CONKO-006: A randomised double-blinded phase IIb-study of additive therapy with gemcitabine + sorafenib/placebo in patients with R1 resection of pancreatic cancer - Final results.

BACKGROUND: CONKO-006 was designed for patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma with postsurgical R1 residual status to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of gemcitabine and sorafenib (GemSorafenib) compared with those of gemcitabine + placebo (GemP) for 12 cycles. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study was planned to detect an improvement in recurrence-free survival (RFS) from 42% to 60% after 18 months. Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), safety and duration of treatment. RESULTS: 122 patients were included between 02/2008 and 09/2013; 57 were randomised to GemSorafenib and 65 to GemP. Patient characteristics were wellbalanced (GemSorafenib/GemP) in terms of median age (63/63 years), tumour size (T3/T4: 97/97%), and nodal positivity (86/85%). Grade 3/4 toxicities comprised diarrhoea (GemSorafenib: 12%; GemP: 2%), elevated gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) (19%; 9%), fatigue (5%; 2%) and hypertension (5%; 2%), as well as neutropenia (18%; 25%) and thrombocytopenia (9%; 2%). By August 2017, 118 (97%) RFS event had occurred. There were no difference in RFS (median GemSorafenib: 8.5 versus GemP: 9.4 months; p = 0.730) nor OS (median GemSorafenib: 17.6 versus GemP: 17.5 months; p = 0.481). Landmark analyses suggest that patients who received more than six cycles of postoperative chemotherapy had significantly longer OS (p = 0.021). CONCLUSION: CONKO-006 is the first randomised clinical trial to include exclusively patients with PDAC with postsurgical R1 status thus far. Sorafenib added to gemcitabine did neither improve RFS nor OS. However, postoperative treatment exceeding six months seemed to prolong survival and should be further investigated in these high-risk patients. CLINICAL TRIAL INFORMATION: German Tumor Study Registry (Deutsches Krebsstudienregister), DRKS00000242.

Impact of age on the efficacy of oxaliplatin in the preoperative chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy of rectal cancer: a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial.

Background: The German rectal cancer trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 has shown a significant benefit in 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) of adding oxaliplatin to a standard preoperative 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. The use of oxaliplatin as adjuvant treatment in elderly patients with colon cancer is controversial. We therefore investigated the impact of age on clinical outcome in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods: We carried out a post hoc analysis of the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial evaluating primary and secondary end points according to age. Patient and tumor characteristics, NCI CTC adverse events grades 3-4 (version 3.0), dose intensities as well as survival and recurrence data were analyzed in three specified age groups (<60, 60-70, and ≥70 years). The influence of age as a continuous variable on DFS was modeled using a subpopulation treatment effect pattern plot (STEPP) analysis. Results: A total of 1232 patients were assessable. With the exception of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group status (P < 0.001), no differences in patient and tumor characteristics were noticed between age groups. Likewise, toxicity pattern, dose intensities of CRT and surgical results were similar in all age groups. After a median follow-up of 50 months, in patients aged <60 years a significant benefit of adding oxaliplatin to 5-FU-based CRT and adjuvant chemotherapy was observed for local (P = 0.013) and systemic recurrences (P = 0.023), DFS (P = 0.011), and even overall survival (OS; P = 0.044). The STEPP analysis revealed improved hazard ratios for DFS in patients aged 40-70 years compared with elderly patients treated with oxaliplatin. Conclusion: The addition of oxaliplatin significantly improved DFS and OS in younger patients aged <60 years with advanced rectal cancer. Patients aged ≥70 years had no benefit. Clinical Trials Number: NCT00349076.

Neoadjuvant rectal score as individual-level surrogate for disease-free survival in rectal cancer in the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 randomized phase III trial.

