Phase III comparative study of vinorelbine combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in disseminated metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA8.

PURPOSE: This phase III study was performed to determine the superiority of doxorubicin (DOX) and vinorelbine (VNB) (arm 1) versus DOX alone (arm 2) in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) for overall survival (OS), time to treatment failure (TTF), toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred three patients were randomized to DOX 50 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) on day 1 and VNB 25 mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8 (arm 1) or DOX 70 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 (arm 2). Both regimens were given every 3 weeks until a cumulative DOX dose of 450 mg/m(2). After 16 of the first 65 randomized patients experienced febrile neutropenia (FN), the doses were reduced to DOX 40 mg/m(2) on day 1 and VNB 20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 versus DOX 60 mg/m(2) on day 1. Eligible patients were vinca alkaloid and anthracycline naive. Chemotherapy was first-line or second-line for MBC. RESULTS: Three patients were ineligible. Thus, 300 patients were assessable for toxicity and to determine time to disease progression (TTP), TTF, and OS. Two hundred eighty-nine patients were assessable for response, and 99 responders were assessable for response duration (RD). The response rates, QOL, and median RD, TTP, and TTF were not significantly different between the arms. Median OS was 13.8 months for arm 1 versus 14.4 months for arm 2 (P =.4). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia was equivalent in both arms but more grade 3/4 neurotoxicity, mild venous toxicity, and FN were seen on arm 1. CONCLUSION: The survival with DOX and VNB is not superior to DOX alone in MBC.

Phase II study of first-line LY231514 (multi-targeted antifolate) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: an NCIC Clinical Trials Group study.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colon cancer is difficult to treat with treatment being palliative and with little effect on survival. This trial has evaluated the effects of LY231514 (Multitargeted antifolate (MTA)) given to previously untreated patients with recurrent or metastatic colorectal carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients were required to have a histological diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma with measurable disease and no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients had to have had performance status of 0-2, pretreatment absolute granulocyte count of > or = 1.5 x 10(9)/l and a platelet count of > or = 150 x 10(9)l. Patients received MTA at a dose of 600 mg/m2 by 10 minute infusion on day 1 repeated every 21 days. After the first 9 patients, this dose was reduced down to 500 mg/m2 every 21 days because of toxicity. Doses of MTA were modified depending on nadir counts. RESULTS: Thirty-two eligible patients were enrolled and twenty-nine were evaluable for response. Three patients did not have repeat radiological testing to determine response because they went off study after only one cycle of treatment due to toxicity. In the 29 evaluable patients, there was 1 complete response, 4 partial responses and 14 patients with stable disease. Response rate was 17.2% (95% confidence intervals: 5.8%-35.8%). All responses occurred in the patients receiving a starting dose of MTA 500 mg/m2. Median time to progression for all eligible patients was 3.3 months. The most common toxicities experienced were mild to moderate fever, lethargy, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, abdominal pain, diarrhea, and skin rash. There was one death due to sepsis. CONCLUSION: Single-agent MTA at 500 mg/m2 given every three weeks has modest activity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Effects of altering the time of administration and the time frame of quality of life assessments in clinical trials: an example using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a large anti-emetic trial.

Previous studies conducted by our group suggested that the ability to demonstrate an impact of emesis control on quality of life might depend upon when an quality of life instrument was administered in relation to chemotherapy and on the time frame of the questionnaire. This study was conducted to address this issue. Six hundred and fifty patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in a randomized trial comparing a variety of anti-emetic regimens were allocated to four different modes of administration (days 4 and 8; 3 and 7 day time frames) of the QLQ-C30. Patients who completed the questionnaire at the time of maximal impact of chemotherapy (day 3) were more likely to report deterioration in quality of life. Patients who completed questionnaires at day 8 were more likely to report deterioration in quality of life if their questionnaire had a 7 day time frame rather than a 3 day time frame. Patients receiving more effective anti-emetic therapy had better quality of life. It was concluded that better anti-emetic control improves quality of life after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. In studying quality of life in situations where the impact of treatment waxes and wanes, careful attention needs to be paid to scheduling the administration of questionnaires and to their time frame.

