Knitted nitinol represents a new generation of constrictive external vein graft meshes.

OBJECTIVE: Constriction of vein grafts with braided external nitinol meshes had previously led to the successful elimination of neointimal tissue formation. We investigated whether pulse compliance, smaller kink-free bending radius, and milder medial atrophy can be achieved by knitting the meshes rather than braiding, without losing the suppressive effect on intimal hyperplasia. METHODS: Pulse compliance, bending stiffness, and bending radius, as well as longitudinal-radial deformation-coupling and radial compression, were compared in braided and knitted nitinol meshes. Identical to previous studies with braided mesh grafts, a senescent nonhuman primate model (Chacma baboons; bilateral femoral interposition grafts/6 months) mimicking the clinical size mismatch between vein grafts and runoff arteries was used to examine the effect of knitted external meshes on vein grafts: nitinol mesh-constricted (group 1); nitinol mesh-constricted and fibrin sealant (FS) spray-coated for mesh attachment (group 2); untreated control veins (group 3), and FS spray-coated control veins (group 4). RESULTS: Compared with braided meshes, knitted meshes had 3.8-times higher pulse compliance (3.43 ± 0.53 vs 0.94 ± 0.12%/100 mm Hg; P = .00002); 30-times lower bending stiffness (0.015 ± 0.002 vs 0.462 ± 0.077 Nmm(2); P = .0006); 9.2-times narrower kink-free bending radius (15.3 ± 0.4 vs 140.8 ± 22.4 mm; P = .0006), and 4.3-times lower radial narrowing caused by axial distension (18.0% ± 1.0% vs 77.0% ± 3.7%; P = .00001). Compared with mesh-supported grafts, neointimal tissue was 8.5-times thicker in group I (195 ± 45 µm) vs group III (23.0 ± 21.0 µm; P < .001) corresponding with a 14.3-times larger neointimal area in group I (4330 ± 957 × 103 µm(2)) vs group III (303 ± 221× 103 µm(2); P < .00004). FS had no significant influence. Medial muscle mass remained at 43.4% in knitted meshes vs the 28.1% previously observed in braided meshes. CONCLUSION: Combining the suppression of intimal hyperplasia with a more physiologic remodeling process of the media, manifold higher kink-resistance, and lower fraying than in braided meshes makes knitted nitinol an attractive concept in external vein graft protection.

Constrictive external nitinol meshes inhibit vein graft intimal hyperplasia in nonhuman primates.

OBJECTIVE: External mesh support of vein grafts has been shown to mitigate the formation of intimal hyperplasia. The aim of the present study was to address the issue of optimal mesh size in a nonhuman primate model that mimics the dimensional mismatch typically encountered between clinical vein grafts and their target arteries. METHODS: The effect of mesh size on intimal hyperplasia and endothelial preservation was assessed in bilateral femoral interposition grafts in Chacma baboons (n(Sigma) = 32/n = 8 per mesh size). No mesh support (group I) was compared with external nitinol meshes at three different sizes: loose fitting (group II), 25% diameter constricting (group III), and 50% diameter constricting (group IV). Mesh sizes were seen not only in isolation but also against the background of anastomotic size mismatch at implantation, expressed as quotient of cross-sectional area of host artery to vein graft (Q(C)). RESULTS: Significant amounts of intimal hyperplasia were found in group I (Q(C) median 0.20; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 1.63 +/- 0.34 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 1.73 +/- 0.5 mm(2)) and group II (Q(C) median 0.25; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 1.96 +/- 1.64 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 2.88 +/- 1.69 mm(2)). In contrast, group III (Q(C) median 0.45; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 0.08 +/- 0.13 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 0.18 +/- 0.32 mm(2)) and IV (Q(C) median 1.16; intimal hyperplasia 6 weeks = 0.02 +/- 0.03 mm(2); intimal hyperplasia 12 weeks = 0.11 +/- 0.10 mm(2)) showed dramatically suppressed intimal hyperplasia (P < .01) at both time points. Endothelial integrity was only preserved in group IV (P < .05). There were no significant differences in vascularization and inflammation in either interlayer or intergroup comparisons. CONCLUSION: By using an animal model that addressed the clinical phenomenon of diameter discrepancy between vein graft and bypassed artery, we could demonstrate that suppression of intimal hyperplasia required constrictive mesh sizes.