Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 110(4): 1216-1224, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32160958

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Microplegia has been studied during isolated coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery but not in more complex operations. Objectives of this study were to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of microplegia relative to Buckberg cardioplegia during these operations. METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2017, 242 patients underwent multicomponent operations with simplified microplegia delivered via syringe pump and 10,512 with modified Buckberg cardioplegia. Operations included aortic root, arch, or ascending aorta replacement in 424 (94%) patients, aortic valve surgery in 324 (72%) patients, and concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in 47 (10%) patients. Outcomes were compared in 226 propensity-matched pairs. RESULTS: There was no difference in median postoperative troponin T between groups after adjusting for aortic clamp time. Microplegia patients received significantly less crystalloid with their cardioplegia (mean 27 ± 8.0 mL/operation vs 735 ± 357 mL/operation; P < .001) and had lower peak intraoperative glucose (196 ± 40 mg/dL vs 248 ± 69 mg/dL; P < .001). Microplegia and Buckberg groups had similar in-hospital mortality (2.7% [n = 6] vs 2.2% [n = 5]; P = .8), stroke (2.2% [n = 5] vs 3.6% [n = 8]; P = .4), renal failure (8% [n = 18] vs 5.8% [n = 13]; P = .4), prolonged ventilation (23% [n = 51] vs 24% [n = 54]; P = .7), median postoperative length of stay (both 8.1 days; P > .9), and median red cell units administered to patients requiring transfusion (4 units vs 3 units; P = .14). The mean cost of cardioplegia per case with microplegia was 1/26th that of Buckberg cardioplegia. CONCLUSIONS: Our simplified microplegia technique offers several advantages over Buckberg cardioplegia without compromising myocardial protection or safety in complex, multicomponent operations with extended aortic clamp times.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/economia , Redução de Custos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/efeitos adversos , Soluções Cardioplégicas/administração & dosagem , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/economia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/sangue , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Troponina T/sangue
2.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 98(2): 618-24, 2014 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24968771

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) decreases requirements for allogeneic blood transfusion and chest reexploration in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Whether rFVIIa increases the risk of postoperative adverse events is unclear. We tested whether rFVIIa administration was associated with increased mortality and neurologic and renal morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Risk of thromboembolic complications and the dose-response of rFVIIa on mortality and morbidity were also evaluated. METHODS: Of 27,977 patients who had complex cardiac surgery, 164 patients (0.59%) received rFVIIa perioperatively. Using propensity-matching techniques, patients were matched to a maximum of 3 control patients. Patients who received rFVIIa were compared with control patients on risk of mortality, neurologic and renal morbidity, and thromboembolic complications, including a composite of myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, and deep venous thrombosis. A corresponding dose-response analysis using multivariable logistic regression was also performed. RESULTS: Propensity techniques successfully matched 144 patients (88%) with 359 control patients. Of patients who received rFVIIa, 40% experienced in-hospital mortality compared with 18% of control patients (odds ratio, 2.82; 98.3% confidence interval, 1.64 to 4.87; p<0.001). Furthermore, 31% of patients treated with rFVIIa versus 17% of control patients experienced renal morbidity (odds ratio, 2.07; 98.3% confidence interval, 1.19 to 3.62; p=0.002); however, neurologic morbidity and thromboembolic complications were not different among groups. High-dose rFVIIa (>60 µg/kg) did not increase the risk for mortality compared with treatment with low-dose rFVIIa (<60 µg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: Administration of rFVIIa is associated with increased mortality and renal morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Fator VIIa/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Taxa de Sobrevida
3.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 23(4): 479-83, 2009 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19285430

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to analyze perioperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) insertion in patients undergoing cardiac surgery in the authors' institution from 1995 to 2005 and to propose an explanation for changes in use over this period. A secondary objective was to assess patient variables associated with IABP use. DESIGN: This is a retrospective study including patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 1995 and 2005. SETTING: The Cardiothoracic Anesthesia Patient Registry of a single teaching institution was queried to obtain the required information. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty thousand two hundred sixty-nine cardiac surgery patients. INTERVENTIONS: Intra-aortic balloon pump insertion before surgery, after cardiopulmonary bypass, or in the cardiovascular intensive care unit was assessed in patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass graft surgery, valve surgery, or both. Select patient variables were analyzed for their association with IABP insertion. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) examinations, milrinone use, and mortality rates also were determined. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Among 30,269 cardiac surgery patients, 1,310 (4.32%) underwent IABP insertion. Combined preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IABP use decreased from 7.8% in 1995 to 3.0% in 2005. Simultaneously, the intraoperative use of milrinone increased from 4.8% to 8.8% and postoperative use increased from 5.2% to 7.8%. The number of intraoperative TEE examinations more than doubled from approximately 1,700 to 3,500. The overall mortality for patients with preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IABP insertion was 12.6%, 17.5%, and 47.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: From 1995 to 2005, preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative IABP use decreased by approximately 60% in cardiac surgery patients. Simultaneously, the use of TEE and milrinone each doubled. Although a cause-effect relationship cannot be established from the present study's observational data, the trends coincide and may be related.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Balão Intra-Aórtico , Idoso , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Feminino , Testes de Função Cardíaca , Humanos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/efeitos adversos , Balão Intra-Aórtico/mortalidade , Período Intraoperatório/mortalidade , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Milrinona/uso terapêutico , Inibidores de Fosfodiesterase/uso terapêutico , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
J Diabetes Sci Technol ; 3(3): 478-86, 2009 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20144285

