A comparison between manual and automated event detection for a drop vertical jump task using motion capture.

BACKGROUND: The use of movement screens as a clinical tool for injury risk assessment requires variables to be extracted across specific phases of interest. While manually selecting task events is the traditional method, automated event detection is an effective technique that maintains consistency across a cohort. This study aimed to examine variations in event identification, comparing manual detection and the application of an automated algorithm, with a specific focus on a drop vertical jump task. METHODS: Thirty participants cleared to return-to-play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and thirty controls were tested. For the automated event detection, normalized vertical ground reaction force and the velocity of the sacrum marker were used to identify five events during the drop vertical jump: initial contact, end of loading, end of propulsion, second contact, and end of second loading. Two raters manually selected events and were compared to the event times of the automated algorithm. FINDINGS: Manual event detection exhibited excellent reliability Significant differences between manual and automated detection were observed, particularly at events indicating the lowest squat position (Event2 and Event5). Participants who had undergone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction demonstrated larger differences than controls at Event5, correlating with significant squat depth disparities. INTERPRETATION: While manual event detection demonstrated reliability, automated algorithms revealed differences, specifically in events of the drop vertical jump involving the lowest squat position. The automated algorithm presents potential benefits in reducing processing time and enhancing accuracy for event identification, offering valuable insights for motion capture applications in clinical settings.

Investigating pelvic drop gait abnormality in adolescent hip pathology patients.

BACKGROUND: Trendelenburg gait describes contralateral pelvic drop during single leg stance (SLS) with occasional lateral trunk lean compensation over the stance limb. However, quantitative research on 'uncompensated Trendelenburg' gait (pelvic drop independent of lateral trunk lean) remains sparse among populations that commonly utilize this gait pattern, such as adolescent hip pathology patients. RESEARCH QUESTION: How prevalent is uncompensated Trendelenburg among various adolescent hip pathologies and how is it related to hip load, hip abduction strength, and self-reported hip pain? METHODS: Gait, strength, and pain data were collected among 152 pre-operative patients clinically diagnosed with acetabular hip dysplasia, femoroacetabular impingement, Legg-Calvé-Perthes, or slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE). Patients with ≥ 5.4° of dynamic pelvic drop in SLS were divided into a 'pelvic drop' group and screened to exclude those with excessive ipsilateral trunk lean. They were then compared to the 'stable pelvis' patients using a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Dysplasia patients represented the highest proportion of the pelvic drop group (46%). The pelvic drop group showed a significant increase in self-reported hip pain (p = 0.011), maximum hip abductor moment (p = 0.002), and peak coronal power absorption at the affected hip during SLS loading response, (p < 0.001) while showing no difference in abduction strength (p = 0.381). SIGNIFICANCE: Uncompensated Trendelenburg gait may lead to increased loading of the affected hip in adolescent hip pathology patients. Disadvantageous hip biomechanics can create increased abductor muscle demand among these pathological populations, with dysplasia patients showing the highest prevalence. Maximal abduction strength did not correlate with pelvic drop. Future work should aim to identify and quantify causal factors. Increased coronal hip power absorption during weight acceptance warrants clinical attention, as there may be a detrimental, over-reliance on passive hip structures to support load among a population that that is already predisposed to hip osteoarthritis.

Pre-operative gait kinematics and kinetics do not change following surgery in adolescent patients with femoroacetabular impingement.

