Data on microRNA expression, predicted gene targets and pathway analysis in response to different concentrations of a cranberry proanthocyanidin-rich extract and its metabolite 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid in intestinal Caco-2BBe1 cells.

Cranberry-derived proanthocyanidin (PAC) is processed by the gut microbiota to produce 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid (HPPA), among other metabolites. These data are in support of the article entitled, "Cranberry proanthocyanidin and its microbial metabolite 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, but not 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid, partially reverse pro-inflammatory microRNA responses in human intestinal epithelial cells," published in Molecular Nutrition and Food Research [1]. Here we describe data generated by nCounterⓇ Human v3 miRNA Expression Panel of RNA obtained from Caco-2BBe1 cells exposed to two different concentrations of cranberry extract rich in PAC (50 µg/ml or 100 µg/ml) or 3-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-propionic acid (5 µg/ml or 10 µg/ml) for 24 h, then stimulated with 1 ng/ml of IL-1ß or not (mock) for three hours. The raw data are publicly available at the NCBI GEO database GSE237078. This work also includes descriptive methodological procedures, treatment-responsive microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles in Caco-2BBe1 cells, and in silico mRNA gene target and pathway enrichment analyses of significantly differentially expressed miRNAs (q < 0.001). Cranberry and its components have recognized health benefits, particularly in relation to combatting inflammation and pathogenic bacterial adhesion. These data will be valuable as a reference to study the response of intestinal cells to other polyphenol-rich food sources, analyze gut microbial responses to cranberry and its metabolites in different cell lines and mammalian hosts to elucidate individualized effects, and to delineate the role of the gut microbiota in facilitating the benefits of cranberry. Moreover, these data will aid in expanding our knowledge on the mechanisms underlying the benefits of cranberry and its components.

The Environmental Sustainability of Plant-Based Dietary Patterns: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: A large part of the existential threat associated with climate change is the result of current human feeding patterns. Over the last decade, research evaluating the diet-related environmental impacts of plant-based diets has emerged, and a synthesis of the available data is now due. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were as follows: 1) to compile and summarize the literature on diet-related environmental impacts of plant-based dietary patterns; 2) to assess the nature of the data on impacts of plant-based dietary patterns on both environmental parameters and health (e.g., if land use is reduced for a particular diet, is cancer risk also reduced?); and 3) to determine where sufficient data exist for meta-analyses, in addition to identifying gaps within the literature. METHODS: Global peer-reviewed studies on the environmental impacts of plant-based diets were searched in Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science. After removing duplicates, the screening identified 1553 records. After 2 stages of independent review by 2 reviewers, 65 records met the inclusion criteria and were eligible to be used in synthesis. RESULTS: Evidence suggests that plant-based diets may offer lower greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), land use, and biodiversity loss than offered by standard diets; however, the impact on water and energy use may depend on the types of plant-based foods consumed. Further, the studies were consistent in demonstrating that plant-based dietary patterns that reduce diet-related mortality also promote environmental sustainability. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was agreement across the studies regarding the impact of plant-based dietary patterns on GHGE, land used, and biodiversity loss despite varied plant-based diets assessed.

Low-carbohydrate vegan diets in diabetes for weight loss and sustainability: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Low-carbohydrate, high animal fat and protein diets have been promoted for weight loss and diabetes treatment. We therefore tested the effect of a low-carbohydrate vegan diet in diabetes as a potentially healthier and more ecologically sustainable low-carbohydrate option. OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the effectiveness of a low-carbohydrate vegan diet with a moderate-carbohydrate vegetarian diet on weight loss and metabolic measures in diabetes. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four male and female participants with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to advice on either a low-carbohydrate vegan diet, high in canola oil and plant proteins, or a vegetarian therapeutic diet, for 3 mo, with both diets recommended at 60% of calorie requirements. Body weight, fasting blood, blood pressure, and 7-d food records, to estimate potential greenhouse gas emissions, were obtained throughout the study with tests of cholesterol absorption undertaken at baseline and end of study on 50 participants. RESULTS: Both low-carbohydrate vegan and vegetarian diets similarly but markedly reduced body weight (-5.9 kg; 95% CI: -6.5, -5.28 kg; and -5.23 kg; 95% CI: -5.84, -4.62 kg), glycated hemoglobin (-0.99%; 95% CI: -1.07, -0.9%; and -0.88%; 95% CI: -0.97, -0.8%), systolic blood pressure (-4 mmHg; 95% CI: -7, -2 mmHg; and -6 mmHg; 95% CI: -8, -3 mmHg), and potential greenhouse gas emissions, but only for potential greenhouse gas emissions was there a significant treatment difference of -0.63 kgCO2/d (95% CI: -0.99, -0.27 kgCO2/d) favoring the low-carbohydrate vegan diet. CONCLUSIONS: Low-carbohydrate vegan and vegetarian diets reduced body weight, improved glycemic control and blood pressure, but the more plant-based diet had greater potential reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02245399.

Systematic review and meta-analysis examining the relationship between postprandial hypotension, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality.

BACKGROUND: Postprandial hypotension (PPH) has been reported to be associated with syncope, falls, adverse cardiovascular outcomes, and increased all-cause mortality. It has been reported to have an incidence as high as 30% in the elderly and persons with diabetes. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to determine the relation of PPH with cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and all-cause mortality. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort and cross-sectional studies to determine the association of PPH with CVD and all-cause mortality. METHODS: We searched the databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane library up to 13 April 2022 for prospective cohort and cross-sectional studies that examined the association of PPH with CVD outcomes and all-cause mortality. Data were analyzed using the generic inverse variance method with a random-effects model. Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach assessed the certainty of evidence. RESULTS: Seven studies that included 2389 participants met our inclusion criteria. PPH was associated with each outcome individually, including increased all-cause mortality, total CVD, CVD mortality, and stroke. CVD outcomes and all-cause mortality combined were also associated with PPH (RR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.05, 2.18; P = 0.03; I2 = 77%). The certainty of evidence was graded as very low due to significant heterogeneity and the limited number of studies. CONCLUSIONS: This assessment indicates an association of PPH with CVD and all-cause mortality. Further studies are required to improve CVD and mortality estimates, but the potential seriousness of CVD and all-cause mortality as outcomes of PPH justifies more screening, diagnosis, and research.