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The importance of near-normal blood glucose in the immediate postoperative period is generally accepted and is best achieved in the perioperative period with a constant intravenous (IV) infusion of insulin. This requires intensive nursing only achievable in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Glucose management after transfer to a regular nursing floor (RNF) has not been studied systematically. In August 2006, the Cleveland Clinic began using long-acting insulin glargine as the insulin infusion was terminated in the ICU. METHODS: This prospective analysis examined all patients receiving IV insulin infusion after cardiothoracic surgery in a 1 month period. The analyses evaluated the safety and efficacy of a protocol using a transition to subcutaneous insulin glargine of 50% of the calculated 24 h requirement at the end of the ICU insulin infusion protocol in preparation for transfer to the RNF. RESULTS: Only 1 patient in 99 developed hypoglycemia, and no patient suffered severe hypoglycemia (glucose < 40 mg/dl), while the majority (70%) had euglycemia (glucose between 70 and 150 mg/dl). CONCLUSIONS: This approach was both safe-as there was very little hypoglycemia (1 patient in 99)-and effective, as blood sugar was well controlled in most subjects. Efficacy for achieving euglycemia was 70%. Efficacy was likely reduced because of the upper limit of insulin glargine dosage imposed by some providers as a safety consideration. Although there was a physician option to override, the maximum protocol dose of 30 U was rarely exceeded, leading to inadequate dosing in some subjects who required high insulin infusion rates in the ICU.


Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/cirurgia , Protocolos Clínicos , Hiperglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Insulina/uso terapêutico , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/tendências , Idoso , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/sangue , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipoglicemiantes/farmacologia , Infusões Intravenosas , Insulina/administração & dosagem , Insulina/análogos & derivados , Insulina/farmacologia , Insulina Glargina , Insulina de Ação Prolongada , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
5.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 34(2): 295-300, 2008 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18539472

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Successful bridging to transplantation (BTT) with ventricular assist devices (VAD) is an alternative to mitigate the effects of end-stage heart failure on organ function while awaiting a heart. The effects of long-term VAD BTT on patient outcomes following transplantation are poorly studied. METHODS: A retrospective chart review identified 145 patients BTT with a VAD between November of 1996 and June of 2005 at the Cleveland Clinic. Patients were divided into two groups and outcomes were compared: group 1 was supported for <100 days (median=44 days) and group 2 was supported for > or =100 days (median=161 days). RESULTS: Patients in group 1 were less likely to be blood type O (33% vs 68%, p<0.0001). BTT <100 days trended towards independently predicting improved survival by multivariate proportional hazards analysis (risk ratio=0.75, 95% CI=0.52-1.08, p=0.12), largely due to reduced in-hospital mortality in this group (2% vs 11%, p=0.055); however, no significant difference with respect to long-term survival was observed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (p=0.14). Furthermore, causes of death differed between groups: group 1 more commonly died of coronary artery vasculopathy (26% vs 0%, p=0.022) and group 2 more commonly died of sepsis (60% vs 26%, p=0.026). Ultimately, 21% of all group 2 patients died from sepsis (compared to 7% of group 1 patients, p=0.018). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that prolonged BTT with a VAD is a viable treatment strategy but may lead to significantly more post-transplant deaths from sepsis and higher in-hospital mortality. These data may inform management of this high-risk patient population.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Transplante de Coração , Coração Auxiliar , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Métodos Epidemiológicos , Feminino , Coração Auxiliar/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Relacionadas à Prótese/etiologia
6.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 81(6): 2183-8, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16731151

