Barriers in Access to Idarucizumab in Ischemic Stroke in a Middle-Income Country.

Background and Purpose: Current stroke guidelines contraindicate the use of thrombolytics if oral anticoagulants are taken within 48 hours of symptom onset. Idarucizumab is an alternative for patients on dabigatran who experience an acute stroke, so that alteplase may be used. However, this treatment may not be readily available in low/middle-income countries. Our objective is to describe barriers to access to the administration of idarucizumab. Methods: We applied a structured survey for health personnel, consulted databases of drug providers, and analyzed reports from the National Pharmacologic Surveillance Data to describe idarucizumab use and the related knowledge among prescribers and the drug distribution in health institutions in Colombia between January 2018 and January 2022. Results: In total, 23.6% of the 337 interviewed physicians' hospitals had access to idarucizumab, and 34.9% of the physicians were unaware of the use of this medication for ischemic stroke. Only 11 private institutions had access to this medication in Colombia. Four male patients with atrial fibrillation received thrombolytics for acute stroke, and two required subsequent mechanical thrombectomy. No fatal complications during hospitalization were observed. Complications included hematuria, hemorrhagic transformation and groin hematoma. None required transfusion or further intervention. All had favorable mRS scores at the 90-day follow-up. Conclusions: There are multiple barriers to access idarucizumab in Colombia. The main factors identified are the low medication availability in provincial hospitals and the low medical knowledge. However clinical results in this limited group are satisfactory. Stronger public policies are needed to guarantee optimal stroke treatment in patients on DOACs in Colombia.

Socioepidemiological macro-determinants associated with the cumulative incidence of bacterial meningitis: A focus on the African Meningitis Belt.

Background: Bacterial meningitis (BM) is a public health challenge as it is associated with high lethality and neurological sequelae. Worldwide, most cases are registered in the African Meningitis Belt (AMB). The role of particular socioepidemiological features is essential for understanding disease dynamics and optimizing policy-making. Objective: To identify socioepidemiological macro-determinants that contribute to explaining the differences in BM incidence between AMB and the rest of Africa. Methods: Country-level ecologic study based on the cumulative incidence estimates of the Global Burden of Disease study and reports of the MenAfriNet Consortium. Data about relevant socioepidemiological features were extracted from international sources. Multivariate regression models were implemented to define variables associated with the classification of African countries within the AMB and the incidence of BM worldwide. Results: Cumulative incidences at the AMB sub-regions were 111.93 (west), 87.23 (central), 65.10 (east), and 42.47 (north) per 100,000 population. A pattern of common origin with continuous exposition and seasonality of cases was observed. Socio-epidemiological determinants contributing to differentiating the AMB from the rest of Africa were household occupancy (OR 3.17 CI 95% 1.09-9.22, p = 0.034) and malaria incidence (OR 1.01 CI 95% 1.00-1.02, p = 0.016). BM cumulative incidence worldwide was additionally associated with temperature and gross national income per capita. Conclusion: Socioeconomic and climate conditions are macro-determinants associated with BM cumulative incidence. Multilevel designs are required to confirm these findings.

Cierre de apéndice auricular en fibrilación auricular y alto riesgo de sangrado: serie de casos / Atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation and high risk of bleeding: case series

RESUMEN INTRODUCCIÓN: La fibrilación auricular aumenta 5 veces el riesgo de un ataque cerebrovascular de origen cardioembólico. La anticoagulación está indicada para prevención primaria y secundaria de embolismo cerebral. En pacientes con alto riesgo de sangrado no modificable se ha propuesto el cierre de apéndice auricular izquierdo como alternativa a la anticoagulación. MÉTODOS: Serie de casos retrospectiva de pacientes incluidos en el registro ReACTIVE entre los años 2019 y 2020 con diagnóstico de fibrilación auricular, puntaje de CHA2DS2-VASc ≥ 4, HAS BLED ≥ 3 y contraindicación de terapia anticoagulante a largo plazo. Se incluyeron variables demográficas, factores de riesgo, desenlace clínico usando la escala de Rankin modificado y se hizo seguimiento clínico a 3 meses después del procedimiento. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 6 pacientes, el 50 % de ellos mujeres, con mediana de edad de 80,8 ± 4,8 años. El 83,3 % presentó antecedente de sangrado mayor bajo consumo de anticoagulantes. En el seguimiento a 90 días, ningún paciente experimentó sangrado ni ataque cerebrovascular, un paciente murió por causas no cardiovasculares, en tanto que el 83,3 % de los pacientes tuvieron un Rankin modificado favorable (0-2). CONCLUSIONES: El cierre de apéndice auricular es una opción terapéutica en pacientes con fibrilación auricular y contraindicación para anticoagulación por alto riesgo de sangrado. Nuestra serie obtuvo resultados similares a los publicados a escala nacional a pesar de incluir pacientes con edad más avanzada. La conformación de equipos interdisciplinarios de corazón y cerebro es útil en la selección de pacientes para esta terapia.

