[Improvement of cost allocation in gastroenterology by introduction of a novel service catalogue covering the complete spectrum of endoscopic procedures]. / Verbesserung der Kostenkalkulation in der Gastroenterologie durch Einführung eines neuen Leistungskatalogs für alle endoskopischen Prozeduren.

BACKGROUND: The German hospital reimbursement system (G-DRG) is incomplete for endoscopic interventions and fails to differentiate between complex and simple procedures. This is caused by outdated methods of personnel-cost allocation. METHODS: To establish an up-to-date service catalogue 50 hospitals made their anonymized expense-budget data available to the German-Society-of-Gastroenterology (DGVS). 2.499.900 patient-datasets (2011-2013) were used to classify operation-and-procedure codes (OPS) into procedure-tiers (e.g. colonoscopy with biopsy/colonoscopy with stent-insertion). An expert panel ranked these tiers according to complexity and assigned estimates of physician time. From June to November 2014 exact time tracking data for a total 38.288 individual procedures were collected in 119 hospitals to validate this service catalogue. RESULTS: In this three-step process a catalogue of 97 procedure-tiers was established that covers 99% of endoscopic interventions performed in German hospitals and assigned validated mean personnel-costs using gastroscopy as standard. Previously, diagnostic colonoscopy had a relative personnel-cost value of 1.13 (compared to gastroscopy 1.0) and rose to 2.16, whereas diagnostic ERCP increased from 1.7 to 3.62, more appropriately reflecting complexity. Complex procedures previously not catalogued were now included (e.g. gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: 16.74). DISCUSSION: This novel service catalogue for GI-endoscopy almost completely covers all endoscopic procedures performed in German hospitals and assigns relative personnel-cost values based on actual physician time logs. It is to be included in the national coding recommendation and should replace all prior inventories for cost distribution. The catalogue will contribute to a more objective cost allocation and hospital reimbursement - at least until time tracking for endoscopy becomes mandatory.

[Myocardial infarcts within the scope of 5-fluorouracil therapy]. / Myokardinfarkte im Rahmen einer 5-Fluorouracil-Therapie.

A young man without heart disease with a metastatic carcinoma of the pancreas received a 5-Fluorouracil therapy (25 mg per kilogram body weight/24 h by continuous infusion over a period of 5 days). Approximately 56 h after beginning of the first cycle of therapy (after 36 h of the second cycle) he complained of severe chest pain, which did not respond to nitrates, improved after application of opioids, and subsided definitely after termination of the 5-FU infusion. During the periods of pain, the ECG and the creatine kinase were normal. At a later time, finally, a scar in the posterior wall of the myocardium was detectable in the ECG. When repeating the 5-FU infusion, similar problems arose with less intensity. The patient died as a consequence of the progress of the tumor disease. At autopsy, two myocardial infarctions were detectable. There was no demonstrable stenosis of the coronary arteries. Spasms of the coronary arteries are discussed as a cause of this side effect of 5-FU-therapy.

[Results of pacing after acute myocardial infarction (author's transl)]. / Ergebnisse der Elektrostimulation des Herzens beim akuten Herzinfarkt

Indications for electrical pacing were present in 58 of 665 patients with acute myocardial infarction (8.7%). Posterior-wall infarction had occurred in 34, anterior-wall infarction in 20, while two had combined infarction and in a further two precise localisation was not possible. There were 16 deaths (27.6%), six of them with posterior-wall and nine with anterior-wall infarction. Bradycardic arrhythmias with A-V block predominated among posterior-wall infarctions, hemiblocks and bifascicular block in anterior-wall infarctions. Permanent pacing was practised in 14 patients, 11 with posterior and three with anterior-wall infarctions, i.e. permanent pacing was four times as common after posterior than anterior-wall infarctions, the proportion being 2:1 for temporary pacing, largely due to a higher mortality-rate after anterior-wall infarction. Old anterior-wall scars were present in nine of eleven patients with permanent pacing. Because of the danger of late bradycardia or A-V block patients with posterior-wall infarction should be carefully followed in the late phase (from about the third week onwards), especially if it is known that they have an old anterior-wall infarct.