Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Transplant ; 36(8): e14770, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35801376

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains the primary cause of death in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) despite improvements in immunosuppression management. Despite advances in knowledge regarding the pathogenesis of CLAD, treatments that are currently available are usuallyineffective and delay progression of disease at best.There are currently no evidence-based guidelines and minimal publications regarding the optimal treatment ofCLAD. OBJECTIVE: To complete a comprehensive review of the literature for the prevention and medical management of CLAD. METHODS: We identified the major domains of the medical management of CLAD and conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed and Embase databases to identify articles published from inception to December 2021 related to CLAD in LTRs. Studies published in English pertaining to the pharmacologic prevention and treatment of CLAD were included; highest priority was given to prospective, randomized, controlled trials if available. Prospective observational and retrospective controlled trials were prioritized next, followed by retrospective uncontrolled studies, case series, and finally case reports if the information was deemed to be pertinent. Reference lists of qualified publications were also reviewed to find any other publications of interest that were not found on initial search.In the absence of literature published in the aforementioned databases, additional articles were identified by reviewing abstracts presented at the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation and American Transplant Congress annual meetings between 2010-2021. CONCLUSION: CLAD should be identified as early as possible along with prompt intervention to optimize the possibility of stabilizing or improving lung function. More robust clinical data is needed to validate the use of all currently available and investigational treatment options for CLAD to identify the optimal pharmacotherapy management for this patient population.


Assuntos
Bronquiolite Obliterante , Doença Enxerto-Hospedeiro , Transplante de Pulmão , Aloenxertos , Bronquiolite Obliterante/etiologia , Doença Crônica , Humanos , Pulmão , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Estudos Observacionais como Assunto , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
Transplantation ; 99(10): 2196-202, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25856407

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The number of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients undergoing lung transplantation continues to grow, as does the prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative rods. However, the posttransplant survival of patients with MDR pathogens, specifically pan-resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, is poorly characterized. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of CF patients (n = 186; all age, > 16 years) transplanted at the University of North Carolina from 1990 through 2013. Respiratory cultures before transplantation were reviewed for Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. Bacteria were defined as pan-resistant if they were resistant or intermediate to all antibiotics tested; otherwise, organisms were defined as MDR. Patients were divided into 5 groups: pan-resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans (n = 9), MDR Achromobacter xylosoxidans (n = 15), pan-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 5), MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (n = 26), and CF patients without Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia or Bulkholderia cenocepacia (n = 131). Survival was compared, and cause of death was described. RESULTS: The survival was similar between all cohorts (P = 0.29). Recurrence of the primary pathogen was the most common with pan-resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans (100%) followed by MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (46%), MDR Achromobacter xylosoxidans (33%), and finally, pan-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (20%). Death attributable to the primary pathogen was uncommon, occurring in 2 patients with MDR Stenotrophomonas maltophilia and 2 patients with MDR Achromobacter xylosoxidans. CONCLUSIONS: The CF patients with Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia have similar posttransplant survival as compared to other CF patients, irrespective of their antibiotic susceptibility patterns. The presence of these organisms should not preclude lung transplantation.


Assuntos
Achromobacter denitrificans/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibrose Cística/microbiologia , Fibrose Cística/cirurgia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/tratamento farmacológico , Transplante de Pulmão , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Fibrose Cística/mortalidade , Resistência a Múltiplos Medicamentos , Feminino , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/complicações , Infecções por Bactérias Gram-Negativas/mortalidade , Humanos , Transplante de Pulmão/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Prevalência , Recidiva , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA