Assessment of Opioid-Induced Immunomodulation in Experimental and Clinical Sepsis.

Opioids remain a standard supportive therapy in patients admitted to the ICU with sepsis. However, as preclinical models indicate an association between opioid exposure and immunosuppression, the use of this class of drugs warrants investigation. The objective of this study was to investigate whether opioid exposure causes immunosuppression in patients with sepsis, and to use a murine sepsis model to determine the effects of opioid exposure on secondary infection. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized opioid exposure would be associated with immunosuppression in patients with sepsis and secondary infection in a murine sepsis model. METHODS AND MODELS: This was a two-phase preclinical and clinical study. The clinical phase included a subgroup of patients with sepsis from an existing randomized controlled trial while the preclinical phase used a murine model of sepsis with C57BL/6 mice. In the clinical phase, a post hoc analysis was performed in subjects receiving fentanyl versus no opioid receipt. In the preclinical phase, a murine cecal slurry-induced sepsis model followed by secondary infection was used. Mice were randomized to fentanyl versus no fentanyl concomitantly. RESULTS: In clinical sepsis, a significant decrease in interleukin-23 (IL-23) level in patients with fentanyl exposure was observed and lower IL-23 was associated with mortality (p < 0.001). Other measured cytokines showed no significant differences. Concomitant fentanyl exposure during murine sepsis was associated with a significantly higher bacterial burden (p < 0.001) after secondary infection; however, immune cell counts and plasma cytokine levels were largely unaffected by fentanyl. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: Minimal alterations in cytokines were seen with opioid exposure during clinical sepsis. In a preclinical model, opioid exposure during sepsis was associated with ineffective bacterial clearance upon secondary infection. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the immunomodulatory role of opioids and their implications, especially in the post-sepsis period.

Exploring the Obesity Paradox in A Murine Model of Sepsis: Improved Survival Despite Increased Organ Injury in Obese Mice.

ABSTRACT: Despite the known deleterious effects of obesity, clinical data indicate that overweight or obese patients experience higher rates of sepsis survival compared to normal and underweight patients; a phenomenon called the obesity paradox. Results from preclinical sepsis studies have not been able to replicate these findings. The objective of this study was to test the existence of the obesity paradox in a murine model of cecal slurry (CS)-induced sepsis with insulin-resistant diet-induced obese mice. Male C57BL/6 mice were provided high-fat (HFD) or low-fat (LFD) diets for 20 weeks. HFD-fed mice experienced higher rates of survival compared to LFD-fed mice after septic challenge induced by CS injection (66% vs. 25%, P = 0.01, survival assessed for 14 days). Despite the survival advantage, HFD-fed mice had higher rates of positive bacterial cultures and increased markers of kidney injury. Circulating levels of IL-6, IL-1ß, TNFα, and IL-23 were equivalent 24 h after CS-injection; however, IL-17A was uniquely increased in HFD-fed mice. While LFD-fed mice maintained euglycemia, HFD-fed mice were hyperglycemic 6 and 12 h after CS-injection. Stable isotope resolved metabolomics analysis of liver tissue showed diverging pathways of glucose utilization during sepsis, with LFD-fed mice significantly upregulating glycolytic activity and HFD-fed mice decreasing glucose entry into the TCA cycle. This murine study corroborates clinical data that obesity confers a survival benefit in sepsis, albeit at the expense of more significant organ injury. The mechanisms promoting survival in the obese remain unknown; however, this model appears to be well-poised to begin answering this question. Differences in glucose utilization are a novel target to investigate this paradox.