Paclitaxel and carboplatin adjuvant therapy alone or with radiotherapy for resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: a feasibility study of the Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to determine the feasibility and toxicity of paclitaxel and carboplatin given in the adjuvant setting alone for patients with resected Stage IB disease and combined with radiotherapy for patients with resected Stages II and IIIA disease and selected patients with Stage IIIB and IV disease (Revised International System for Staging of Lung Cancer). METHODS: One hundred two patients with resected nonsmall cell lung carcinoma were treated in the postoperative period with 3 courses of paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) intravenously (i.v.) over 1 hour and carboplatin area under the curve of 6 i.v. every 3 weeks for 3 courses. Patients with Stage IB received no further therapy, and those with higher stages also subsequently received radiotherapy plus concurrent weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin over 6 weeks. The median age was 61 years, with 56 men and 46 women, and the predominant histologic type was adenocarcinoma. Twenty pneumonectomies, 80 lobectomies, and 2 other procedures were performed. Ninety percent of the patients (92 of 102) received all 3 courses of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin (84% received full doses). Seventy-three percent received full doses of radiotherapy and concurrent weekly chemotherapy (49 of 67 patients), and 14 others received greater than 75% of the radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS: Toxicity of the chemotherapy was mild with only three hospitalizations for neutropenia and fever and no treatment-related deaths. Severe hypersensitivity occurred in six patients (6%). Concurrent radiation therapy and weekly chemotherapy also was well tolerated with the exception of Grade 3-4 esophagitis observed in 27% (17 of 67 patients). Follow-up was short with a median of 10 months, and 65% of all patients remained progression free. CONCLUSIONS: Three courses of paclitaxel and carboplatin is tolerable, feasible, and can be delivered in most patients in the adjuvant setting. Subsequently, in higher stage patients, concurrent postoperative radiation therapy and weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin is well tolerated and delivered in most patients. Definitive prospective randomized Phase III adjuvant trials are warranted.

Weekly docetaxel in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. A Minnie Pearl Cancer Research Network Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Weekly administration of docetaxel was found to reduce myelosuppression and other nonhematologic toxicities when compared with administration every 3 weeks. In the current Phase II trial, the authors evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of weekly docetaxel in the treatment of elderly patients with newly diagnosed advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with advanced, previously untreated nonsmall cell lung carcinoma entered this Phase II trial between February 1998 and January 1999. Patients were required either to be age >/= 65 years or to be poor candidates for combination chemotherapy due to coexistent medical illnesses. All patients received docetaxel, 36 mg/m(2), administered weekly for 6 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks without treatment. Patients were reevaluated after 8 weeks of treatment; responding patients continued weekly docetaxel for a maximum of 32 weeks or until disease progression. RESULTS: Weekly docetaxel was well tolerated by this elderly group of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Grade 3 leukopenia was noted in only 3 patients (8%), and no patient developed Grade 4 myelosuppression. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicity also was uncommon; fatigue/asthenia was reported in 4 patients (10%). Seven of 38 evaluable patients (18%) had objective responses to weekly docetaxel whereas an additional 13 patients (34%) had a minor response or stable disease at first reevaluation. The median survival in this group of elderly patients was 5 months, with a 1-year actuarial survival rate of 27%. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study show that weekly docetaxel is active and well tolerated in elderly patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and provides an additional treatment option for these patients, who often tolerate combination chemotherapy regimens poorly.

Rituximab monoclonal antibody as initial systemic therapy for patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Rituximab, a chimeric antibody that targets CD20(+) B cells, produces a 48% response rate in patients with refractory low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma. In this phase II trial, patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma who had previously received no systemic therapy were treated with rituximab, 375 mg/m(2), administered by IV infusion for 4 consecutive weeks. Patients with objective response or stable disease received repeat 4-week courses of rituximab at 6-month intervals. At the time of initial reevaluation at 6 weeks, 21 of 39 patients (54%) had objective response to treatment, and an additional 14 patients (36%) had stable disease or minor response. Response rates were similar in patients with follicular and small lymphocytic (CLL-type) lymphoma (52% versus 57%, respectively). At present, follow-up is short and only 13 patients have undergone a second course of rituximab treatment. However, 4 additional responses were documented either prior to the second course of rituximab (2 patients) or following the second course (2 patients) and 4 patients improved from partial to complete response. The current response rate is 64%, with 6 complete responses (15%). Treatment with rituximab was well tolerated, with only 1 patient experiencing grade 3/4 infusion-related toxicity. Rituximab is well tolerated and highly active in patients with low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma previously untreated with systemic therapy. Although further follow-up is required, the demonstration of minimal toxicity and considerable activity of this new biologic agent represents an important beginning of more specific, less toxic treatment for this important group of cancer patients.

Gemcitabine and vinorelbine in the second-line treatment of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma patients: a minnie pearl cancer research network phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Second-line chemotherapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma has been ineffective due to the lack of activity of older agents following platinum-based therapy. This Phase II trial evaluated the feasibility, toxicity, and efficacy of two active new agents, gemcitabine and vinorelbine, used in combination as second-line therapy for patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma who had progressive disease after previous chemotherapy or combined-modality therapy were eligible for this trial. All patients received vinorelbine 20 mg/m(2) followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on Days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle. Patients were reevaluated for a response after two treatment courses: responding patients and those with stable disease received a maximum of six courses. Fifty-five patients were treated between January 1998 and November 1998; 47 patients (85%) had previously received both a taxane and a platinum agent. RESULTS: Objective responses were seen in 9 of 50 evaluable patients (18%), including 8 partial responses and 1 complete response. Twenty-four additional patients (48%) had either minor response or stable disease. The median time to progression for patients with objective response or stable disease was 5 months. The median survival was 6.5 months with an actuarial 1-year survival of 20%. The treatment was well tolerated with uncommon nonhematologic toxicity and no alopecia. Grade 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 27% and 22% of patients, respectively, but Grade 4 neutropenia was uncommon (occurring in 9% of patients) and only 4 patients required hospitalization for treatment of neutropenia and fever. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of vinorelbine and gemcitabine is active and well tolerated as second-line therapy for patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. This regimen merits further evaluation as a first-line therapy for patients with this disease.