Florida State University College of Medicine: from ideas to outcomes.

The Florida State University College of Medicine (FSU COM) was established in 2000, the first new MD-granting medical school in the United States in over 25 years. In its brief history, the FSU COM has developed rapidly in accordance with its founding mission to meet the need for primary care physicians, especially those caring for the elderly and the underserved. The school recently received a full continuation of accreditation for the maximum period, eight years, from the Liaison Committee on Medical Education.The authors describe FSU COM's new, innovative educational program using community-based clinical training on six statewide regional campuses and two rural sites. Third- and fourth-year students are assigned to community physicians in a one-on-one clinical training model in all of the settings where physicians practice. Over 70% of student clinical training is in such settings. The authors describe how the model operates, including curricular oversight (which ensures quality and equivalence of the educational experience at all sites), the regional campus structure, administration, education program delivery during core clerkships, and assessment of students' performance. Ongoing required faculty development for all clerkship faculty is an essential feature of the training program, as is tracking of all individual student contacts through an online clinical data collection system used for evaluation of the clerkship experiences as well as research.The authors demonstrate that the school has been highly successful in implementing its mission, and that the challenge ahead is to sustain its approach to the training of future physicians.

The surgical clerkship: a contemporary paradigm.

BACKGROUND: Traditional surgical clerkships have been composed of hospitalized patients, usually in academic centers, daily resident interaction, periodic attending rounds, assigned texts, and a lecture format. However, traditional clerkships do not reflect the current changes in learning theory nor the economic realities of today's surgical practice. Initiated in 2001, the allopathic Florida State University College of Medicine provided an opportunity to create a contemporary surgical clerkship. METHODS: At each of 6 regional campuses, clerkship students served as apprentices to a board-certified community surgeon. In addition, during weekly meetings with the student, a campus-specific Clerkship Director administered a centralized curriculum with defined objectives and competencies. Contact with residents was minimal, and lectures were not used. Students were free to choose from suggested texts or to use alternative learning sources. An electronic data system monitored patient contacts. Evaluations of the students' clinical performance are 360 degrees. RESULTS: To date, 450 students have graduated. No significant differences were found between campuses for the following: types of patients encountered, U.S. Medical Liscensure Examination Step 2 Clinical Knowledge and Clinical Skills scores, internal Objective Structured Clinical Examination results, or National Board of Medical Examiners scores (P > 0.05). The national examination metrics have been met or exceeded. On the recent anonymous Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire survey, the students rated the surgery clerkship as the best course in the school. Overall, 23.3% of graduates have chosen some aspect of surgery as a career. CONCLUSIONS: A quality clerkship in surgery can be provided using a nontraditional community-based system, with as many as 6 distributed campuses. Also, the distributed campus model does not lead to inequality in learning opportunities, surgical experiences, or basic surgical knowledge. Third, documentation of campus comparability is markedly assisted by electronic monitoring. Fourth, the tutorial model offers, at the very least, a comparable learning experience and is strongly supported by both students and the community surgical faculty. Finally, student learning and acquisition of a fund of surgical knowledge in this system has been confirmed by national metrics.