Concurrent involved-field radiotherapy and XELOX versus XELOX chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer patients with postoperative locoregional recurrence.

PURPOSE: To compare the treatment outcomes of concurrent involved-field radiotherapy and XELOX (oxaliplatin and capecitabine) versus XELOX chemotherapy alone in gastric adenocarcinoma patients with locoregional recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2004 to 2008, 79 patients with recurrent locoregional gastric cancer after curative resection of gastric tumor were enrolled. Among them, 41 patients received involved-field radiotherapy (median dose 50 Gy) by a 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy technique and concurrent XELOX chemotherapy, and 38 patients were treated with XELOX chemotherapy alone (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m, capecitabine 1000 mg/m, twice daily, 3 wk each cycle). RESULTS: The concurrent radiochemotherapy group showed better overall response (including complete response and partial response) when compared with the chemotherapy group (87.8% vs. 63.0%, P=0.01). The control rates for pain, bleeding, and dysphagia/obstruction were 89.5% (17/19), 81.8% (9/11), and 80% (8/10), respectively, in the radiochemotherapy group and 58.8% (10/17), 50% (5/10), and 57.1% (4/7), respectively, in the chemotherapy group. The concurrent radiochemotherapy group showed better overall symptom-control rate when compared with the chemotherapy group (55.9% vs. 85%, P=0.006). Patients receiving concurrent radiochemotherapy trended toward a better median overall survival when compared with those receiving chemotherapy alone (13.4 vs. 5.4 mo, P=0.06). In addition, there were no significant differences in the rates of toxicity or adverse reactions between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent involved-field radiotherapy and XELOX showed better responses and overall symptom-control rates compared with XELOX chemotherapy alone in gastric cancer patients with postoperative locoregional recurrence. A trend of survival benefit from radiochemotherapy was also observed but needs to be further explored.

[Impact of the pattern of lymph node metastasis on the clinical target volume in radiotherapy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma].

OBJECTIVE: To study the pattern of lymph node metastasis of thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after esophagectomy and its impact on the clinical target volume (CTV) delineation in radiotherapy fpr thoracic ESCC. METHODS: The pattern of lymph node metastasis was retrospectively analyzed in 1077 patients with primary thoracic ESCC. All patients received esophagectomy with two- or three-field lymphadenectomy. The clinicopathologic factors related to lymph node metastasis were then analyzed using logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The rates of cervical, upper mediastinal, middle mediastinal, lower mediastinal and abdominal cavity lymph node metastasis were 16.7%, 33.3%, 11.1%, 5.6% and 5.6%, respectively. The rates of those node metastasis in the middle thoracic ESCC were 4.0%, 3.8%, 28.5%, 7.1% and 17.1%, respectively, and the rates of those node metastasis in the lower thoracic ESCC were 1.5%, 3.0%, 22.7%, 37.0% and 33.2%, respectively. The depth of tumor invasion, histologic differentiation and the length of tumor were showed to be statistically most significant risk factors of lymph node metastasis of ESCC (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The depth of tumor invasion, histologic differentiation, and length of tumor were closely correlated with lymph node metastasis of ESCC. All these factors and tumor location should be considered comprehensively when designing the target volume for radiotherapy.

[Bronchial and pulmonary arterial sleeve resection and reconstruction in the treatment of central NSCLC].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the indications and surgical procedure of bronchial and pulmonary artery sleeve resection for patients with centrally located non-small cell lung cancer, and how to prevent complications. METHODS: From July 1989 to Aug 2000, 32 cases of central NSCLC were treated with bronchial and pulmonary arterial sleeve resection and reconstruction. The results were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The complication rate was 25.0% (8/32), the mortality rate in 30-day postoperation was 6.3% (2/32), the overall 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate was 82.8% (24/29), 50.0% (11/22) and 33.3% (4/12), respectively. CONCLUSION: Bronchial and pulmonary arterial sleeve resection and reconstruction in the treatment of patients with central NSCLC can not only maximize preservation of functional pulmonary parenchyma and improve patients, quality of life, but also provide an opportunity for those patients with poor pulmonary function to receive surgical resection of the tumor.