Neighborhood Racialized Economic Polarization, Home Visiting Coverage, and Adverse Birth Outcomes in a Medicaid-eligible Population.

BACKGROUND: Residential polarization shaped by racial segregation and concentrations of wealth (hereafter neighborhood racialized economic polarization) results in both highly deprived and highly privileged neighborhoods. Numerous studies have found a negative relationship between neighborhood racialized economic polarization and birth outcomes. We investigated whether community-informed home visiting programs achieve high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods and can attenuate the deleterious effect of neighborhood polarization on birth outcomes. METHODS: We used 2016-2019 data from Michigan's statewide database that links birth records, Medicaid claims, and program participation (N = 211,412). We evaluated whether 1) home visiting programs achieved high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods, 2) participation in home visiting may help to mitigate the negative relationship between neighborhood polarization and birth outcomes, and 3) the reductions in preterm birth and low birthweight were larger among Black birthing individuals. Data were examined using multilevel generalized linear models and mediation analysis. RESULTS: The statewide home visiting program achieved higher rates of coverage in the most deprived neighborhoods (21.0% statewide, 28.3% in the most deprived vs. 10.4% in the most privileged neighborhoods). For all, home visiting participation was associated with a decrease in the relationship between neighborhood polarization and preterm birth by 6.8% (mean indirect effect, -0.008; 95% confidence interval, -0.011 to -0.005), and by 5.2% (mean indirect effect, -0.013; 95% confidence interval, -0.017 to -0.009) for low birthweight, adjusting for individual-level risk factors. The decrease was larger among Black individuals. CONCLUSIONS: A statewide Medicaid-sponsored home visiting program achieved high rates of service coverage in highly deprived neighborhoods. Program participation may help to mitigate the negative relationship between neighborhood polarization and birth outcomes, and more so among Black individuals. Continued support for home visiting services is required to better engage birthing individuals in neighborhoods with concentrated deprivation and to decrease disparities.

Community Health Workers: Improving Home Visiting Engagement of High-Risk Birthing People in Segregated Neighborhoods.

CONTEXT: Racial and ethnic disparities in perinatal health remain a public health crisis. Despite improved outcomes from home visiting (HV) participation during pregnancy, most eligible individuals of color do not engage. Neighborhood segregation, a manifestation of structural racism, may impose constraints on engaging eligible individuals in HV. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether race, ethnicity, and/or language-concordant community health workers (CHWs) increased HV engagement for birthing people in segregated neighborhoods. DESIGN: Program evaluation using administrative linked data from birth records, Medicaid claims, and HV program participation. Strong Beginnings (SB), a program with HV provided by CHWs working with nurses and social workers, was compared with the Maternal Infant Health Program (MIHP), a state Medicaid-sponsored HV program without CHW involvement. Data were analyzed using χ 2 tests and Poisson regressions. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 4560 individuals with a Medicaid-eligible birth between 2016 and 2019, including 1172 from SB and 3388 from the MIHP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Penetration (percentage of participants in HV among all Medicaid-eligible individuals across quintiles of neighborhood segregation) and dosage (the total number of home visits from both CHWs and nurses/social workers, and then restricted to those from nurses/social workers). RESULTS: SB penetrated more segregated neighborhoods than the MIHP (58.4% vs 48.3%; P < .001). SB participants received a higher dosage of home visits (mean [SD]: 11.9 [6.1]) than MIHP participants (mean [SD]: 4.4 [2.8], P < .001). Importantly, CHWs did not replace but moderately increased home visits from nurses and social workers (51.1% vs 35.2% with ≥5 intervention visits, P < .001), especially in more segregated neighborhoods. POLICY IMPLICATION: Community-informed HV models intentionally designed for people facing disparities may help facilitate program outreach to segregated neighborhoods with concentrated deprivation and reduce racial and ethnic disparities. CONCLUSIONS: An HV program provided by CHWs working with nurses and social workers was associated with an increase in penetration and dosage in segregated neighborhoods, compared with HV without CHW involvement. This underscores the value of CHWs partnering with licensed professional workers in improving HV engagement in disadvantaged communities.