Synthetic abnormal mast cell particles successfully mimic neoplastic mast cells by flow cytometry.

Clinical flow cytometry laboratories require quality control materials for assay development, validation, and performance monitoring, including new reagent lot qualification. However, finding suitable controls for populations with uncommonly expressed antigens or for rare populations, such as mast cells, can be difficult. To that end, we evaluated synthetic abnormal mast cell particles (SAMCP), developed together with, and manufactured by, Slingshot Biosciences. The SAMCP's were designed to phenotypically mimic abnormal neoplastic mast cells: they were customized to have the same light scatter and autofluorescence properties of mast cells, along with surface antigen levels of CD45, CD33, CD117, CD2, CD25, and CD30 consistent with that seen in mast cell disease. We evaluated several performance characteristics of these particles using ARUP's high sensitivity clinical mast cell assay, including limit of detection, off-target activity and FMO controls, precision, scatter properties of the particles utilizing several different cytometer platforms, and particle antigen stability. The phenotype of the SAMCP mimicked abnormal mast cells, and they could be distinguished from normal native mast cells. FMO controls demonstrated specificity of each of the markers, and no off-target binding was detected. The limit of detection of the particles spiked into normal bone marrow was found to be ≤0.003% in a limiting dilution assay. The mast cell particles were found to perform similarly on Becton Dickinson Lyric, Cytek Aurora, and Beckman Coulter Navios and CytoFLEX platforms. Within run and between run precision were less than 10% CV. SAMCP were stable up to 13 days with minimal loss of antigen fluorescence intensity. The SAMCP's were able to successfully mimic neoplastic mast cells based on the results of our high sensitivity mast cell flow cytometry panel. These synthetic cell particles represent an exciting and innovative technology, which can fulfill vital needs in clinical flow cytometry such as serving as standardized control materials for assay development and performance monitoring.

Rates of severe neutropenia and infection risk in patients treated with deferiprone: 28 years of data.

Patients treated with deferiprone for transfusional iron overload may experience idiosyncratic drug-induced neutropenia (IDIN) that may put them at risk of infection. The purpose of this analysis was to examine the rates of severe IDIN and risk of serious infections at different ANC levels in patients treated with deferiprone. Events of severe IDIN (ANC <0.5×109/L) and associated serious infections from clinical trials and postmarketing setting were analyzed by 3 discrete ANC levels: Group 1, 0.2-0.5×109/L; Group 2, 0.1-0.199×109/L; Group 3, <0.1×109/L. In clinical trials, 22 events of severe IDIN were observed (Group 1, n=9; Group 2, n=3; Group 3, n=10); total deferiprone exposure was 1990.26 patient-years; and rates of severe IDIN per 100 patient-years were 0.45 in Group 1, 0.15 in Group 2, and 0.50 in Group 3. All serious infections were in Group 3 (3/10, 30.0%). In the postmarketing setting, 176 events of severe IDIN were reported (Group 1, n=65; Group 2, n=20; Group 3, n=91); total deferiprone exposure was 111,570.24 patient-years; and rates of severe IDIN per 100 patient-years were 0.06 in Group 1, 0.02 in Group 2, and 0.08 in Group 3. Rates of serious infection were 7.7% (n=5/65) in Group 1, 10% (n=2/20) in Group 2, and 13.2% (n=12/91) in Group 3. Our findings suggest that in patients receiving deferiprone, ANC below 0.2×109/L carries a high risk of serious infections, consistent with the recent neutropenia guidelines that agranulocytosis with ANC <0.2×109/L is associated with a high risk of serious infections.

Modeling relaxed policies for discontinuation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus contact precautions.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the economic costs of reducing the University of Virginia Hospital's present "3-negative" policy, which continues methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) contact precautions until patients receive 3 consecutive negative test results, to either 2 or 1 negative. DESIGN: Cost-effective analysis. SETTINGS: The University of Virginia Hospital. PATIENTS: The study included data from 41,216 patients from 2015 to 2019. METHODS: We developed a model for MRSA transmission in the University of Virginia Hospital, accounting for both environmental contamination and interactions between patients and providers, which were derived from electronic health record (EHR) data. The model was fit to MRSA incidence over the study period under the current 3-negative clearance policy. A counterfactual simulation was used to estimate outcomes and costs for 2- and 1-negative policies compared with the current 3-negative policy. RESULTS: Our findings suggest that 2-negative and 1-negative policies would have led to 6 (95% CI, -30 to 44; P < .001) and 17 (95% CI, -23 to 59; -10.1% to 25.8%; P < .001) more MRSA cases, respectively, at the hospital over the study period. Overall, the 1-negative policy has statistically significantly lower costs ($628,452; 95% CI, $513,592-$752,148) annually (P < .001) in US dollars, inflation-adjusted for 2023) than the 2-negative policy ($687,946; 95% CI, $562,522-$812,662) and 3-negative ($702,823; 95% CI, $577,277-$846,605). CONCLUSIONS: A single negative MRSA nares PCR test may provide sufficient evidence to discontinue MRSA contact precautions, and it may be the most cost-effective option.

Reduced Monocyte Proportions and Responsiveness in Convalescent COVID-19 Patients.

The clinical manifestations of acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and COVID-19 suggest a dysregulation of the host immune response that leads to inflammation, thrombosis, and organ dysfunction. It is less clear whether these dysregulated processes persist during the convalescent phase of disease or during long COVID. We investigated the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the proportions of classical, intermediate, and non-classical monocytes, their activation status, and their functional properties in convalescent COVID-19 patients and uninfected control subjects. We found that the percentage of total monocytes was decreased in convalescent COVID-19 patients compared to uninfected controls. This was due to decreased intermediate and non-classical monocytes. Classical monocytes from convalescent COVID-19 patients demonstrated a decrease in activation markers, such as CD56, in response to stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In addition, classical monocytes from convalescent COVID-19 patients showed decreased expression of CD142 (tissue factor), which can initiate the extrinsic coagulation cascade, in response to LPS stimulation. Finally, we found that monocytes from convalescent COVID-19 patients produced less TNF-α and IL-6 in response to LPS stimulation, than those from uninfected controls. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibits a clear effect on the relative proportions of monocyte subsets, the activation status of classical monocytes, and proinflammatory cytokine production that persists during the convalescent phase of disease.

Automation in flow cytometry: Guidelines and review of systems.

Automation in flow cytometry has recently advanced from the partial laboratory automation and robotics islets, to more fully integrated systems. This article reviews three manufacturers' newest sample preparation systems: the Beckman CellMek, the Sysmex PS-10, and the BD FACSDuet. These three instruments are capable of performing many of the manual steps in flow cytometry sample processing (pipetting, staining, lysing, washing, fixing). General description, capabilities, advantages, and disadvantages of each system are compared. Overall, these systems have the potential to become mainstay items in today's busy clinical flow cytometry laboratories, and save a significant amount of hands-on time for laboratory staff.

Reduced monocyte proportions and responsiveness in convalescent COVID-19 patients.

Introduction: The clinical manifestations of acute severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) suggest a dysregulation of the host immune response that leads to inflammation, thrombosis, and organ dysfunction. It is less clear whether these dysregulated processes persist during the convalescent phase of disease or during long COVID. We sought to examine the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the proportions of classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocytes, their activation status, and their functional properties in convalescent COVID-19 patients. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from convalescent COVID-19 patients and uninfected controls were analyzed by multiparameter flow cytometry to determine relative percentages of total monocytes and monocyte subsets. The expression of activation markers and proinflammatory cytokines in response to LPS treatment were measured by flow cytometry and ELISA, respectively. Results: We found that the percentage of total monocytes was decreased in convalescent COVID-19 patients compared to uninfected controls. This was due to decreased intermediate and non-classical monocytes. Classical monocytes from convalescent COVID-19 patients demonstrated a decrease in activation markers, such as CD56, in response to stimulation with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In addition, classical monocytes from convalescent COVID-19 patients showed decreased expression of CD142 (tissue factor), which can initiate the extrinsic coagulation cascade, in response to LPS stimulation. Finally, we found that monocytes from convalescent COVID-19 patients produced less TNF-α and IL-6 in response to LPS stimulation, than those from uninfected controls. Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 infection exhibits a clear effect on the relative proportions of monocyte subsets, the activation status of classical monocytes, and proinflammatory cytokine production that persists during the convalescent phase of disease.

