RESUMO
BACKGROUND: We conducted a prespecified meta-analysis of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials of rivaroxaban 10 mg daily in prehospital patients with acute coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Individually, the trials had limited power to detect a treatment effect due to recruitment stopping ahead of plan. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The statistical analysis plan for the meta-analysis was finalized before unblinding of PREVENT-HD, the larger of the two trials. Pooled risk ratios and pooled risk differences along with the two-sided 95% confidence intervals were calculated using random-effect models. RESULTS: Rivaroxaban did not reduce the occurrence of either the primary prespecified endpoint, a composite of symptomatic arterial and venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality (risk difference: 0.0044; 95% confidence interval: -0.0263, 0.0175; p = 0.69 for pooled risk difference) or the secondary endpoint of all-cause hospitalization (p = 0.76). Although thrombotic events were infrequent, pooled analysis did reveal that rivaroxaban reduced arterial and venous thrombotic events (placebo 6 events, rivaroxaban 0 events; pooled risk difference: -0.0068; 95% confidence interval: -0.0132, -0.0006; p = 0.03). In the pooled studies, only one major bleeding event was observed in a rivaroxaban-allocated patient with no critical site or fatal bleeding events. CONCLUSION: Although this meta-analysis does not support antithrombotic prophylaxis with rivaroxaban in a broad prehospital population with acute COVID-19, the prevention of arterial and venous thrombotic events among rivaroxaban-allocated patients is consistent with the known thromboprophylactic effect of the drug in medically ill patients.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) is associated with heightened risks of venous and arterial thrombosis and hospitalization due to respiratory failure. To assess whether prophylactic anticoagulation can safely reduce the frequency of venous and arterial thrombosis, hospitalization, and death in nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one thrombosis risk factor, we conducted the PREVENT-HD double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial (A Study of Rivaroxaban to Reduce the Risk of Major Venous and Arterial Thrombotic Events, Hospitalization and Death in Medically Ill Outpatients With Acute, Symptomatic COVID-19] Infection). METHODS: PREVENT-HD was conducted between August 2020 and April 2022 at 14 US integrated health care delivery networks. A virtual trial design used remote informed consent and clinical monitoring and facilitated data collection through electronic health record integration with a cloud-based research platform. Nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 and at least one thrombosis risk factor were enrolled and randomly assigned to either 10 mg of oral rivaroxaban or placebo daily for 35 days. The primary efficacy outcome was time to first occurrence of a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, non-central nervous system systemic arterial embolism, hospitalization, or death through day 35. The principal safety end point was International Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis critical-site or fatal bleeding. The last study visit was on day 49. RESULTS: The study was terminated prematurely because of enrollment challenges and a lower-than-expected blinded pooled event rate. A total of 1284 patients underwent randomization with complete accrual of primary events through May 2022. No patients were lost to follow-up. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 22 of 641 in the rivaroxaban group and 19 of 643 in the placebo group (3.4% versus 3.0%; hazard ratio, 1.16 [95% CI, 0.63-2.15]; P=0.63). No patient in either group experienced critical-site or fatal bleeding. One patient receiving rivaroxaban had a major bleed. CONCLUSIONS: The study was terminated prematurely after enrollment of 32% of planned accrual because of recruitment challenges and lower-than-expected event rate. Rivaroxaban prescribed for 35 days in nonhospitalized patients with symptomatic COVID-19 at risk for thrombosis did not appear to reduce a composite end point of venous and arterial thrombotic events, hospitalization, and death. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT04508023.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombose , Humanos , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Trombose/epidemiologia , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Hospitalização , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Background Venous thromboembolism (VTE) often occurs after hospitalization in medically ill patients, but the population benefit-risk of extended thromboprophylaxis remains uncertain. Methods and Results The MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk) study (NCT02111564) was a randomized double-blind trial that compared thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban 10 mg daily versus placebo for 45 days after hospital discharge in medically ill patients with a creatinine clearance ≥50 mL/min. The benefit-risk balance in this population was quantified by calculating the between-treatment rate differences in efficacy and safety end points per 10 000 patients treated. Clinical characteristics of the study population were consistent with a hospitalized medical population at risk for VTE. Treating 10 000 patients with rivaroxaban resulted in 32.5 fewer symptomatic VTE and VTE-related deaths but was associated with 8 additional major bleeding events. The treatment benefit was driven by the prevention of nonfatal symptomatic VTE (26 fewer events). There was no between-treatment difference in the composite of critical site or fatal bleeding. Conclusions Extending thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban for 45 days after hospitalization provides a positive benefit-risk balance in medically ill patients at risk for VTE who are not at high risk for bleeding. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/; Unique identifier: NCT02111564.
Assuntos
Rivaroxabana , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Assistência ao Convalescente , Creatinina , Alta do Paciente , Hospitalização , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Medição de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Extended thromboprophylaxis has not been widely implemented in acutely ill medical patients because of bleeding concerns. The MAGELLAN (Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Medically Ill Patients Comparing Rivaroxaban With Enoxaparin) and MARINER (Medically Ill Patient Assessment of Rivaroxaban Versus Placebo in Reducing Post-Discharge Venous Thrombo-Embolism Risk) trials evaluated whether rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin or placebo could prevent venous thromboembolism without increased bleeding. We hypothesized that patients with major bleeding but not those with nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding would be at an increased risk of all-cause mortality (ACM). METHODS: We evaluated all bleeding events in patients taking at least 1 dose of study drug and their association with ACM in 4 mutually exclusive groups: (1) no bleeding, or first event was (2) nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding, (3) major bleeding, or (4) trivial bleeding. Using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics associated with ACM, we assessed the risk of ACM after such events. RESULTS: Compared with patients with no bleeding, the risk of ACM for patients with nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was not increased in MARINER (hazard ratio, 0.43; P=0.235) but was increased in MAGELLAN (hazard ratio, 1.74; P=0.021). Major bleeding was associated with a higher incidence of ACM in both studies, whereas trivial bleeding was not associated with ACM in either study. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with major bleeding had an increased risk of ACM, whereas nonmajor clinically relevant bleeding was not consistently associated with an increased risk of death. These results inform the risk-benefit calculus of extended thromboprophylaxis in medically ill patients. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: MAGELLAN, NCT00571649. URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: MARINER, NCT02111564.
Assuntos
Rivaroxabana , Tromboembolia Venosa , Assistência ao Convalescente , Anticoagulantes/efeitos adversos , Enoxaparina/efeitos adversos , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/complicações , Humanos , Alta do Paciente , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Background: Bronchiectasis is a chronic inflammation of the bronchi with recurrent infections and hemoptysis. The MAGELLAN study compared oral rivaroxaban, 10â mg once daily (QD), for 35 ± 4 days with subcutaneous enoxaparin 40â mg QD for 10 ± 4 days followed by placebo for 25 ± 4 days to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness. MAGELLAN included a subset of patients with bronchiectasis. In a post hoc analysis, we evaluated the incidence and severity of pulmonary bleeding in patients with bronchiectasis who were hospitalized for an acute medical illness. This analysis included MAGELLAN patients diagnosed with bronchiectasis at baseline. Patients were evaluated by treatment group for International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis major bleeding, non-major clinically relevant (NMCR) bleeding, and the composite of the 2 (ie, clinically relevant bleeding). Results: Medically ill patients with bronchiectasis were randomized to rivaroxaban (n = 60) or enoxaparin/placebo (n = 61). There were 2 fatal pulmonary bleeds and 1 fatal gastrointestinal bleed in the rivaroxaban arm and no fatal or major bleeding in the enoxaparin/placebo arm. The incidence of major bleeding was 5% in the rivaroxaban arm. One NMCR bleed occurred in the rivaroxaban arm and 2 NMCR bleeds occurred in the enoxaparin/placebo arm. The incidence of clinically relevant bleeding was 6.7% versus 3.3% in the rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/placebo groups, respectively (relative risk = 2.06 [95% confidence interval: 0.351-12.046]). Conclusion: In-patients hospitalized with bronchiectasis and an acute medical illness, clinically relevant bleeding, including fatal pulmonary hemorrhage, occurs more frequently with extended rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis than with enoxaparin followed by placebo.
Assuntos
Bronquiectasia/complicações , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Tromboembolia Venosa/complicações , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Bronquiectasia/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Rivaroxabana/farmacologia , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) represents one of the key regulators of the homeostasis of lipid particles, including high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Epidemiological evidence correlates increased HDL and decreased LDL to coronary heart disease (CHD) risk reduction. This relationship is consistent with a clinical outcomes trial of a CETP inhibitor (anacetrapib) combined with standard of care (statin), which led to a 9% additional risk reduction compared to standard of care alone. We discuss here the discovery of MK-8262, a CETP inhibitor with the potential for being the best-in-class molecule. Novel in vitro and in vivo paradigms were integrated to drug discovery to guide optimization informed by a critical understanding of key clinical adverse effect profiles. We present preclinical and clinical evidence of MK-8262 safety and efficacy by means of HDL increase and LDL reduction as biomarkers for reduced CHD risk.
Assuntos
Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapêutico , Proteínas de Transferência de Ésteres de Colesterol/antagonistas & inibidores , Doença das Coronárias/tratamento farmacológico , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapêutico , Animais , Anticolesterolemiantes/síntese química , Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacocinética , Anticolesterolemiantes/toxicidade , Cães , Humanos , Macaca mulatta , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Estrutura Molecular , Oxazolidinonas/síntese química , Oxazolidinonas/farmacocinética , Oxazolidinonas/toxicidade , Ratos Wistar , Relação Estrutura-AtividadeRESUMO
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is associated with both venous and arterial thrombotic complications. While prophylactic anticoagulation is now widely recommended for hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the effectiveness and safety of thromboprophylaxis in outpatients with COVID-19 has not been established. STUDY DESIGN: PREVENT-HD is a double-blind, placebo-controlled, pragmatic, event-driven phase 3 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban in symptomatic outpatients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 at risk for thrombotic events, hospitalization, and death. Several challenges posed by the pandemic have necessitated innovative approaches to clinical trial design, start-up, and conduct. Participants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by time from COVID-19 confirmation, to either rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily or placebo for 35 days. The primary efficacy end point is a composite of symptomatic venous thromboembolism, myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, acute limb ischemia, non-central nervous system systemic embolization, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. The primary safety end point is fatal and critical site bleeding according to the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition. Enrollment began in August 2020 and is expected to enroll approximately 4,000 participants to yield the required number of end point events. CONCLUSIONS: PREVENT-HD is a pragmatic trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban in the outpatient setting to reduce major venous and arterial thrombotic events, hospitalization, and mortality associated with COVID-19.
Assuntos
COVID-19/complicações , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Hospitalização , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Adulto , COVID-19/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Método Duplo-Cego , Extremidades/irrigação sanguínea , Inibidores do Fator Xa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemorragia/induzido quimicamente , Hemorragia/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Isquemia/etiologia , AVC Isquêmico/etiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infarto do Miocárdio/etiologia , Placebos/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/efeitos adversos , Trombose/mortalidade , Tromboembolia Venosa/mortalidade , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Background Asymptomatic proximal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an end point frequently used to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Recently, the clinical relevance of asymptomatic DVT has been challenged. Methods and Results The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between asymptomatic proximal DVT and all-cause mortality (ACM) using a cohort analysis of a randomized trial for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill medical patients. Patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had an adequate compression ultrasound examination of the legs on either day 10 or day 35 were categorized into 1 of 3 cohorts: no VTE, asymptomatic proximal DVT, or symptomatic DVT. Cox proportional hazards model, with adjustment for significant independent predictors of mortality, were used to compare the incidences of ACM. Of the 7036 patients, 6776 had no VTE, 236 had asymptomatic DVT, and 24 had symptomatic VTE. The incidence of ACM was 4.8% in patients without VTE. Both asymptomatic proximal DVT (mortality, 11.4%; hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.52-3.51; P<0.0001) and symptomatic VTE (mortality, 29.2%; HR, 9.42; 95% CI, 4.18-21.20; P<0.0001) were independently associated with significant increases in ACM. The analysis was post hoc, and ultrasound results were not available for all patients. Adjustment for baseline variables significantly associated with ACM may not fully compensate for differences. Conclusions Asymptomatic proximal DVT is associated with higher ACM than no VTE and remains a relevant end point to evaluate the efficacy of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis in medical patients. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00571649.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Doenças Assintomáticas , Estado Terminal/mortalidade , Trombose Venosa/diagnóstico , Idoso , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Ultrassonografia , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/mortalidade , Trombose Venosa/prevenção & controleRESUMO
An individualized approach to identify acutely ill medical patients at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a low risk of bleeding to optimize the benefit and risk of extended thromboprophylaxis (ET) is needed. The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE) VTE risk score has undergone extensive external validation in medically ill patients for in-hospital use and a modified model was used in the MARINER trial of ET also incorporating an elevated D-dimer. The MAGELLAN study demonstrated efficacy with rivaroxaban but had excess bleeding. This retrospective analysis investigated whether the modified IMPROVE VTE model with an elevated D-dimer could identify a high VTE risk subgroup of patients for ET from a subpopulation of the MAGELLAN study, which was previously identified as having a lower risk of bleeding. We incorporated the modified IMPROVE VTE score using a cutoff score of 4 or more or 2 and 3 with an elevated D-dimer (>2 times the upper limit of normal) to the MAGELLAN subpopulation. In total, 56% of the patients met the high-risk criteria. In the placebo group, the total VTE event rate at Day 35 was 7.94% in the high-risk group and 2.83% for patients in the lower-risk group. A reduction in VTE was observed with rivaroxaban in the high-risk group (relative risk [RR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51-0.91, p = 0.008) and in the lower-risk group (RR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.40 -1.20, p = 0.187). The modified IMPROVE VTE score with an elevated D-dimer identified a nearly threefold higher VTE risk subpopulation of patients where a significant benefit exists for ET using rivaroxaban.
RESUMO
Patients with renal impairment are at higher risk of thrombosis and bleeding than those with normal renal function. The optimal rivaroxaban dose for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with renal impairment is unknown. MARINER and MAGELLAN were multicenter, randomized clinical trials of rivaroxaban in acutely ill medical patients. Efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with renal impairment in MARINER (7.5 mg once daily) were compared with those in patients with normal renal function in MARINER (10 mg once daily) and in a subpopulation of MAGELLAN that excluded patients at high risk for bleeding at baseline (10 mg once daily). Compared with enoxaparin/placebo in the MAGELLAN subpopulation, the relative risk (RR) of symptomatic venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related death with rivaroxaban 10 mg in patients with renal impairment (RR = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27-1.44) was similar to that in those with normal renal function (RR = 0.78; 95% CI 0.44-1.40), while in MARINER, the 7.5 mg dose did not reduce the risk in patients with renal impairment (hazard ratio = 1.00; 95% CI 0.52-1.92). Major bleeding with rivaroxaban 10 mg once daily was higher in patients with renal impairment than in those with normal renal function in MAGELLAN (1.54% vs. 0.98%) and in the MAGELLAN subpopulation (0.94% vs. 0.61%). At a dose of 10 mg once daily, rivaroxaban is effective for thromboprophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients with impaired or normal renal function. The safety of this regimen is enhanced without loss of efficacy by excluding patients at high risk for bleeding, but not by using a reduced-dose strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT00571649 for the MAGELLAN trial, NCT02111564 for the MARINER trial.
Assuntos
Nefropatias/sangue , Nefropatias/complicações , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Trombose/prevenção & controle , Doença Aguda , Idoso , Anticoagulantes , Método Duplo-Cego , Enoxaparina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Hemorragia , Humanos , Incidência , Testes de Função Renal , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
Acutely ill medical patients are at risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and VTE-related mortality during hospitalization and posthospital discharge, but widespread adoption of extended thromboprophylaxis has not occurred. We analyzed a subpopulation within the MAGELLAN study of extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban to reevaluate the benefit risk profile. We identified 5 risk factors for major and fatal bleeding after a clinical analysis of the MAGELLAN study and analyzed efficacy and safety with these patients excluded (n = 1551). Risk factors included: active cancer, dual antiplatelet therapy at baseline, bronchiectasis/pulmonary cavitation, gastroduodenal ulcer, or bleeding within 3 months before randomization. We evaluated efficacy, safety, and benefit risk using clinically comparable endpoints in the subpopulation. At day 10, rivaroxaban was noninferior to enoxaparin (relative risk [RR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-1.15) and at day 35 rivaroxaban was significantly better than enoxaparin/placebo (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.53-0.88) in reducing VTE and VTE-related death. Major bleeding was reduced at day 10 (RR = 2.18, 95% CI = 1.07-4.44 vs 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54-2.65) and at day 35 (2.87, 95% CI = 1.60-5.15 vs 1.48, 95% CI = 0.77-2.84) for MAGELLAN versus this subpopulation, respectively. The benefit risk profile was favorable in this subpopulation treated for 35 days, with the number needed to treat ranging from 55 to 481 and number needed to harm from 455 to 1067 for all pairwise evaluations. Five exclusionary criteria defined a subpopulation of acutely ill medical patients with a positive benefit risk profile for in-hospital and extended thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban.
Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Inibidores do Fator Xa/uso terapêutico , Rivaroxabana/uso terapêutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Oral , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Método Duplo-Cego , Inibidores do Fator Xa/farmacologia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Rivaroxabana/farmacologiaRESUMO
In lower eukaryotes, such as A. thaliana, C. elegans, S. pombe and N. crassa, RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) is a required component of the RNA silencing pathway. Remarkably, even though robust RNA silencing occurs in Drosophila in response to exogenous dsRNA and siRNAs, no RdRP homolog has been identified in the Drosophila genome or in any other higher eukaryote characteristic of the known cellular RdRPs. We showed recently that the largest subunit of the Drosophila RNA polymerase II core elongator complex, called D-elp1, has RdRP activity capable of using unprimed or primed synthesis mechanisms to convert single stranded RNA templates into double stranded RNA (dsRNA) that can be cleaved by Dcr-2. Loss of D-elp1 inhibits both siRNA and dsRNA directed RNAi in S2 cells but does not affect micro RNA targeting. Transposon RNA levels also increase with the loss of D-elp1 while the corresponding endo siRNAs, critical for transposon suppression, are dramatically reduced and this is correlated with a reduction in transposon antisense RNA levels. D-elp1 associates tightly with Dicer-2, similar to the Dicer-RdRP interaction observed in lower eukaryotes. With the exception of S. cerevisiae, which lacks the RNAi machinery altogether, RdRP activity is conserved in the elp1 homologs from S. pombe to human. This commentary focuses on the importance and universality of RdRP in RNA silencing.
Assuntos
Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila/enzimologia , Interferência de RNA , RNA Polimerase Dependente de RNA/metabolismo , Animais , Drosophila/genética , HumanosRESUMO
Here, we show that recombinant Drosophila elp1 (D-elp1) produced in Sf9 cells or Escherichia coli, corresponding to the largest of the three subunits in the RNA polymerase II core elongator complex, has RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) activity. D-elp1 is a noncanonical RdRP that can synthesize dsRNA from different ssRNA templates using either a primer-dependent or primer-independent initiation mechanism. Of the three core subunits, only D-elp1 depletion inhibits RNAi in S2 cells but does not affect micro RNA function. Furthermore, D-elp1 depletion results in increased steady state levels of representative transposon RNAs and a decrease in the corresponding transposon antisense transcripts and endo siRNAs. In contrast, although Dcr-2 depletion results in increased transposon RNA levels and a reduction in the corresponding endo siRNAs, there is no change in the transposon antisense RNA levels. In D-elp1 null third instar larvae transposon RNA levels are also increased and the corresponding transposon antisense RNAs are reduced. D-elp1 associates tightly with Dcr-2, similar to the Dicer-RdRP interaction observed in lower eukaryotes. These results identify an aspect of the RNAi pathway in Drosophila that suggest transposon derived endo siRNAs, critical for transposon suppression, are produced, in part, in a D-elp1 dependent step that converts transposon RNA into dsRNA that is subsequently processed by Dcr-2. The generality of this mechanism in genome defense and RNA silencing in higher eukaryotes is suggested.
