Impact of socioeconomic status on vision-related quality of life in primary open-angle glaucoma.

PurposeTo investigate the impact of socioeconomic status (SES) on vision-related quality of life (VRQOL) in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG).Patients and methodsThis prospective cross-sectional study included consecutive patients with POAG at a tertiary hospital between March 2012 and January 2013. All patients had visual acuity no worse than 20/60 in the better eye and reliable visual field tests. VRQOL was assessed by the validated Taiwan version 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). Sociodemographic characteristics, medical history, and ocular parameters were recorded. SES was evaluated based on educational attainment and monthly income, both stratified into three levels. Analysis of variance and linear regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between SES, VRQOL, and clinical parameters.ResultsAmong the 186 patients recruited, intergroup differences were not observed among educational or monthly income levels for binocular vision or integrated visual field defects. Patients of lower educational and monthly income levels had lower self-reported general health ratings. After adjustment for visual function, treatment complexity, and general health in the multiple linear regression model, patients with a college degree or higher reported better NEI VFQ-25 scores for the composite score (P=0.041), mental health (P=0.035), and peripheral vision (P=0.05) than did those with education below junior high school. Monthly income levels did not affect the NEI VFQ-25 scores.ConclusionEducational attainment significantly affects VRQOL in patients with POAG. Additional counseling may be provided to patients with lower educational background to help them cope with the disease.

Seven-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error among an elderly Chinese population in Shihpai, Taiwan: The Shihpai Eye Study.

PURPOSE: To report the 7-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error in a metropolitan Chinese elderly population. METHODS: The Shihpai Eye Study 2006 included 460/824 (55.8%) subjects (age range 72-94 years old) of 1361 participants in the 1999 baseline survey for a follow-up eye examination. Visual acuity was assessed using a Snellen chart, uncorrected refractive error was defined as presenting visual acuity (naked eye if without spectacles and with distance spectacles if worn) in the better eye of <6/12 that improved to no impairment (≥6/12) after refractive correction. RESULTS: The 7-year incidence of uncorrected refractive error was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.6-13.4%). 92.7% of participants with uncorrection and 77.8% with undercorrection were able to improve at least two lines of visual acuity by refractive correction. In multivariate analysis controlling for covariates, uncorrected refractive error was significantly related to myopia (relative risk (RR): 3.15; 95% CI: 1.31-7.58) and living alone (RR: 2.94; 95% CI 1.14-7.53), whereas distance spectacles worn during examination was protective (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14-0.88). CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that the incidence of uncorrected refractive error was high (10.5%) in this elderly Chinese population. Living alone and myopia are predisposing factors, whereas wearing distance spectacles at examination is protective.

Cataract surgery is associated with a reduced risk of dementia: a nationwide population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Our purpose was to determine the association of cataract surgery with subsequent development of dementia in older adults with newly diagnosed cataract. METHODS: By using data from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), a population-based cohort study including 491 226 subjects aged 70 or older with first-time diagnosis of cataract coded from 2000 to 2009 was conducted. After matching cataract patients receiving cataract surgery with cataract patients without receiving cataract surgery for age, sex, index date, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, interval between first coding of cataract diagnosis and index date, hypertension and diabetes mellitus, 113 123 patients in each cohort were enrolled. The main outcome measure was newly diagnosed dementia coded by neurologists or psychiatrists more than 365 days after cataract surgery. Incidence rate and hazard ratio of dementia were compared between the cataract surgery and cataract diagnosis cohorts. RESULTS: The incidence rate of dementia was 22.40 per 1000 person-years in the cataract surgery cohort and 28.87 per 1000 person-years in the cataract diagnosis cohort. The rate of dementia was significantly lower in the cataract surgery group (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.75-0.79, P < 0.001). Female gender (P < 0.001) and a shorter interval between the date of first coding of a cataract diagnosis and the date of cataract surgery (P = 0.009) were significantly associated with a lower incidence rate of dementia. CONCLUSION: In an NHIRD cohort of Taiwanese aged 70 years and older with a diagnosis of cataract, patients undergoing cataract surgery were associated with a reduced risk of subsequent dementia compared with those without cataract surgery.

Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers.

AIMS: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), noncontact tonometer (NCT), and ocular blood flow tonometer (OBFT), and to evaluate the effects of varying central corneal thickness (CCT) on the readings. METHODS: Ultrasound pachymetry and tonometry were performed on 170 eyes. Using the corrected GAT values that took CCT into account as the standard, we calculated the NCT and OBFT measurement errors related to the CCT variable by a linear regression model. Group comparisons were performed with the chi2 test and one-way ANOVA test. The correlation between the various tonometer measurements was analysed by Pearson's correlation method. RESULTS: Both the NCT (r=0.872, P<0.001) and OBFT measurements (r=0.861, P<0.001) were highly correlated with the GAT measurements. IOP measurements using the three tonometers were all correlated with CCT (all P<0.001), with the NCT measurements showing the greatest regression coefficient (beta=0.063, r=0.650) and the GAT measurements the least (beta=0.037, r=0.496). A linear regression model indicated that a 10 microm change in CCT resulted in a NCT measurement deviation of 0.47-0.98 mmHg and an OBFT measurement deviation of 0.29-0.81 mmHg. CONCLUSION: Pressure readings with the GAT, NCT, and OBFT are all affected by CCT, with the NCT being the one most affected and the GAT the least. Our findings suggest CCT an essential variable to consider in interpreting IOP readings, especially for the NCT measurements.