Immunolab: Combining targeted real-world data with advanced analytics to generate evidence at scale in immunology.

Real-world evidence (RWE) has traditionally been used by regulatory or payer authorities to inform disease burden, background risk, or conduct post-launch pharmacovigilance, but in recent years RWE has been increasingly used to inform regulatory decision-making. However, RWE data sources remain fragmented, and datasets are disparate and often collected inconsistently. To this end, we have constructed an RWE-generation platform, Immunolab, to facilitate data-driven insights, hypothesis generation and research in immunological diseases driven by type 2 inflammation. Immunolab leverages a large, anonymized patient cohort from the Optum electronic health record and claims dataset containing over 17 million patient lives. Immunolab is an interactive platform that hosts three analytical modules: the Patient Journey Mapper, to describe the drug treatment patterns over time in patient cohorts; the Switch Modeler, to model treatment switching patterns and identify its drivers; and the Head-to-Head Simulator, to model the comparative effectiveness of treatments based on relevant clinical outcomes. The Immunolab modules utilize various analytic methodologies including machine learning algorithms for result generation which can then be presented in various formats for further analysis and interpretation.

Characterizing real world safety profile of oral Janus kinase inhibitors among adult atopic dermatitis patients: evidence transporting from the rheumatoid arthritis population.

OBJECTIVE: To address potential safety concerns of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAK-Is), we characterized their safety profile in the atopic dermatitis (AD) patient population. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we used propensity score-based methods and a Poisson modeling framework to estimate the incidence of health outcomes of interest (HOI) for the AD patient. To that end, two mutually exclusive cohorts were created using a real world data resource: a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cohort, where we directly quantify the safety risk of JAK-Is on HOIs, and an AD cohort, that comprises the target population of interest and to whom we transport the results obtained from the RA cohort. The RA cohort included all adults who filled at least one prescription for a JAK-I (tofacitinib, baricitinib, or upadacitinib) between 1 January 2017 and 31 January 2020. The AD cohort consisted of all adults diagnosed with AD during the same period. We first estimated the incidence rate of each HOI in the RA cohort, and then transported the results to the AD population. RESULTS: The RA and AD cohorts included 5,296 and 261,855 patients, respectively. On average, patients in the AD cohort were younger, more often male, more likely to be Asian, and had higher household income. They also had a lower prevalence of several comorbid conditions including hypertension, chronic kidney disease, obesity, and depression. Overall, the transported incidence rates of the HOIs to the AD cohort were lower than those obtained in the RA cohort by 13-50%. CONCLUSION: We applied transportability methods to characterize the risk of the HOIs in the AD population and found absolute risks higher than that of the general population. Future work is needed to validate these conclusions in comparable populations.

Bridging the Gap Between RCTs and RWE Through Endpoint Selection.

This commentary is authored by several industry real-world evidence (RWE) experts, with support from IQVIA, as part of the 'RWE Leadership Forum': a group of Industry Leaders who have come together as non-competitive partners to understand and respond to RWD/E challenges and opportunities with a single expert voice. Here, the forum discusses the value in bridging the industry disconnect between RTCs and RWE, with a view to promoting the use of RWE in the RCT environment. RCT endpoints are explored along several axes including their clinical relevance and their measure of direct patient benefit, and then compared with their real-world counterparts to identify suitable paths, or gaps, for assimilating RWE endpoints into the RCT environment.

Designing, Conducting, Monitoring, and Analyzing Data from Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trials: Proceedings from a Multi-stakeholder Think Tank Meeting.

In late 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) outlined a framework for evaluating the possible use of real-world evidence (RWE) to support regulatory decision-making. This framework was created to facilitate studies that would generate high-quality RWE, including pragmatic clinical trials (PCTs), which are randomized trials designed to inform clinical or policy decisions by assessing the real-world effectiveness of an intervention. There is general agreement among experts that the use of existing healthcare and patient-generated data holds promise for making randomized trials more efficient, less costly, and more generalizable. Yet the benefits of relying on real-world data sources must be weighed against difficulties with ensuring data integrity and completeness. Additionally, appropriately monitoring patient safety in randomized trials of new drugs using healthcare system data that might not be available in real time can be quite difficult. Recognizing that these and other concerns are critical to the development and acceptability of PCTs, a group of stakeholders from academia, industry, professional organizations, regulatory bodies, government agencies, and patient advocates discussed a path forward for PCT growth and sustainability at a think tank meeting entitled "Monitoring and Analyzing Data from Pragmatic Streamlined Randomized Clinical Trials," which took place in January 2019 (Washington, DC). The goals of this meeting were to: (1) evaluate study design and methodological options specific to PCTs that have the potential to yield high-quality evidence; (2) discuss best practices to ensure data quality in PCTs; and (3) identify appropriate methods for study monitoring. Proceedings from the think tank meeting are summarized in this manuscript.

Strengthening pharma's contract with society: the value of trusted partnerships between pharma and healthcare facilitated by real-world data.

This White Paper is authored by 11 industry real-world evidence (RWE) experts, with support from IQVIA, as part of the 'RWE Leadership Forum': a group of industry leaders who come together as noncompetitive partners to understand and respond to internal or external RWD/E challenges and opportunities with a single expert voice. Herein we aim to clarify the rules of engagement between pharma and healthcare in order to establish trust-based partnerships, which will unlock unique value for society, including the medical community and the ultimate beneficiary, the patient.

Epidemiology and health outcomes associated with hyperkalemia in a primary care setting in England.

BACKGROUND: Real-world incidence, clinical consequences, and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) of hyperkalemia (HK) remain poorly characterized, particularly in patients with specific comorbidities. METHODS: Data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and Hospital Episode Statistics databases were analyzed to determine incidence of an index HK event, subsequent clinical outcomes, and HRU in the English population. Factors associated with index HK in a primary care setting were also identified for those with an index HK event during the study period (2009-2013) and matched controls. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate of an index HK event was 2.9 per 100 person-years. Use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors was strongly associated with HK (odds ratio, 13.6-15.9). Few patients (5.8%) had serum potassium (K+) retested ≤ 14 days following the index event; among those retested, 32% had HK. Following an index HK event, all-cause hospitalization, HK recurrence, and kidney function decline were the most common outcomes (incidence rates per 100 person-years: 14.1, 8.1, and 6.7, respectively), with higher rates in those with comorbidities or K+ > 6.0 mmol/L. Mortality and arrhythmia rates were higher among those with K+ > 6.0 mmol/L. Older age, comorbid diabetes mellitus, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use were associated with HK recurrence. Relatively few patients received testing or prescriptions to treat HK following an event. CONCLUSIONS: Severe index HK events were associated with adverse outcomes, including arrhythmia and mortality. Despite this, retesting following an index event was uncommon, and incidence of recurrence was much higher than that of the index event.

Comparison of Methods to Generalize Randomized Clinical Trial Results Without Individual-Level Data for the Target Population.

Our study explored the application of methods to generalize randomized controlled trial results to a target population without individual-level data. We compared 4 methods using aggregate data for the target population to generalize results from the international trial, Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER), to a target population of trial-eligible patients in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). The gold-standard method used individual data from both the trial and CPRD to predict probabilities of being sampled in the trial and to reweight trial participants to reflect CPRD patient characteristics. Methods 1 and 2 used weighting methods based on simulated individual data or the method of moments, respectively. Method 3 weighted the trial's subgroup-specific treatment effects to match the distribution of an effect modifier in CPRD. Method 4 calculated the expected absolute benefits in CPRD assuming homogeneous relative treatment effect. Methods based on aggregate data for the target population generally yielded results between the trial and gold-standard estimates. Methods 1 and 2 yielded estimates closest to the gold-standard estimates when continuous effect modifiers were represented as categorical variables. Although individual data or data on joint distributions remains the best approach to generalize trial results, these methods using aggregate data might be useful tools for timely assessment of randomized trial generalizability.

Burden of cardio-renal-metabolic conditions in adults with type 2 diabetes within the Diabetes Collaborative Registry.

We examined the prevalence of cardio-renal-metabolic (CaReMe) conditions and their combinations among 530 747 adults with type 2 diabetes in a USA-based outpatient registry of 271 primary care, cardiology and endocrinology offices. We evaluated the following CaReMe conditions: hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic kidney disease (CKD), cerebrovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, and gout or hyperuricaemia; prevalence estimates were adjusted based on the distribution of diabetes by age in the US population in 2015. We found that it was uncommon for patients to have isolated type 2 diabetes without other CaReMe conditions, with only 6.4% having no other CaReMe conditions and 51% having ≥3 other CaReMe conditions. The most prevalent individual conditions were hypertension (83%), hyperlipidemia (81%), CAD (32%) and CKD (20%), and the most common combinations included various groupings of hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and CKD. Older age, male sex and tobacco use were each associated with increased numbers of CaReMe conditions. These findings highlight the clinical need for novel treatment strategies for diabetes that address both glycaemia and coexisting disease states.

Generalizing Randomized Clinical Trial Results: Implementation and Challenges Related to Missing Data in the Target Population.

Statins are indicated in patients with elevated levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and normal low-density lipoprotein cholesterol based on results of the multicountry trial, Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin (JUPITER) (2003-2008), but the benefit in real-world populations remains unknown. We sought to generalize JUPITER results to trial-eligible population using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), 2001-2014. We multiply imputed missing baseline characteristics for the CPRD population and selected the trial-eligible participants as the target population based on observed and imputed values. Trial participants were weighted to be representative of the CPRD population (n = 383,418) based on individual predicted probability of selection into the trial. Trial participants were also standardized to the CPRD population without missing values (n = 2,677). In JUPITER, rosuvastatin reduced cardiovascular risk with a 3-year risk difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI): -2.9, -1.1). The rosuvastatin effect was muted in the first 2 years but remained strong at 3 years after standardizing to the imputed CPRD population (3-year risk difference = -2.7%; 95% CI: -5.8, 0.4) and the CPRD population without missing data (3-year risk difference = -1.7%; 95% CI: -3.5, 0.1). The study serves as an illustration of possible approaches to understanding generalizability of trials using real-world databases given limitations due to missing data on inclusion/exclusion criteria.

Laxative utilization over time in chronic pain patients with opioid-induced constipation.

AIM: To determine laxative utilization over time among chronic noncancer pain patients with opioid-induced constipation (OIC). SETTING: A prospective longitudinal study conducted in the USA, Canada, Germany and UK. METHODS: Patients on daily opioid therapy for treatment of chronic noncancer pain with OIC were recruited from clinics to complete a survey at Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24. RESULTS: 489 patients completed baseline with 452 completing one or more follow-up visits. 128 (28%) were nonlaxative users, 112 (25%) were insufficient laxative users and 212 (47%) were sufficient laxative users. The consistent sufficient laxative users reported the most bowel movements per week. CONCLUSION: The majority of OIC patients do not take or only intermittently take laxatives.

Opioid-Induced Constipation among a Convenience Sample of Patients with Cancer Pain.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the burden of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) among patients who suffer from cancer-related pain. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted among cancer patients in the United Kingdom (UK), Canada, and Germany, which included medical record data abstraction, Internet-based patient surveys, and physician surveys. Patients on daily opioid therapy (≥30 mg for ≥4 weeks) for treatment of cancer pain with self-reported OIC were recruited. Response to laxatives was defined by classifying participants into categories of laxative use and evaluating the prevalence of inadequate response. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate outcomes, including the patient assessment of constipation-symptom (PAC-SYM), patient assessment of constipation-quality of life, EuroQOL-5 dimensions, and global assessment of treatment benefit, satisfaction, and willingness to continue. RESULTS: Recruitment was difficult for this study with only 31 participants completing the baseline survey and meeting criteria for opioid use and OIC (26 UK, 1 Canada, and 4 Germany). Fifty-two percent (n = 16) of participants were male, and all were White. Breast (23%, n = 7), pancreatic (13%, n = 4), and multiple myeloma (13%, n = 4) were the most common cancers. Mean duration of chronic pain and opioid use were 2.3 and 1.3 years, respectively. Participants reported having a mean of 4.4 bowel movements/week in the 2 weeks prior to baseline, of which a mean of 0.9 were spontaneous. Most participants (90%, n = 28) were using at least 1 lifestyle approach to manage their constipation; 65% (n = 20) were taking ≥1 over-the-counter laxative; 19% (n = 6) were taking ≥1 prescription laxative; 23% (n = 7) reported no laxative use in the prior 2 weeks. Moderate-to-severe constipation symptoms on the PAC-SYM were common, and mean scores on health-related quality of life outcomes were comparable to chronic pain populations. CONCLUSION: In this primarily UK sample, there appears to be considerable unmet OIC treatment needs among cancer patients.

The Burden of Opioid-Induced Constipation: Discordance Between Patient and Health Care Provider Reports.

BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC), a common side effect of opioid treatment for chronic pain, affects patient health-related quality of life (HRQL) and may prompt some patients to lower the dose or alter adherence to their opioid medication, compromising pain relief. Although health care providers (HCPs) are aware of the potential for OIC, patients may not inform their HCPs of their OIC symptoms, and HCPs may not initiate conversation regarding OIC if their patients' pain is controlled. Patients often try to address OIC symptoms on their own by using natural approaches or over-the-counter options. When OIC is discussed in an office visit, HCPs typically recommend conventional laxatives to relieve symptoms, but the efficacy of this approach is unproven and often suboptimal. In many areas of medicine, HCP perceptions of the impact of adverse effects of treatment on a patient's HRQL do not align with the patient's experience. OBJECTIVES: To (a) describe HCP-reported understanding of his or her patients' experiences with OIC and (b) evaluate the level of agreement or discordance in perception between patients and their HCPs of OIC's impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective, longitudinal, observational cohort study conducted in the United States, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom (NCT01928953) in patients aged 18 to 85 years who had been receiving daily opioid therapy for ≥ 4 weeks for chronic noncancer pain with presence of OIC in the past 2 weeks. Data were collected from retrospective chart reviews, HCP questionnaires, and web-based patient surveys. Eligible patients enrolled online and completed the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem, the EuroQOL 5 Dimensions, and the Global Assessment of Treatment Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue standardized questionnaires. The patient-reported component included 1 baseline survey and 8 follow-up surveys over 24 weeks. HCPs completed a web-based survey at baseline and at week 24 to assess their perceptions of OIC burden, treatment patterns, laxative use, and overall treatment satisfaction. The correspondence of patient- and HCP-reported data was evaluated for all similar outcomes from these 2 databases. RESULTS: Patients (N = 489) reported a mean (SD) number of bowel movements (BMs) per week and spontaneous BMs per week of 3.7 (2.9) and 1.4 (2.3), respectively, at baseline. Most (87%) reported chronic pain of ≥ 2 years duration; 65% had used opioids for ≥ 2 years; and the mean pain score at baseline was 6.3, consistent with a moderate-to-severe pain population. Most (97%) patients at baseline reported any gastrointestinal-related symptom of at least moderate intensity, with 82% reporting the same intensity of any symptom at week 24. Of the 405 patients who had seen their HCPs in the past month, 63% reported that they had spoken to their HCPs about constipation, and 62% reported that their HCPs had asked them if they had constipation in the past month. The proportion of agreement between HCPs and their patients on the presence of constipation at baseline was 61%. Similar average pain ratings between HCPs and patients (5.9 vs. 6.0) at week 24 suggested clear communication regarding the level of pain experienced by the patient; however, OIC symptoms, laxative use and effectiveness, and impact of OIC on pain management and HRQL were not fully appreciated by HCPs. CONCLUSIONS: The importance and severity of OIC are perceived differently by patients and their HCPs, a discordance that complicates pain management and demonstrates a need for greater communication. These disparate perceptions indicate a need for clinical education and coordination of care by HCPs to improve understanding and proactively manage OIC in patients with chronic noncancer pain.

Satisfaction with Therapy Among Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain with Opioid-Induced Constipation.

BACKGROUND: Greater satisfaction with medication is associated with better adherence; however, specific to opioid-induced constipation (OIC), data on the relationship between medication satisfaction and efficacy are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To understand satisfaction with therapy among patients with chronic noncancer pain and OIC. METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in the United States, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom using web-based patient surveys. Patients on daily opioid therapy for ≥ 74 weeks for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain with OIC were recruited from physician offices and completed a web-based survey at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. When completing each survey, patients selected the remedies used in the previous 2 weeks to relieve constipation; options included natural/behavioral therapies, over-the-counter (OTC) therapies, and prescription laxatives. Patients selected the amount of relief and satisfaction with each selected therapy. Descriptive statistics were calculated; Spearman's correlations were calculated for symptom relief and satisfaction. RESULTS: Mean age of the 489 patients who met the criteria for OIC and completed the baseline survey was 52.6 ± 11.6 years; 62% were female; 85% were white. Increasing levels of relief from constipation were associated with increasing levels of satisfaction for all agents; correlations were > 0.55 and statistically significant (P < 0.001). Among the patients who had used OTC therapies in the 2 weeks prior to baseline, 54% to 73% reported that they were somewhat or very satisfied with the therapy. Yet, of these satisfied patients, 28% to 63% experienced no or only slight relief from the therapy. Twenty percent to 79% of the patients who had used prescription laxatives in the 2 weeks prior to baseline reported being at least somewhat satisfied with the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that there is a high rate of inadequate response to laxatives for patients with OIC that persisted for the 6 months of this study. While increased relief from constipation was associated with increased satisfaction for all therapies, there remains a substantial number of patients who report satisfaction despite having only inadequate relief from OIC that merits further investigation.

