A homozygous stop codon in HORMAD2 in a patient with recurrent digynic triploid miscarriage.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent miscarriage (RM) affects 1% to 5% of couples trying to conceive. Despite extensive clinical and laboratory testing, half of the RM cases remain unexplained. We report the genetic analysis of a couple with eight miscarriages and the search for their potential genetic etiology. METHODS: Short tandem repeat (STR) markers, single nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) microarray, and human DNA methylation microarray were used to analyze the genotypes of two miscarriages. Exomes sequencing was performed on DNA from the two partners and identified variants were validated by Sanger sequencing. RESULTS: STR marker genotyping demonstrated that the two available miscarriages are triploid digynic and resulted from the failure of Meiosis II. SNP microarray analysis revealed an additional Meiosis I abnormality that is the segregation of the two maternal homologous chromosomes in one triploid miscarriage. Whole-exome sequencing on DNA from the two partners identified candidate variants only in the female partner in two genes with roles in female reproduction, a missense in EIF4ENIF1 (OMIM 607445) and a stop gain in HORMAD2 (OMIM 618842). EIF4ENIF1 is a eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E nuclear import factor required for the oocyte germinal vesicle breakdown, and HORMAD2 is part of the synaptonemal complex that was hypothesized to act as a checkpoint mechanism to eliminate oocytes with asynapsis during meiotic prophase I in mice. CONCLUSION: While both genes may contribute to the phenotype, the Meiosis I abnormalities in the conceptions favor the causal role of HORMAD2 in the etiology of RM in this couple. This report illustrates the importance of comprehensively analyzing the products of conception to guide the search for the genetic causation of RM.

A report of two homozygous TERB1 protein-truncating variants in two unrelated women with primary infertility.

PURPOSE: To investigate the genetic etiology of patients with female infertility. METHODS: Whole Exome Sequencing was performed on genomic DNA extracted from the patient's blood. Exome data were filtered for damaging rare biallelic variants in genes with possible roles in reproduction. Sanger sequencing was used to validate the selected variants and segregate them in family members. RESULTS: A novel homozygous likely pathogenic variant, c.626G>A, p.Trp209*, was identified in the TERB1 gene of the patient. Additionally, we report a second homozygous pathogenic TERB1 variant, c.1703C>G, p.Ser568*, in an infertile woman whose azoospermic brother was previously described to be homozygous for her variant. CONCLUSIONS: Here, we report for the first time two homozygous likely pathogenic and pathogenic TERB1 variants, c.626G>A, p.Trp209* and c.1703C>G, p.Ser568*, respectively, in two unrelated women with primary infertility. TERB1 is known to play an essential role in homologous chromosome movement, synapsis, and recombination during the meiotic prophase I and has an established role in male infertility in humans. Our data add TERB1 to the shortlist of Meiosis I genes associated with human infertility in both sexes.