Methods for anti-factor VIII antibody levels in haemophilia A patients - validation of a multiplex immunoassay and comparability with assays measuring non-neutralising and neutralising antibodies (inhibitors).

INTRODUCTION: The development of neutralising (inhibitors) and non-neutralising antibodies (NNAs) is a complication to factor replacement therapy in haemophilia. The diagnostic methods available lack standardisation, have high inter-laboratory variation, and false-negative as well as false-positive results may affect treatment. Both functional inhibitors and NNAs may be detected with higher reproducibility, sensitivity and specificity using the immunological Luminex xMAP-based fluorescence-immunoassay (xFLI). AIM: Validation of our xFLI and comparability with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and chromogenic Nijmegen-Bethesda assay (CBA) for anti-FVIII antibodies in haemophilia A (HA) patients. METHODS: The xFLI method was developed with full-length and B-domain deleted factor coupled to magnetic beads, optimised and validated for performance characteristics. Comparability with ELISA and CBA was evaluated in HA patient samples (n = 112), serial samples in six inhibitor patients and reference interval and decision-limits in healthy donors (n = 44). RESULTS: The intra- and inter-assay precision (CV%) for the xFLI method was below 6% and detection limit (LLOQ) .084 ng/mL (NovoEight). All ELISA-positive samples were positive with either Advate or NovoEight. Additionally, 10.7%-14.3% were xFLI-positive and ELISA-negative. All but one CBA-positive sample was above 3SD with xFLI; one was between 2 and 3SD. 29.1% were xFLI-positive and CBA negative. The overall concordance between xFLI and ELISA was 82.1% and xFLI and CBA 77.9%. CONCLUSION: The anti-FVIII antibody xFLI method is adaptable to clinical practice and more sensitive and reproducible than ELISA and CBA. Actual NNA titers are determined to both full-length and B-domain deleted FVIII. The xFLI is thus valuable for confirmation of all anti-FVIII antibodies.

Validation of factor VIII activity for monitoring standard and extended half-life products and correlation to thrombin generation assays.

INTRODUCTION: Monitoring replacement therapy with standard and extended half-life (EHL) products is challenging, since one-stage assay (OSA) and chromogenic substrate assay (CSA) results may differ significantly. Recent recommendations include local validation of each new product with recovery within 20-30%, depending on activity level. AIM: To validate factor VIII (FVIII) activity for monitoring products in clinical use on Atellica Coag and to correlate it with thrombin generation. METHODS: Plasma samples spiked with Advate® , Elocta® , Adynovi® , Nuwiq® , NovoEight® and Afstyla® (0.05, 0.20, 0.50 and 0.80 IU/ml) were analysed using Atellica Coag 360 with CSA-1 (Coatest SP) and CSA-2 (FVIII chromogenic), and OSA (Actin FS). Thrombin generation was performed using two thrombin generation assays (TGA-1 (Thrombinoscope) and TGA-2 (Technothrombin). RESULTS: All products at levels above 0.05 IU/ml, except Adynovi, showed acceptable recovery using CSA-1, whereas measurements using CSA-2 gave more results outside the target level. All products, except Afstyla, showed acceptable recovery using OSA. Correlation between CSA-1 and OSA was excellent (r2 =1.0) with biases of 6-3​2%, depending on FVIII product. A clear dose-response was seen for all thrombin generation parameters and products using both methods, except at low levels for lag time using TGA-1. With CSA-1 as an independent variable, the correlations to thrombin peak (measured with TGA-2) were good (r2  = .8-.9). CONCLUSION: Our data revealed good correlation and acceptable bias between CSA and OSA using our sets of reagents, methods and analyser in spiked samples. Thrombin generation gave good correlation to CSA-1 factor activity and is a possible complement to factor activity assays.