Insurer Market Power And Hospital Prices In The US.

The extent to which concentration in the health insurance market affects negotiated prices paid to hospitals is of high interest to policy makers. We examined the association between insurer market share and hospital prices, using a new source of data obtained through the federal Hospital Price Transparency initiative. We found that the market-leading insurer in the least competitive (most concentrated) insurance markets pays 15 percent less to hospitals than the market-leading insurer in the most competitive (least concentrated) markets. We also found the price relationship to be more pronounced for for-profit hospitals than for not-for-profit hospitals. Our results invite the question of whether dominant insurers are passing savings on to employers in the form of lower premiums.

Does Preventive Care Reduce Severe Pediatric Dental Caries?

INTRODUCTION: Tertiary oral health services (caries-related surgery, sedation, and emergency department visits) represent high-cost and ineffective ways to improve a child's oral health. We measured the impact of increased Texas Medicaid reimbursements for preventive dental care on use of tertiary oral health services. METHODS: We used difference-in-differences models to compare the effect of a policy change among children (≤9 y) enrolled in Medicaid in Texas and Florida. Linear regression models estimated 4 outcomes: preventive care dental visit, dental sedation, emergency department use, and surgical event. RESULTS: Increased preventive care visits led to increased sedation visits (1.7 percentage points, P < .001) and decreased emergency department visits (0.3 percentage points, P < .001) for children aged 9 years or younger. We saw no significant change in dental surgical rates associated with increased preventive dental care reimbursements. CONCLUSION: Increased access to preventive dentistry was not associated with improved long-term oral health of Medicaid-enrolled children. Policies that aim to improve the oral health of children may increase the effectiveness of preventive dentistry by also targeting other social determinants of oral health.

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Community Water Fluoridation and Prevalence of Pediatric Dental Surgery Among Medicaid Enrollees.

Importance: Dental surgery under general anesthesia (DGA) is an ineffective, costly treatment for caries. Interventions to reduce the need for DGA are challenging because children's parents may not seek care until surgery is required. Community water fluoridation (CWF) effectively prevents early childhood caries, but its effectiveness in reducing severe early childhood caries is unknown. Objective: To determine whether access to CWF is associated with the prevalence of DGA. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a cross-sectional analysis of Medicaid claims data from 2011 to 2012. Deidentified data were derived from Medicaid claims and enrollee files for Massachusetts, Texas, Connecticut, Illinois, and Florida for children aged 9 years and younger enrolled in either a fee-for-service or managed care plan through their state's Medicaid program. Linear regression models tested for associations between CWF and covariates. Multivariable linear regression models tested for associations between CWF and outcomes. Regression models included clustered SEs at the county level. Data analysis was performed from December 2018 to March 2020. Exposures: Access to CWF was determined by estimating the proportion of a county's total population that had access to a fluoridated public water system. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was county-level DGA prevalence. Other outcomes were caries-related visit prevalence and patient quality indicators (asthma and diabetes). Covariates included county-level demographic, socioeconomic, and dental practitioner variables. Results: A total of 436 counties within 5 states per year (872 county-year observations), were included in the analysis. Adjusted analysis revealed that a 10% increase in the proportion of county's population access to CWF was associated with lower caries-related visit prevalence (-0.45 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.59 to -0.31 percentage points; P < .001). Increasing CWF access in 10% increments was associated with decreased DGA prevalence in unadjusted analysis (-0.39 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.67 to -0.12 percentage points; P = .006) but not in adjusted analysis (-0.23 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.49 to 0.02 percentage points; P = .07). Increasing the proportion of county's access to CWF by 10% was not associated with the prevalence of asthma-related exacerbations (-0.02 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.10 to 0.05 percentage points; P = .53) or diabetes-related exacerbations (-0.0003 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.0014 to 0.0009 percentage points; P = .66). Conclusions and Relevance: This study extends our understanding of CWF's benefits for children's oral health. Specifically, these findings suggest that increasing a population's access to CWF's is associated with decreased caries-related visits and may also be associated with use of dental surgical services within high-risk populations.

Wellness Programs With Financial Incentives Through Disparities Lens.

PURPOSE: To examine wellness programs with financial incentives and their effect on disparities in preventive care. DESIGN: Financial incentives were introduced by 15 large employers, from 2010 to 2013. SETTING: Fifteen private employers. SUBJECTS: A total of 299 436 employees and adult dependents. MEASURES: Preventive services and participation in financial incentives. ANALYSIS: Multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: Disparities in preventive services widened after introduction of financial incentives. Asians were 3% more likely and African Americans were 3% less likely to receive wellness rewards than whites and non-Hispanics, controlling for other factors. CONCLUSION: Federal law limits targeting of wellness financial incentives by subgroups; thus, employers should consider outreach and culturally appropriate messaging.

