A comparative analysis of ChatGPT, ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard performances at the Advanced Burn Life Support Exam.

Artificial intelligence and Large Language Models (LLM) have recently gained attention as promising tools in various healthcare domains, offering potential benefits in clinical decision-making, medical education and research. The Advanced Burn Life Support (ABLS) program is a didactic initiative endorsed by the American Burn Association, aiming to provide knowledge on the immediate care of the severely burn patient. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of three LLMs (ChatGPT-3.5, ChatGPT-4 and Google Bard) on the ABLS exam. The ABLS exam consists of 50 questions with 5 multiple choice answers. The passing threshold is 80% of correct answers. The three LLMs were queried with the 50 questions included in the latest version of the ABLS exam, on July 18th, 2023. ChatGPT-3.5 scored 86% (43 out of 50), ChatGPT-4 scored 90% (45 out of 50), and Bard scored 70% (35 out of 50). No difference was measured between ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 (p=0.538) and between ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard (p=0.054), despite the borderline p-value. ChatGPT-4 performed significantly better than Bard (p=0.012). Out of the 50 questions, 78% (n=39) were direct questions, while 12% (n=11) were presented as clinical scenarios. No difference in the rate of wrong answers was found based on the type of question for the three LLMs. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 demonstrated high accuracy at the ABLS exam, and outperformed Google Bard. However, the potential multiple applications of LLMs in emergency burn and trauma care necessitate appropriate surveillance and most likely should represent a tool to complement human cognition.

Fourteen-Year Experience in Burn Eyelid Reconstruction and Complications Recurrence: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Loss of vision and other ocular defects are a concern with eyelid burn sequelae. This most commonly progresses from eyelid contracture to cicatricial ectropion and lagophthalmos. When left untreated, these may lead to exposure keratitis, ulceration, infection, perforation, and loss of vision. In the case of full-thickness eyelid burns, release and grafting are required. However, there is a paucity of studies on outcomes in eyelid burn surgery treatment, despite concern for permanent ocular damage or loss of vision. The aim of the study is to describe the complication rates in burn eyelid reconstruction at a single center for 14 years. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of all patients who had sustained eyelid burns and required reconstruction between April 2009 and February 2023. Medical records were obtained from patients' charts. Collected data include demographics, medical history, type of injury, indication for surgery, procedure performed, and complications. RESULTS: A total of 14 patients and 25 eyelids underwent eyelid reconstruction of the 901 total patients with burn-related injuries requiring plastic surgery reconstruction. These patients underwent 54 eyelid surgeries with a mean follow-up time of 13.1 ± 17.1 months. Patients were 71% men and 29% women, with a mean age of 45.1 ± 15.6 years. In 53.7% (n = 29) of the cases, the simultaneous reconstruction of both the upper and lower eyelids was necessary. The reconstruction of the upper and lower eyelid alone represented a smaller percentage (25.9% and 20.4%, respectively). On average, the patients received 3.9 ± 3.5 eyelid surgeries. The overall complication rate was 53.7% (n = 29). The most common complication was ectropion (42.6%, n = 23). Other complications included eye injury (25.9%, n = 14), lagophthalmos (24.1%, n = 13), local infection (7.4%, n = 4), and graft loss (5.6%, n = 3). CONCLUSION: Periorbital burns represent a major challenge that may require complex surgical intervention. Full-thickness skin graft remains the standard of care for patients with eyelid burns. However, there is a high incidence of ectropion that may require reoperation. Further studies examining the conditions of successful eyelid burn procedures may provide guidance on when patients may benefit from eyelid reconstruction during their burn treatment.

The Development and Management of Neck Burn Scar Contracture Recurrence: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: Burn neck contractures pose a great challenge for reconstructive surgeons. A paucity of literature exist regarding long-term outcomes based on different surgical management strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of the treatment of neck burn scar contractures and evaluate surgical strategies according to their long-term effectiveness and associated complications. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to review outcomes of neck contractures release after burn injury. All patients operated on between January 2009 and February 2023 at a single institution were included. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients developed neck burn scar contracture and were included in this study. The mean age was 32.9 ± 20.3 years. The burn injuries were most commonly thermal (n = 19, 95%). All burn injuries were full-thickness burns, with an average neck defect size of 130.5 ± 106.0 cm2. Overall, 45 surgical scar release procedures were performed on the 20 patients who developed a neck contracture. Patients underwent 1.65 ± 1.04 surgeries on average to address neck contracture. Although 25% of patients only received 1 surgery to treat neck contracture, some patients underwent as many as 8 surgeries. Contracture recurrence (CR) was the most common complication and occurred in 28.9% of the cases. The mean percentage total body surface area did not significantly differ in CR patients (26.7% ± 14.9%) and no-CR patients (44.5% ± 30.2%). However, there was a significant difference (P = 0.01) in the average neck defect size between CR patients (198.5 ± 108.3 cm2) and no-CR patients (81.1 ± 75.1 cm2). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that risk factors for initial burn scar contractures may differ from those associated with CR, highlighting the importance of neck defect size as a predictor. The study also examines various surgical approaches, with Z-plasty showing promise for managing CR. However, the absence of data on neck range of motion is a limitation. This research underscores the complexity of managing CR and emphasizes the need for ongoing postoperative monitoring.

A Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Cited Articles on Body Contouring Surgery After Massive Weight Loss.

BACKGROUND: Body contouring surgery after massive weight loss has emerged a safe and reliable option to improve self-esteem, social life, work ability, physical activity, and sexual activity, and it is considered as an essential step in the multidisciplinary approach to morbid obesity. In this study, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of literature on body contouring after massive weight loss, identifying research trends and areas for future investigation. METHODS: The Web of Science Core Collection was used to identify the 50 most cited publications on post-massive weight loss surgery. Data collected from each article included: title, journal, publication year, total citations, average citations per year, authors, study type, study topic, country, and institution of origin. RESULTS: The top 50 most-cited articles include 44 original articles and 6 review articles. The most cited article, published by Lockwood in 1991, received a total of 224 citations. The research areas included surgical outcomes and complications (n=19, 38%), psychological aspects such as body image, quality of life and desire for body contouring procedures (n=18, 36%), surgical techniques (n=11, 22%), an anatomical study (n=1, 2%), and a classification system (n=1; 2%). Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery journal published most (44%) of the papers identified. The University of Pittsburgh was the single institution that contributed the most (n=11; 22%). CONCLUSION: This bibliometric analysis provides insights and research trends for clinicians interested in body contouring after massive weight loss, facilitating the understanding and evolution of post-bariatric surgery and elucidating the rationale behind current practice. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Plastic Surgery in Burn Care: A Call for Enhanced Burn Surgery Training Within Plastic Surgery Residency Programs.

ABSTRACT: A 10 year cohort of patients admitted to a verified burn unit were analyzed to assess the role of plastic surgeons in the operative management of those patients. All 3843patients were admitted during this study period. Of these, 1509 of those patients underwent surgical procedures. Plastic surgeons performed 658 operations on these patients, including acute and delayed reconstruction of hand and facial burn injuries. In this population, plastic surgeons played a critical role in acute and reconstructive burn injuries in anatomically complex areas. This series illustrates the need for plastic surgery training in burn care.

The Effect of Fat Grafting on Scars Hyperpigmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hyperpigmented scars, particularly in exposed body areas, can be difficult to conceal and may evoke psychological distress. While the precise causes of scar dyschromia are not fully understood, alterations in melanogenic activity appear to hold more significance than changes in melanocyte quantity. Current treatments encompass laser interventions. However, it is essential to consider their costs and potential complications in relation to their limited proven effectiveness. Fat grafting has gained interest as a scar modulation technique due to its regenerative properties, and its efficacy in reducing scar hyperpigmentation is currently under investigation. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were accessed. PROSPERO registration number is CRD42023457778. The primary outcome was a change in scar pigmentation after fat grafting. Pigmentation changes after fat grafting were calculated using the standardized mean difference (SMD) between baseline and postoperative scores according to POSAS and VSS scales. Bias assessment was conducted according to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence quality assessment tool. RESULTS: A total of 8 articles meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria were identified, involving 323 patients with hyperpigmented scars treated with fat grafting. A significant difference in scar pigmentation was noted after treatment with fat grafting according to observers' ratings, with a SMD of - 1.09 [95% CI: - 1.32; - 0.85], p<0.01. The SMD for patient-reported scar pigmentation after treatment with fat grafting was - 0.99 [96% CI: - 1.31; - 0.66], p<0.01. Four studies provided objective measurements of melanin changes after fat grafting and revealed inconsistent findings compared to subjective observations. CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting shows promise in ameliorating hyperpigmented scars based on subjective assessments, but further corroborating evidence from objective measures is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

The First Months of Life of ChatGPT and Its Impact in Healthcare: A Bibliometric Analysis of the Current Literature.

