Estimating the completeness of physician billing claims for diabetes case ascertainment: a multiprovince investigation. / Estimation de l'exhaustivité des demandes de remboursement des médecins dans une optique de détermination des cas de diabète : étude menée dans plusieurs provinces.

INTRODUCTION: Previous research has suggested that how physicians are paid may affect the completeness of billing claims for estimating chronic disease. The purpose of this study is to estimate the completeness of physician billings for diabetes case ascertainment. METHODS: We used administrative data from eight Canadian provinces covering the period 1 April 2014 to 31 March 2016. The patient cohort was stratified into two mutually exclusive groups based on their physician remuneration type: fee-for-service (FFS), for those paid only on that basis; and non-fee-for-service (NFFS). Using diabetes prescription drug data as our reference data source, we evaluated whether completeness of disease case ascertainment varied with payment type. Diabetes incidence rates were then adjusted for completeness of ascertainment. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 86 110 patients. Overall, equal proportions received their diabetes medications from FFS and NFFS physicians. Overall, physician payment method had little impact upon the percentage of missed diabetes cases (FFS, 14.8%; NFFS, 12.2%). However, the difference in missed cases between FFS and NFFS varied widely by province, ranging from -1.0% in Nova Scotia to 29.9% in Newfoundland and Labrador. The difference between the observed and adjusted disease incidence rates also varied by province, ranging from 22% in Prince Edward Island to 4% in Nova Scotia. CONCLUSION: The difference in the loss of cases by physician remuneration method varied across jurisdictions. This loss may contribute to an underestimation of disease incidence. The method we used could be applied to other chronic diseases for which drug therapy could serve as reference data source.

A Population-based Study of Grade 12 Academic Performance in Adolescents With Childhood-onset Chronic Rheumatic Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were (1) to compare grade 12 standardized test results of patients diagnosed with childhood-onset chronic rheumatic diseases (ChildCRD) and unaffected peers; and (2) to identify factors associated with test results of patients with ChildCRD and unaffected peers. METHODS: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study. All patients with ChildCRD (juvenile arthritis and systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases) from the only pediatric rheumatology center in Manitoba for birth cohorts January 1979 to December 1998 were linked to the provincial administrative databases containing records of healthcare use and education outcomes. Patients were matched by age, sex, and postal codes to their peers who did not have ChildCRD. The primary outcomes were the grade 12 Language Arts Achievement Index (LAI) and the Math Achievement Index (MAI) scores. ChildCRD, sociodemographic, and mental health factors were tested for their associations with LAI and MAI scores using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: Five hundred and forty-one patients with ChildCRD were matched to 2713 unaffected peers. Patients with ChildCRD had lower LAI and MAI scores compared to their peers. More patients with ChildCRD failed or did not take the language arts (51% vs 41%, P < 0.001) and math (61% vs 55%, P = 0.02) tests. On multivariable analysis, ChildCRD, lower socioeconomic status, younger maternal age at first childbirth, family income assistance, involvement with child welfare services, and mental health morbidities (between ChildCRD diagnosis and standardized testing), were associated with worse LAI and MAI results. CONCLUSION: This population-based study showed that patients with ChildCRD performed less well than their peers on grade 12 standardized testing, independent of sociodemographic and mental health comorbidities.