A Novel Digital Health Platform With Health Coaches to Optimize Surgical Patients: Feasibility Study at a Large Academic Health System.

BACKGROUND: Pip is a novel digital health platform (DHP) that combines human health coaches (HCs) and technology with patient-facing content. This combination has not been studied in perioperative surgical optimization. OBJECTIVE: This study's aim was to test the feasibility of the Pip platform for deploying perioperative, digital, patient-facing optimization guidelines to elective surgical patients, assisted by an HC, at predefined intervals in the perioperative journey. METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved, descriptive, prospective feasibility study of patients scheduled for elective surgery and invited to enroll in Pip from 2.5 to 4 weeks preoperatively through 4 weeks postoperatively at an academic medical center between November 22, 2022, and March 27, 2023. Descriptive primary end points were patient-reported outcomes, including patient satisfaction and engagement, and Pip HC evaluations. Secondary end points included mean or median length of stay (LOS), readmission at 7 and 30 days, and emergency department use within 30 days. Secondary end points were compared between patients who received Pip versus patients who did not receive Pip using stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: A total of 283 patients were invited, of whom 172 (60.8%) enrolled in Pip. Of these, 80.2% (138/172) patients had ≥1 HC session and proceeded to surgery, and 70.3% (97/138) of the enrolled patients engaged with Pip postoperatively. The mean engagement began 27 days before surgery. Pip demonstrated an 82% weekly engagement rate with HCs. Patients attended an average of 6.7 HC sessions. Of those patients that completed surveys (95/138, 68.8%), high satisfaction scores were recorded (mean 4.8/5; n=95). Patients strongly agreed that HCs helped them throughout the perioperative process (mean 4.97/5; n=33). The average net promoter score was 9.7 out of 10. A total of 268 patients in the non-Pip group and 128 patients in the Pip group had appropriate overlapping distributions of stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting for the analytic sample. The Pip cohort was associated with LOS reduction when compared to the non-Pip cohort (mean 2.4 vs 3.1 days; median 1.9, IQR 1.0-3.1 vs median 3.0, IQR 1.1-3.9 days; mean ratio 0.76; 95% CI 0.62-0.93; P=.009). The Pip cohort experienced a 49% lower risk of 7-day readmission (relative risk [RR] 0.51, 95% CI 0.11-2.31; P=.38) and a 17% lower risk of 30-day readmission (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.30-2.31; P=.73), though these did not reach statistical significance. Both cohorts had similar 30-day emergency department returns (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.56-2.01, P=.85). CONCLUSIONS: Pip is a novel mobile DHP combining human HCs and perioperative optimization content that is feasible to engage patients in their perioperative journey and is associated with reduced hospital LOS. Further studies assessing the impact on clinical and patient-reported outcomes from the use of Pip or similar DHPs HC combinations during the perioperative journey are required.

Neutralizing antibodies to interferon alfa arising during peginterferon therapy of chronic hepatitis B in children and adults: Results from the HBRN trials.

BACKGROUND: Peginterferon-α (PegIFNα) is of limited utility during immunotolerant (IT) or immune active (IA) phases of chronic hepatitis B infection but is being explored as part of new cure regimens. Low/absent levels of IFNα found in some treated patients are associated with limited/no virological responses. AIM: To determine if sera from participants inhibit IFNα activity and/or contain therapy-induced anti-IFNα antibodies. METHODS: Pre-, on- and post-treatment sera from 61 IT trial participants on PegIFNα/ entecavir therapy and 88 IA trial participants on PegIFNα/tenofovir therapy were screened for anti-IFNα antibodies by indirect ELISA. The neutralization capacity of antibodies was measured by pre-incubation of sera +/- recombinant-human IFNα (rhIFNα) added to Huh7 cells with measurement of interferon stimulated gene (ISG)-induction by qPCR. Correlations between serum-induced ISG inhibition, presence, and titer of anti-IFNα antibodies and virological responses were evaluated. RESULTS: Pre-incubation of on-treatment serum from 26 IT (43%) and 13 IA (15%) participants with rhIFNα markedly blunted ISG-induction in Huh7 cells. Degree of ISG-inhibition correlated with IFNα antibody titer (p<0.0001; r=0.87). On-treatment development of anti-IFNα neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) was associated with reduced qHBsAg and qHBeAg declines (p<0.05) and inhibited IFNα bioactivity to 240 weeks after PegIFNα cessation. Children developed anti-IFNα nAbs more frequently than adults (p=0.004) but nAbs in children had less impact on virological responses. CONCLUSIONS: The development of anti-IFNα nAbs during PegIFNα treatment diminishes responses to antiviral therapy. Understanding how and why anti-IFNα antibodies develop may allow for optimization of IFN-based therapy, which is critical given its renewed use in HBV-cure strategies.

COVID-19 pandemic's relationship with enrollment at US Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to characterize the COVID-19 pandemic's relationship with enrollment in US Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers (ADRCs). METHODS: Using data on 10,105 participants from 30 ADRCs, we conducted interrupted time series analyses to assess the relationship of the pandemic with enrollment and calculate projected dates of enrollment recovery. RESULTS: Participants enrolled during the pandemic (vs pre-pandemic) were more likely to have dementia and be referred by health professionals. The pandemic was associated with a 77% drop in enrollment, with projected trend recovery in March 2024 and 100% recovery in September 2024. COVID was associated with a 91% drop in Black/African American participants, compared to 71% in White participants. Enrollment of both Hispanic and female participants was declining 1.4% and 0.3%/month pre-pandemic. DISCUSSION: Funders and researchers should account for ongoing COVID-19 impact on ADRD research enrollment. Strategies to speed enrollment recovery are needed, especially for Black/African American and Hispanic groups. HIGHLIGHTS: Tested COVID pandemic association with enrollment at Alzheimer's Disease Research Centers. During versus pre-pandemic enrollees differed on demographic and clinical variables. Interrupted time series analyses: immediate 77% drop in enrollment related to COVID. Recovery projections: trend recovery in March 2024, 100% recovery in September 2024. Enrollment of African American and Hispanic participants should be prioritized.

Role of the NeuroCuple™ Device for the Postoperative Pain Management of Patients Undergoing Unilateral Primary Total Knee and Hip Arthroplasty: A Pilot Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study.

BACKGROUND: The potential effectiveness of the non-pharmacological and nanotechnology-based NeuroCuple™ device in reducing postoperative surgical pain and opioid consumption remains unknown. METHODS: This randomized controlled open-label study was conducted in patients undergoing a primary unilateral total knee or total hip arthroplasty. In the recovery room, patients were randomized to receive either standard of care (control group) or standard of care plus two NeuroCuple™ devices. The outcome variables included pain and opioid consumption (oral morphine equivalent, OME in milligrams). RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were randomized to either the NeuroCuple™ group (n = 38) or the control group (n = 31). Use of the NeuroCuple™ devices was associated with a significant 34% reduction in pain at rest (means of area under the curve: 6.3 vs. 9.5; p = 0.018) during postoperative days 1-3. Opioid consumption was reduced by 9%. More importantly, use of the NeuroCuple™ devices reduced the number of patients requesting an opioid prescription following discharge from the hospital by 52% (26% vs. 55%, p = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that the NeuroCuple™ device may be an effective non-pharmacological alternative to opioids to manage postoperative pain following unilateral arthroplasty due to its ability to reduce postoperative opioid use.