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Indiscriminate antibiotic use may lead to development of antibiotic resistance. Preoperative mupirocin treatment decreases Staphylococcus aureus carriage and may reduce subsequent surgical site infection, but is unlikely to benefit noncarriers. This study was undertaken to evaluate whether avoiding mupirocin in noncarriers places them at increased risk for subsequent postoperative infection. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study examining incidence of postoperative infection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery at the Cleveland Clinic after introduction of a protocol of polymerase chain reaction screening for nasal S aureus carriage, and avoiding mupirocin treatment of noncarriers. RESULTS: Between August 1, 2002, and May 31, 2004, 6,334 patients were screened for nasal carriage of S aureus before undergoing cardiac surgery. There was no significant difference in infection rates between carriers and noncarriers when examining the incidence of all infections (5.6% and 5.0%; relative risk [RR] 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.86 to 1.43]), infections caused specifically by S aureus (1.04% and 0.80%; RR 1.30 [95% CI: 0.71 to 2.39]), any surgical site infection (3.1% and 3.2%; RR 0.97 [95% CI: 0.69 to 1.36]), S aureus surgical site infection (0.82% and 0.58%; RR 1.41 [95% CI: 0.71 to 2.82]), any bloodstream infection (3.1% and 2.5%; RR 1.21 [95% CI: 0.86 to 1.71]), and S aureus bloodstream infection (0.37% and 0.48%; RR 0.77 [95% CI: 0.30 to 2.03]). Mupirocin use declined substantially after introduction of the protocol. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of targeting perioperative mupirocin treatment to carriers leads to significant reduction in mupirocin use without increasing early postoperative infectious complications in noncarriers.


Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Portador Sadio/tratamento farmacológico , Mupirocina/uso terapêutico , Cavidade Nasal/microbiologia , Medicação Pré-Anestésica , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controle , Staphylococcus aureus/isolamento & purificação , Idoso , Antibioticoprofilaxia/efeitos adversos , Antibioticoprofilaxia/estatística & dados numéricos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Suscetibilidade a Doenças , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mupirocina/administração & dosagem , Ohio/epidemiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Medicação Pré-Anestésica/efeitos adversos , Medicação Pré-Anestésica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecções Estafilocócicas/epidemiologia , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/microbiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Desnecessários
7.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 25(6): 613-8, 2006 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16730565

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients bridged to heart transplantation with a ventricular assist device (VAD) developed coronary vasculopathy at the same rate as non-bridged patients despite having higher levels of pre-formed antibodies. We hypothesized that allosensitized VAD patients have higher levels of immunosuppression and thus different morbidity and causes of mortality. METHODS: Patients who received a transplant between January 1996 and May 2002 were separated into 2 groups based on the need for VAD support as a bridge to transplantation. Transplant and Inpatient Pharmacy Databases and charts were queried for date of transplantation, degree of allosensitization, use of desensitization therapy, immunosuppressive strategies, number of treated rejection episodes, and specific causes of death. RESULTS: This study investigated 238 patients (125 VAD patients, 113 non-VAD patients). VAD patients were more likely to be allosensitized than non-VAD patients (20% vs 5%, p < 0.01). OKT3 was given to 22% of VAD patients as anti-rejection prophylaxis and 14% received pre-transplant plasmapheresis. Non-VAD patients rarely were desensitized (2.6% of non-VAD patients). After transplantation, 68 VAD patients (54%) and 44 non-VAD patients (39%) had episodes of severe rejection requiring therapy. Episodes of rejection in VAD patients were commonly treated with steroids (90%), plasmapheresis (10%), and OKT3 (7%), and episodes of rejection in non-VAD patients were treated with steroids (76%) and OKT3 (8%). The 5-year survival for both groups was similar (90% and 86% respectively, p = 0.31). VAD patients commonly died of sepsis (75%), and non-VAD patients died of rejection (39%) and ischemic transplant cardiomyopathy (30%). CONCLUSION: When short-term outcomes between bridged and non-bridged heart transplant recipients were compared, overall survival was similar but causes of death differed. Findings in this study might aid in the post-operative management of patients bridged to transplantation with a VAD.


Assuntos
Soro Antilinfocitário/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Coração/imunologia , Coração Auxiliar , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Muromonab-CD3/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Soro Antilinfocitário/administração & dosagem , Causas de Morte , Doença das Coronárias/imunologia , Doença das Coronárias/prevenção & controle , Doença das Coronárias/cirurgia , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Coração/mortalidade , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fragmentos de Peptídeos , Plasmaferese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sepse/epidemiologia , Linfócitos T/imunologia
8.
Pharmacotherapy ; 22(11): 1484-8, 2002 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12432975

RESUMO

Clinical pharmacy services in the critical care setting have expanded dramatically and include assisting physicians in pharmacotherapy decision making, providing pharmacokinetic consultations, monitoring patients for drug efficacy and safety, providing drug information, and offering medical education to physicians, nurses, and patients. Measurable clinical effects of these services include reduced drug errors and adverse drug events, decreased morbidity and mortality rates, and a positive pharmacoeconomic impact by decreasing overall health care costs.


Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacêuticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Críticos/economia , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Humanos , Farmacêuticos/economia , Farmacêuticos/normas , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/economia , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/normas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...