Treatment patterns, healthcare utilization, and costs of chronic opioid treatment for non-cancer pain in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs among patients within a large managed care population chronically using opioids for non-cancer pain. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 prescription initiating opioids between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2011, who also had 12 months of continuous pre-index health plan enrollment, were identified. Patients with pre-index opioid use or cancer diagnosis were excluded. Opioid exposure was stratified by treatment duration-short-term (30-182 days) versus chronic (≥183 days)-and by index opioid type (weak vs strong). RESULTS: A total of 2.9 million patients initiating opioids were identified, of which 257,602 had at least 30 days of continuous use and were included in the study. The mean age was 51 years and 52% were female. Overall, 239,998 (93%) patients had short-term opioid use, and 17,604 (7%) had chronic use; 215,424 (84%) initiated treatment with a weak opioid, and 44,712 (17%) with a strong opioid. The specialty most associated with the use of less potent opioids was general/family practice (28%), and for more potent opioids it was surgery (22%). Large increases in health-care utilization were reported between the pre-index and first 6-month post initiation periods for chronic users. Utilization rates decreased after the first 6 months but never reverted to baseline levels. Costs mirrored utilization trends, more than doubling between baseline and the first 6 months of treatment for pharmacy ($2029 vs $4331) and all-cause medical ($11,430 vs $27,365). Costs declined after the first 6 months of opioid use but remained above pre-index levels. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrated that healthcare resource utilization and costs increased during the first 6 months following clinical scenarios that necessitated opioid initiation and subsequently declined, suggesting the need to monitor patients beyond the acute care period.

Opioid-Induced Constipation Among Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain in the United States, Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom: Laxative Use, Response, and Symptom Burden Over Time.

PURPOSE: Estimate rate of laxative inadequate response (LIR) over time among patients with chronic noncancer pain with opioid-induced constipation (OIC). METHODS: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted in United States, Canada, Germany, and United Kingdom. Patients on opioid therapy for ≥4 weeks for chronic noncancer pain and OIC completed an Internet-based survey at Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24. 1xLIR was defined as sufficient laxative use (≥1 laxative ≥ 4 times in past 2 weeks) and inadequate response (<3 bowel movements or ≥ 1 constipation symptom rated Moderate or greater). 2xLIR was sufficient laxative use of ≥2 laxatives from different drug classes and inadequate response. Descriptive statistics and logistic regressions were performed. RESULTS: 489 patients (62% female; 85% white) completed Baseline; 27% reported no laxative use; 25% had insufficient laxative use; 48% had sufficient laxative use. During follow-up, 21-28% of patients had no or insufficient laxative use. Prevalence of 1xLIR was 93% at Baseline and ranged from 59-81% across follow-up; 26% met criteria for 2xLIR (follow-up range: 11-20%). CONCLUSIONS: OIC among noncancer pain patients is a persistent and significant condition with varying utilization and response to laxatives thus increasing the ongoing burden of chronic pain. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

A description of clinical characteristics and treatment patterns observed within prescribed opioid users in Germany and the UK.

AIMS: To describe a cohort of new opioid users (adult noncancer patients) in terms of clinical characteristics and treatment patterns in the UK and Germany. MATERIAL & METHODS: Data used were extracted from electronic medical records databases (UK: Clinical Practice Research Database-Hospital Episode Statistics; Germany: IMS Disease Analyzer) covering the 2008-2012 period. RESULTS: Most eligible patients were treated with opioids for less than 6 months (UK: 78.7% and Germany: 93.7%) and indexed on weak opioids (UK: 89.5% and Germany: 88.6%). Most prescribed opioids were codeine (UK) and tramadol (Germany). Most prevalent comorbidities were dorsalgia/depression. Constipation was observed in 16.8%/17.4% (UK/Germany) of chronic users (>6 months). CONCLUSION: While both populations were highly morbid populations largely initiated on weak opioids, chronic use was less common in Germany.

The role of prediction modeling in propensity score estimation: an evaluation of logistic regression, bCART, and the covariate-balancing propensity score.

The covariate-balancing propensity score (CBPS) extends logistic regression to simultaneously optimize covariate balance and treatment prediction. Although the CBPS has been shown to perform well in certain settings, its performance has not been evaluated in settings specific to pharmacoepidemiology and large database research. In this study, we use both simulations and empirical data to compare the performance of the CBPS with logistic regression and boosted classification and regression trees. We simulated various degrees of model misspecification to evaluate the robustness of each propensity score (PS) estimation method. We then applied these methods to compare the effect of initiating glucagonlike peptide-1 agonists versus sulfonylureas on cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in the US Medicare population in 2007-2009. In simulations, the CBPS was generally more robust in terms of balancing covariates and reducing bias compared with misspecified logistic PS models and boosted classification and regression trees. All PS estimation methods performed similarly in the empirical example. For settings common to pharmacoepidemiology, logistic regression with balance checks to assess model specification is a valid method for PS estimation, but it can require refitting multiple models until covariate balance is achieved. The CBPS is a promising method to improve the robustness of PS models.

