A phase I randomized postcoital testing and safety study of the Caya diaphragm used with 3% Nonoxynol-9 gel, ContraGel or no gel.

OBJECTIVES: The Caya® Diaphragm is a newly approved single-size, nonlatex diaphragm. Contragel® is a personal lubricant containing lactic acid approved in Europe and other countries for use with vaginal barrier devices. This study assessed the effectiveness in preventing sperm from penetrating midcycle cervical mucus of Caya with Contragel, Caya with 3% nonoxynol-9 (N-9) and Caya alone. STUDY DESIGN: Phase I multicenter, single-blind, randomized, crossover, nonsignificant risk study at two sites: Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA, USA, and Profamilia, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Healthy, sexually active women 18-45years old, not at risk for pregnancy due to tubal occlusion, were eligible. Each participant was seen in nine visits, completing a baseline cycle (without product use) followed by three test cycles (sequence determined by randomization), each consisting of a cervical mucus check visit and a postcoital test visit. To proceed to test cycles, the baseline postcoital test had to show adequate cervical mucus and >5 progressively motile sperm per high power field (PMS/HPF). RESULTS: All women had an average of <5 PMS/HPF during the test cycle of each study arm, the primary endpoint. Caya with ContraGel and Caya with N-9 reduced the average number of PMS/HPF from 22.5 to 0. Caya alone reduced the average number of PMS/HPF from 22.5 to 0.4. There were two possibly product-related mild adverse events. CONCLUSION: This study supports that Caya with ContraGel is safe and functions as well as Caya with N-9 in preventing PMS from reaching midcycle cervical mucus. IMPLICATIONS: A single-size diaphragm used with a personal lubricant gel containing lactic acid appears to be safe and to function as well as the same diaphragm used with N-9 in preventing PMS from reaching midcycle cervical mucus.

Use of the dye stain assay and ultraviolet light test for assessing vaginal insertion of placebo-filled applicators before and after sex.

BACKGROUND: Applicator dye staining and ultraviolet (UV) light have been used in trials to measure adherence, but not in the setting of before and after sex gel dosing (BAT-24). This study was designed to determine if semen or presex gel dosing impacts the sensitivity and specificity of a dye stain assay (DSA) for measuring vaginal insertion of placebo-filled applicators with BAT-24 dosing. METHODS: Healthy monogamous couples received Microlax-type applicators (Tectubes, Åstorp, Sweden) filled with hydroxyethylcelluose placebo gel. Women were instructed to vaginally insert 1 dose of gel before and a second dose after sex and to return applicators within 48 hours after sex. Applicators were stained to detect semen, followed by UV then DSA, and scored by 2 readers. Positive and negative controls were randomly included in applicator batches. RESULTS: Fifteen couples completed the study. Each woman returned at least 6 applicators over a 30-day period. The sensitivity for insertion of postsex applicators was higher for UV (97%) compared with DSA (90%), and the specificity was similar (≥96%). For presex applicators, the sensitivity and specificity were higher for DSA (100%) compared with UV testing (87% sensitivity, 96% specificity). Among returned postsex applicators, 95% tested positive by UV compared with 87% by DSA. Agreement between readers was significantly better on the presex applicators for DSA than for UV, and for postsex readings, agreement was less than half that for UV, although the results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Applicator tests are feasible for measuring adherence in trials with gel dosing before and after sex.

Evaluation of 3 approaches for assessing adherence to vaginal gel application in clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Accurate measurement of adherence to product use is an ongoing challenge in microbicide trials. METHODS: We compared adherence estimates using 2 applicator tests (a dye stain assay [DSA] and an ultraviolet light assay [UVA]), the Wisebag (an applicator container that electronically tracks container openings), and self-reported adherence (ability, frequency, and percent missed doses). Healthy, HIV-negative, nonpregnant US women aged 23 to 45 years received a Wisebag and 32 applicators filled with placebo gel were instructed to insert 1 applicator daily for 30 days, returned the Wisebag and all applicators, and completed an exit interview. Emptied applicators were tested by UVA and then DSA, and scored by 2 blinded readers. Positive and negative controls were randomly included in applicator batches. RESULTS: Among 42 women enrolled, 39 completed the study. Both DSA and UVA yielded similar sensitivity (97% and 95%) and specificity (79% and 79%). Two participants had fully inoperable Wisebags, and 9 had partially inoperable Wisebags. The proportion of participants considered to have high adherence (≥80%) varied: 43% (Wisebag), 46% (UVA), 49% (DSA), and 62% to 82% (self-reports). For estimating high adherence, Wisebag had a sensitivity of 76% (95% confidence interval, 50%-93%) and a specificity of 85% (95% confidence interval, 62%-97%) compared with DSA. Although 28% of participants reported forgetting to open the Wisebag daily, 59% said that it helped them remember gel use. CONCLUSIONS: Dye stain assay and UVA performed similarly. Compared with these tests, self-reports overestimated and Wisebag underestimated adherence. Although Wisebag may encourage gel use, the applicator tests currently seem more useful for measuring use in clinical trials.

Assessing the reporting of adherence and sexual activity in a simulated microbicide trial in South Africa: an interview mode experiment using a placebo gel.

Misreporting of adherence undermines detection of an association between product use and HIV infection in microbicide trials. This study investigates whether, in a placebo trial, audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) produces more accurate reporting of adherence and sexual behavior than a face-to-face interview (FTFI). At three South African clinics, 849 women were enrolled and instructed to use applicators filled with placebo gel; participants were randomly assigned to FTFI or ACASI. Behavioral reports were validated through two biomarkers that detect product usage and unprotected sex. For most behaviors, ACASI generated significantly higher reporting, although differences by interview mode appeared to diminish over time. ACASI participants were more likely to report having had sex without gel, but reported and tested applicators did not indicate greater honesty about gel insertion with ACASI. While comparisons of reported unprotected sex with the validated biomarker revealed more agreement with ACASI than with FTFI, differences were small.