High flow nasal oxygen in frail COVID-19 patients hospitalized in intermediate care units and non-eligible to invasive mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND: In COVID-19 patients, older age (sixty or older), comorbidities, and frailty are associated with a higher risk for mortality and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) failure. It therefore seems appropriate to suggest limitations of care to older and vulnerable patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and a poor expected outcome, who would not benefit from invasive treatment. HFNO (high flow nasal oxygen) is a non-invasive respiratory support device already used in de novo acute respiratory failure. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the survival of patients treated with HFNO outside the ICU (intensive care unit) for a severe COVID-19 pneumonia, otherwise presenting limitations of care making them non-eligible for IMV. Secondary objectives were the description of our cohort and the identification of prognostic factors for HFNO failure. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study. We included all patients with limitations of care making them non-eligible for IMV and treated with HFNO for a severe COVID-19 pneumonia, hospitalized in a COVID-19 unit of the pulmonology department of Lyon Sud University Hospital, France, from March 2020 to March 2021. Primary outcome was the description of the vital status at day-30 after HFNO initiation, using the WHO (World Health Organization) 7-points ordinal scale. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients were included. Median age was 83 years [76.3-87.0], mean duration for HFNO was 7.5 days, 53% had a CFS score (Clinical Frailty Scale) >4. At day-30, 73% of patients were deceased, one patient (2%) was undergoing HFNO, 9% of patients were discharged from hospital. HFNO failure occurred in 66% of patients. Clinical signs of respiratory failure before HFNO initiation (respiratory rate >30/min, retractions, and abdominal paradoxical breathing pattern) were associated with mortality (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that HFNO is an option in non-ICU skilled units for older and frail patients with a severe COVID-19 pneumonia, otherwise non-suitable for intensive care and mechanical ventilation. Observation of clinical signs of respiratory failure before HFNO initiation was associated with mortality.

Tracheal stent aspergillosis occurring after aortic allograft of the trachea.

BACKGROUND: Aspergillosis is a fungal infection with many clinical forms. Invasive aspergillosis is the most widely known severe manifestation, but other forms can need intensive care. AIM: Our purpose is to report a case of tracheal aspergilloma and provide a review of the literature concerning endobronchial aspergillus. METHOD: We report a case of tracheal aspergilloma causing tracheal obstruction in a patient admitted in the ICU for respiratory distress. The aspergilloma occurred in a tracheal stent implanted during tracheal allograft for tracheal cancer. A combination of local and systemic antifungal was used with successful result.

Molecular profiling of non-small-cell lung cancer patients with or without brain metastases included in the randomized SAFIR02-LUNG trial and association with intracranial outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer remains the most frequent cause of brain metastases (BMs) and is responsible for high morbidity and mortality. Intracranial response to systemic treatments is inconsistent due to several mechanisms: genomic heterogeneity, blood-tumor barrier, and the brain-specific microenvironment. We conducted a study using data from the SAFIR02-LUNG trial. The primary objective was to compare the molecular profiles of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without BMs. The secondary objective was to explore central nervous system (CNS) outcomes with various maintenance treatment regimens. METHODS: In total, 365 patients harboring interpretable molecular data were included in this analysis. Clinical and biological data were collected. Genomic analyses were based on array-comparative genomic hybridization and next-generation sequencing (NGS) following the trial recommendations. RESULTS: Baseline genomic analyses of copy number variations identified a 24-gene signature specific to lung cancer BM occurrence, all previously known to take part in oncogenesis. NGS analysis identified a higher proportion of KRAS mutations in the BM-positive group (44.3% versus 32.3%), especially G12C mutations (63% versus 47%). Protein interaction analyses highlighted several functional interactions centered on EGFR. Furthermore, the risk of CNS progression was decreased with standard pemetrexed maintenance therapy. The highest rate of CNS progression was observed with durvalumab, probably because of the specific intracranial immune microenvironment. CONCLUSION: This work identified a 24-gene signature specific to lung cancer with BM. Further studies are needed to precisely determine the functional implications of these genes to identify new therapeutic targets for the treatment of lung cancer with BM.

Association between immune-related adverse events and long-term survival outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The impact of immune-related adverse events (irAE) on survival outcomes after single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the association between irAEs and ICI efficacy in various malignancies. METHODS: All patients treated with a single-agent ICI for any advanced cancer were included in this retrospective multicentric series. The primary objective was to assess the impact of all type grade ≥II irAEs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). IrAEs were first considered as a fixed covariate and included in Cox-regression models. In addition, as irAEs are time-related events and can occur at any point during follow-up, we analysed the occurrence of irAEs as a time-varying covariate. RESULTS: In this cohort of 410 patients, the majority of patients (70%) were treated for non-small cell lung cancer. The ICI was an anti-PD(L)1 for 356 patients (82%) and an anti-CTLA4 for 79 patients (18%). In total 126 (29%) of the patients presented at least one grade ≥II irAEs. The first occurrence of a grade ≥II irAE had a positive impact on PFS and OS when considered as a fixed or as a time-varying covariate (hazard ratio [HR] for PFS = 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.81; P = 0.00022; HR for OS = 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.74, P < 0.0001). This overall finding was confirmed in patients treated with an anti-PD(L)1 and among patients with lung cancer. CONCLUSION: In this pooled multi-institutional cohort, the incidence of irAEs was associated with better long-term survival across different malignancies treated with ICI monotherapy.

Older and younger patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors have similar outcomes in real-life setting.

BACKGROUND: Age-related immune dysfunction might impair the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in older patients. We aimed to evaluate the impact of age on clinical outcomes and tolerance of ICIs in a real-life setting. METHODS: All patients receiving a single-agent ICI (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA-4] or programmed death(ligand)1 [PD(L)-1] inhibitors) for the standard treatment of a locally advanced or metastatic cancer were included in this retrospective multicentric series. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS). Progression-free survival (PFS) and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were secondary end-points. The impact of age was assessed using the threshold of 70 years. RESULTS: A total of 410 patients were included, for 435 lines of treatment, including 150 lines (34%) given to patients aged 70 years or older. The primary tumour types were lung cancer (n = 304, 74%), melanoma (n = 79, 19%) and urologic cancer (n = 27, 7%). Most of the administered treatments were PD(L)-1 inhibitors (n = 356, 82%). Median follow-up reached 46 months in the CTLA-4 cohort, and 20 months in the PD(L)-1 cohort. In both treatment cohorts, age did not impact OS (respectively, HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.5-1.4; log-rank P = 0.49 and HR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1; log-rank P = 0.27) or PFS (HR = 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.1; log-rank P = 0.13 and HR = 0.9, 95% CI 0.7-1.1; log-rank P = 0.19). Grade 3-4 irAEs rates were not statistically different between older and younger patients (11% vs 12%, P = 0.87). CONCLUSION: In a large real-world series of patients treated by ICI monotherapy, the long-term clinical outcomes were not statistically different between older or younger patients, with no increased immune-related toxicity.

Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: There is no recommended therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma that has progressed after first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease control has been less than 30% in all previous studies of second-line drugs. Preliminary results have suggested that anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody could be efficacious in these patients. We thus aimed to prospectively assess the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: This multicentre randomised, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial was done at 21 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma progressing after first-line or second-line pemetrexed and platinum-based treatments, measurable disease by CT, and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg bodyweight) every 2 weeks, or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks), given until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Central randomisation was stratified by histology (epithelioid vs non-epithelioid), treatment line (second line vs third line), and chemosensitivity to previous treatment (progression ≥3 months vs <3 months after pemetrexed treatment) and used a minimisation method with a 0·8 random factor. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved 12-week disease control, assessed by masked independent central review; the primary endpoint would be met if disease control was achieved in at least 40% of patients. The primary endpoint was assessed in the first 108 eligible patients. Efficacy analyses were also done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02716272. FINDINGS: Between March 24 and August 25, 2016, 125 eligible patients were recruited and assigned to either nivolumab (n=63) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=62). In the first 108 eligible patients, 12-week disease control was achieved by 24 (44%; 95% CI 31-58) of 54 patients in the nivolumab group and 27 (50%; 37-63) of 54 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. In the intention-to-treat population, 12-week disease control was achieved by 25 (40%; 28-52) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 32 (52%; 39-64) of 62 patients in the combination group. Nine (14%) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 16 (26%) of 61 patients in the combination group had grade 3-4 toxicities. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were asthenia (one [2%] in the nivolumab group vs three [5%] in the combination group), asymptomatic increase in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (none vs four [7%] of each), and asymptomatic lipase increase (two [3%] vs one [2%]). No patients had toxicities leading to death in the nivolumab group, whereas three (5%) of 62 in the combination group did (one fulminant hepatitis, one encephalitis, and one acute kidney failure). INTERPRETATION: Anti-PD-1 nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab plus anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab combination therapy both showed promising activity in relapsed patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, without unexpected toxicity. These regimens require confirmation in larger clinical trials. FUNDING: French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup.

Association between lung cancer somatic mutations and occupational exposure in never-smokers.

Occupational exposure constitutes a common risk factor for lung cancer. We observed molecular alterations in 73% of never-smokers, 35% of men and 8% of women were exposed to at least one occupational carcinogen. We report herein associations between molecular patterns and occupational exposure.BioCAST was a cohort study of lung cancer in never-smokers that reported risk factor exposure and molecular patterns. Occupational exposure was assessed via a validated 71-item questionnaire. Patients were categorised into groups that were unexposed and exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), asbestos, silica, diesel exhaust fumes (DEF), chrome and paints. Test results were recorded for EGFR, KRAS, HER2, BRAF and PIK3 mutations, and ALK alterations.Overall, 313 out of 384 patients included in BioCAST were analysed. Asbestos-exposed patients displayed a significantly lower rate of EGFR mutations (20% versus 44%, p=0.033), and a higher rate of HER2 mutations (18% versus 4%, p=0.084). ALK alterations were not associated with any occupational carcinogens. The DEF-exposed patients were diagnosed with a BRAF mutation in 25% of all cases. Chrome-exposed patients exhibited enhanced HER2 and PIK3 mutation frequency.Given its minimal effects in the subgroups, we conclude that occupational exposure slightly affects the molecular pattern of lung cancers in never-smokers. In particular, asbestos-exposed patients have a lower chance of EGFR mutations.

Lung cancer may increase serum procalcitonin level.

INTRODUCTION: Serum procalcitonin (PCT) is a biomarker used routinely to diagnose infections. Some malignancies are usual false positives for PCT. However, its value and behavior in the setting of lung cancers are poorly known. The objective of this study was to assess PCT positivity in a lung cancer cases series. METHOD: Between November 2011 and September 2012, all cases of newly diagnosed lung cancer with a pre-antineoplastic PCT assay and no patent signs of infection were included in the study. All PCT levels were assessed by immunofluorescent assay in a single laboratory. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included (70.8% male; mean age 62; small-cell cancer 20.2%; stage IV cancer 60.7%). Overall, PCT was positive in 42%. A neuroendocrine component, having 2 or more metastatic sites, having a pleura or a liver metastasis, and being positive for CRP were all significantly associated with positive PCT in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, only the presence of a neuroendocrine component remained strongly associated with a positive PCT (AOR=7.24 [CI=95% 1.91-27.51]; P=0.004). Finally, baseline PCT levels <0.5 µg/l were found in 43% of NSCLC with a neuroendocrine component, vs. 9% of cancers with other histology (P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: Lung cancer may cause false positives for procalcitonin, particularly in cases of neuroendocrine cancers or in the presence of multiple metastases. These results should be taken into account for PCT-based decisional algorithms.

Routine EGFR molecular analysis in non-small-cell lung cancer patients is feasible: exons 18-21 sequencing results of 753 patients and subsequent clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeting therapies dramatically modified the prognosis of stage 4 non-small-cell lung cancer. Sensitizing EGFR mutations are the best efficacy factor of these treatments. In 2006, the French National Cancer Institute launched a network of 28 centers for EGFR molecular analysis in routine practice. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the results of routine EGFR analysis in one of these centers (Lyon University Hospital) and to assess outcomes in patients with the mutation. METHODS: EGFR mutations were analyzed for exons 18-21 by direct sequencing. The characteristics of each sample were retrospectively collected from the lab archives. Subsequent outcomes for patients harboring at least one mutation were retrospectively collected from each referring physician. RESULTS: During 1 year, 792 samples were analyzed, corresponding to 753 patients. A total of 133 mutations were diagnosed in 124 samples (15.7 %), corresponding to 121 patients. Most of them (77.4 %) were sensitizing mutations and were located in exons 19 and 21. Others were resistance mutations (8.3 %) or rare mutations (14.3 %) for which effects on tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitivity are unknown. The rate of indeterminate results (i.e., no sequencing of the entire exon 19 or 21) was 6.3 % (n = 50 samples). The only factor statistically associated with a risk of failure was sample from bone tissue: 13.7 % gave incomplete results (i.e., no whole sequencing of exons 18-21). CONCLUSIONS: Eighty-five of the 121 patients with EGFR mutations were treated with TKI. There were no differences in progression free survival (PFS) according to the type of molecule (erlotinib or gefitinib) or to the line of prescription of TKI. By contrast, exon 18 sensitizing mutations showed a worse PFS than exon 19 or 21 mutations. Finally, dose reduction was significantly more frequent in the erlotinib group than in the gefitinib group.