1 year. Outcomes showed significant differences in uptake rates between methodologies (7.5%, 24.6%, and 60.1%), yielding an 8-fold increase in service utilization when post-test telephonic outreach to all clients was performed. Further, utilization spanned all risk levels based on client results, evidence that not only clients with high-risk results were motivated to engage in the genetic counseling service. This research indicates that implementing strategies to educate clients about genetic counseling can positively impact client engagement and utilization of available services.

Chromosome 22q11 deletion in patients with ventricular septal defect: frequency and associated cardiovascular anomalies.

BACKGROUND: A ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the most common form of congenital heart disease and is one of the most common cardiovascular anomalies in individuals with chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome. However, the frequency of a chromosome 22q11 deletion in patients with a VSD is not known. In addition, among patients with a VSD, it is not clear whether particular types of VSD or associated cardiovascular phenotypic features are associated with a chromosome 22q11 deletion. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 125 patients with a conoventricular (n = 100), posterior malalignment (n = 14), or conoseptal hypoplasia (n = 11) VSD who were admitted to Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between November 1991 and December 2001. Patients were studied for a chromosome 22q11 deletion by using fluorescence in situ hybridization. RESULTS: A chromosome 22q11 deletion was detected in 12 (10%) of the 125 patients. Anatomic features that were significantly associated with a chromosome 22q11 deletion included abnormal aortic arch sidedness, an abnormal aortic arch branching pattern, a cervical aortic arch, and discontinuous pulmonary arteries. There was no correlation between the type of VSD and chromosome 22q11 deletion. Of 20 patients with an abnormal aortic arch and/or discontinuous pulmonary arteries, 45% had a chromosome 22q11 deletion compared with only 3% of those with a left aortic arch, normal aortic arch branching pattern, and continuous branch pulmonary arteries CONCLUSIONS: A chromosome 22q11 deletion is common in individuals with a conoventricular, posterior malalignment, or conoseptal hypoplasia VSD and anomalies of the aortic arch or branch pulmonary arteries. On the basis of these findings, at a minimum, we recommend testing for a chromosome 22q11 deletion in patients with these types of VSD who have abnormalities of aortic arch sidedness or branching, a cervical aortic arch, and/or discontinuous pulmonary arteries. Testing of patients with these types of VSD but a normal aortic arch and pulmonary arteries may be performed routinely or guided by the presence of associated noncardiovascular features of chromosome 22q11 deletion syndrome.