Alterations of Cytoskeleton Networks in Cell Fate Determination and Cancer Development.

Cytoskeleton proteins have been long recognized as structural proteins that provide the necessary mechanical architecture for cell development and tissue homeostasis. With the completion of the cancer genome project, scientists were surprised to learn that huge numbers of mutated genes are annotated as cytoskeletal or associated proteins. Although most of these mutations are considered as passenger mutations during cancer development and evolution, some genes show high mutation rates that can even determine clinical outcomes. In addition, (phospho)proteomics study confirms that many cytoskeleton-associated proteins, e.g., ß-catenin, PIK3CA, and MB21D2, are important signaling mediators, further suggesting their biofunctional roles in cancer development. With emerging evidence to indicate the involvement of mechanotransduction in stemness formation and cell differentiation, mutations in these key cytoskeleton components may change the physical/mechanical properties of the cells and determine the cell fate during cancer development. In particular, tumor microenvironment remodeling triggered by such alterations has been known to play important roles in autophagy, metabolism, cancer dormancy, and immune evasion. In this review paper, we will highlight the current understanding of how aberrant cytoskeleton networks affect cancer behaviors and cellular functions through mechanotransduction.

Mediating EGFR-TKI Resistance by VEGF/VEGFR Autocrine Pathway in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

NSCLC treatment includes targeting of EGFR with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as Erlotinib; however, resistance to TKIs is commonly acquired through T790M EGFR mutations or overexpression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2). We investigated the mechanisms of EGFR-TKI resistance in NSCLC cell lines with EGFR mutations or acquired resistance to Erlotinib. These studies showed upregulated gene and protein expression of VEGF, VEGFR-2, and a VEGF co-receptor neuropilin-1 (NP-1) in Erlotinib-resistant (1.4-5.3-fold) and EGFR double-mutant (L858R and T790M; 4.1-8.3-fold) NSCLC cells compared to parental and EGFR single-mutant (L858R) NSCLC cell lines, respectively. Immunofluorescence and FACS analysis revealed increased expression of VEGFR-2 and NP-1 in EGFR-TKI-resistant cell lines compared to TKI-sensitive cell lines. Cell proliferation assays showed that treatment with a VEGFR-2 inhibitor combined with Erlotinib lowered cell survival in EGFR double-mutant NSCLC cells to 9% compared to 72% after treatment with Erlotinib alone. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed shorter median survival in late-stage NSCLC patients with high vs. low VEGFR-2 expression (14 mos vs. 21 mos). The results indicate that VEGFR-2 may play a key role in EGFR-TKI resistance and that combined treatment of Erlotinib with a VEGFR-2 inhibitor may serve as an effective therapy in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations.

Surgical Infection Society: Chest Wall Injury Society Recommendations for Antibiotic Use during Surgical Stabilization of Traumatic Rib or Sternal Fractures to Reduce Risk of Implant Infection.

Background: Surgical stabilization of rib fractures is recommended in patients with flail chest or multiple displaced rib fractures with physiologic compromise. Surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRF) and surgical stabilization of sternal fractures (SSSF) involve open reduction and internal fixation of fractures with a plate construct to restore anatomic alignment. Most plate constructs are composed of titanium and presence of this foreign, non-absorbable material presents opportunity for implant infection. Although implant infection rates after SSRF and SSSF are low, they present a challenging clinical entity often requiring prolonged antibiotic therapy, debridement, and potentially implant removal. Methods: The Surgical Infection Society's Therapeutics and Guidelines Committee and Chest Wall Injury Society's Publication Committee convened to develop recommendations for antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib and sternal fractures. Clinical scenarios included patients with concomitant infectious processes (sepsis, pneumonia, empyema, cellulitis) or sources of contamination (open chest, gross contamination) incurred as a result of their trauma and present at the time of their surgical stabilization. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for pertinent studies. Using a process of iterative consensus, all committee members voted to accept or reject each recommendation. Results: For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the absence of pre-existing infectious process, there is insufficient evidence to suggest existing peri-operative guidelines or recommendations are inadequate. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF in the presence of sepsis, pneumonia, or an empyema, there is insufficient evidence to provide recommendations on duration and choice of antibiotic. This decision may be informed by existing guidelines for the concomitant infection. For patients undergoing SSRF or SSSF with an open or contaminated chest there is insufficient evidence to provide specific antibiotic recommendations. Conclusions: This guideline document summarizes the current Surgical Infection Society and Chest Wall Injury Society recommendations regarding antibiotic use during and after surgical stabilization of traumatic rib or sternal fractures. Limited evidence exists in the chest wall surgical stabilization literature and further studies should be performed to delineate risk of implant infection among patients undergoing SSSRF or SSSF with concomitant infectious processes.

Comparison of Next-Generation Assays for Fecal Calprotectin vs the PhiCal Assay.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the PhiCal assay (CALPRO), the first US Food and Drug Administration-approved assay for fecal calprotectin, to 4 next-generation assays. METHODS: Stool samples from 50 patients were selected, and relevant clinical information was collected. Comparisons were performed using the PhiCal, fCAL turbo (BÜHLMANN), LIAISON Calprotectin (DiaSorin), QUANTA Lite Calprotectin ELISA (Inova Diagnostics), and Calprotectin Chemiluminescence ELISA (ALPCO) assays. RESULTS: All 4 assays had acceptable agreement with PhiCal when qualitatively categorizing results. Within the PhiCal reportable range of 16 to 1,250 µg/g, the DiaSorin, Inova Diagnostics, and ALPCO assays had Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.98, 0.97, and 0.95 and positive biases of 17%, 20%, and 15%, respectively. The BÜHLMANN assay ran approximately 2-fold higher than the PhiCal assay but had a correlation coefficient of 0.98, with similar result categorization. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate good comparison between PhiCal and 4 next-generation assays. Laboratories performing fecal calprotectin assays may have compelling reasons to adopt next-generation fecal calprotectin testing, such as greater automation, a decreased number of replicates needed per test, and the use of stool-extraction devices. These benefits could decrease turnaround times and lower costs. Although the results of the assays correlated, they are not standardized. Laboratories adopting the newer assays will need to further investigate their performance through validation studies.

Clinical and Analytical Verification of an Automated Fecal Calprotectin Immunoassay with Extraction Device.

BACKGROUND: Fecal calprotectin (FC) is a screening test for intestinal inflammation, and often used by clinicians to help identify and monitor patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Improvements in FC assays include moving to more automated immunoassays compared to ELISAs and simple-to-use extraction devices compared to manual weighing for the extraction process. METHODS: A method comparison was performed between the PhiCal ELISA and LIAISON immunoassay for 53 stool samples, and the screening results were compared to the gold standard endoscopy with biopsy results. Clinical accuracy was assessed by comparing the FC results from each assay to the presence or absence of inflammation determined from the biopsy report. The performance of the extraction device was compared to manually weighing. Additional studies were completed to verify the manufacturer's claims. RESULTS: The FC results were compared to the biopsy results for detecting inflammation. PhiCal ELISA had a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 100%, while the LIAISON immunoassay had a sensitivity of 97% with specificity of 94%. Therefore, the LIAISON immunoassay performed better than the PhiCal ELISA. The extraction device performed well compared to manual weighing if stool samples were <800 µg/g, within Bristol stool types 2-6, and did not contain a significant amount of undigested material, fibrous material, or mucus. CONCLUSION: The LIAISON immunoassay with extraction device has acceptable performance for clinical use in measuring fecal calprotectin.