Background: Surrogate end points in rectal cancer after preoperative chemoradiation are lacking as their statistical validation poses major challenges, including confirmation based on large phase III trials. We examined the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score that incorporates weighted cT, ypT and ypN categories for disease-free survival (DFS) in 1191 patients with rectal carcinoma treated within the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 phase III trial. Patients and methods: Cox regression models adjusted for treatment arm, resection status, and NAR score were used in multivariable analysis. The four Prentice criteria (PC1-4) were used to assess individual-level surrogacy of NAR for DFS. Results: After a median follow-up of 50 months, the addition of oxaliplatin to fluorouracil-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) significantly improved 3-year DFS [75.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 72.30% to 79.50%) versus 71.3% (95% CI 67.60% to 74.90%); P = 0.034; PC 1) and resulted in a shift toward lower NAR groups (P = 0.034, PC 2) compared with fluorouracil-only CRT. The 3-year DFS was 91.7% (95% CI 88.2% to 95.2%), 81.8% (95% CI 78.4% to 85.1%), and 58.1% (95% CI 52.4% to 63.9%) for low, intermediate, and high NAR score, respectively (P < 0.001; PC 3). NAR score remained an independent prognostic factor for DFS [low versus high NAR: hazard ratio (HR) 4.670; 95% CI 3.106-7.020; P < 0.001; low versus intermediate NAR: HR 1.971; 95% CI 1.303-2.98; P = 0.001] in multivariable analysis. Notwithstanding the inherent methodological difficulty in interpretation of PC 4 to establish surrogacy, the treatment effect on DFS was captured by NAR, supporting satisfaction of individual-level PC 4. Conclusion: Our study validates the prognostic role and individual-level surrogacy of NAR score for DFS within a large randomized phase III trial. NAR score could help oncologists to speed up response-adapted therapeutic decision, and further large phase III trial data sets should aim to confirm trial-level surrogacy.

Long-term prognostic impact of surgical complications in the German Rectal Cancer Trial CAO/ARO/AIO-94.

BACKGROUND: The influence of postoperative complications on survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing combined modality treatment is debatable. This study evaluated the impact of surgical complications on oncological outcomes in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated within the randomized CAO/ARO/AIO-94 (Working Group of Surgical Oncology/Working Group of Radiation Oncology/Working Group of Medical Oncology of the Germany Cancer Society) trial. METHODS: Patients were assigned randomly to either preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) or postoperative CRT between 1995 and 2002. Anastomotic leakage and wound healing disorders were evaluated prospectively, and their associations with overall survival, and distant metastasis and local recurrence rates after a long-term follow-up of more than 10 years were determined. Medical complications (such as cardiopulmonary events) were not analysed in this study. RESULTS: A total of 799 patients were included in the analysis. Patients who had anterior or intersphincteric resection had better 10-year overall survival than those treated with abdominoperineal resection (63·1 versus 51·3 per cent; P < 0·001). Anastomotic leakage was associated with worse 10-year overall survival (51 versus 65·2 per cent; P = 0·020). Overall survival was reduced in patients with impaired wound healing (45·7 versus 62·2 per cent; P = 0·009). At 10 years after treatment, patients developing any surgical complication (anastomotic leakage and/or wound healing disorder) had impaired overall survival (46·6 versus 63·8 per cent; P < 0·001), a lower distant metastasis-free survival rate (63·2 versus 72·0 per cent; P = 0·030) and more local recurrences (15·5 versus 6·4 per cent; P < 0·001). In a multivariable Cox regression model, lymph node metastases (P < 0·001) and surgical complications (P = 0·008) were the only independent predictors of reduced overall survival. CONCLUSION: Surgical complications were associated with adverse oncological outcomes in this trial.

[Lymph node metastases in ypT1/2 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy : The Achilles heel of organ-preserving operative procedures?]. / Lymphknotenmetastasen beim ypT1/2-Rektumkarzinom nach neoadjuvanter Radiochemotherapie : Die Achillesferse organerhaltender Operationsverfahren?