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION: Atrial fibrillation increases the risk of a cerebrovascular attack of cardioembolic source by 5 times. Anticoagulation is indicated for primary and secondary prevention of cerebral embolism. In patients at high risk of non-modifiable bleeding, closure of the left atrial appendage has been proposed as an alternative to anticoagulation. METHODS: Retrospective case series of patients included in the ReACTIVE registry between 2019 and 2020 with a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation, CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥ 4, HAS-BLED ≥ 3, and long-term anticoagulant therapy contraindication. Demographic variables, risk factors, and clinical outcomes were included using the modified Rankin scale, and clinical follow-up was done three months after the procedure. RESULTS: 6 patients were included, 50 % women, median age 80.8 ± 4.8 years. 83.3 % history of major bleeding under anticoagulant treatment. At the 90-day follow-up, no patient had a bleeding or cerebrovascular attack, one patient died from non-cardiovascular causes, and 83.3 % of the patients had a favorable modified Rankin (0-2). CONCLUSIONS: Atrial appendix closure is a therapeutic option in patients with atrial fibrillation and a contraindication for anticoagulation due to a high risk of bleeding. Our series obtained results like those published at the national level despite including older patients. The formation of interdisciplinary heart and brain teams is helpful in the selection of patients for this therapy.

Disparities Influencing Functional Outcomes Between Rural and Urban Patients With Acute Stroke.

Introduction: There is scarce information in Latin America about factors related to stroke patient outcomes in rural areas compared to urban ones. Objective: To evaluate functional outcomes of stroke code patients from rural and urban areas and their relationship with socioeconomic disparity. Methods: Prospective cohort study included patients of urban, semi-urban, and rural origin with stroke code from a high complexity hospital in southwestern Colombia between 2018 and 2019. Demographic, clinical data modified Rankin at discharge, and 3-month follow-up were analyzed. The poverty index, barriers to health access and availability of ambulances by the municipality was assessed at an ecological level. Results: Five hundred and fifty five stroke patients were registered, 21.2% from rural areas, 432 (77.98%) had an ischemic stroke. There were no significant differences in sociodemographic factors and medical background. Urban patients had lower reperfusion therapies rates (23.25%). Favorable mRS at discharge (<3) was higher in urban areas (63.03%) and mortality was superior in rural patients (13.56%). The ambulance rate in semi-urban and rural areas was as low as 0.03 per 100.000 inhabitants, the poverty index was 11.9% in urban areas vs. 23.3% in semi urban and rural areas. Conclusions: Rural patients treated in our center were more likely to present with severe strokes and unfavorable mRS at hospital discharge and 3-month follow-up compared to urban, despite having similar risk factors. There is an inverse relationship, which is not related to the poverty rate or the percentage of people with barriers to access to health. There is a need for further studies that assess barriers inherent in rural patients and establish a regional stroke network.

Did COVID-19 impact stroke services? A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: It has been reported that acute stroke services were compromised during COVID-19 due to various pandemic-related issues. We aimed to investigate these changes by recruiting centers from different countries. METHODS: Eight countries participated in this cross-sectional, observational, retrospective study by providing data from their stroke data base. We compared 1 year before to 1 year during COVID-19 as regards onset to door (OTD), door to needle (DTN), door to groin (DTG), duration of hospital stay, National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at baseline, 24 h, and at discharge as well as modified Rankin score (mRS) on discharge and at 3 months follow-up. RESULTS: During the pandemic year, there was a reduction in the number of patients, median age was significantly lower, admission NIHSS was higher, hemorrhagic stroke increased, and OTD and DTG showed no difference, while DTN time was longer, rtPA administration was decreased, thrombectomy was more frequent, and hospital stay was shorter. mRS was less favorable on discharge and at 3 months. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 showed variable effects on stroke services. Some were negatively impacted as the number of patients presenting to hospitals, DTN time, and stroke outcome, while others were marginally affected as the type of management.