Patient nostril microbial flora: individual-dependency and diversity precluding prediction of Staphylococcus aureus acquisition.

The potential role of a patient's resident microbial flora in the risk of acquiring multiresistant bacteria (MRB) during hospitalization is unclear. We investigated this role by cross-sectional study of 103 patients at risk of acquisition of Staphylococcus aureus (SA), resistant (MRSA) or not (MSSA) to methicillin, recruited in four French hospitals. The flora was analysed by an exhaustive culture-based approach combined with molecular and/or mass-spectrometry-based identification, and SA strain typing. Forty-three of the 53 SA-negative patients at entry were followed for up to 52 weeks: 19 (44.2%) remained negative for SA and 24 (55.8%) became positive, including 19 (79%) who acquired an MSSA, four (17%) who acquired an MRSA and one who acquired both (4%). Fifty-one different species were identified among the 103 patients, of which two, Corynebacterium accolens and Staphylococcus haemolyticus (p = 0.02-0.01), were more prevalent in the absence of SA. However, the same number of patients carrying or not these two species acquired an MSSA/MRSA during follow-up, regardless of antibiotic treatment received. Clustering analysis showed that the microbial flora was highly specific to each patient, and not predictive for acquisition of MSSA/MRSA or not. Patient-specific microbial resident flora is not predictive of SA acquisition.

Novel influenza A(H1N1) outbreak among French armed forces in 2009: results of Military Influenza Surveillance System.

OBJECTIVES: An outbreak of novel A(H1N1) virus influenza, detected in Mexico in April 2009, spread worldwide in 9 weeks. The aim of this paper is to present the monitoring results of this influenza outbreak among French armed forces. STUDY DESIGN: The period of monitoring by the Military Influenza Surveillance System (MISS) was 9 months, from May 2009 to April 2010. METHODS: The main monitored events were acute respiratory infection (ARI), defined by oral temperature ≥38.5 °C and cough, and laboratory-confirmed influenza. Weekly incidence rates were calculated by relating cases to the number of servicepersons monitored. RESULTS: In continental France, the incidence of ARI increased from September 2009, with a weekly maxima of 401 cases per 100,000 in early December 2009 according to MISS. Estimations of the incidence of consultations which could be related to novel A(H1N1) influenza ranged from 48 to 57 cases per 100,000. CONCLUSIONS: The trends observed by MISS are compatible with French national estimations. The incidence of consultations which could be related to A(H1N1) influenza at the peak of the epidemic (194 cases per 100,000) was much lower than the national estimate (1321 cases per 100,000). This may be due to servicepersons who consulted in civilian facilities and were not monitored. Other explanations are the healthy worker effect and the younger age of the military population.

[A(H1N1) influenza surveillance in the French armed forces: adapting the surveillance systems to the pandemic setting]. / Surveillance épidémiologique de la grippe A(H1N1) 2009 dans les armées françaises: adaptation des systèmes de surveillance au contexte pandémique.

OBJECTIVES: An outbreak of A(H1N1) virus influenza, detected in Mexico during April 2009, spread around the world in nine weeks. French armed forces had to adapt their epidemiological surveillance systems to this pandemic. Our aim was to present surveillance results. DESIGN: There are two influenza surveillance systems in French armed forces: one permanent throughout the year and one seasonal, the Military influenza surveillance system (SMOG). The pandemic threat led to an early reactivation of SMOG, before the initiation of a daily surveillance system specifically dedicated to A(H1N1) influenza. RESULTS: In metropolitan France, the increase of respiratory infections was observed as of September 2009, with a maximum of 401 cases for 100,000 at the beginning of December according to SMOG. The estimated rate of consultations related to A(H1N1) influenza ranged between 46 and 65 cases for 100,000. For military units operating outside of metropolitan France, a peak of incidence was observed in August (400 cases for 100,000). CONCLUSION: The trends observed by influenza military surveillance networks were compatible with French ones. Concerning French forces in operations, the increase of incidence observed in August was the consequence of the influenza outbreak in the Southern hemisphere. Estimations of consultations rate related to A(H1N1) influenza, ranged between 127 and 194 cases for 100,000 at the beginning of December, lower than the national rate (1321 cases for 100,000), a consequence of the age pyramid in the military population.