BACKGROUND: For patients with rectal cancer and complete remission (ypT0) or with good response and residual tumor restricted only to the bowel wall (ypT1-2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), local excision has been suggested as an alternative to avoid the significant morbidity and functional deficits associated with total mesorectal excision (TME). The aim of this investigation was to investigate the incidence, distribution and tumor-related localization of mesorectal lymph node (LN) metastases in TME specimens with complete remission (ypT0), intramural (ypT1-2) and extramural (ypT3-4) residual tumor tissue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Specimens of TME from 81 patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UICC II-III) undergoing neoadjuvant CRT within the phase III German rectal cancer trial CAO/ARO/AIO-04 were prospectively evaluated. The entire mesorectal compartment was microscopically screened after complete paraffin embedding. The number and localization of all detectable LN metastases were documented in relation to the primary tumor. RESULTS: Whereas 50 patients (62 %) had ypT3-4 rectal cancer after neoadjuvant CRT, 20 patients (25 %) presented with residual tumor within the bowel wall (ypT1-2), 11 patients (14 %) had pathological complete remission (ypT0), an average of 28 ± 13.7 LN were detected per specimen and 25 patients (31 %) had residual LN metastases after CRT. Although the incidence of LN metastases was higher in the ypT3-4 group (40 %), 25 % of patients in the ypT1-2 group with intramural residual tumor had a mean number of 2.2 residual LN metastases of which 55 % were located far from the primary lesion in the proximal mesorectum. None of the patients with ypT0 status (complete response) had residual LN metastases. CONCLUSION: Even in patients with good response and post-CRT tumor tissue restricted only to the bowel wall (ypT1-2), there is still a considerable risk for residual LN metastases. Local excision of residual rectal cancer was accompanied by a higher rate of local failure and radical surgery with TME should remain the standard treatment in these patients. To date, valid selection criteria for patients eligible for organ-sparing surgery are still lacking.

Discrepancies between medical oncologists and surgeons in assessment of resectability and indication for chemotherapy in patients with colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary discussion of the treatment of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is advocated currently. The aim of this study was to investigate medical oncologists' and surgeons' assessment of resectability and indication for chemotherapy, and the effect of an educational intervention on such assessment. METHODS: Medical histories of 30 patients with CRLM were presented to ten experienced medical oncologists and 11 surgeons at an initial virtual tumour board meeting (TB1). Treatment recommendations were obtained from each participant by voting for standardized answers. Following lectures on the potential of chemotherapy and surgery, assessment was repeated at a second virtual tumour board meeting (TB2), using the same patients and participants. RESULTS: Overall, 630 answers (21 × 30) were obtained per tumour board meeting. At TB1, resectability was expected more frequently by surgeons. Participants changed 56·8 per cent of their individual answers at TB2. Assessment shifted from potentially resectable to resectable CRLM in 81 of 161 and from unresectable to (potentially) resectable CRLM in 29 of 36 answers. Preoperative chemotherapy was indicated more often by medical oncologists, and overall was included in 260 answers (41·3 per cent) at TB1, compared with only 171 answers (27·1 per cent) at TB2. Medical oncologists more often changed their decision to primary resection in resectable patients (P = 0·006). Postoperative chemotherapy was included in 51·9 and 52·4 per cent of all answers at TB1 and TB2 respectively, with no difference in changes between medical oncologists and surgeons (P = 0·980). CONCLUSION: Resectability and indication for preoperative chemotherapy were assessed differently by medical oncologists and surgeons. The educational intervention resulted in more patients deemed resectable by both oncologists and surgeons, and less frequent indication for chemotherapy.

Survival of patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab or FOLFIRI/cetuximab in a multidisciplinary concept (CELIM study).

BACKGROUND: Initially, unresectable colorectal liver metastases can be resected after response to chemotherapy. While cetuximab has been shown to increase response and resection rates, the survival outcome for this conversion strategy needs further evaluation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with technically unresectable and/or ≥5 liver metastases were treated with FOLFOX/cetuximab (arm A) or FOLFIRI/cetuximab (arm B) and evaluated with regard to resectability every 2 months. Tumour response and secondary resection data have been reported previously. A final analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was carried out in December 2012. RESULTS: Between December 2004 and March 2008, 56 patients were randomised to arm A, 55 to arm B. The median OS was 35.7 [95% confidence interval (CI) 27.2-44.2] months [arm A: 35.8 (95% CI 28.1-43.6), arm B: 29.0 (95% CI 16.0-41.9) months, HR 1.03 (95% CI 0.66-1.61), P = 0.9]. The median PFS was 10.8 (95% CI 9.3-12.2) months [arm A: 11.2 (95% CI 7.2-15.3), arm B: 10.5 (95% CI 8.9-12.2) months, HR 1.18 (95% CI 0.79-1.74), P = 0.4]. Patients who underwent R0 resection (n = 36) achieved a better median OS [53.9 (95% CI 35.9-71.9) months] than those who did not [21.9 (95% CI 17.1-26.7) months, P < 0.001]. The median disease-free survival for R0 resected patients was 9.9 (95% CI 5.8-14.0) months, and the 5-year OS rate was 46.2% (95% CI 29.5% to 62.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms a favourable long-term survival for patients with initially sub-optimal or unresectable colorectal liver metastases who respond to conversion therapy and undergo secondary resection. Both FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, appear to be appropriate regimens for 'conversion' treatment in patients with K-RAS codon 12/13/61 wild-type tumours. Thus, liver surgery can be considered curative or alternatively as an additional 'line of therapy' in those patients who are not cured. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT00153998, www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Metastatic recurrence after complete resection of colorectal liver metastases: impact of surgery and chemotherapy on survival.

