Phase II Study of Recombinant Antitumor and Antivirus Protein Injection Compared With Placebo in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure of Standard Treatment.

LESSONS LEARNED: Novaferon showed moderate efficacy and was well-tolerated in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), especially with the 20 µg injected 3 times a week strategy.Although Novaferon did not provide a survival benefit for mCRC patients who have failed standard treatment, it may play a role in improvement of immune function. BACKGROUND: To observe the efficacy, safety, and optimal dosage of recombinant antitumor and antivirus protein (Novaferon) in treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed at least two prior palliative regimens. METHODS: We enrolled 108 patients from May 2011 to December 2012. According to different treatment modalities and therapeutic dosages, the participants were randomly divided into four cohorts at a 2:2:2:1 ratio: (a) 20 µg Novaferon (Genova Biotech, Beijing, People's Republic of China, http://www.genovabiotech.net) injected twice per week, (b) 20 µg Novaferon injected 3 times per week, (c) 40 µg Novaferon injected 3 times per week, or (d) saline injected 3 times per week. The primary endpoint was overall survival. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in overall survival among the four cohorts. The 20-µg dose of Novaferon injected 3 times per week had the highest disease control rate (44.0%) at 6 weeks but without significant differences when compared with placebo (p = .159). Major adverse events with Novaferon were influenza-like symptoms, bone marrow suppression, liver dysfunction, and gastrointestinal discomfort. The level of natural killer cells increased and regulatory T cells decreased significantly after treatment with Novaferon, whereas levels in the placebo group remained the same. CONCLUSION: Novaferon showed moderate efficacy and was well tolerated in patients with mCRC, especially with the 20-µg dose injected 3 times per week. Furthermore, Novaferon might improve immune function of these patients.

[Analysis of therapeutic effect and prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and different K-ras status].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the correlation of clinical effect and prognosis between patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and different K-ras status. METHODS: The clinical characteristics, chemotherapeutic regimens and survival of 153 mCRC patients with different K-ras status were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: The median overall survival (OS) in patients without K-ras mutation were 31.7 months, significantly longer than 21.3 months in the patients with K-ras mutation (P = 0.037). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in patients who received chemotherapy followed by anti-EGFR antibody treatment were 11.5 and 39.3 months, respectively, significantly longer as compared with the PFS and OS in those received chemotherapy in combination with anti-EGFR antibody concomitantly (5.7, P = 0.02, and 28.7 months, P = 0.034, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: K-ras status is a prognostic biomarker for mCRC patients treated with anti-EGFR antibody. The combination settings of anti-EGFR in combination with chemotherapy may improve survival of mCRC patients with wild-type K-ras status.

Expression and prognostic value of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-ß, and c-Met in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We explore the clinical and prognostic significance of expression of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-ß, and c-Met in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The expression of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-ß, and c-Met were determined by immunohistochemical examination of the tissues of 93 HCC patients. The relationships of these markers with clinicopathological factors and prognosis were then analyzed. RESULTS: High expression of VEGFR-2, PDGFR-ß, and c-Met was found in 86%, 19.4%, and 80.6% of patients, respectively. Expression of VEGFR-2 correlated with gender (P = 0.044), hepatitis B surface antigen positivity (P = 0.024), degree of tumor differentiation (P = 0.023), and hepatic cirrhosis (P = 0.026). Expression of PDGFR-ß correlated with alpha-fetoprotein level (P = 0.029), tumor size (P = 0.033), and hepatic cirrhosis (P = 0.023). No significant correlations were identified between expression of c-Met and clinicopathological factors. Expression of PDGFR-ß correlated with overall survival (P = 0.046) and expression of c-Met correlated with progression-free survival (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We found that in patients with HCC, high expression of VEGFR-2 correlates with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and hepatic cirrhosis. High expression of PDGFR-ß is a predictor of poor prognosis. High expression of C-Met may predict therapeutic effectiveness of sorafenib in HCC patients.

[Clinical analysis of the current treatment status of gastric cancer in 636 patients].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the current clinical treatment status of gastric cancer in China. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of clinicopathological characteristics of 636 patients with gastric cancer was conducted. Tumor response was evaluated using RECIST version 1.1 criteria. RESULTS: Six hundred and thirty-six patients were included in this retrospective cohort: 479 men and 157 women. The median age was 57 years (14 to 86). The tumor site was: proximal (41.4%), distal (46.4%) or unknown (12.2%). The histology was: adenocarcinoma (85.8%), signet ring cell carcinoma (6.9%), or other and unknown (7.2%). The differentiation of the adenocarcinomas was: well differentiated (31.0%), moderately differentiated (13.4%), poorly differentiated (37.0%), or unknown (18.7%). The pTNM stage was: 0 (0.3%), I (3.6%), II (10.1%), III (36.8%), IV (45.6%), or unknown (3.6%). In 284 patients who underwent radical resection, the ratio of examined ten and/or more lymph nodes was higher in hospitals at or above provincial level than in hospitals at regional level (57.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.009). The disease-free survival was longer (21.7 m vs. 14.6 m, P = 0.005), and the overall survival was longer too (52.9 m vs. 33.8 m, P = 0.040). In 205 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy, the ratio of administered six and/or more cycles chemotherapy was 42.1% vs. 35.2% (P = 0.318), and the disease-free survival was 22.7 m vs. 16.3 m (P = 0.005) between hospitals at or above provincial level and hospitals at regional level. In 387 patients with metastatic or unresectable gastric cancer who received palliative chemotherapy, the overall survival was 11.1 m (95%CI 9.9 - 12.3 m). Among them, 198 patients received second and/or more line chemotherapy, and the overall survival was longer (12.5 m vs. 7.7 m, P < 0.001). Except a longer progression-free survival (10.2 m, P < 0.05) and a longer overall survival (16.9 m, P < 0.05) were corresponded with the regimen containing trastuzumab, no other significant difference was observed among regimens in first line chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Chinese doctors working in different level hospitals have a different understanding of the treatment standard of gastric cancer, which resulted in different outcomes.

[HER-2 expression in advanced gastric cancer and its correlation with clinical features, outcome and prognosis].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the HER-2 status in Chinese advanced gastric cancer patients and explore its correlation with clinical features, treatment response and prognosis. METHODS: A total of 107 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated in our hospital from December 2005 to November 2008 were included in this retrospective analysis. HER-2 status was determined by immunohistochemisty (IHC) and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The correlations of HER-2 status with tumor location, pathology, treatment response and prognosis were analyzed and the efficacy of different chemottherapy regimens was compared. RESULTS: The overall positive rate of HER-2 expression was 14.7% (15/102). The HER-2 status was detected by both methods in 102 patients, and the concordance of the two methods was 66.5%. The tumor site distribution was gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) 28.0%, proximal stomach 19.4%, gastric corpus 16.1%, antrum 26.9% and whole stomach 9.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference of HER-2 status among different tumor sites (P = 0.726), and no significant correlation between HER-2 expression and differentiation (P = 0.110). Among the evaluable 51 patients treated by first-line chemotherapy, the total objective effective rate was 23.5%. The median time-to-progression was 7.47 months, and median overall survival time was 11.07 months. The effective rate was 43.8% in patients who received XP regimen chemotherapy (cisplatin + capecitabine), significantly higher than the 14.3% in patients treated with other regimens (P = 0.033). Their overall survival was 14.17 months and 9.53 months, respectively (P = 0.059). The TTP was 6.63 months in HER-2 positive patients and 7.47 months in HER-2 negative patients, with a non-significant difference (P = 0.510). However, there was a improving tendency in the efficacy and OS, showing a effective rate of 45.5% and 17.5% (P = 0.102) and OS of 14.17 months and 10.63 months, respectively (P = 0.205). CONCLUSIONS: HER-2-positivity rate in Chinese patients with advanced gastric cancer is similar to those reported in the literature. Along with the increasing use of targeted therapy and targeted agents, the efficacy and survival of gastric cancer patients is improving. HER-2-positive patients may benefit from it.

[Evaluation of bevacizumab combined with irinotecan-based regimen as the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab plus irinotecan-based regimen for the first line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients, and to investigate the correlation between serum tumor markers including CEA and CA19-9 and response as well as prognosis. METHODS: From May 2007 to July 2008, 67 previously untreated mCRC patients received treatment of IFL (n = 25), IFL plus Bevacizumab (n = 20) or FOLFIRI (n = 22). The treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The data were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: All patients were evaluable for response, survival and toxicity analysis. The objective response rate of IFL, IFL plus Bevacizumab or FOLFIRI regimen groups was 16.0% (4/25), 35.0% (7/20) and 18.2% (4/22), respectively (χ(2) = 6.026, P = 0.049). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of IFL plus bevacizumab group was 7.5 months, significantly improved as compared with 3.7 months in the IFL group and 4 months in FOLFIRI group (χ(2) = 11.97, P = 0.003). Of all 67 cases, the one-year survival rate was 47.0%, two-year survival rate was 27.0%, and the median overall survival (OS) was 13.0 months, with no significant difference among the three treatment groups (χ(2) = 3.42, P = 0.18). The serum CEA and CA19-9 levels were decreased after treatment, but with no significant difference among the three groups (P > 0.05). The common toxicity profiles of IFL and FOLFIRI regimens were diarrhea and neutropenia, while the toxicity related to bevacizumab was consistent with that documented in previous literature, such as hypertension, hemorrhage, cardiac toxicity and delayed wound healing. CONCLUSION: The addition of bevacizumab to irinotecan-based regimen significantly improves the response rate and PFS in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC and its toxicity is well tolerated.

[Study on the amount of daily iodine intake of inhabitants living in drinking water with excessive iodine content areas after termination of iodized salt supply].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the amount of daily iodine intake in the diet of the target population in drinking water with areas of excessive iodine after stopping supply of iodized salt, to provide evidence for developing strategies on control and prevention of excessive iodine. METHODS: 335 objectives were selected by a two-stage sampling method in 4 administrative villages with different iodine contents in drinking water. The amount of drinking water intake and dietary survey for 335 people were done by a door-to-door survey,while the iodine contents in the drinking water of each selected family, local staple food and vegetable were measured. RESULTS: The median level of iodine in drinking water was 431.5 microg/L while the daily amount of iodine intake among the three groups of waters with different iodine contents were all greater than RNI. The daily iodine intake of local people was all greater than UL in the areas where the water iodine contents were more than 300 microg/L. It was of statistical sense that the iodine mean intake per capita per day of the three groups differed at different water iodine levels (P < 0.01). The iodine mean intake per capita per day of the three groups of different water iodine levels increased along with water iodine and showed a uptrend (P < 0.01). 83.2%-98.7% of the daily iodine intake of the three groups was from drinking water and 1.3%-16.8% came from food. The iodine intake had high-positive correlation relation with the content of water iodine (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that drinking water was the main source of iodine intake in areas with iodine excessive water by the percentage of over 80%. It was necessary to adopt measures to improve the quality of water to decrease the iodine content other than just stopping supplies of iodized salt in the areas where the water iodine contents were greater than 300 microg/L, in order to prevent and control excessive intake of iodine.