Mechanism of electrical remodeling of atrial myocytes and its influence on susceptibility to atrial fibrillation in diabetic rats.

AIMS: To explore the atrial electrical remodeling and the susceptibility of atrial fibrillation (AF) in diabetic rats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats were chosen as diabetic animal model, and age-matched non-diabetic littermate Zucker lean (ZL) rats as control. AF susceptibility was determined by electrophysiological examination. The current density of Ito, IKur and ICa-L were detected by whole-cell patch-clamp technique, and ion channel protein expression in atrial tissue and HL-1 cells treated with advanced glycation end products (AGE) was analyzed by western blotting. KEY FINDINGS: Diabetic rats had significantly enlarged left atria and evenly thickened ventricular walls, hypertrophied cells and interstitial fibrosis in atrial myocardium, increased AF susceptibility, and prolonged AF duration after atrial burst stimulation. Compared with atrial myocytes isolated from ZL controls, atrial myocytes isolated from ZDF rats had prolonged action potential duration, decreased absolute value of resting membrane potential level and current densities of Ito, IKur and ICa-L. The ion channel protein (Kv4.3, Kv1.5 and Cav1.2) expression in atrium tissue of ZDF rats and HL-1 cells treated with high concentration AGE were significantly down-regulated, compared with controls. SIGNIFICANCE: The atrial electrical remodeling induced by hyperglycemia contributed to the increased AF susceptibility in diabetic rats.

Comparison of Ca2+ Handling for the Regulation of Vasoconstriction between Rat Coronary and Renal Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Ca2+ plays an important role in the regulation of vasoconstriction. Ca2+ signaling is regulated by a number of Ca2+-handling proteins. However, whether differences in Ca2+ handling affect the regulation of vasoconstriction in different arteries remains elusive. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether differences in Ca2+ handling affect the response to vasoconstrictors in different arteries. METHODS: Arterial ring contraction was measured using a Multi Myograph System. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) were digested with type 2 collagenase in DMEM, then intracellular calcium concentration was measured with the Ca2+ probe fluo-4/AM in the isolated cells. Calcium-related proteins were assayed by Western blotting. RESULTS: Phenylephrine did not induce -coronary arterial contraction. There were differences in -5-hydroxytryptamine, 9,11-dideoxy-11a,9a-epoxymethano-prostaglandin F2a, and endothelin 1-induced vasoconstriction in different solutions between coronary and renal arteries. Vasoconstrictions in the presence of Bay K8644 were stronger in coronary than in renal arteries. Store-operated calcium (SOC) channels could mediate Ca2+ influx in VSMCs of both groups. SOC channels did not participate in the contraction of coronary arteries. In addition, there were significant differences in the expressions of receptors and ion channels between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Ca2+ handling contributed to the different responses to vasoconstrictors between coronary and renal arteries.