PURPOSE: Surgery is the standard of care for resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRC-LM). Unfortunately, 60% of patients develop secondary metastatic recurrence (SMR) after R0-resection of CRC-LM. We investigated the impact of surgical re-intervention and chemotherapy (Ctx) on survival in a consecutive series of patients with SMR. METHODS: From 01/2001 to 11/2011, 104 out of 178 consecutive patients with R0-resection of CRC-LM developed SMR and were evaluated. The impact of surgical and Ctx re-interventions on recurrence free (RFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) was analyzed. Median follow-up was 28.0 (95%CI: 19.4-37.4) months. RESULTS: SMR occurred in 81 patients at a single site (49× liver, 18× lung, 14× other) and in 23 patients at multiple sites. Forty-two patients were scheduled for primary surgery. Fifty-three patients were classified as non-resectable and treated with median 5.0 [IQR, 3.0-10.0] cycles of Ctx, combined with an EGFR/VEGF-antibody in 27 patients. Nine patients received best supportive care only. R0/R1 resection could be achieved in 35 patients primarily and even in 8 patients secondarily after Ctx. Surgical morbidity and mortality were 16 and 0%, respectively. The 5-year RFS rates for patients with R0 versus R1-resection were 22 and 24% (p = 0.948). The 5-year CSS rate for R0/R1-resected patients was 38% versus 10% for those patients treated by Ctx alone (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In SMR, surgical re-intervention is feasible and safe in a remarkable number of patients and offers significantly longer CSS compared to patients without resection.

Survivin as a prognostic/predictive marker and molecular target in cancer therapy.

Evasion from apoptotic cell death is reported to be a pivotal mechanism by which tumor cells acquire resistance to therapeutic treatment. Targeting the apoptotic pathways may constitute a promising strategy to counteract therapy resistance and to re-sensitize cancer cells. Expression of survivin, the smallest and structurally unique member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family, has been shown to be associated with poor clinical outcome, more aggressive clinicopathologic features and resistance to both, conventional chemo and radiation therapy. Moreover, survivin detection in cancer tissue, in circulating tumor cells and in patient's serum has prognostic and predictive relevance and may display a prerequisite for marker based molecular therapies. Indeed, due to its universal over expression in malignant tissue, and its prominent role at disparate networks of cellular division, intracellular signaling, apoptosis and adaption to unfavorable surroundings, survivin has been shown to be a suitable target for a targeted therapy. The applicability of survivindriven strategies in clinical practice is currently under investigation as the first survivin antagonists (small molecule inhibitors, antisense oligonucleotides and immunotherapy) successfully entered phase I/II trials. Taken together, these data provide a rationale for the implementation of both, survivin as a molecular diagnostic tool and survivin targeted therapies, within future clinical practice.

Bilobar spreading of colorectal liver metastases does not significantly affect survival after R0 resection in the era of interdisciplinary multimodal treatment.

PURPOSE: Bilobar colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are often considered incurable or associated with poor prognosis even after R0 resection. In this single-center study, we evaluate the impact of CRLM spreading on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and cancer-specific overall survival (CSS) after R0 resection of CRLM with respect to multimodal treatment strategies including perioperative chemotherapy and multistep resections. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2010, R0 resection could be achieved in 70 patients with bilobar and 100 with unilobar CRLM. Extent of disease, perioperative chemotherapy, surgical procedures, adjuvant treatment, histopathological workup, RFS, and CSS were compared between both cohorts. RESULTS: Forty-six (66 %) patients with bilobar and 26 (26 %) patients with unilobar CRLM received preoperative chemotherapy (p < 0.001). For bilobar CRLM, more extended and multistep resection including portal vein occlusion were performed (29 % versus 3 %; p < 0.001). Morbidity (39 % versus 28 %, p = 0.183) and mortality (1 % versus 3 %, p = 0.644) rates were comparable in both patients' cohorts. Postoperative therapy was applied in adjuvant intent to 42 (60 %) versus 51 (51 %) patients (p = 0.275). The 5-year RFS and CSS rates were 24 % versus 31 % (p = 0.169) and 42 % versus 55 % (p = 0.131), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: To our single-center experience, there is no significant effect of CRLM spreading (bilobar versus unilobar) on RFS and CSS rates. Bilobar CRLM are more likely to require extended multimodal efforts to achieve R0 resection.

[(68)Ga-labeled peptides for clinical trials - production according to the German Drug Act: the Göttingen experience]. / (68)Ga-markierte Peptide für klinische Studien. Herstellung gemäß Arzneimittelgesetz: Göttinger Erfahrungen.

The AMG implies far-reaching implications for the synthesis of new radiopharmaceuticals for clinical trials. AIM, METHODS: As a part of the DFG-funded Clinical Research Group (KFO 179) a project designated "Immuno-PET for assessment of early response to radiochemotherapy of advanced rectal cancer" was initiated. This trial is focused on a trivalent bispecific humanized monoclonal antibody, and a 68Ga-labeled peptide. Following the new regulatory framework we established a GMP-compliant cleanroom laboratory and applied for a manufacturing permission. RESULTS: During the project constructural, personnel and organizational conditions for a successful application were established, including a quality management system. A GMP-conform cleanroom laboratory class C was constructed, equipped with a two-chamber lock. The actual manufacturing is performed in a closed system with subsequent sterile filtration. The manufacturing processes have been automatised and validated as well as the necessary quality controls. The manufacturing permission was granted after an official inspection. CONCLUSIONS: The new German Drug Act is considered as a break in the production practice of nuclear medicine. The early involvement and communication with the authorities avoids time-consuming and costly planning errors. It is much to be hoped that the new legal situation in Germany will not cause serious impairments in the realization of clinical trials in German nuclear medicine.

[Rectal cancer: current status of multimodal therapy--when and how?]. / Rektumkarzinom: Aktueller Stand der multimodalen Therapie--wann und wie?

Preoperative 5-fluorouracil-based radiochemotherapy (RCT) followed by quality assessed total mesorectal excision (TME surgery) are the two most important elements of multimodal treatment for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (UICC stages II and III). The optimum sequence of these neoadjuvant modalities complemented by adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy, has been addressed in several randomised trials. Especially within the trials of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group (GRCSG), preoperative RCT has been shown to be superior to postoperative treatment for a variety of endpoints (pathologically confirmed complete tumour remission (pCR), RCT-induced tumour regression, R0 resection rates (including circumferential resection margins) and long-term locoregional control). This neoadjuvant multimodal strategy has decreased the 5-year and 10-year local recurrence rates below 10%, and the development of distant metastases (e.g., 35% to 45% liver metastases) remains the predominant reason for failure. Furthermore, approximately 25% of patients do not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, mainly due to surgical complications, patients' refusal or the investigator's discretion. Thus, today, integrating more effective systemic therapy into (preoperative) multimodal regimens is the most accepted challenge! But from the clinical point of view this demand is also a dilemma. The question to be addressed is how and when to apply intensified systemic therapy with adequate dosage and intensity as well as acceptable treatment-associated toxicity. The increase of therapeutic options requires valid predictive biomarkers that may help to stratify patients into regimens associated with low toxicity (5-FU monotherapy alone) or into more intensified treatment for better long-term outcome. In summary, the use of biomarkers for individualised risk-adapted treatment is one of the most promising areas of clinical investigations, not only in rectal cancer. The assessment of individual tumour response, toxicity, and prognosis during multimodal treatment of rectal cancer as a model of a very common solid tumour offers radiooncologists, surgeons, pathologists, gastroenterologists as well as oncologists immense insights into the under-standing of tumour biology.

The role of survivin for radiation oncology: moving beyond apoptosis inhibition.