Description of cardiovascular event rates in patients initiating chronic opioid therapy for noncancer pain in observational cohort studies in the US, UK, and Germany.

INTRODUCTION: Previous observational studies in the US suggest that opioid analgesic use increases the risk of cardiovascular (CV) events. The current study provides additional background event rates for five prespecified CV outcomes of interest in patients from three countries. METHODS: Three observational cohort studies were conducted in patients from the US (N = 17,604), the UK (N = 9,823), and Germany (N = 9,412). Patients were new opioid users who had undergone ≥6 months of chronic, continuous therapy. De-identified data were collated from electronic healthcare databases in the respective countries. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and opioid use were examined. Overall rates, prevalence rates in patients with established CV disease, and incidence rates in patients without established CV disease were determined for myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, transient ischemic attack, unstable angina, and congestive heart failure (CHF). RESULTS: Cardiovascular disease at baseline was more prevalent in US and German patients. Back pain and depression were prevalent preexisting comorbidities. The majority of patients were using various weak opioids (based on receptor affinities), CV medications, and antidepressants. Overall rates by individual CV outcome per 1,000 patient-years by country were greatest for CHF (US 37.2, 95% CI 24.1-40.5), unstable angina (UK 8.2, 95% CI 7.0-9.6), and stroke (Germany 5.3, 95% CI 4.1-6.7). Overall rates for MI were: US, 10.7 (95% CI 9.1-12.5), UK, 6.7 (95% CI 5.6-8.0), and Germany, 2.7 (95% CI 1.9-3.7). Overall rates for each CV outcome, prevalence rates in patients with preexisting CV disease, and incidence rates in patients without established CV disease differed by country. Rates were higher in patients with preexisting CV disease. CONCLUSIONS: CV risk for new opioid users with ≥6 months of therapy was increased in patients with established CV disease compared with those without established CV disease, and the risk for specific outcomes differed by country. Assessment of CV safety events of new therapies introduced to chronic opioid users should consider sample size and population heterogeneity in the design of an observational study.

Opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain in the USA, Canada, Germany, and the UK: descriptive analysis of baseline patient-reported outcomes and retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: The characteristics of patients who suffer from noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation are not well understood. METHODS: Cross-sectional patient survey and chart review data from the baseline assessment of an ongoing longitudinal study in the USA, Canada, Germany, and the UK were evaluated via descriptive statistics. Participants had confirmation of daily opioid therapy ≥30 mg for ≥4 weeks and self-reported opioid-induced constipation. Response to laxatives was defined by classifying participants into categories of laxative use and evaluating the prevalence of inadequate response to one laxative agent and two or more agents from at least two different laxative classes. Outcomes included the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem, EuroQOL 5 Dimensions, and Global Assessment of Treatment Benefit, Satisfaction, and Willingness to Continue. RESULTS: Patients reported a mean of 1.4 bowel movements not preceded by laxatives and 3.7 bowel movements with laxative use per week; 83% wanted at least one bowel movement per day. Most commonly reported on Patient Assessment of Constipation-Symptoms were straining/squeezing to pass bowel movements (83%), bowel movements too hard (75%), flatulence (69%), and bloating (69%). Eighty-four percent were taking natural or behavioral therapies; 60% were taking at least one over-the-counter laxative; and 19% were taking at least one prescription laxative. Prevalence of inadequate response to one laxative agent was 94%; inadequate response to two or more agents from at least two different laxative classes was 27%. Mean Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire-Specific Health Problem values for percent work time missed, percent impairment while working, and percent activity impairment were 9%, 32% (equivalent of 14 hours of lost productivity per week), and 38%. Mean EuroQOL 5 Dimensions index and visual analog scale scores were 0.49 and 50.6, respectively. Forty-four percent reported being satisfied with their treatment for constipation. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with opioids for noncancer pain commonly endure constipation symptoms that limit their work productivity and overall health-related quality of life while adhering to treatments that provide little relief. Further research is needed to identify more efficacious constipation therapies for this patient population.