BACKGROUND: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is a condition where the femoral head-neck junction collides with the acetabulum. Open or arthroscopic treatment of FAI aims to increase hip motion while reducing impingement during passive or dynamic movements. RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the biomechanical characteristics of the hip and pelvis in adolescents and young adults diagnosed with FAI syndrome 1) pre-operatively compared to controls and 2) pre- to post-operatively? METHODS: 43 patients with FAI and 43 controls were included in the study. All patients with FAI had cam deformities and underwent unilateral hip preservation surgery (either open or arthroscopic). Pre- and post-operative imaging, patient-reported outcomes, and gait analysis were performed. Joint angles and internal joint moments were evaluated with an emphasis on the pelvis and hip. A comparative analysis was conducted to evaluate the gait patterns before and after surgical treatment, as well as to compare pre-operative gait patterns to a control group. RESULTS: 43 patients with FAI (28 female, 16.5 ± 1.5 yrs) and 43 controls (28 female, 16.0 ± 1.5 yrs) were included. Pre-operative patients with FAI had decreased stride length and walking speed compared to controls, with no significant change following surgery. There were no differences in sagittal and coronal plane hip and pelvis kinematics comparing pre- to post-operative and pre-operative to controls. Pre-operatively, differences in internal hip rotation angle (pre: 3.3˚, post: 3.9˚, controls: 7.7˚) and hip extensor moment (pre: 0.121, post: 0.090, controls: 0.334 Nm/kg) were observed compared to controls with no significant changes observed following surgery. SIGNIFICANCE: Compensatory movement strategies in pelvic and hip motion are evident during gait in patients with FAI, particularly in the sagittal and transverse planes. These strategies remained consistent two years post-surgery. While surgery improved radiographic measures and patient-reported outcomes, gait did not elicit biomechanical changes following surgical treatment.

Lower-extremity kinematics and kinetics differ based on drop vertical jump variation: An assessment of methodology for a return-to-play protocol using motion analysis.

BACKGROUND: The drop vertical jump (DVJ) is commonly used in return-to-play evaluations to assess movement quality and risk during a dynamic task. However, across biomechanics literature, a multitude of DVJ variations have been used, influencing the generalizability and potential interpretation of the reported findings. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to identify differences in lower extremity kinematics and kinetics between DVJ variations that differ based on horizontal jump distance, verbal instructions, and the use of a jump target. METHODS: A single-group repeated measures design was used in a laboratory setting. Twenty participants were tested, and three-dimensional angles and moments of the pelvis, hip, knee, and ankle were computed. Wilcoxon signed rank tests were performed to determine differences between DVJ variations. RESULTS: Reduced knee flexion at initial contact and greater knee extensor moments across the descent phase were observed with increased horizontal jump distance. Additionally, both verbal instructions and a jump target influenced movement strategies at the pelvis, hip, and knee. Ground reaction forces were found to be similar across conditions and jump height following the first landing increased with a target. SIGNIFICANCE: Although subtle, the biomechanical differences observed between task variations emphasize the importance of standardizing motion analysis protocols for research and clinical decision-making. Given the findings of the current study, the authors recommend using the Half Height variation in patients treated for a knee injury as it will likely be the most indicative of movement quality.

The relationship of coronal trunk motion on the hip abductor moment impulse in pre-operative hip pathology patients during walking.

BACKGROUND: Compensatory mechanisms for hip pain, pathology, and weakness include excessive trunk lean towards the stance limb, counteracting pelvic drop to maintain stability during single leg stance. Trunk lean shifts the center of mass towards the hip joint center to decrease the moment arm and reduce hip abductor demand. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether adolescent patients with symptomatic hip pain demonstrate excessive trunk lean and the effect on the hip abductor moment impulse. METHODS: Self-selected speed walking data collected through an approved study were reviewed on pre-operative patients clinically diagnosed with a hip deformity. Instrumented motion analysis was performed to analyze trunk kinematics and the hip abductor moment impulse. FINDINGS: There was a weak, but significant correlation between hip abductor moment impulse and trunk lean. Patients diagnosed with Acetabular Dysplasia demonstrated an increased trunk lean and a decreased hip abductor moment impulse (r = - 0.311, p = 0.001). Of those who presented with excessive trunk lean, 62% of these patients had a normal hip abductor moment impulse. There was no correlation between hip abductor moment impulse and hip abductor strength. INTERPRETATION: Excessive trunk lean was not seen uniformly across adolescent patients with symptomatic hip deformities, despite pain being reported in 80% of patients. Furthermore, a majority of those that presented with excessive trunk lean did not present with a reduced moment, suggesting that although the amount of lean was greater than normal, it was not enough to significantly reduce the demand on the hip musculature.