Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Massive Weight Loss: Understanding Risks in a Growing Population.

BACKGROUND: Massive weight loss (MWL) may have suboptimal effects on tissues used for autologous reconstruction. With the rising rates of obesity and bariatric surgery, more patients who have experienced MWL will be presenting for breast reconstruction. The authors hypothesize that autologous breast reconstruction in patients with a history of MWL will have more complications and require more revisions compared with reconstruction in patients without a history of MWL. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent autologous breast reconstruction by five microsurgeons at an academic institution from 2009 through 2020. Patients with a history of bariatric surgery or greater than 50-pound weight loss were identified and compared with patients who had not experienced MWL. Analysis compared demographics, operative details, complications, revision rates, and BREAST-Q scores. RESULTS: Of 916 patients who underwent 1465 flaps, 39 patients with MWL (4.3%) underwent 68 flaps (4.6%), and 877 patients without MWL underwent 1397 flaps. MWL patients were more likely to require blood transfusions postoperatively ( P = 0.005); experienced more surgical-site infections ( P = 0.02), wound-healing complications of flap ( P = 0.007) and donor sites ( P = 0.03), and late partial flap losses ( P = 0.03); and required more revisional surgery for flap ( P = 0.009) and donor sites ( P = 0.01). BREAST-Q scores were not statistically different for satisfaction with breasts or surgeon but were lower in MWL patients for psychosocial ( P = 0.01) and sexual well-being ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Reconstructive surgeons should expect increased postoperative complications when performing autologous breast reconstruction in patients who have experienced MWL. These patients should be counseled on the possibility of an increased risk of postoperative complications and need for revisional surgery. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.

Comparing tissue oximetry to doppler monitoring in 1367 consecutive breast free flaps.

BACKGROUND: Retrospective studies evaluating tissue oximetry in a more recent cohort have shown superiority in flap outcomes. This study compares the use of tissue oximetry in a historical cohort to clinical observation and handheld doppler in a more recent cohort. We hypothesize that there is no benefit to using tissue oximetry. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent abdominal-based autologous breast reconstruction by five microsurgeons at an academic institution from 2009 to 2020. Method of postoperative flap monitoring was determined then operative details and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: 1367 flaps were reviewed; 740 flaps in 460 patients were monitored with clinical observation and tissue oximetry, and 627 flaps in 391 patients were monitored with clinical observation and handheld doppler. There were no statistical differences in ischemic (p = .59) or congestive complications (p = .41), flap salvage rates when exploring for venous or arterial compromise (p = .52), or early flap loss (p = .56). Although not significant, acute flap-related return to the operating room was lower in the doppler group (4.6%) compared to the oximetry group (6.1%; p = .22). Flaps monitored with tissue oximetry had a statistical increase in length of stay (4.8 ± 1.4 days vs. 3.8 ± 1.6 days; p ≤ .001). The rates of late partial flap loss and fat necrosis were significantly higher in the oximetry group (2.6%, 19/740 vs. 0.3%, 2/740; p = .04) and (18.2%, 135/740 vs. 13.6%, 85/627; p = .02), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There is no statistical benefit to the use of tissue oximetry compared to handheld doppler in flap monitoring with regards to flap outcomes.

A Paradigm Shift: Outcomes of Early Autologous Breast Reconstruction after Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Radiation creates significant challenges for breast reconstruction. There is no consensus regarding optimal timing for autologous reconstruction following radiation. This study explores clearly defined, shorter time intervals between completion of radiation and reconstruction than previously reported. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on patients who underwent autologous reconstruction by five microsurgeons at an academic institution from 2009 to 2020. Cohorts were selected by time elapsed between radiation and autologous reconstruction including <3 months, 3 to 6 months, 6 to 9 months, 9 to 12 months, 12 to 24 months, and >24 months. Analysis compared baseline characteristics, operative details, complications, revision rates, and BREAST-Q scores. Analysis of variance was used for continuous variables and chi-square for discrete variables. RESULTS: In total, 462 radiated patients underwent 717 flaps. There were 69 patients at <3 months (14.9%), 97 at 3 to 6 months (21%), 64 at 6 to 9 months (13.9%), 36 at 9 to 12 months (7.8%), 73 at 12 to 24 months (15.8%), and 123 at >24 months (26.6%). Age, time from mastectomy, and failure of primary reconstruction were higher at >24 months (p < 0.001). There was no difference between cohorts in intraoperative complications in radiated or nonradiated breasts. There was no difference in acute and late postoperative complications between cohorts. Wound-healing complications in radiated sides were lowest at <3 months and 3 to 6 months (5/69 [7.3%] and 11/97 [11.3%], respectively) compared with other groups (18.8-22.2%) but did not reach significance (p = 0.11). More fat graft revisions occurred at <3 months (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Reconstruction can be safely performed within 3 months after radiation without increases in intraoperative, acute, or late reconstructive complications.

Closed-Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Prevents Major Abdominal Donor-Site Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Outcomes in autologous breast reconstruction continue to improve with refinements in microsurgical techniques; however, donor-site morbidity remains a concern. Closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) has been shown to reduce wound complications. Limited evaluation in abdominal donor sites has shown promising results. We hypothesize that ciNPT will reduce abdominal donor-site complications. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed of patients who underwent abdominally based autologous free tissue transfer for breast reconstruction by 4 microsurgeons at an academic institution from 2015 to 2020. The application of a commercial ciNPT for donor-site management was at the discretion of the operating surgeon. Demographics, operative details, and management of donor-site complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three patients underwent autologous breast reconstruction; 212 abdominal donor sites were managed with ciNPT and 219 with standard dressings. Demographics were statistically similar between groups. Abdominal wound healing complications were noted in 30.2% of ciNPT patients (64/212) and 22.8% of control patients (50/219, P = 0.08); however, overall wound complications were attributed to obesity on multivariable analysis. Closed-incision negative pressure therapy significantly decreased complications requiring reoperation (ciNPT 6.2%, 4/64; control 26.5%, 13/51; P = 0.004). There were no significant differences in surgical site infection rates (P = 0.73) and rates of abdominal scar revisions (ciNPT 11.8%, 25/212; control 9.1%, 20/219; P = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Use of ciNPT in abdominal donor-site management significantly decreases the incidence of delayed wound healing requiring surgical intervention, with one major wound healing complication prevented for every 6 donor sites managed with ciNPT.