Alterations in the expression of apoptosis-related proteins, like the inhibitor of apoptosis (IAP) protein family, display a pivotal pathway by which cancer cells acquire resistance to therapeutic treatment. Among this family, survivin, the smallest and structural unique member, deserves growing attention due to its universal over-expression in human tumors, and its prominent role in disparate networks of cellular division, intracellular signaling and apoptosis. Several preclinical studies have demonstrated that targeting survivin expression by the use of small interfering RNAs, dominant negative mutants, antisense-oligonucleotides and small molecule repressors sensitized tumor cells towards chemotherapy and irradiation and reduced tumor growth potential. Due to these properties, survivin has been proposed as a molecular target for anticancer therapies. Recent studies further revealed that radio-sensitization achieved by survivin inhibition seems to be multifaceted and involves caspase-dependent and caspase-independent mechanisms. In general, an enhanced rate of apoptosis, and pronounced cell cycle arrest have been observed. More recently, a hampered DNA-damage response has been noted, indicating a distinct role of the protein in radiation-induced double strand break repair. These properties were linked to a nuclear import and physical interrelationship with members of the DNA-DSB repair machinery such as phospho-histone H2AX and DNA dependent Protein Kinase (DNA-PKcs). The applicability of survivin-driven strategies in clinical practice is currently under investigation as the first survivin inhibitors successfully entered phase I/II trials. Although these trials do not include radiation therapy at present, survivin inhibitors may represent a novel type of molecular antagonists to improve the effectiveness of radiation therapy or chemoradio-therapy.

Radiation therapy and tamoxifen after breast-conserving surgery: updated results of a 2 x 2 randomised clinical trial in patients with low risk of recurrence.

To study the role of radiotherapy and tamoxifen after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with a favourable prognosis, a clinical trial was initiated by the German Breast Cancer Study Group (GBSG-V). Between 1991 and 1998, 361 patients (pT 1pN0M0, aged 45-75 years, receptor positive, grades I and II) were randomised to radiotherapy (yes/no) and tamoxifen for 2 years (yes/no) in a 2 x 2-factorial design; the exclusion of seven centres (14 patients) left 347 patients for the analysis. First results after a median follow-up of 5.9 years were published. Herein we present updated results after a median follow-up of about 10 years. Hundred and eleven events concerning event-free survival (EFS) have been observed. Since a strong interactive effect between radiotherapy and tamoxifen has been established, the results are presented in terms of the treatment effects for all four treatment groups separately. Mainly due to the presence of local recurrences, the event rate was much higher in the group with BCS only than in the other three groups. No significant difference could be established between the four treatment groups for distant disease-free survival rates (DDFS). Updated results give further evidence that even in patients with a favourable prognosis, the avoidance of radiotherapy and tamoxifen after BCS increases the rate of local recurrences substantially. Rates are about three times higher in the BCS only group. For the two outcomes EFS and DDFS, no important difference could be seen between the three groups with an additional treatment. However, because of the limited sample size with corresponding low power the strength of evidence for such a comparison is weak.

The mesopancreas is the primary site for R1 resection in pancreatic head cancer: relevance for clinical trials.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of patients with pancreatic cancer remains poor, even after potentially curative R0 resection. This discrepancy may be due to the histopathological misclassification of R1 cases as curative resections (R0) in the past. MATERIALS AND METHODS: To test this hypothesis, color coding of all resection margins and organ surfaces as part of a standardized histopathological workup was implemented and prospectively tested on 100 pancreatic head specimens. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were excluded from the analysis owing to the pathohistological diagnosis; only pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, distal bile duct adenocarcinoma, and periampullary adenocarcinoma were included. Applying the International Union Against Cancer criteria, 32 cancer resections were classified R0 (49.2%), while 33 cases turned out to be R1 resections (50.8%). The mesopancreas was infiltrated in 22 of the 33 R1 resection specimens (66.6%). It proved to be the only site of tumor infiltration in 17 specimens (51.5%). Applying the Royal College of Pathologists' criteria, 46 resections were classified R1 (70.8%). As expected, the mesopancreas again was the most frequent site of noncurative resection (n = 27; 58.7%). CONCLUSION: Using the intensified histopathological workup for pancreatic head cancer specimens resulted in an increased rate of R1 resections and the mesopancreas represents the primary site for positive resection margins. Such results are of relevance for patients' stratification in clinical trials.

Targeting NCA-95 and other granulocyte antigens and receptors with radiolabeled monoclonal antibodies (Mabs).