Boosting workplace wellness programs with financial incentives.

OBJECTIVES: Using a large natural experiment among 39 employers, we examined the effect of adding financial incentives to workplace wellness programs. STUDY DESIGN: The 39 study employers used the same national insurer to administer their wellness programs, allowing us to observe preventive and health-promoting behaviors before and after financial incentives were implemented. Fifteen treatment employers introduced financial incentives into their wellness programs over 3 years, providing variation in the start dates, whereas 24 employers did not introduce financial incentives. These incentives were attached to specific health actions, including annual preventive visits, biometric screening, and selected screening services for diabetes, heart disease, and cancer. METHODS: Using multivariate regression, we examined employees and their adult dependents who had insurance coverage for at least 12 months and were offered a wellness program. Outcomes include utilization of annual preventive visits, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol testing, fasting blood sugar (FBS) testing, and breast, cervical, and colon cancer screens. RESULTS: Financial incentives increased annual preventive visits by 7.7 percentage points, cholesterol testing by 7.9 percentage points, and FBS testing by 7.1 percentage points (P <.05 for each). Compared with baseline rates, these changes represent significant improvements of 21% to 29%. Increases for cancer screening were smaller: 2.7 percentage points for mammograms and 2.2 percentage points for colorectal cancer screening, which correspond to increases over baseline rates of 5.5% and 7.3%, respectively. We did not detect an impact on cervical cancer screening. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of financial incentives to wellness programs increases their impact on selected preventive care services.

Health literacy and health care spending and utilization in a consumer-driven health plan.

We examined health literacy and health care spending and utilization by linking responses of three health literacy questions to 2006 claims data of enrollees new to consumer-driven health plans (n = 4,130). Better health literacy on all four health literacy measures (three item responses and their sum) was associated with lower total health care spending, specifically, lower emergency department and inpatient admission spending (p < .05). Similarly, fewer inpatient admissions and emergency department visits were associated with higher adequate health literacy scores and better self-reports of the ability to read and learn about medical conditions (p-value <.05). Members with lower health literacy scores appear to use services more appropriate for advanced health conditions, although office visit rates were similar across the range of health literacy scores.

Effect of market competition on hospital performance for heart failure.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether market competition is a potential driver of hospital performance on the key evidence-based Joint Commission heart-failure (HF) quality indicators of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker prescribed, left ventricular function assessment, smoking-cessation counseling, and discharge instructions. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multivariate analysis. METHODS: Hospital performance data for HF was obtained from The Joint Commission's ORYX program from 2003 to 2006. The performance data were linked with hospital characteristics from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and area-level sociodemographic information from the Area Resource File. Healthcare markets were defined as hospital referral regions (HRRs) and market competition intensity was defined by the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index. Hospital-level and HRR-level ordinary least squares fixed effects regression models were used to estimate the relationship between market competition and performance. RESULTS: A paired comparison indicated that there was a significant change in the mean hospital-level performance over time on all of the HF quality indicators. From the multivariate analyses, hospitals in the least competitive markets (Quintile 5) performed slightly better (2.9%) than the most competitive markets (Quintile 1) for left ventricular function assessment (P <.01). At the HRR level, however, the least competitive markets (Quintile 5) performed moderately worse (5.1%) on the discharge-instructions quality indicator compared with the most competitive markets (Quintile 1) (P = .05). CONCLUSIONS: Market competition intensity was associated with only small differences in hospital performance. The level of market competitiveness may produce only marginal incremental benefits to inpatient HF care.

Cost-effectiveness of enhancing primary care depression management on an ongoing basis.

PURPOSE: Although potentially costly, enhancing primary care depression management on an ongoing basis results in substantial long-term treatment effectiveness. The purpose of this article is to compare the cost-effectiveness of this approach with that of usual care. METHODS: The study was conducted in 12 community primary care practices randomized to enhanced or usual care after stratification by baseline practice patterns. Practices assigned to enhanced care encouraged depressed patients to engage in active treatment, using practice nurses to provide regularly scheduled care management during the course of 24 months. We analyze outcomes for 211 adults (73.4% of potential eligible patients) beginning a new treatment episode for major depression determined by previsit screening. Outcomes included blinded estimates of days free of depression impairment as well as health care costs for 2 years. RESULTS: Enhanced care significantly increased the number of days free of depression impairment for 2 years when compared with usual care (647.6 days vs 588.2 days, P <.01). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for enhanced care ranged from 9,592 dollars to 14,306 dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). The number of incremental days free of depression impairment increased between the first year and the second year (23.0 vs 36.4, respectively, P <.001) while incremental health plan costs decreased significantly (568 dollars vs -12 dollars, P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing primary care depression management on an ongoing basis should be considered for adoption by policy and health plan leaders.