Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Public Health ; 129(4): 364-9, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25698497

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Argentina has enacted important tobacco control initiatives in recent years. Yet little is known about the social patterning of attitudes toward tobacco control. Research is needed to explore what predicts opposition to tobacco control initiatives such as higher taxes on tobacco and the prohibition of tobacco advertising. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of Argentina's Global Adult Tobacco Survey (N = 6645). METHODS: Binary logistic regression analysis examining opposition to raising tobacco taxes and banning tobacco publicity. Models were stratified by smoking status. RESULTS: Respondents generally indicated very little opposition to either tobacco control measure, with only 15.6% of respondents opposed to increasing taxes on tobacco products and 9.6% opposed to banning tobacco advertisements. Smoking status is the most important predictor of opposition to increasing taxes (OR = 7.85, 95% CI = 6.60-9.34) and banning advertisements (OR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.39-2.11). Opposition to these measures is most likely among young respondents (aged 15-24) and least likely among older age groups (55-64 and 65 or over), compared to the 25-34 age group. Stratified models suggest that the effect of age may be different for smokers and non-smokers. Low income is a significant predictor of opposition, but only in stratified models for smokers. CONCLUSION: There is general support for stronger tobacco control measures in Argentina. Opposition to raising taxes on tobacco products and banning tobacco advertisement appears to be concentrated among young smokers with low and medium levels of household income.


Assuntos
Publicidade/legislação & jurisprudência , Opinião Pública , Impostos/legislação & jurisprudência , Produtos do Tabaco , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Argentina/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fumar/epidemiologia , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Produtos do Tabaco/economia , Adulto Jovem
2.
Tob Control ; 24(6): 562-7, 2015 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24985731

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine social gradients in tobacco use in Argentina and Uruguay, using newly available directly comparable data sets. METHODS: Secondary analysis of Global Adult Tobacco Survey data from Argentina (N=6645) and Uruguay (N=5581). Social gradients in current tobacco use, exposure to secondhand smoke, and cessation attempt were examined with sex-stratified and age-adjusted logistic regression. RESULTS: Among men, there is evidence of higher odds of being a current smoker among respondents with lower levels of education, but the association is only statistically significant for respondents with less than primary education in Uruguay (OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.22 to 3.77). Similarly, women with lower levels of education have higher odds of being a current smoker in Uruguay. The association between education and exposure to secondhand smoke is broadly similar for both sexes in both countries, with generally higher odds among groups with low education, though the relationship is only statistically significant among men in Uruguay (OR=1.77, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.92). In both countries, respondents with lower levels of education in general have higher odds of having attempted to quit smoking in the past year, although these associations did not attain statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Social gradients in tobacco use, exposure to secondhand smoke and cessation attempts are broadly similar in both countries. Efforts to evaluate the long-term effects of tobacco control efforts in these countries should monitor how policies affect national averages, and the social gradients that are embedded in aggregate data.


Assuntos
Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/estatística & dados numéricos , Fumar/epidemiologia , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Argentina/epidemiologia , Escolaridade , Feminino , Inquéritos Epidemiológicos , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Uruguai/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Public Health ; 126(10): 821-6, 2012 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23083845

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To identify changes in the social gradients for Pap smears and mammograms in Argentina. STUDY DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the 2005 and 2009 Argentine National Risk Factor Surveys. METHODS: Logistic regression analysis was used to examine social gradients by income and education, adjusting for age and health insurance. RESULTS: The proportion of women who received a Pap smear in the previous 2 years increased from 51.6% in 2005 to 60.5% in 2009 (χ(2) = 344.8, P < 0.001). A significant increase was also seen in the receipt of a mammogram in the previous 2 years by women aged ≥50 years, with an increase from 39.6% in 2005 to 52.6% in 2009 (χ(2) = 279.6, P < 0.001). In 2005, low-income women were most likely not to have received a Pap test [odds ratio (OR) = 3.27, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.70-3.98], followed by medium-income women (OR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.41-2.12), compared with high-income women. The gradient by education was of a similar magnitude, and both income and education gradients remained stable from 2005 to 2009. Restricting the analysis to eight provinces that have been deemed to be high priority due to their high levels of mortality from cervical cancer reveals an increasing income-based gradient in Pap smears. In contrast, inequalities in mammography diminished across the country, with a significant reduction in the social gradient measured either by income or education. In contrast to high-income women, low-income women experienced higher odds of not having a mammogram, but the gap diminished over time [OR = 4.14 (95% CI = 2.96-5.78) in 2005 vs OR = 2.37 (95% CI = 1.81-3.11) in 2009]. CONCLUSION: Social gradients in cancer screening are changing in Argentina. There are signs of a reduction in inequalities in mammograms, although this is attenuated by indications that inequalities in Pap smear utilization in priority provinces are growing. Surveillance of population indicators is needed to verify whether these short-term changes persist over time.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Renda/estatística & dados numéricos , Mamografia/estatística & dados numéricos , Teste de Papanicolaou , Esfregaço Vaginal/estatística & dados numéricos , Argentina , Neoplasias da Mama/prevenção & controle , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle
4.
Tob Control ; 21(4): 402-6, 2012 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21602536

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown a decrease in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) admissions after the implementation of 100% smoke-free legislation. However, no studies have been conducted in developing countries. METHODS: We conducted a time series analysis of ACS hospital admissions in Santa Fe province and Buenos Aires city, Argentina. In 2006, Santa Fe implemented a 100% smoke-free law and Buenos Aires implemented a partial law with designated smoking areas and exceptions. Age-standardised ACS admissions rates were compared before and after the implementation of the laws in each district. Smoking prevalence, compliance with legislation and exposure to secondhand smoke (SHS) was also assessed in both districts. RESULTS: In Santa Fe an immediate decrease in ACS admissions was observed after implementation (-2.5 admissions per 100,000, p=0.03; 13% reduction), compared with no change in Buenos Aires city (rate ratio Santa Fe vs Buenos Aires: 0.74, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.86, p≤0.001). In Santa Fe, the immediate effect was followed by a persistent decrease in admissions due to ACS (-0.26 admissions per 100,000 per month). Smoking prevalence did not change significantly in either district during the same period. In both districts, there was a reduction in self-reported SHS exposure, with a trend towards lower exposure in Santa Fe province. No other comprehensive tobacco control interventions were implemented during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: A 100% smoke-free law was more effective than a partial restriction law in reducing ACS admissions. An immediate effect was followed by a sustained decrease in ACS admissions. Smoke-free initiatives can be also effective in decreasing acute coronary events in developing countries.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/legislação & jurisprudência , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/etiologia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/efeitos adversos , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/legislação & jurisprudência , Poluição do Ar em Ambientes Fechados/prevenção & controle , Argentina/epidemiologia , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Hospitalização/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prevalência , Estações do Ano , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Fumar/legislação & jurisprudência , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/efeitos adversos , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/análise , Poluição por Fumaça de Tabaco/prevenção & controle , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA