Prospective, multicenter study on the economic and clinical impact of gene-expression assays in early-stage breast cancer from a single region: the PREGECAM registry experience.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness and impact of gene-expression assays (GEAs) on treatment decisions in a real-world setting of early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients. METHODS: This is a regional, prospective study promoted by the Council Health Authorities in Madrid. Enrolment was offered to women with estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, node-negative or micrometastatic, stage I or II breast cancer from 21 hospitals in Madrid. Treatment recommendations were recorded before and after knowledge of tests results. An economic model compared the cost-effectiveness of treatment, guided by GEAs or by common prognostic factors. RESULTS: 907 tests (440 Oncotype DX® and 467 MammaPrint®) were performed between February 2012 and November 2014. Treatment recommendation changed in 42.6% of patients. The shift was predominantly from chemohormonal (CHT) to hormonal therapy (HT) alone, in 30.5% of patients. GEAs increased patients' confidence in treatment decision making. Tumor grade, progesterone receptor positivity and Ki67 expression were associated with the likelihood of change from CHT to HT (P < 0.001) and from HT to CHT (P < 0.001). Compared with current clinical practice genomic testing increased quality-adjusted life years by 0.00787 per patient and was cost-saving from a national health care system (by 13.867€ per patient) and from a societal perspective (by 32.678€ per patient). CONCLUSION: Using GEAs to guide adjuvant therapy in ESBC is cost-effective in Spain and has a significant impact on treatment decisions.

[Evaluation on non invasive diagnostic tests for the second look in epithelial ovarian cancer]. / Valoración de las pruebas diagnósticas no invasivas frente al second look en el cáncer epitelial de ovario.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the usefulness of diagnostic tests performed before a second look laparotomy in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Thirty-three patients with epithelial ovarian cancer attended at Fundación Jiménez Díaz from 1984 to 1995 were studied. All patients initially underwent cyto-reducing surgery, followed by at least six platinum-based chemotherapy cycles. Prior to second look laparotomy all patients were evaluated by computerized tomography (CT) of the pelvis and abdomen, CA-125, pelvic-abdominal echography and gynecologic examination. To evaluate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for each test contingency tables were used. RESULTS: Eleven out of the 33 second look patients (33%) had histologic or cytologic evidence of disease. Six out of the eleven positive second look had a positive CT prior to second look (sensitivity of 55%). CT showed lack of disease in 21 out of the 22 negative second look cases (specificity 95%). Positive and negative predictive values of the test were 86% and 81%, respectively. Nine cases out of the 28 who had a CA-125 obtained had a positive second look. Four out of these nine patients had an increased CA-125 value (sensitivity 44%, specificity 95%, positive predictive value 80% and negative predictive value 78%). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of physical examination and echography were 36%, 100%, 100%, 76% and 27%, 95%, 75%, 72%, respectively. On the other hand, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of all tests taken together were 64%, 91%, 78% and 83%, with a rate of false-negative results of 17% and a rate of false-positive results of 22%. CONCLUSION: Pelvic-abdominal computerized tomography, CA-125, pelvic-abdominal echography and gynecologic examination can be an alternative to second look laparotomy for the diagnosis of persistence or recurrence of the disease in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer.