Soft tissue infections of the extremities in an orthopaedic centre in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the spectrum, and clinical impact of acute extremity soft tissue infections, encountered in the Orthopaedic service of an inner city hospital in UK. METHODS: Patients requiring admission for an acute limb soft tissue infection to the Orthopaedic unit of the Manchester Royal Infirmary, UK, between July 1996 and 2001 were identified from our database. Infections involving the groin and axilla, those developing within 30 days of a surgical procedure, and patients with chronic soft tissue ulcers or infections were not considered. RESULTS: Of 142 infections the majority were cellulitis (50%) and superficial abscesses (34.5%). Most were secondary to trauma (31.6%), human or animal bites (20%) and intravenous drug abuse (17.6%). Although most patients were young and otherwise healthy, ten developed significant complications: myonecrosis requiring below knee amputation (1), acute carpal tunnel syndrome (1), osteomyelitis (6), extensive skin loss requiring reconstruction (1), deep vein thrombosis (1). Seven hundred and eighty four hospital inpatient days and 143 operative interventions were devoted to these patients. The estimated cost for each episode of soft tissue infection was pound 1011. In 25% of cases earlier referral to a surgical service would have been more appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: Soft tissue infections of the extremities confer significant morbidity and impose an important burden on medical resources.

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in the intensive care unit.

Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major nosocomial pathogen that causes severe morbidity and mortality worldwide. MRSA strains are endemic in many American and European hospitals and account for 29%-35% of all clinical isolates. Recent studies have documented the increased costs associated with MRSA infection, as well as the importance of colonisation pressure. Surveillance strategies have been proposed especially in high risk areas such as the intensive care unit. Pneumonia and bacteraemia account for the majority of MRSA serious clinical infections, but intra-abdominal infections, osteomyelitis, toxic shock syndrome, food poisoning, and deep tissue infections are also important clinical diseases. The traditional antibiotic therapy for MRSA is a glycopeptide, vancomycin. New antibiotics have been recently released that add to the armamentarium for therapy against MRSA and include linezolid, and quinupristin/dalfopristin, but cost, side effects, and resistance may limit their long term usefulness.

Effect of nurse-to-patient ratio in the intensive care unit on pulmonary complications and resource use after hepatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Nurse-to-patient ratios in the intensive care unit are associated with postoperative mortality, morbidity, and costs after some high-risk surgery. OBJECTIVE: To determine if having 1 nurse caring for 1 or 2 patients ("more nurses") versus 1 nurse caring for 3 or more patients ("fewer nurses") in the intensive care unit at night is associated with differences in clinical and economic outcomes after hepatectomy. METHODS: Statewide observational cohort study of 569 adults who had hepatic resection, 1994 to 1998. Hospital discharge data were linked to a prospective survey of organizational characteristics in the intensive care unit. Multivariate analysis was used to determine the association of nighttime nurse-to-patient ratios with in-hospital mortality, length of stay, hospital costs, and specific postoperative complications. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients at 25 hospitals had fewer nurses; 316 patients in 8 hospitals had more nurses. No significant association between nighttime nurse-to-patient ratios and in-hospital mortality was detected. The overall complication rate was 28%. By univariate analysis, patients with fewer nurses had increased risks for pulmonary failure (5.8% vs 1.6%, relative risk, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.3-10.1; P=.006) and reintubation (10.8% vs 1.9%, relative risk, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.4-13.7; P<.001). By multivariate analysis, patients with fewer nurses had increased risk for reintubation (odds ratio, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.0-8.1; P=.04) and a 14% increase (95% CI, 3%-23%; P=.007) or an additional $1248 (95% CI, $384-$2112; P = .005) in total hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: Fewer nurses at night is associated with increased risk for specific postoperative pulmonary complications and with increased resource use in patients undergoing hepatectomy.

Intensive care unit nurse staffing and the risk for complications after abdominal aortic surgery.

CONTEXT: We previously found that length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after abdominal aortic surgery increased when fewer ICU nurses were available per patient. We hypothesized that having fewer nurses increases the risk for medical complications. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between nurse-to-patient ratio in the ICU and risk for medical and surgical complications after abdominal aortic surgery. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: All nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland. DATA SOURCES: Information about patients came from hospital discharge data on all patients in Maryland with a principal procedure code for abdominal aortic surgery from 1994 through 1996 (n = 2606). The organizational characteristics of ICUs were obtained by surveying ICU medical and nursing directors in 1996 at the 46 Maryland hospitals that performed abdominal aortic surgery. Thirty-nine of the ICU directors (85%) completed the survey. EXPOSURE: Surgery in hospitals with fewer ICU nurses (in which each nurse cared for three or four patients) compared with hospitals with more ICU nurses (in which each nurse cared for one or two patients). OUTCOME: Proportion of patients who developed postoperative complications. RESULTS: Seven hospitals with 478 patients had fewer ICU nurses, and 31 hospitals with 2128 patients had more ICU nurses. Patients in hospitals with fewer nurses were more likely than patients in hospitals with more nurses to have complications: 47% vs. 34% had any complication, 43% vs. 28% had any medical complication, 24% vs. 9% had pulmonary insufficiency after a procedure, and 21% vs. 13% were reintubated (P < 0.001 for all comparisons). After adjustment for patient, hospital, and surgeon characteristics, having fewer versus more ICU nurses was associated with an increased risk for any complication (relative risk, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.3 to 2.4]), any medical complication (relative risk, 2.1 [CI, 1.5 to 2.9]), pulmonary insufficiency after procedure (relative risk, 4.5 [CI, 2.9 to 6.9]) and reintubation (relative risk, 1.6 [CI, 1.1 to 2.5]). CONCLUSION: Having fewer ICU nurses per patient is associated with increased risk for respiratory-related complications after abdominal aortic surgery.

Negative results of randomized clinical trials published in the surgical literature: equivalency or error?

HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that review of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) with nonstatistically significant or "negative" results published in the surgical literature do not have appropriate statistical power to demonstrate equivalency between treatment arms. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: The MEDLINE database was searched to obtain reports of all RCTs with negative results published in 3 surgical journals from 1988 to 1998. Manual review of one year (1997) of publications for each journal was performed to validate our search strategy. Equivalency was evaluated using the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure and post hoc power calculations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ninety reports of RCTs with negative results were identified in the surgical literature between 1988 and 1998. The manual review of 1997 showed a 100% retrieval rate for our search strategy. After applying the Two One-Sided Tests Procedure, 35 reports (39%) met the criteria for demonstrating equivalency. The other 55 reports (61%) contained at least a 10% absolute difference in the 90% confidence interval of Delta. Using the power calculation method, only 22 (24%) articles had a power greater than.80 to detect a 50% difference in therapeutic effect. Only 29% of the reports included a formal sample size calculation and these studies were more likely to demonstrate equivalency than those without a sample size estimate (P<.01). CONCLUSIONS: Many reports from negative RCTs published in the surgical literature lack sufficient statistical power to establish that clinically important differences are not present. Surgeons should perform appropriate sample size calculations when designing RCTs and recognize the utility of confidence intervals when reporting negative results.

Hospital volume is related to clinical and economic outcomes of esophageal resection in Maryland.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have documented a relationship between hospital volume and perioperative and economic outcomes. Our objective was to determine the effect of hospital volume on outcomes of esophageal resection. METHODS: Statewide database was analyzed for patients who underwent esophageal resection in Maryland (n = 1,136 patients) from 1984 to 1999. Multivariate regression was used to determine the association of hospital volume with in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and charges after adjusting for case mix and time period. RESULTS: Unadjusted in-hospital mortality rates were lower in high volume hospitals (2.7%) than medium (12.7%) and low (16%) volume hospitals (p < 0.001). High hospital volume was associated with (1) fivefold reduction in the risk of death (odds ratio, 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.10 to 0.42; p < 0.001); (2) a 6-day (95% confidence interval, 5 to 7 days; p < 0.001) reduction in length of stay; and (3) $11,673 (95% confidence interval, $9,504 to $12,841; p < 0.001) decrease in hospital charges. Conclusions. Hospitals that perform high volumes of esophageal resection have superior clinical and economic outcomes. By referring these patients to high volume centers, we may improve quality and reduce costs.

Intensive care unit physician staffing is associated with decreased length of stay, hospital cost, and complications after esophageal resection.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether having daily rounds by an intensive care unit (ICU) physician is associated with clinical and economic outcomes after esophageal resection. DESIGN: ICU information was obtained from a prospective survey and linked to retrospective patient data from the Maryland Health Services Cost Review Commission. The main outcome variables were in-hospital mortality rate, length of stay, hospital cost, and complications after esophageal resection. SETTING: Nonfederal acute care hospitals in Maryland that performed esophageal resection (n = 35 hospitals) during the study period, 1994-1998. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent esophageal resection in Maryland (n = 366 patients) from 1994 to 1998. INTERVENTIONS: Presence vs. absence of daily rounds by an ICU physician. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After adjusting for patient case-mix and other hospital characteristics, lack of daily rounds by an ICU physician was independently associated with a 73% increase in hospital length of stay (7 days; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1-15; p =.012) and a 61% increase in total hospital cost ($8,839; 95% CI, $ 1,674-$19,192; p =.013), but there was no association with in-hospital mortality rate. In addition, the following postoperative complications were independently associated with lack of daily rounds by an ICU physician: pulmonary insufficiency (odds ratio [OR], 4.0; CI, 1.4-11.0), renal failure (OR, 6.3; CI, 1.4-28.7), aspiration (OR, 1.7; CI, 1.0-2.8), and reintubation (OR, 2.8; CI, 1.5-5.2). CONCLUSIONS: Having daily rounds by an ICU physician is associated with shorter lengths of stay, lower hospital cost, and decreased frequency of postoperative complications after esophageal resection. Healthcare providers and policymakers should use this information to help improve quality of care and reduce costs for patients undergoing high-risk surgical procedures.

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole to prevent candidal infections in critically ill surgical patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prophylactic use of enteral fluconazole to prevent invasive candidal infections in critically ill surgical patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Invasive fungal infections are increasingly common in the critically ill, especially in surgical patients. Although fungal prophylaxis has been proven effective in certain high-risk patients such as bone marrow transplant patients, few studies have focused on surgical patients and prevention of fungal infection. METHODS: The authors conducted a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in a single-center, tertiary care surgical intensive care unit (ICU). A total of 260 critically ill surgical patients with a length of ICU stay of at least 3 days were randomly assigned to receive either enteral fluconazole 400 mg or placebo per day during their stay in the surgical ICU at Johns Hopkins Hospital. RESULTS: The primary end point was the time to occurrence of fungal infection during the surgical ICU stay, with planned secondary analysis of patients "on-therapy" and alternate definitions of fungal infections. In a time-to-event analysis, the risk of candidal infection in patients receiving fluconazole was significantly less than the risk in patients receiving placebo. After adjusting for potentially confounding effects of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III score, days to first dose, and fungal colonization at enrollment, the risk of fungal infection was reduced by 55% in the fluconazole group. No difference in death rate was observed between patients receiving fluconazole and those receiving placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Enteral fluconazole safely and effectively decreased the incidence of fungal infections in high-risk, critically ill surgical patients.

Nicardipine versus nitroprusside for breakthrough hypertension following carotid endarterectomy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of nicardipine and nitroprusside for breakthrough hypertension following carotid endarterectomy. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled effectiveness trial. SETTING: University-based surgical intensive care unit. PATIENTS: 60 ASA physical status I, II, III, and IV patients experiencing breakthrough hypertension at the time of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either nicardipine (n = 29) and placebo or nitroprusside (n = 31) and placebo for up to 6 hours postoperatively. Loading doses of nicardipine were provided, but placebo was used as a load for patients randomized to nitroprusside. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Rapidity and variability of blood pressure (BP) control were assessed. During the first 10 minutes, 83% of nicardipine patients compared to 23% of nitroprusside-treated patients, achieved BP control (p < 0.01). Following initial control, 12 nicardipine- and 24 nitroprusside-treated patients required additional titration of their infusions to maintain blood pressure within the targeted range (p < 0.05). No patient suffered a stroke, myocardial infarction, or was returned to the operating room (OR) for bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: Nicardipine administration produced more rapid BP control, most likely related to the administration of a loading dose. In addition to more rapid control, nicardipine-treated patients had less variability in BP and required significantly fewer additional interventions. Although no patient suffered a major event during this study, this study was not powered sufficiently to assess safety.

Surveillance strategies and impact of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal colonization and infection in critically ill patients.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the optimal site and frequency for vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) surveillance to minimize the number of days of VRE colonization before identification and subsequent isolation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The increasing prevalence of VRE and the limited therapeutic options for its treatment demand early identification of colonization to prevent transmission. METHODS: The authors conducted a 3-month prospective observational study in medical and surgical intensive care unit (ICU) patients with a stay of 3 days or more. Oropharyngeal and rectal swabs, tracheal and gastric aspirates, and urine specimens were cultured for VRE on admission to the ICU and twice weekly until discharge. RESULTS: Of 117 evaluable patients, 23 (20%) were colonized by VRE. Twelve patients (10%) had VRE infection. Of nine patients who developed infections after ICU admission, eight were colonized before infection. The rectum was the first site of colonization in 92% of patients, and positive rectal cultures preceded 89% of infections acquired in the ICU. This was supported by strain delineations using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Twice-weekly rectal surveillance alone identified 93% of the maximal estimated VRE-related patient-days; weekly or admission-only surveillance was less effective. As a test for future VRE infection, rectal surveillance culture twice weekly had a negative predictive value of 99%, a positive predictive value of 44%, and a relative risk for infection of 34. CONCLUSIONS: Twice-weekly rectal VRE surveillance of critically ill patients is an effective strategy for early identification of colonized patients at increased risk for VRE transmission, infection, and death.

Increased resource use associated with catheter-related bloodstream infection in the surgical intensive care unit.

HYPOTHESIS: Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in critically ill surgical patients with prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stays is associated with a significant increase in health care resource use. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Surgical ICU at a large tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Critically ill surgical patients (N = 260) with projected surgical ICU length of stay greater than 3 days. INTERVENTIONS: Central venous catheters were cultured for clinical suspicion of infection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Increases in total hospital cost, ICU cost, hospital days, and ICU days attributable to CRBSI were estimated using multiple linear regression after adjusting for demographic factors and severity of illness (APACHE III [Apache Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation III] score). RESULTS: The incidence of CRBSI per 1000 catheter-days was 3.6 episodes (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1-5.8 episodes). Microbiologic isolates were Gram-positive bacteria in 75%, Gram-negative bacteria in 20%, and yeast in 5%. After adjusting for demographic factors and severity of disease, CRBSI was associated with an increase of $56 167 (95% CI, $11 523-$165 735; P =.001) (in 1998 dollars) in total hospital cost, an increase of $71 443 (95% CI, $11 960-$195 628; P<.001) in ICU cost, a 22-day increase in hospital length of stay, and a 20-day increase in ICU length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: For critically ill surgical patients, CRBSI is associated with a profound increase in resource use. Prevention, early diagnosis, and intervention for CRBSI might result in cost savings in this high-risk population.

Handwashing compliance depends on professional status.

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial infections can be transmitted from microorganisms on the hands of health care workers to patients. Handwashing (HW) has a proven benefit in preventing transmission of infection, yet compliance with handwashing, especially in intensive care units, ranges between 28% and 74%. METHODS: To determine if HW behavior varies as a function of health care professional status and patient interaction, we conducted an observational study of a surgical intermediate care unit in a large university teaching hospital. HW compliance was observed among all health care workers (HCW): physicians (MD; N = 46), nurses (RN; N = 295), and nursing support personnel (NSP; N = 93). Over an 8-week period, unidentified, trained observers documented all HCW interactions in 1-h random blocks. HW opportunities were classified into low and high risk of pathogen acquisition and transmission. RESULTS: A total of 493 HW opportunities were observed, of which 434 involved MD, RN, and NSP. Two hundred and sixty-one low-risk (MD 35, RN 171, NSP 55) and 173 (MD 11, RN 124, NSP 38) high-risk interactions were observed. Overall HW rates were low (44%). Significant differences existed among HCW, with MDs being the least likely to wash (15% versus RN 50%, NSP 37%, p < 0.01). In adjusting for high-risk situations, MDs (odds ratio [OR] 5.58, 95% CI 2.49-12.54; NSP, OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.13-2.64; RN, OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77-1.23) were significantly less likely to perform HW when compared to RNs. Nursing groups were significantly less likely to wash in low-risk versus high-risk situations (MD 9.2% versus 17.1%; RN 69.4% versus 39.6%; NSP 85% versus 23.3%), suggesting individual discrimination of the importance of HW. Although nurses were less likely to wash in high-risk situations compared to NSP, the overall number of opportunities was greater, suggesting that improvement in HW to the level of NSP could have a major impact on infection transmission. CONCLUSION: Significant opportunities exist for quality improvement, novel educational strategies, and assessment of reasons why MDs and, to a lesser extent, RNs fail to follow simple HW practices.

Sickness Impact Profile Score versus a Modified Short-Form survey for functional outcome assessment: acceptability, reliability, and validity in critically ill patients with prolonged intensive care unit stays.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life after surgical critical illness is an important measure of outcome. The Sickness Impact Profile Score (SIP) has been validated in critically ill patients, but the Modified Short-Form (MSF) has not been directly compared with it. METHODS: The SIP and MSF-36 were coadministered to 127 patients (surrogates) with a prolonged surgical critical illness at baseline at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Reliability, validity, and acceptability were determined for overall and subscores at each time point. RESULTS: The overall SIP and eight subscores, including physical health and psychosocial health, were all significantly improved at 1 year compared with baseline (p < 0.05). However, the MSF-36 was improved only in health perception (p < 0.05), but pain scores were higher (p < 0.05) than at baseline. Internal consistency of the MSF-36 was poor at 1 and 3 months. Correlation between the tools was excellent at baseline and 1 year but variable in overall and subscores at other time points. CONCLUSION: The SIP is more comprehensive, reliable, and acceptable in determining specific quality-of-life abnormalities, but the MSF-36 is easier to administer and correlates well at baseline and 1 year in patients with a prolonged critical illness.

Comparison of intravenous/oral ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and efficacy of intravenous (IV) ciprofloxacin plus IV metronidazole (CIP+MET) with that of IV piperacillin/tazobactam (PIP/TAZO) in adults with complicated intraabdominal infections, and to compare the efficacy of sequential IV-to-oral CIP+MET therapy with that of the IV CIP-only regimen. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Treatment of intraabdominal infections remains a challenge, mainly because of their polymicrobial etiology and attendant death and complications. Antimicrobial regimens using sequential IV-to-oral therapy may reduce the length of hospital stay. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial involving 459 patients, clinically improved IV-treated patients were switched to oral therapy after 48 hours. Overall clinical response was the primary efficacy measurement. RESULTS: A total of 282 patients (151 CIP+MET, 131 PIP/TAZO) were valid for efficacy. Of these patients, 64% CIP+MET and 57% PIP/TAZO patients were considered candidates for oral therapy. Patients had a mean APACHE II score of 9.6. The most common diagnoses were appendicitis (33%), other intraabdominal infection (29%), and abscess (25%). Overall clinical resolution rates were statistically superior for CIP+MET (74%) compared with PIP/TAZO (63%). Corresponding rates in the subgroup suitable for oral therapy were 85% for CIP+MET and 70% for PIP/TAZO. Postsurgical wound infection rates were significantly lower in CIP+MET (11%) versus PIP/TAZO patients (19%). Mean length of stay was 14 days for CIP+MET and 17 days for PIP/TAZO patients. CONCLUSION: CIP+MET, initially administered IV and followed by CIP+MET oral therapy, was clinically more effective than IV PIP/TAZO for the treatment of patients with complicated intraabdominal infections.

Survival and functional outcome after prolonged intensive care unit stay.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the functional outcome and costs of a prolonged illness requiring a stay in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) of 7 of more days. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The long-term benefits and costs after a prolonged SICU stay have not been well studied. METHODS: All patients with an SICU length of stay of 7 or more days from July 1, 1996, to June 30, 1997, were enrolled. One hundred twenty-eight patients met the entry criteria, and mortality status was known in 127. Functional outcome was determined at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using the Sickness Impact Profile score, which ranges from 0 to 100, with a score of 30 being severely disabled. Hospital costs for the index admission and for all readmissions to Johns Hopkins Hospital were obtained. All data are reported as median values. RESULTS: For the index admission, age was 57 and APACHE II score was 23. The initial length of stay in the ICU was 11 days; the hospital length of stay was 31 days. The Sickness Impact Profile score was 20.2 at baseline, 42.9 at 1 month, 36.2 at 3 months, and 20.3 at 6 months, and was lower than baseline at 1 year. The actual 1-year survival rate was 45.3%. The index admission median cost was $85,806, with 65 total subsequent admissions to this facility. The cost for a single 1-year survivor was $282,618 (1996). CONCLUSIONS: An acute surgical illness that results in a prolonged SICU stay has a substantial in-hospital death rate and is costly, but the functional outcome from both a physical and physiologic standpoint is compatible with a good quality of life.

The diagnostic value of fungal surveillance cultures in critically ill patients.

BACKGROUND: Heavy fungal colonization is a known risk factor for fungal infection, yet the value of fungal surveillance cultures is uncertain. METHODS: To evaluate the utility of fungal surveillance cultures in predicting fungal infections, we evaluated surveillance fungal cultures over a three month period in a prospective, cohort study conducted at a university medical center with a large tertiary referral population. We enrolled 172 patients in the Oncology Center and the medical and surgical intensive care units at Johns Hopkins Hospital. RESULTS: Surveillance cultures from five sites were obtained twice weekly and evaluated for prediction of subsequent fungal infection. Infections were prospectively defined and evaluated by a panel of clinicians. Test characteristics were assessed. Of 159 eligible patients, 14 (9%) developed invasive fungal infections. Having two or more surveillance sites positive in a single day had an odds ratio of 8.2 (1.1-358.0) (p = 0.03), a negative predictive value of 0.98, sensitivity of 0.92, and a likelihood ratio of 1.6 for a fungal infection. In a multiple logistic regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis, fungal burden was strongly and independently associated with infection (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Surveillance cultures are helpful in determining fungal colonization but do not have a high positive predictive value for fungal infection in a broad population of intensive care unit patients. However, fungal infection is more likely in heavily colonized patients, and surveillance cultures show that fungal infection is extremely unlikely in patients without fungal colonization.

ICU nurse-to-patient ratio is associated with complications and resource use after esophagectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if having a night-time nurse-to-patient ratio (NNPR) of one nurse caring for one or two patients (> 1:2) versus one nurse caring for three or more patients (< 1:2) in the intensive care unit (ICU) is associated with clinical and economic outcomes following esophageal resection. DESIGN: State-wide observational cohort study. Hospital discharge data was linked to a prospective survey of ICU organizational characteristics. Multivariate analysis adjusting for case-mix, hospital and surgeon volume was used to determine the association of NNPR with in-hospital mortality, length of stay (LOS), hospital cost and specific postoperative complications. SETTING: Non-federal acute care hospitals (n = 35) in Maryland that performed esophageal resection. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients who had esophageal resection in Maryland, 1994 to 1998 (n = 366 patients). MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five patients at nine hospitals had a NNPR > 1:2;128 patients in 23 hospitals had a NNPR < 1:2. No significant association between NNPR and in-hospital mortality was seen. A 39 % increase in median in-hospital LOS (4.3 days; 95% CI, (2, 5 days); p < 0.001), and a 32% increase in costs ($4,810; 95 % CI, ($2,094, $7,952) was associated with a NNPR < 1:2. Pneumonia (OR 2.4; 95 % CI (1.2, 4.7); p = 0.012), reintubation (OR 2.6; 95% CI(1.4, 4.5);p = 0.001), and septicemia (OR 3.6; 95 % CI(1.1, 12.5); p = 0.04), were specific complications associated with a NNPR < 1:2. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse caring for more than two ICU patients at night increases the risk of several postoperative pulmonary and infectious complications and was associated with increased resource use in patients undergoing esophageal resection.

Organizational characteristics of intensive care units related to outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery.

CONTEXT: Morbidity and mortality rates in intensive care units (ICUs) vary widely among institutions, but whether ICU structure and care processes affect these outcomes is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether organizational characteristics of ICUs are related to clinical and economic outcomes for abdominal aortic surgery patients who typically receive care in an ICU. DESIGN: Observational study, with patient data collected retrospectively and ICU data collected prospectively. SETTING: All Maryland hospitals that performed abdominal aortic surgery from 1994 to 1996. PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS: We analyzed hospital discharge data for patients in non-federal acute care hospitals in Maryland who had a principal procedure code for abdominal aortic surgery from January 1994 through December 1996 (n = 2987). We obtained information about ICU organizational characteristics by surveying ICU medical directors at the 46 Maryland hospitals that performed abdominal aortic surgery. Thirty-nine (85%) of the ICU directors completed this survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: In-hospital mortality and hospital and ICU length of stay. RESULTS: For patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery, in-hospital mortality varied among hospitals from 0% to 66%. In multivariate analysis adjusted for patient demographics, comorbid disease, severity of illness, hospital and surgeon volume, and hospital characteristics, not having daily rounds by an ICU physician was associated with a 3-fold increase in in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR], 3.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-4.9). Furthermore, not having daily rounds by an ICU physician was associated with an increased risk of cardiac arrest (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.2-7.0), acute renal failure (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.3-3.9), septicemia (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6), platelet transfusion (OR, 6.4; 95% CI, 3.2-12.4), and reintubation (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-4.1). Not having daily rounds by an ICU physician, having an ICU nurse-patient ratio of less than 1:2, not having monthly review of morbidity and mortality, and extubating patients in the operating room were associated with increased resource use. CONCLUSIONS: Organizational characteristics of ICUs are related to differences among hospitals in outcomes of abdominal aortic surgery. Clinicians and hospital leaders should consider the potential impact of ICU organizational characteristics on outcomes of patients having high-risk operations.