We aimed to evaluate current trends and future directions in the field of AI research since ChatGPT was launched. We performed a bibliometric analysis of the literature published during the first 7 months of the life of ChatGPT since its introduction, updated to July 1st, 2023. Seven hundred and twenty-four (724) articles were retrieved. This analysis highlights a significant increase in publications exploring ChatGPT use across various medical disciplines, indicating its expanding relevance in healthcare. A decline proportion of studies focusing on ethical considerations was observed. Simultaneously, there was a steady increase in studies focused on the exploration of possible applications of ChatGPT. As ChatGPT applications continue to expand, ongoing vigilance and collaborative efforts to optimize ChatGPT performance are essential in harnessing the benefits while mitigating the risks of AI use in healthcare.

Consulting the Digital Doctor: Google Versus ChatGPT as Sources of Information on Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma and Breast Implant Illness.

BACKGROUND: Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare complication associated with the use of breast implants. Breast implant illness (BII) is another potentially concerning issue related to breast implants. This study aims to assess the quality of ChatGPT as a potential source of patient education by comparing the answers to frequently asked questions on BIA-ALCL and BII provided by ChatGPT and Google. METHODS: The Google and ChatGPT answers to the 10 most frequently asked questions on the search terms "breast implant associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma" and "breast implant illness" were recorded. Five blinded breast plastic surgeons were then asked to grade the quality of the answers according to the Global Quality Score (GQS). A Wilcoxon paired t-test was performed to evaluate the difference in GQS ratings for Google and ChatGPT answers. The sources provided by Google and ChatGPT were also categorized and assessed. RESULTS: In a comparison of answers provided by Google and ChatGPT on BIA-ALCL and BII, ChatGPT significantly outperformed Google. For BIA-ALCL, Google's average score was 2.72 ± 1.44, whereas ChatGPT scored an average of 4.18 ± 1.04 (p < 0.01). For BII, Google's average score was 2.66 ± 1.24, while ChatGPT scored an average of 4.28 ± 0.97 (p < 0.01). The superiority of ChatGPT's responses was attributed to their comprehensive nature and recognition of existing knowledge gaps. However, some of ChatGPT's answers had inaccessible sources. CONCLUSION: ChatGPT outperforms Google in providing high-quality answers to commonly asked questions on BIA-ALCL and BII, highlighting the potential of AI technologies in patient education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Online patient education in body contouring: A comparison between Google and ChatGPT.

Appropriate patient education and preparation prior to surgery represent a fundamental step in managing expectations, avoiding unnecessary encounters and eventually achieving optimal outcomes. Thus, the objective of this study is to evaluate ChatGPT's potential as a viable source for patient education by comparing its responses and provided references to frequently asked questions on body contouring, with Google's. A Google search was conducted on July 15th, 2023, using the search term "body contouring surgery". The first 15 questions under the "People also ask" section and answers provided by Google were recorded. The 15 questions were then asked to ChatGPT-3.5. Four plastic surgeons evaluated the answers from 1 to 5 according to the Global Quality Scale. The mean score for responses given by Google was 2.55 ± 1.29, indicating poor quality but some information present, of very limited use to patients. The mean score for responses produced by ChatGPT was 4.38 ± 0.67, suggesting that the content was of good quality, useful to patients, and encompassed the most important topics. The difference was statistically significant (p = 0.001). Deficiencies in providing references represent one of the most evident weaknesses of ChatGPT. However, ChatGPT did not appear to spread misinformation, and the content of the generated responses was deemed of good quality and useful to patients. The integration of AI technology as a source for patient education has the potential to optimize patient queries on body contouring questions.

