Thecal Sac Contouring as a Surrogate for the Cauda Equina and Intracanal Spinal Nerve Roots for Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT): Contour Variability and Recommendations for Safe Practice.

PURPOSE: To present interobserver variability in thecal sac (TS) delineation based on contours generated by 8 radiation oncologists experienced in spine stereotactic body radiation therapy and to propose contouring recommendations to standardize practice. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In the setting of a larger contouring study that reported target volume delineation guidelines specific to sacral metastases, 8 academically based radiation oncologists with dedicated spine stereotactic body radiation therapy programs independently contoured the TS as a surrogate for the cauda equina and intracanal spinal nerve roots. Uniform treatment planning simulation computed tomography datasets fused with T1, T2, and T1 post gadolinium magnetic resonance imaging for each case were distributed to each radiation oncologist. All contours were analyzed and agreement was calculated using both Dice similarity coefficient and simultaneous truth and performance level estimation with kappa statistics. RESULTS: A fair level of simultaneous truth and performance level estimation agreement was observed between practitioners, with a mean kappa agreement of 0.38 (range, 0.210.55) and the mean Dice similarity coefficient (± standard deviation, with range) was 0.43 (0.36 ± 0.1 to -0.53 ±0.1). Recommendations for a reference TS contour, accounting for the variations in practice observed in this study, include contouring the TS to encompass all the intrathecal spinal nerve roots, and caudal to the termination of the TS, the bony canal can be contoured as a surrogate for the extra thecal nerves roots that run within it. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that even among high-volume practitioners, there is a lack of uniformity when contouring the TS. Further modifications may be required once dosimetric data on nerve tolerance to ablative doses, and pattern of failure analyses of clinical data sets using these recommendations, become available. The contouring recommendations were designed as a guide to enable consistent and safe contouring across general practice.

Four-dimensional dose calculations for dynamic tumour tracking with a gimbal-mounted linear accelerator.

PURPOSE: In this study we present a novel method for re-calculating a treatment plan on different respiratory phases by accurately modeling the panning and tilting beam motion during DTT (the "rotation method"). This method is used to re-calculate the dose distribution of a plan on multiple breathing phases to accurately assess the dosimetry. METHODS: sIMRT plans were optimized on a breath hold computed tomography (CT) image taken at exhale (BHexhale ) for 10 previous liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy patients. Our method was used to re-calculate the plan on the inhale (0%) and exhale (50%) phases of the four-dimensional CT (4DCT) image set. The dose distributions were deformed to the BHexhale CT and summed together with proper weighting calculated from the patient's breathing trace. Subsequently, the plan was re-calculated on all ten phases using our method and the dose distributions were deformed to the BHexhale CT and accumulated together. The maximum dose for certain organs at risk (OARs) was compared between calculating on two phases and all ten phases. RESULTS: In total, 26 OARs were examined from 10 patients. When the dose was calculated on the inhale and exhale phases six OARs exceeded their dose limit, and when all 10 phases were used five OARs exceeded their limit. CONCLUSION: Dynamic tumor tracking plans optimized for a single respiratory phase leave an OAR vulnerable to exceeding its dose constraint during other respiratory phases. The rotation method accurately models the beam's geometry. Using deformable image registration to accumulate dose from all 10 breathing phases provides the most accurate results, however it is a time consuming procedure. Accumulating the dose from two extreme breathing phases (exhale and inhale) and weighting them properly provides accurate results while requiring less time. This approach should be used to confirm the safety of a DTT treatment plan prior to delivery.

International consensus recommendations for target volume delineation specific to sacral metastases and spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To interrogate inter-observer variability in gross tumour volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) delineation specific to the treatment of sacral metastases with spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and develop CTV consensus contouring recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Nine specialists with spinal SBRT expertise representing 9 international centres independently contoured the GTV and CTV for 10 clinical cases of metastatic disease within the sacrum. Agreement between physicians was calculated with an expectation minimisation algorithm using simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE) and with kappa statistics. Optimised confidence level consensus contours were obtained using a voxel-wise maximum likelihood approach and the STAPLE contours for GTV and CTV were based on an 80% confidence level. RESULTS: Mean GTV STAPLE agreement sensitivity and specificity was 0.70 (range, 0.54-0.87) and 1.00, respectively, and 0.55 (range, 0.44-0.64) and 1.00 for the CTV, respectively. Mean GTV and CTV kappa agreement was 0.73 (range, 0.59-0.83) and 0.59 (range, 0.41-0.70), respectively. Optimised confidence level consensus contours were identified by STAPLE analysis. Consensus recommendations for the CTV include treating the entire segment containing the disease in addition to the immediate adjacent bony anatomic segment at risk of microscopic extension. CONCLUSION: Consensus recommendations for CTV target delineation specific to sacral metastases treated with SBRT were established using expert contours. This is a critical first step to achieving standardisation of target delineation practice in the sacrum and will serve as a baseline for meaningful pattern of failure analyses going forward.

Consistency in electronic portal imaging registration in prostate cancer radiation treatment verification.

BACKGROUND: A protocol of electronic portal imaging (EPI) registration for the verification of radiation treatment fields has been implemented at our institution. A template is generated using the reference images, which is then registered with the EPI for treatment verification. This study examines interobserver consistency among trained radiation therapists in the registration and verification of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for patients with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 20 consecutive patients with prostate cancer undergoing EBRT were analyzed. The EPIs from the initial 10 fractions were registered independently by 6 trained radiation therapist observers. For each fraction, an anterior-posterior (AP or PA) and left lateral (Lat) EPIs were generated and registered with the reference images. Two measures of displacement for the AP EPI in the superior-inferior (SI) and right left (RL) directions and two measures of displacement for the Lat EPI in the AP and SI directions were prospectively recorded. A total of 2400 images and 4800 measures were analyzed. Means and standard deviations, as well as systematic and random errors were calculated for each observer. Differences between observers were compared using the chi-square test. Variance components analysis was used to evaluate how much variance is attributed to the observers. Time trends were estimated using repeated measures analysis. RESULTS: Inter-observer variation expressed as the standard deviation of the six observers' measurements within each image were 0.7, 1.0, 1.7 and 1.4 mm for APLR, APSI, LatAP and LatSI respectively. Variance components analysis showed that the variation attributed to the observers was small compared to variation due to the images. On repeated measure analysis, time trends were apparent only for the APLR and LatSI measurements. Their magnitude however was small. CONCLUSION: No clinically important systematic observer effect or time trends were identified in the registration of EPI by the radiation therapist observers in this study. These findings are useful in the documentation of consistency and reliability in the quality assurance of treatment verification of EBRT for prostate cancer.

Spinal cord tolerance to high-dose fractionated 3D conformal proton-photon irradiation as evaluated by equivalent uniform dose and dose volume histogram analysis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate cervical spinal cord tolerance using equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and dose volume histogram (DVH) analysis after proton-photon radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIAL: The 3D dose distributions were analyzed in 85 patients with cervical vertebral tumors. Mean follow-up was 41.3 months. The mean prescribed dose was 76.3 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE = proton dose x RBE 1.1). Dose constraints to the center and the surface of the cervical cord were 55-58 CGE and 67-70 CGE, respectively. Dose parameters, DVH and EUD, were calculated for each patient. The spinal cord toxicity was graded using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) and Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) late effects scoring system. RESULTS: Thirteen patients experienced Grade 1-2 toxicity. Four patients had Grade 3 toxicity. For the dose range used in this study, none of the dosimetric parameters was found to be associated with the observed distribution of cord toxicities. The only factor significantly associated with cord toxicity was the number of surgeries before irradiation. CONCLUSION: The data and our analysis suggest that the integrity of the normal musculoskeletal supportive tissues and vascular supply may be important confounding factors of toxicity at these dose levels. The results also indicate that the cervical spinal cord dose constraints used in treating these patients are appropriate for conformal proton-photon radiotherapy.

Computed tomography determination of prostate volume and maximum dimensions: a study of interobserver variability.

OBJECTIVE: (1) To evaluate the reproducibility of prostate volume, maximum dimensions and geometrical center coordinates determination using computed tomography (CT) and (2) to identify patterns of interobserver variability. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients, suitable for our brachytherapy program, were selected for the study. All patients underwent CT scanning and the prostate volumes were determined by three radiation oncologists. Measurements of geometrical center coordinates, maximum organ dimensions in the anterior-posterior (AP), lateral (Lat) and longitudinal (Long) axes as well as prostate volumes were recorded. This yielded 840 measurements of seven variables for analysis. The means and corresponding standard deviations (SD) of each variable were calculated for each patient. The SDs were then averaged and presented as indices of dispersion. Average variations from the mean were also calculated for each observer along with the SDs. RESULTS: Analysis of the geometrical center coordinates revealed acceptable variability amongst observers. For the AP, Lat and Long coordinates the SDs were 0.78, 0.89 and 1.72 mm, respectively. The corresponding values for the maximum organ dimensions were 2.54, 2.72 and 4.43 mm, respectively. While the volumes outlined by observer B were less than or equal to the mean in 95% of cases and those of observer C were greater than or equal to the mean in 93% of cases, the volumes of observer A were equally distributed above and below the mean (48% in both cases). CONCLUSION: The determination of the geometrical center coordinates was reproducible amongst observers. The largest variations were seen with the Long axis. The volume determination is more variable. However, a characteristic trend was seen amongst observers when their volumes were compared to the mean volumes of the group.