During the last decade considerable effort has been made in the research for in vivo techniques of labeling neutrophils with peptides, labeled cytokines and (99m)Tc-labeled antigranulocyte monoclonal antibodies (AG-Mabs). In general the advantage of in vivo labeling is the simplicity of this approach compared with in vivo techniques. Three of these AG-Mabs have been evaluated in clinical studies: Besilesomab (Scintimun®), Sulesomab (Leucoscan®) and Fanolesomab (Leu-Tech®). White blood cells (WBCs) radiolabeled with AG-Mabs do not show the same behaviour as in vivo labeled white blood cells. Especially (99m)Tc-Sulesomab and (99m)Tc-Besilesomab image infectious foci mainly by non-specific extravasation with secondary binding to postmigratory leukocytes already present at the site of infection.

[Extramural Gastral GIST Manifested by Spontaneous Perforation with Acute Intraabdominal Bleeding and Haemoperitoneum]. / Extramuraler GIST des Magens mit Manifestation durch Spontanruptur und akuter intraabdomineller Blutung mit Hämatoperitoneum.

We report on the case of a 38-year-old male patient with a huge extramural gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) of the stomach, located in the left upper and middle abdominal cavity that was diagnosed on the basis of a spontaneous -rupture and consecutive haemoperitoneum. The lesion was resected completely in an emergency operation. The tumour was classified as a high-risk lesion for aggressive biological behaviour and with regard to tumour rupture with perforation of the serosa, an adjuvant systemic therapy was indicated.

[Individualizing treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer]. / Therapie beim lokal fortgeschrittenen Rektumkarzinom. Ansätze zur Individualisierung.

Based on results of the German Rectal Cancer Study Group CAO/ARO/AIO-94 trial, long-term chemoradiotherapy (RT/CTx) is recommended as standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (UICC stages II/III) in the lower two thirds of the rectum (0-12 cm from the anocutaneous verge). Tumor response to neoadjuvant therapy is very heterogeneous, ranging from complete remission to total resistance to RT/CTx. To fulfill the clinical requirement of individual and risk-adapted multimodal treatment, distinct progress in translational research has been achieved (e.g. gene profiling). However, in clinical reality "individualization" of the therapy of rectal cancer patients has not actually been realized. This can be achieved only on the basis of successful randomized clinical trials (e.g. the CAO/ARO/AIO-04 and GAST-05 trials) translationally combined with basic scientific approaches. One simple first step toward individualizing rectal cancer therapy is being made with the ongoing GAST-05 trial. This investigator initiated phase II trial funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) excludes preoperative RT/CTx for patients with rectal cancer localized in the upper third of the rectum, using only quality controlled principles of radical surgery (partial vs total mesorectal excision) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy.

FDG-PET in patients with fever of unknown origin: the importance of diagnosing large vessel vasculitis.

This review analyzes the impact of 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) in the diagnostic work-up of classic fever of unknown origin (FUO) according to the criteria first proposed by Petersorf in 1961 and later modified by Durack et al. in 1991. Algorithms currently used in this diagnostic process are not strictly evidence based up to now. FDG accumulates in malignant tissues, but also in inflammatory cells by the overexpression of facultative glucose transporter-isotypes (mainly GLUT-1 and GLUT-3) and by an overproduction of glycolytic enzymes. Therefore, this technique covers a broad spectrum of possible etiologies for FUO. Once imaged, these lesions can be further investigated by other (e.g. invasive) and more specific methods. Until now, four prospective studies using FDG-PET in patients with classic FUO, encompassing 167 patients in total are published. Three retrospective studies with 125 patients are also available. These studies are discussed and weighted according to the control of selection-bias that was performed. An interstudy-bias may also be present resulting from a considerable variability in causes of FUO. A low number of diagnostic scans in a study may sometimes be related to a high rate of fevers caused by miscellaneous disorders or to a high rate of undiagnosed patients. In these disease categories, focal pathologies that can be imaged with FDG-PET, are rare. A high number of diagnostic scans is always related to a high prevalence of patients with medium- and large-vessel vasculitis. Available data indicate that FDG-PET has the potential to play an important role as a second line procedure in the management of about 1/3 of patients with classic FUO. It is expected that hybrid imaging (PET/computed tomography [CT]; PET/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]) will improve the diagnostic impact of FDG-PET further, but prospective data about the value of this methods are currently not available. The question as to how these new techniques can be implemented into an evidence based diagnostic algorithm, can only be resolved within a multidisciplinary setting, avoiding both selection- and interstudy-bias whenever possible.