Assuntos
Elementos de DNA Transponíveis/genética , Drosophila/enzimologia , Drosophila/genética , Interferência de RNA/fisiologia , RNA Polimerase Dependente de RNA/metabolismo , Animais , Baculoviridae/genética , Linhagem Celular , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Escherichia coli/enzimologia , Escherichia coli/genética , Deleção de Genes , Genes de Insetos , RNA Helicases/genética , RNA Helicases/metabolismo , RNA Polimerase Dependente de RNA/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Proteínas Recombinantes/metabolismo , Ribonuclease III/genética , Ribonuclease III/metabolismo , Supressão GenéticaRESUMO
The realization that short double-stranded RNA (dsRNAs) 21-25 bp in length represent the basis for posttranscriptional gene silencing (PTGS) in plants, quelling in N. crassa, and RNA interference (RNAi) in C. elegans and Drosophila has given insight into one of the most evolutionarily conserved pathways in eukaryotes. dsRNA that arises due to viral infection, transposon mobilization, random insertion of transgenes near active promoters, transcripts from repetitive elements in the genome, or introduction of exogenous dsRNA directly is processed by one of the RNase III-related enzymes, known as the Dicers, to produce 21- to 25-bp short dsRNAs or short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) that target the degradation of the cognate RNA sequence (Denli and Hannon, 2003; Hannon, 2002; Plasterk, 2002). Proteins in the RNAi pathway and siRNA-like RNAs have also been recently demonstrated to play a role in the formation and maintenance of heterochromatin in S. pombe as well as in transgene-induced PTGS in Drosophila (Hall et al., 2002; Pal-Bhadra et al., 2004; Volpe et al., 2002). An understanding of siRNA function in these crucial regulatory pathways requires biochemical approaches to study siRNAs and their role in gene silencing as well as the formation and maintenance of heterochromatin. This chapter describes simple methods for using Drosophila embryo extracts and cultured insect cells to study siRNA function in the RNAi pathway in vivo and in vitro. We describe the most recent protocols for the preparation and use of Drosophila embryo extracts used in gene targeting studies. We present methods we have used to assay siRNA function in Drosophila embryo extracts and in cultured SL2 cells that demonstrate a combined role for siRNAs and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp) activity in Drosophila RNAi.
Assuntos
Drosophila/embriologia , Interferência de RNA/fisiologia , RNA Interferente Pequeno/fisiologia , Animais , Linhagem Celular , Drosophila/citologia , RNA de Cadeia Dupla/fisiologiaRESUMO
Members of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene family have been shown to be essential for dsRNA-mediated gene silencing based on genetic screens in a variety of organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans, Arabidopsis, Neurospora, and Dictyostelium. A hallmark of this process is the formation of small 21- to 25-bp dsRNAs, termed siRNAs for small interfering RNAs, which are derived from the dsRNA that initiates gene silencing. We have developed methods to demonstrate that these siRNAs produced in Drosophila embryo extract can be uniformly incorporated into dsRNA in a template-specific manner that is subsequently degraded by RNase III-related enzyme activity to create a second generation of siRNAs. SiRNA function in dsRNA synthesis and mRNA degradation depends upon the integrity of the 3'-hydroxyl of the siRNA, consistent with the interpretation that siRNAs serve as primers for RdRP activity in the formation of dsRNA. This process of siRNA incorporation into dsRNA followed by degradation and the formation of new siRNAs has been termed "degradative PCR" and the proposed mechanism is consistent with the genetic and biochemical data derived from studies in C. elegans, Arabidopsis, Drosophila, and Dictyostelium. The methods used to study the function of both natural and synthetic siRNAs in RNA interference in Drosophila embryo extracts are detailed. The importance of the 3'-hydroxyl group for siRNA function and its incorporation into dsRNA is emphasized and the results support a model that places RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as a key mediator in the RNA interference mechanism in Drosophila.
Assuntos
Drosophila/genética , Técnicas Genéticas , Radical Hidroxila/análise , Interferência de RNA , RNA Interferente Pequeno/química , Animais , Embrião não Mamífero/ultraestruturaRESUMO
Trafficking of receptors is of crucial importance for the physiology of most exocrine and endocrine organs. It is not known yet if the same mechanisms are used for sorting in the exocytic and endocytic pathways in the different epithelial tissues. In this work, we have used a deletion mutant of the human neurotrophin receptor p75(hNTR) that is normally localized on the apical membrane when expressed in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. This internal 57-amino acid deletion of the cytoplasmic tail leads to a relocation of the protein from the apical to the basolateral membrane and to rapid and efficient endocytosis. These events are mediated by a signal localized within 9 amino acids of the mutated cytoplasmic tail that is strictly dependent on a tyrosine residue (Tyr-308). We have analyzed the basolateral sorting efficiency and endocytic capacity of this signal in Fischer rat thyroid (FRT) cells, in which basolateral and endocytic determinants have not yet been identified. We found that this targeting signal can mediate efficient transport to the basolateral membrane also in FRT cells with similar tyrosine dependence as in MDCK cells. In contrast to MDCK cells, this Tyr-based signal was not able to mediate coated pits localization and endocytosis in FRT cells. These data represent the first characterization of basolateral/endocytic signals in thyroid epithelial cells. Furthermore, our results indicate that requirements for tyrosine-dependent basolateral sorting signals are conserved among cell lines from different tissues but that the recognition of the colinear endocytic signal is tissue specific.