Surgical Posture with Microscopic Versus Exoscopic Visualization in Anterior Cervical Procedures.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons sustain deviated postures during procedures even with the use of loupes or an operative microscope. The surgical exoscope is a new intraoperative visualization technology designed to improve surgical ergonomics; however, no objective data exist to say that surgeon posture is significantly improved. This study aimed to quantify the difference in posture during standard anterior cervical spine procedures performed with the aid of an operative microscope versus an exoscope. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study utilizing a posture-sensing device at the surgeon's cervicothoracic junction. The primary outcome was the proportion of time under scope spent in a deviated posture, defined as greater than 10 degrees of deviation from neutral in the x- and y-axes (flexion/extension and lateral bending) of the surgeon's upper torso. Average deviation from baseline for the x-, y-, and z-axes (flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation, respectively), as well as the percentage of operative time spent with the visualization aid was also analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, 37 anterior cervical procedures were recorded: 18 were performed with an exoscope and 19 with a microscope. Surgeons spent significantly more time in the deviated posture with the operative microscope than with the exoscope (32% vs. 8% with x-axis >10 deg, P <0.005; 20% vs. 6% with y-axis >10 deg, P <0.05). This is also reflected by the significant differences in the average deviation in the x- and y-axes, while under scope. CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing the exoscope for anterior cervical spine procedures allows surgeons to spend less time in a deviated posture.

The Utility of the 5 Factor Modified Frailty Index in Outcome Prediction for Patients with Chronic Subdural Hematoma Treated with Surgical Drainage.

OBJECTIVE: Increasing frailty is a significant determinant of perioperative morbidity and mortality within neurosurgical literature. This study investigates the predictive value of the modified frailty index 5 (mFI-5) for postoperative morbidity and mortality following surgical drainage of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients who underwent surgical evacuation of a cSDH. The mFI-5 score was calculated for each patient and used to stratify patients: prefrail (mFI-5<2), frail (mFI-5 = 2), and severely frail (mFI-5>2). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards (CPH) regression analysis were used to identify factors associated with our primary outcomes: overall survival and 30-day readmission. Secondary outcomes included nonhome discharge, length of stay, hematoma accumulation, development of new postoperative neurologic deficits, resolution of preoperative neurologic deficits, and a modified Rankin score >2 at discharge. RESULTS: 118 patients with a mean age of 74.4 ± 11.9 years were analyzed. All baseline demographics were similar across the 3 groups. On multivariate analysis, severely frail patients (N = 24, 20.3%) had increased rates of 30-day readmission (hazard ratio [HR] 4.3, CPH regression P value<0.001) and postoperative mortality (HR 3.1, CPH regression P value<0.01) compared to the prefrail cohort. Severely frail patients had increased rates of nonhome disposition (HR 9.6, CPH regression P value< 0.001), development of new postoperative neurologic deficits (HR 2.75, CPH regression P value = 0.03), and hematoma reaccumulation (HR 4.07, CPH regression P value = 0.004). A novel scoring system accounting for patient age and frailty was predictive of 90-day mortality (area under the curve 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty, measured by the mFI-5, and our novel scoring system hold a predictive value regarding outcomes for patients undergoing surgical drainage of a cSDH.