Patterns of medical and developmental comorbidities among children presenting with feeding problems: a latent class analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Children with feeding problems often have multiple co-occurring medical and developmental conditions; however, it is unknown whether patterns of comorbidity exist and whether they relate to important feeding-related health outcomes. The main objective of this study was to examine (1) the relationship between the number of medical and developmental comorbidities and important feeding-related health outcomes; (2) how various comorbidities interact and form empirically derived patterns; and (3) how empirically derived patterns of comorbidity relate to weight status, nutritional variety, and child and parent mealtime behavior problems. METHODS: The medical records of 286 children (mean age = 35.56 months) seen at an outpatient feeding disorders clinic were reviewed. Child weight status, nutritional variety, and child and parent mealtime behavior problems were assessed using standardized measures. The lifetime occurrence of medical and developmental conditions was reliably coded. Empirically derived patterns of comorbidity were generated via latent class analyses. RESULTS: Latent class analyses generated 3 comorbidity patterns: "Behavioral" (58% of cases), "Developmentally Delayed" (37%), and "Autism Spectrum Disorder" (ASD, 5%). The Autism Spectrum Disorder group was found to have less nutritional variety compared to the Behavioral and Developmentally Delayed groups. No differences were found between groups in terms of percent ideal body weight, or severity of child or parent mealtime behavior problems. CONCLUSION: Multiple co-occurring conditions of children with feeding problems were empirically reduced to 3 patterns of comorbidities. Comorbidity patterns were largely unrelated to weight status and child or parent mealtime behavior problems. This suggests that medical and developmental conditions confer general, rather than specific, risk for feeding problems in children.

Pain, disability, and symptoms among siblings of children with functional abdominal pain.

OBJECTIVE: To examine reports of pain, disability, and somatic and psychological symptoms among siblings of children with functional abdominal pain (FAP) and siblings of "healthy" comparison children. METHODS: This survey study explored two groups of participants (FAP and healthy) consisting of (1) children with FAP and their siblings and parents and (2) healthy comparison children and their siblings, and parents. Participants included 13 FAP families and 10 healthy comparison families. Siblings and children were between 8 and 14 years of age. Measures included the Behavioral Assessment System for Children, Abdominal Pain Index, Children's Somatization Inventory, Functional Disability Inventory, and Family Inventory of Life Events. Cross-sectional data were analyzed using correlations and analysis of variance techniques. RESULTS: Siblings of children with FAP reported significantly greater mean levels of emotional/ behavioral symptoms than siblings of healthy comparison children. No significant between-group differences were identified in FAP and healthy comparison parents' reports of siblings' pain or emotional/behavioral symptoms. There were significantly more persons with pain problems living in the homes of FAP families. Among FAP families, a greater number of parent-reported family stressful life events was significantly associated with sibling functional disability and somatic symptoms. CONCLUSION: This investigation suggests that siblings of children with FAP experience more emotional/behavioral symptoms than peers and that their symptoms are not readily identified by parents. These findings highlight the importance of considering the psychological functioning of "unaffected" siblings and family stressors when children present with recurrent pain complaints.

Brief report: family-based group intervention for young siblings of children with chronic illness and developmental disability.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a family-based group intervention for young siblings of children with chronic illness and developmental disability (CI/DD). METHODS: Forty-three healthy siblings (ages 4-7 years) of children with CI/DD and their parents participated in an intervention designed to address sibling challenges that cut across types of diagnostic conditions. The intervention consisted of six sessions of collateral and integrated sibling-parent groups. Measures of sibling knowledge, sibling sense of connectedness with other children in similar family circumstances, and sibling global functioning were collected before and after intervention. A subsample of 17 families completed a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Siblings' knowledge of the child's disorder and sibling connectedness increased significantly from pre- to posttreatment for both boys and girls, regardless of the nature of the brother or sister's condition. Sibling perceptions of self-competence increased from pre- to posttreatment, whereas parent reports of sibling behavioral functioning remained within the normal range. Improvements in sibling knowledge and connectedness maintained at follow-up. Parent satisfaction with the program was high. CONCLUSIONS: Results support more controlled evaluations of family-based intervention to improve young sibling adaptation to CI/DD.

Latino sibling knowledge and adjustment to chronic disability.

Forty matched healthy Latino and non-Latino siblings (ages 8-14 years) of children with developmental and physical disabilities completed interviews and questionnaires assessing sibling knowledge of and adjustment to disability and sibling global psychological functioning. One-way analyses of variance revealed Latino siblings to have significantly less accurate information about the disability and more internalizing problems than non-Latino siblings. Sibling and parent wishes for the healthy sibling reflected cultural values. The results indicate that Latino siblings of children with chronic disabilities may be at risk for internalizing psychological problems. Future research regarding cultural factors affecting sibling adaptation to childhood disability is encouraged.

Integrated sibling-parent group intervention to improve sibling knowledge and adjustment to chronic illness and disability.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an integrated group intervention for siblings and parents designed to increase sibling understanding of and adjustment to chronic illness and developmental disability (CI/DD). METHODS: Fifty-four well siblings (ages 8-13 years) and their parents were recruited through hospital-based and community agencies serving children with CI/DD. Measures of sibling knowledge, sibling adjustment to the disorder, sibling connectedness, and sibling global behavioral functioning were collected before and after the intervention. A subsample of 20 families completed a 3-month follow-up to assess maintenance of results. RESULTS: Sibling knowledge of the child's disorder and sibling connectedness increased, while sibling reports of negative adjustment to the disorder and parent reports of sibling global behavioral functioning decreased significantly from pre- to posttreatment for both boys and girls, regardless of the type of diagnostic condition. Improvements in sibling knowledge, connectedness, and behavioral problems maintained at 3-month follow-up. Parent satisfaction with the program was high. CONCLUSIONS: Results support the future conduct of more controlled evaluation of the integrated sibling and parent group intervention model to improve sibling knowledge of and adjustment to CI/DD.