Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Surgeon ; 20(3): 129-136, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33726957

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Robotic distal pancreatectomy has been accepted to be safe and effective for pancreatic tail lesion. Whether spleen preservation by preserving the splenic vessels with robot assistance is feasible and beneficial remains controversial. Here we would like to compare the operative outcomes of robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy (DPS) with robotic spleen preserving distal pancreatectomy by means of splenic vessel preservation (SVP). METHODS: Between March 2011 and September 2019, 56 consecutive patients undergoing robotic distal pancreatectomy were identified, with 28 patients in each group. Patient demographics, histopathology findings and operative outcomes were prospectively collected and compared between the two groups. A subgroup analysis was made after excluding malignant and pancreatic lesions >6 cm in the DPS group. RESULTS: The two groups had similar conversion rate, blood loss, morbidity and pancreatic fistula rate. There was no operative mortality. The SVP group had shorter median operative time (245 vs 303.5 min, P = 0.019) and shorter median hospital stay (5 vs 6 days, P = 0.019) than the DPS group. However, all malignant lesions occurred in the DPS group and lesion size in DPS group was significantly larger. After matching, there were 28 SVP and 15 DPS. The histopathology findings and lesion size became comparable. The SVP group still had shorter operative time (245 vs 290 min, P = 0.022) and shorter hospital stay (5 vs 7 days, P = 0.014) than the DPS group. CONCLUSION: Apart from avoiding risk of overwhelming postsplenectomy sepsis, robotic SVP had additional advantage of shorter operative time and shorter hospital stay than robotic DPS.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Robótica , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Duração da Cirurgia , Pancreatectomia/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Baço/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg ; 26(1): 84-90, 2022 Feb 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34903678

RESUMO

BACKGROUNDS/AIMS: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains a dreadful complication. Duct-to-mucosa pancreaticojejunostomy (DTMPJ) is a commonly performed anastomosis after PD. This study aims to evaluate whether there is a size limit of pancreatic duct below which POPF rate increases significantly after DTMPJ. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed from a database with prospectively collected data on consecutive patients undergoing DTMPJ. RESULTS: Between the years 2003 and 2019, a total of 288 patients with DTMPJ were recruited. POPF occurred in 56.3% of the patients, of which 43.8% were biochemical leak, 8.7% were grade B, and 1.4% were grade C. Overall operative morbidity was 51.4%, of which 19.1% were major complications. Five patients (1.7%) died within 90 days of operation. Patients with grade B/C POPF had significantly soft pancreas (p < 0.001), smaller duct size (p = 0.031), and a diagnosis of carcinoma of the pancreas (p = 0.027). When a clinically significant POPF rate was analysed based on the pancreatic duct diameter, pancreatic duct size ≤ 1 mm had the highest POPF rate (35.7%). There was a significant difference in POPF rate between adjacent ductal diameter ≤ 1 mm and > 1 mm to 2 mm (35.7% vs 13.3%; p = 0.040). Multivariable analysis showed that for the soft pancreas, pancreatic duct diameter ≤ 1 mm was the only significant predictive factor for POPF (p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: DTMPJ can be safely performed for pancreatic duct > 1 mm without significantly increased POPF risk.

4.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 70: 83-86, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32416488

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients suffering from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is usually due to oesophageal or gastric varices secondary to portal hypertension. Very rarely, HCC can directly invade into the stomach or duodenum resulting in UGIB. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 62-year-old man presented to the emergency department for haematemesis and tarry stool. He was a hepatitis B carrier and had received open radiofrequency ablation and wedge resection for HCC previously. Urgent endoscopy and contrast computed tomography confirmed recurrent HCC invading into the duodenum. The patient received radical resection and remained disease free for 7 years after the operation. DISCUSSION: Direct invasion into gastrointestinal tract by HCC is rare. Different modalities of treatment have been reported in the literature with variable success. En-bloc resection should be considered if surgically feasible in order to achieve good haemostasis and possible long term survival. CONCLUSION: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a rare presentation of hepatocellular carcinoma and long term survival can be achieved by curative surgery.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...