Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Adv Ther ; 33(7): 1199-214, 2016 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27312976

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Allergen immunotherapy is a long-term treatment that has been associated with patient adherence issues. The aim of the study was to increase the knowledge on compliance of patients allergic to house dust mites, receiving sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). METHODS: A retrospective observational study was performed in 53 Spanish allergy units. We enrolled patients undergoing the SLIT treatment for house dust mites including a scheduled control visit 12 months after initiating the therapy. We conducted a comprehensive assessment of compliance using three methods. In the first step, an allergist evaluated the patients according to the results of an interview and the existing medical records. The subjects taking more than 80% of the overall prescription were defined as compliant. The remaining noncompliant patients were divided into groups taking less than 25%, 25-50%, and 50-80% of the prescribed SLIT. In the second stage, we conducted the Morisky-Green test. Finally, the noncompliant patients were asked to fill a self-report assessment form. Data were stratified into age groups. The potential factors affecting compliance were also investigated. RESULTS: Overall, 380 subjects participated in the study. The compliance rate was 79.7%, and the treatment discontinuation rate was 22.5%, while 66.8% of patients were adherent (both compliant and continuing with the treatment). The results showed that children were the most compliant and adolescents the least compliant (86.6% and 60.9%, respectively). The main reason for noncompliance was "forgetting some doses" in 31.0% of the children, 48.0% of the adolescents, and 53.2% of the adults. Compliance was associated with the following factors: age, number of annual control visits, and reduction in symptomatic medication. CONCLUSION: Our results showed that two out of three patients with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis adhered to the SLIT treatment. Multidisciplinary and integral solutions are needed to improve the compliance, with special attention paid to adolescents. FUNDING: Stallergenes Greer Spain.


Assuntos
Adesão à Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Pyroglyphidae , Rinite Alérgica Perene/terapia , Imunoterapia Sublingual/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Criança , Feminino , Humanos , Assistência de Longa Duração , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Autorrelato , Espanha , Adulto Jovem
3.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 25(4): e123-8, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21310119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although the prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) is increasing, relatively little is known about patient characteristics in Spain. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical profile and therapeutic strategies in patients attending Spanish specialists for AR caused by grass pollen or house-dust mites (HDMs). METHODS: This was a multicenter cross-sectional epidemiological study of consecutive patients aged ≥5 years with confirmed diagnosis of AR caused by grass pollen or HDMs attending allergy specialists throughout Spain. Demographic and clinical data and information on treatment were collected. RESULTS: Data from 1043 patients were analyzed (524 with grass pollen allergy and 519 with HDM allergy; mean age, 27.1 years). Three-quarters had persistent AR as per the Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) definition, with disease duration of >2 years in 94.3% of those with pollen allergy and 85.5% of those with HDM allergy. Approximately 38% had concurrent asthma. Over one-half of the patients were considered to have gotten worse since the first onset of symptoms. In total, 51.5% did not achieve good disease control with pharmacotherapy and 47.7% were treated with immunotherapy (52.2% of HDM allergic patients and 43.2% of grass pollen-allergic patients). CONCLUSION: The duration of AR in patients attended for the first time by specialists is long and, in general, the disease does not improve over time and is often not well controlled with pharmacologic interventions. Less than one-half of patients receive allergen-specific immunotherapy that is more often prescribed in HDM allergy.


Assuntos
Asma/epidemiologia , Imunoterapia , Rinite Alérgica Perene/epidemiologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/epidemiologia , Adulto , Animais , Antígenos de Dermatophagoides/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/efeitos adversos , Antígenos de Plantas/imunologia , Asma/complicações , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Poaceae , Pólen/efeitos adversos , Prevalência , Pyroglyphidae , Rinite Alérgica Perene/complicações , Rinite Alérgica Perene/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Perene/fisiopatologia , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/complicações , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/tratamento farmacológico , Rinite Alérgica Sazonal/fisiopatologia , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...