Bronchogenic cyst of the posterior neck mimicking lymphatic malformation.

Bronchogenic cysts are embryologic malformations of the foregut and are rarely found head and neck region. Here we present a case of an upper scapular/lower posterior neck cystic mass which was initially suspicious for lymphatic malformation but confirmed by pathology to be an ectopic bronchogenic cyst.

Primary Cutaneous Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma in an Elderly Adult: A Rare Potential Mimic of Merkel Cell Carcinoma.

ABSTRACT: Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) rarely arises as a primary skin tumor. It is also very rare in older adults, especially the alveolar type. We report an 80-year-old White woman who presented with a painful, erythematous, raised lesion (2 × 3.5 cm) above the left knee that was fixed within the skin, yet mobile about underlying soft tissue. A punch biopsy showed monotonous malignant round blue cells involving the dermis. Immunostains showed diffuse expression of CD56, focal chromogranin, focal dot-like pancytokeratin, CK7, and neurofilament, but negative for synaptophysin, CK20, SOX-10, MUM-1, CD43, TTF-1, and CD99. A CK20-negative variant of Merkel cell carcinoma was initially favored, but given the unusual immunophenotype and the presence of cellular dyscohesion, desmin and myogenin stains were performed, both of which were diffusely positive. Molecular testing revealed rearrangement of PAX3 and FOXO1 loci, confirming the diagnosis of alveolar RMS. PET/CT showed a probable 1.9-cm left inguinal lymph node metastasis; no internal or deep soft tissue primary tumor mass was identified, supporting a true primary cutaneous origin. Alveolar RMS may express keratins and neuroendocrine markers, making it easy to confuse with Merkel cell carcinoma on those exceptionally rare instances, when it arises in the skin of older adults.

Characterization of Morphologic and Cytochemical Staining Properties of Exogenous Materials Mimicking Fungal Organisms Encountered in Skin Biopsies.

BACKGROUND: Exogenous materials may be encountered in skin biopsies as contamination. Contamination may occur during the biopsy procedure in the clinic or during tissue processing in the laboratory. Although the experienced pathologist may often instinctively ignore clear examples of contamination, such tissue may be a source of confusion for young pathologists and those in training. Foreign materials can typically be recognized as exogenous by morphology, polarizability, and the presence or absence of a tissue reaction, but we have rarely encountered situations in which exogenous materials could be misinterpreted as organisms, either by their morphologic appearance or staining properties. METHODS: Exogenous materials used during skin biopsy and grossing were embedded in a nonhuman tissue scaffold and prepared into histologic slides. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), periodic acid-Schiff with diastase, and Grocott methenamine silver stains were performed, and each material was evaluated under polarized microscopy. RESULTS: Exogenous materials were divided into the following 3 categories with shared morphologic appearances and staining properties: suture materials, plant-based materials, and synthetic materials. CONCLUSION: We present a comprehensive characterization of the morphologic and cytochemical staining properties of multiple exogenous materials that may contaminate a skin biopsy. This characterization will aid the pathologist by providing a mechanism to identify potential contaminants in skin biopsies.