Selective stabilization of the intermediate inactivated Na+ channel by the new-generation anticonvulsant rufinamide.

Na+ channels undergo multiple inactivated states with different kinetics, which set the refractory period of neuronal discharges, but isolating the intermediate inactivated state has been challenging. Most classical Na+channel-inhibiting anticonvulsants bind to the fast inactivated state to reduce Na+currents and cellular excitability. These anticonvulsants have the slow binding kinetics and thus necessitate long depolarization for drug action, a "use-dependent" effect sparing most normal activities. Rufinamide is a new anticonvulsant targeting Na+channels, and has a therapeutic effect on Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) which is refractory to classicalNa+channel inhibitors. The efficacy on LGS, whose epileptiform discharges largely involve short depolarization or bursts, is primarily due to the very fast binding kinetics of rufinamide. Could the very fast kinetics of rufinamide lead to indiscriminate inhibition of neuronal activities ? Onhippocampal neurons from male and female mice, wefound that rufinamide most effectively shifts the Na+channel inactivation curve if the inactivating pulse is 1 s, rather than 0.1 or 18 s, in duration. Rufinamide also shows a maximal slowing effect on the recovery kinetics from the inactivation driven by modest depolarization (e.g. -60 mV) of intermediate length (e.g. 50-300 ms). Consistently, rufinamide selectively inhibits the burst discharges at 50-300 ms on a plateau of ∼-60 mV. This is mechanistically ascribable to selective binding of rufinamide to an intermediate inactivated state withan apparent dissociation constantof ∼40 µM. Being the first molecule embodying the evasive transitional gating state, rufinamide could have a unique anti-seizure profile with a novel form of use-dependent action.

How Can an Na+ Channel Inhibitor Ameliorate Seizures in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome?

OBJECTIVE: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is an epileptic encephalopathy frequently associated with multiple types of seizures. The classical Na+ channel inhibitors are in general ineffective against the seizures in LGS. Rufinamide is a new Na+ channel inhibitor, but approved for the treatment of LGS. This is not consistent with a choice of antiseizure drugs (ASDs) according to simplistic categorical grouping. METHODS: The effect of rufinamide on the Na+ channel, cellular discharges, and seizure behaviors was quantitatively characterized in native neurons and mammalian models of epilepsy, and compared with the other Na+ channel inhibitors. RESULTS: With a much faster binding rate to the inactivated Na+ channel than phenytoin, rufinamide is distinctively effective if the seizure discharges chiefly involve short bursts interspersed with hyperpolarized interburst intervals, exemplified by spike and wave discharges (SWDs) on electroencephalograms. Consistently, rufinamide, but not phenytoin, suppresses SWD-associated seizures in pentylenetetrazol or AY-9944 models, which recapitulate the major electrophysiological and behavioral manifestations in typical and atypical absence seizures, including LGS. INTERPRETATION: Na+ channel inhibitors shall have sufficiently fast binding to exert an action during the short bursts and then suppress SWDs, in which cases rufinamide is superior. For the epileptiform discharges where the interburst intervals are not so hyperpolarized, phenytoin could be better because of the higher affinity. Na+ channel inhibitors with different binding kinetics and affinity to the inactivated channels may have different antiseizure scope. A rational choice of ASDs according to in-depth molecular pharmacology and the attributes of ictal discharges is advisable. ANN NEUROL 2021;89:1099-1113.