Can ChatGPT be the Plastic Surgeon's New Digital Assistant? A Bibliometric Analysis and Scoping Review of ChatGPT in Plastic Surgery Literature.

BACKGROUND: ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot that uses natural language processing (NLP) to interact in a humanlike manner, has made significant contributions to various healthcare fields, including plastic surgery. However, its widespread use has raised ethical and security concerns. This study examines the presence of ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot, in the literature of plastic surgery. METHODS: A bibliometric analysis and scoping review of the ChatGPT plastic surgery literature were performed. PubMed was queried using the search term "ChatGPT" to identify all biomedical literature on ChatGPT, with only studies related to plastic, reconstructive, or aesthetic surgery topics being considered eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: The analysis included 30 out of 724 articles retrieved from PubMed, focusing on publications from December 2022 to July 2023. Four key areas of research emerged: applications in research/creation of original work, clinical application, surgical education, and ethics/commentary on previous studies. The versatility of ChatGPT in research, its potential in surgical education, and its role in enhancing patient education were explored. Ethical concerns regarding patient privacy, plagiarism, and the accuracy of information obtained from ChatGPT-generated sources were also highlighted. CONCLUSION: While ethical concerns persist, the study underscores the potential of ChatGPT in plastic surgery research and practice, emphasizing the need for careful utilization and collaboration to optimize its benefits while minimizing risks. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Assessing the Soft Tissue Infection Expertise of ChatGPT and Bard Compared to IDSA Recommendations.

The aim of the study was to evaluate whether ChatGPT-3.5 and Bard provide safe and reliable medical answers to common topics related to soft tissue infections and their management according to the guidelines provided by the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA). IDSA's abridged recommendations for soft tissue infections were identified on the IDSA official website. Twenty-five queries were entered into the LLMs as they appear on the IDSA website. To assess the concordance and precision of the LLMs' responses with the IDSA guidelines, two infectious disease physicians independently compared and evaluated each response. This was done using a 5-point Likert scale, with 1 representing poor concordance and 5 excellent concordance, as adapted from the validated Global Quality Scale. The mean ± SD score for ChatGPT-generated responses was 4.34 ± 0.74, n = 25. This indicates that raters found the answers were good to excellent quality with the most important topics covered. Although some topics were not covered, the answers were in good concordance with the IDSA guidelines. The mean ± SD score for Bard-generate responses was 3.5 ± 1.2, n = 25, indicating moderate quality. Despite LLMs did not appear to provide wrong recommendations and covered most of the topics, the responses were often found to be generic, rambling, missing some details, and lacking actionability. As AI continues to evolve and researchers feed it with more extensive and diverse medical knowledge, it may be inching closer to becoming a reliable aid for clinicians, ultimately enhancing the accuracy of infectious disease diagnosis and management in the future.

Free Flap Failure and Complications in Acute Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background: Severe acute burn injuries represent a challenge to the reconstructive surgeon. Free flap reconstruction might be required in cases of significant critical structure exposure and soft tissue deficits, when local options are unavailable. This study aimed to determine the free flap complication rate in acute burn patients. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted and reported according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines and registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews database (CRD42023404478). The following databases were accessed: Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The primary outcome was the free flap failure rate. Results: The study identified 31 articles for inclusion. A total of 427 patients (83.3% men, 16.7% women) accounting for 454 free flaps were included. The mean patient age was 36.21 [95% confidence interval (CI), 31.25-41.16]. Total free flap loss rate was 9.91% [95% CI, 7.48%-13.02%], and partial flap loss was 4.76% [95% CI, 2.66%-8.39%]. The rate of venous thrombosis was 6.41% [95% CI, 3.90%-10.36%] and arterial thrombosis was 5.08% [95% CI, 3.09%-8.26%]. Acute return to the operating room occurred in 20.63% [16.33%-25.71%] of cases. Stratified by body region, free flaps in the lower extremity had a failure rate of 8.33% [95% CI, 4.39%-15.24%], whereas in the upper extremity, the failure rate was 6.74% [95% CI, 3.95%-11.25%]. Conclusion: This study highlights the high risk of free flap complications and failure in acute burn patients.