EGFR/c-Met and mTOR signaling are predictors of survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: EGFR/c-Met activation/amplification and co-expression, mTOR upregulation/activation, and Akt/Wnt signaling upregulation have been individually associated with more aggressive disease and characterized as potential prognostic markers for lung cancer patients. METHODS: Tumors obtained from 109 participants with stage I-IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were studied for EGFR/c-Met co-localization as well as for total and active forms of EGFR, c-Met, mTOR, S6K, beta-catenin, and Axin2. Slides were graded by two independent blinded pathologists using a validated scoring system. Protein expression profile correlations were assessed using Pearson correlation and Spearman's rho. Prognosis was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Protein expression profile analysis revealed significant correlations between EGFR/p-EGFR (p = 0.0412) and p-mTOR/S6K (p = 0.0044). Co-localization of p-EGFR/p-c-Met was associated with increased p-mTOR (p = 0.0006), S6K (p = 0.0018), and p-S6K (p < 0.0001) expression. In contrast, active beta-catenin was not positively correlated with EGFR/c-Met nor any activated proteins. Axin2, a negative regulator of the Wnt pathway, was correlated with EGFR, p-EGFR, p-mTOR, p-S6K, EGFR/c-Met co-localization, and p-EGFR/p-c-Met co-localization (all p-values <0.03). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed shorter median survival in participants with high expression of Axin2, total beta-catenin, total/p-S6K, total/p-mTOR, EGFR, and EGFR/c-Met co-localization compared with low expression. After controlling for stage of disease at diagnosis, subjects with late-stage disease demonstrated shorter median survival when exhibiting high co-expression of EGFR/c-Met (8.1 month versus 22.3 month, p = 0.050), mTOR (6.7 month versus 22.3 month, p = 0.002), and p-mTOR (8.1 month versus 25.4 month, p = 0.004) compared with low levels. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that increased EGFR/c-Met signaling is correlated with upregulated mTOR/S6K signaling, which may in turn be associated with shorter median survival in late-stage NSCLC.

No QTc Prolongation With Zanubrutinib: Results of Concentration-QTc Analysis From a Thorough QT Study in Healthy Subjects.

This thorough QT (TQT) study evaluated the effect of zanubrutinib on electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters by using concentration-QTc (C-QTc) analysis as the primary analysis for this study. Part A of the study determined the safety and tolerability of a single supratherapeutic dose of zanubrutinib (480 mg) in healthy volunteers. Part B was a randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled and positive-controlled, four-way crossover, TQT study of single therapeutic (160 mg) and supratherapeutic (480 mg) doses of zanubrutinib, placebo, and open-label moxifloxacin 400 mg. Thirty-two participants received at least 1 dose of zanubrutinib, and 26 participants completed all 4 periods. Zanubrutinib did not have any effect on heart rate or cardiac conduction (pulse rate, QRS interval, or T-wave morphology) and was generally well-tolerated. Using C-QTc analysis, the predicted placebo-corrected change-from-baseline QT interval using Fridericia's formula (ΔΔQTcF) was -3.4 msec (90% confidence interval: -4.9 to -1.9 msec) at peak concentrations of the 480 mg dose. A QT effect (ΔΔQTcF) exceeding 10 msec could be excluded within the observed concentration range at 160 and 480 mg doses. Assay sensitivity was established by moxifloxacin with 90% lower bound exceeding 5 msec. Implementing a C-QTc analysis prospectively in this TQT study resulted in a substantially smaller sample size to maintain a similar study power as shown in the traditional time-point analysis. A single 160-mg or 480-mg zanubrutinib dose did not prolong the QTc interval or have any other clinically relevant effects on ECG parameters.

A Novel Cell-Penetrating Antibody Fragment Inhibits the DNA Repair Protein RAD51.

DNA damaging chemotherapies are successful in cancer therapy, however, the damage can be reversed by DNA repair mechanisms that may be up-regulated in cancer cells. We hypothesized that inhibiting RAD51, a protein involved in homologous recombination DNA repair, would block DNA repair and restore the effectiveness of DNA damaging chemotherapy. We used phage-display to generate a novel synthetic antibody fragment that bound human RAD51 with high affinity (KD = 8.1 nM) and inhibited RAD51 ssDNA binding in vitro. As RAD51 is an intracellular target, we created a corresponding intrabody fragment that caused a strong growth inhibitory phenotype on human cells in culture. We then used a novel cell-penetrating peptide "iPTD" fusion to generate a therapeutically relevant antibody fragment that effectively entered living cells and enhanced the cell-killing effect of a DNA alkylating agent. The iPTD may be similarly useful as a cell-penetrating peptide for other antibody fragments and open the door to numerous intracellular targets previously off-limits in living cells.

American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2018 Focused Update of Breast Cancer HER2 FISH Testing GuidelinesResults From a National Reference Laboratory.

OBJECTIVES: To review impact of the ASCO/CAP 2018 update on HER2 testing. METHODS: HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) test requests from primary and metastatic breast cancers between August 2018 and January 2019 were included. FISH results requiring a changed algorithm under the new guidelines (groups 2, 3, and 4) were identified and HER2:CEN17 ratios, average HER2, CEN17 signals/cell, and HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) results were recorded. RESULTS: Of the HER2 FISH cases 176/812(21.7%) fell within groups 2, 3, or 4; 0/12, 1/12, and 2/152 cases were positive (3+) by IHC, and 1/12, 2/12, and 6/152 cases were positive after targeted scoring from groups 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Following 2018 updates, 8.3%, 25%, and 5.3% of the groups 2, 3, and 4 were positive, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Groups 2, 3, and 4 constituted over 20% of HER2 FISH tests in a reference laboratory. The 2018 ASCO/CAP update significantly decreased the HER2 positivity rate.

Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features.

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines classified breast cancers with a fluorescence in situ hybridization dual-probe HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater as "amplified," inclusive of cases with a HER2 copy number less than 4. The 2018 ASCO/CAP update assigns HER2/neu status for the latter group in a fashion that is highly dependent on the associated immunohistochemical findings. Herein, the authors define the frequency, immunohistochemical correlates, and other clinicopathological features of breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater and HER2/neu copy number less than 4 (group A), based on an analysis of an institutional cohort assessed for HER2/neu status by both florescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry and scored using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. Group A cases were compared with a group B of HER2/neu-amplified breast cancers with a HER2/neu copy number of 4 or greater regarding a variety of clinicopathological features. One hundred sixty-nine (14%) of 1201 cases were HER2/neu amplified, 18 (10.7%) in group A and 151 (89.3%) in group B. By immunohistochemistry, 61.1% of group A cases were HER2/neu negative, 7 (38.9%) were equivocal, and none were positive. In contrast, 66.9% of group B cases were HER2 positive (3+). We could not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding standard clinicopathological variables. In summary, our group A cases account for 1.5% of breast cancers, and 10.7% of all HER2/neu-amplified cancers classified as such based on 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. They are predominantly HER2/neu negative by immunohistochemistry, which suggests that they are biologically different from classically HER2/neu-amplified cases and which validates the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline against automatically classifying such cases as HER2/neu amplified.

Current Molecular-Targeted Therapies in NSCLC and Their Mechanism of Resistance.

Lung cancer is treated with many conventional therapies, such as surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. However, these therapies have multiple undesirable side effects. To bypass the side effects elicited by these conventional treatments, molecularly-targeted therapies are currently in use or under development. Current molecularly-targeted therapies effectively target specific biomarkers, which are commonly overexpressed in lung cancers and can cause increased tumorigenicity. Unfortunately, several molecularly-targeted therapies are associated with initial dramatic responses followed by acquired resistance due to spontaneous mutations or activation of signaling pathways. Acquired resistance to molecularly targeted therapies presents a major clinical challenge in the treatment of lung cancer. Therefore, to address this clinical challenge and to improve lung cancer patient prognosis, we need to understand the mechanism of acquired resistance to current therapies and develop additional novel therapies. This review concentrates on various lung cancer biomarkers, including EGFR, ALK, and BRAF, as well as their potential mechanisms of drug resistance.