Sleep quality and circadian rhythm profile of persons with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy in a tertiary epilepsy center: A case-control study.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated sleep quality, chronotype, and excessive diurnal somnolence in persons with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME) and their possible association with clinical variables. METHODS: This cross-sectional controlled study evaluated 49 consecutive patients (65% females, mean age 27.53 years) with an electroclinical diagnosis of JME and 49 healthy controls (55% females, mean age 28.55 years). The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI) was used to assess sleep quality and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) to evaluate excessive daytime sleepiness. The patients' chronotype was evaluated by the Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire (MEQ). Epilepsy-related factors gathered from the medical chart and personal interview were epilepsy duration, age at onset, frequency of myoclonic (Mcl), generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) and absence (ABS) seizures, pharmacoresponse, and current antiseizure medication (ASM). RESULTS: Persons with JME did not differ from the control group regarding daytime sleepiness (p=0.840); however, the JME group had worse sleep quality (p=0.01) than the controls. Persons with JME presented a more evening chronotype than controls (p = 0.003). The age at onset, epilepsy duration, frequency of Mcl seizure, frequency of GTC seizure, frequency of ABS seizure, and drug response did not predict ESS and MEQ scales. Pharmacoresponsive patients had lower PSQI scores compared with pharmacoresistant patients (p=0.036). CONCLUSION: Persons with JME have worse sleep quality and a more evening chronotype. Notably, pharmacoresistant patients present a worse sleep quality that deserves attention and special care due to the relationship between sleep deprivation and seizure worsening.

Dissociation between decision making under ambiguity and risk in patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

INTRODUCTION: Decision making (DM) is one aspect of impulsivity that can be defined by the ability to decide between two or more options in a given situation. To date, there are at least two types of DM that differ in the level of uncertainty, and how much information about consequences is provided. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the two domains of DM - under risk and ambiguous - with a comprehensive evaluation in a group of patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), and correlate with patients' characteristics, clinical variables, and neuropsychological evaluation for executive functions. METHODS: We evaluated 35 patients with JME and 39 healthy controls using the Iowa Gambling Task for DM under ambiguity and the Game Dice Task for DM under risk. We assessed the performance in Iowa Gambling Task and Game Dice Task through net scores, safe and risky choices, besides the type of decisions across time. RESULTS: Patients with JME had a higher number of risky choices compared to controls in the Game Dice Task. There was no significant difference between patients and controls in the Iowa Gambling Task. However, patients with higher seizure frequency had worse scores on decks C and D (safe choices) from the Iowa Gambling Task. CONCLUSION: Patients with JME have worse performance on DM under risk. The same was not observed for DM under ambiguity. Epilepsy-related factors and the presence of psychiatric disorders, but not executive dysfunction, were associated with a lower tendency for safe choices. These findings showed a dissociation between DM processes in patients with JME and a tendency to make disadvantageous decisions with measurable risks.

The executive profile of children with Benign Epilepsy of Childhood with Centrotemporal Spikes and Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.

RATIONALE: Benign Epilepsy of Childhood with Centrotemporal Spikes (BECTS) and temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) represent two distinct models of focal epilepsy of childhood. In both, there is evidence of executive dysfunction. The purpose of the present study was to identify particular deficits in the executive function that would distinguish children with BECTS from children with TLE. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 19 consecutive children and adolescents with TLE with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) (57.9% male; mean 11.74years [SD 2.05]; mean IQ 95.21 [SD 15.09]), 19 with BECTS (36.8% male; mean 10.95years [SD 2.33]; mean IQ 107.40 [SD 16.01]), and 21 age and gender-matched controls (33.3% male; mean 11.86years [SD 2.25]; mean IQ 108.67 [15.05]). All participants underwent a neuropsychological assessment with a comprehensive battery for executive and attentional functions. We used ANOVA and chi-square to evaluate differences on demographic aspects among groups (BECTS, TLE-HS, and control groups). Group comparisons on continuous variables were complemented by MANOVA and Bonferroni posthoc comparisons. RESULTS: Patients with BECTS had worse performance than controls in: Matching Familiar Figures Test, time (p=0.001); Matching Familiar Figures Test, time×errors index (p<0.001); Verbal Fluency for foods (p=0.038); Trail Making Test, part B time (p=0.030); Trail Making Test, part B number of errors (p=0.030); and WCST, number of categories achieved (p=0.043). Patients with BECTS had worse performance than patients with TLE-HS on Matching Familiar Figures Test, time (p=0.004), and Matching Familiar Figures Test, time×errors index (p<0.001). Patients with TLE-HS had worse performance than controls on the following tests: Verbal Fluency for foods (p=0.004); Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the number of categories achieved (p<0.001); and Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the number of perseverative errors (p=0.028). Patients with TLE-HS had worse performance than patients with BECTS on Digit Backward (p=0.002); and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, the number of perseverative errors (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with TLE and BECTS present distinct cognitive profiles. Patients with TLE-HS had worse performance in mental flexibility, concept formation, and working memory compared to BECTS. Patients with BECTS had worse inhibitory control compared to children with TLE-HS. Both TLE-HS and BECTS had a higher number of errors on an inhibitory control test. However, patients with BECTS had a slower mental processing even when compared to patients with TLE-HS. Rehabilitation programs for children with epilepsy must include children with benign epilepsies and must take into account the epileptic syndrome and its particular neurocognitive phenotype.