Phase III double-blind comparison of dolasetron mesylate and ondansetron and an evaluation of the additive role of dexamethasone in the prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting due to moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of dolasetron and ondansetron in controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours; to evaluate the efficacy when dexamethasone is added to either drug in the first 24 hours; and to extend these comparisons over 7 days in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized study with six parallel arms that used a 2 x 2 factorial design in chemotherapy-naive patients. In arm 1, dolasetron (2.4 mg/kg) was given intravenously (I.V.) prechemotherapy, followed 24 hours later by oral dolasetron (200 mg once daily) for 6 days. Arms 2 and 3 consisted of dolasetron and dexamethasone 8 mg I.V., followed 24 hours later by oral dexamethasone (8 mg once daily) in one arm, and oral dexamethasone and dolasetron in the other, also for 6 days. In arms 4, 5, and 6, ondansetron (32 mg I.V. or 8 mg orally twice daily) was administered in a similar manner to arms 1, 2, and 3 before and 24 hours after chemotherapy. Mean nausea severity (MNS) was assessed on a visual analog scale (VAS) in a daily diary. RESULTS: Of 703 patients enrolled, 696 were eligible. There were 343 dolasetron- and 353 ondansetron-treated patients; 57% of dolasetron-treated patients had complete protection in the first 24 hours versus 67% of patients who received ondansetron (P = .013). MNS was also more pronounced on the dolasetron arm (P = .051). Sixty-seven percent of patients who received added dexamethasone in the first 24 hours had complete protection, compared with 55% without dexamethasone (P < .001). MNS was significantly reduced with the addition of dexamethasone (P < .001). At 7 days, dolasetron and ondansetron had equivalent complete protection rates (36% and 39%, respectively). With the addition of dexamethasone, 48% of patients compared with 28% had complete protection (P < .001). MNS was significantly improved with added dexamethasone (P < .001). CONCLUSION: At the doses used, dolasetron was significantly less effective than ondansetron at controlling nausea and vomiting in the first 24 hours in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy, but there was no demonstrable difference between both drugs over 7 days. The addition of dexamethasone significantly improved the efficacy of both drugs in the first 24 hours and over 7 days.

The role of the 5-HT3 antagonists ondansetron and dolasetron in the control of delayed onset nausea and vomiting in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: 5-HT3 antagonists are effective in reducing the acute nausea and vomiting caused by cancer chemotherapy. However, it is not clear whether continuing these agents beyond twenty four hours is useful in controlling emesis on days two to seven after chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred seven patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy who had been given dexamethasone 8 mg i.v. and either ondansetron 32 mg i.v. or dolasetron 2.4 mg/kg i.v. were randomized to continue either an oral form of their 5-HT3 antagonist (ondansetron 8 mg b.i.d. or dolasetron 200 mg daily) plus dexamethasone 8 mg p.o. daily or dexamethasone alone for days two to seven. Endpoints assessed by self-report were: 1) complete control (no vomiting, no rescue medications, no missing data) of emesis; 2) nausea severity; and 3) quality-of-life as measured by the EORTC QLQ-C30. RESULTS: Continuation of 5-HT3 antagonists improved slightly, but not significantly, the complete control rate (47% vs. 41%: P = 0.24 one-sided) after chemotherapy. However, mean nausea severity was significantly (P = 0.015 one sided) reduced (by 3 mm on a 10 cm scale) on the combined arm. Minimal differences in quality of life were observed. CONCLUSION: The benefit of continuing 5-HT3 antagonists beyond 24 hours is modest and the merits of routine use in these circumstances debatable.

Docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a phase II study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: The National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group (NCIC-CTG) conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with measurable MBC were studied. Three patients were ineligible and were excluded from analysis. The planned dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks. Prior adjuvant chemotherapy was allowed if at least 12 months had elapsed from completion of treatment to recurrence. RESULTS: The most severe toxicity was granulocytopenia. Ten patients (20.8%) were hospitalized for febrile neutropenia. The protocol was amended to a starting dose of 75 mg/m2 for the last 16 patients. Sixty percent of patients experienced hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). After two protocol amendments, the use of a premedication regimen of oral dexamethasone and i.v. H1 and H2 blockers prevented significant HSRs. Edema developed in 62% of patients and was cumulative, was present in 50% who received greater than 400 mg/m2, and was not improved by premedication regimens. Following an independent radiology review, 22 partial remissions and four complete responses in 47 assessable patients were confirmed (response rate, 55%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 40% to 69%). The response rate for 15 assessable patients registered at 75 mg/m2 was 40% (95% CI, 16% to 67%); for 32 assessable patients registered at 100 mg/m2, the response rate was 63%, (95% CI, 43% to 78%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is an active agent in MBC. Its activity as a single agent is comparable to many combination chemotherapy regimens and is not affected by prior adjuvant chemotherapy. Studies are ongoing to improve its therapeutic index and to incorporate docetaxel in combination chemotherapy regimens.

Secretion of atrial natriuretic peptide and vasopressin by small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Hyponatremia in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a common clinical problem usually attributed to tumor secretion of arginine vasopressin (AVP). It recently was shown that some SCLC cell lines produce atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP). The purpose of this investigation was to determine the frequency and clinical consequences of secretion of ANP by SCLC and the relative contribution of ANP and AVP to the hyponatremia associated with this disease. METHODS: Levels of ANP and AVP were measured in 23 SCLC cell lines and 23 other human tumor cell lines. Also, ANP and AVP levels were determined in plasma samples from 69 patients with active small cell carcinomas. RESULTS: Of the 23 SCLC lines, 16 (70%) had elevated ANP levels. Only two (8.7%) had elevated AVP levels, and these two also had elevated ANP levels. One of the ANP-producing cell lines was derived from a hyponatremic patient with no other apparent explanation for a low sodium level. However, the four cell lines with the highest levels of ANP were derived from patients who were not hyponatremic. Two other human tumor lines also produced ANP. Of the 69 patients with SCLC, 21 (30.4%) had elevated ANP levels, whereas 4 (6%) had elevated AVP levels. Fifteen of these patients were hyponatremic during their clinical course (21.7%). Of the eight patients who were hyponatremic when samples were collected, two had elevated ANP levels, and only one had elevated AVP levels. Six patients (8.7%) had symptoms of postural hypotension, possibly attributable in some cases of tumor secretion of ANP. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of SCLC lines produce ANP, and a minority produce AVP. Secretion of ANP may result in hyponatremia and/or postural hypotension. However, secretion of either or both of these peptides does not account for all cases of hyponatremia in patients with SCLC and does not necessarily cause clinical manifestations.

Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase III trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: This study examines whether the schedule of ondansetron significantly influences its antiemetic efficacy in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, whether the administration of oral ondansetron after 24 hours is effective in preventing delayed emesis, and whether the efficacy of ondansetron is preserved over multiple courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter double-blind study randomized 302 cancer patients to one of three treatment arms. Arm A received dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Canada Inc, Toronto, Canada) 8 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally every 12 hours postchemotherapy for nine doses. Arm B received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 16 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus placebo orally postchemotherapy in the same schedule as arm A. Arm C received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 8 mg prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally postchemotherapy for one dose followed by placebo orally every 12 hours for eight more doses. Response was assessed by the number of reported episodes of vomiting and by severity of nausea measured on a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: The two schedules of ondansetron used in the first 24 hours were no different in their antiemetic efficacy, with similar rates for complete responses (76.7% v 72.0%, P = .472), complete plus major responses (90.2% v 82.0%, P = .135), and severity of nausea (P = .348). Oral ondansetron after 24 hours was more effective than placebo in preventing delayed nausea and emesis, with superior rates of complete responses (59.6% v 42.1%, P = .012 by one-sided test), complete plus major responses (80.9% v 66.3%, P = .018 by one-sided test), and less severe nausea (9.2 mm v 18.6 mm on a 100-mm VAS, P = .002). The efficacy of ondansetron was maintained over subsequent courses of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The schedule of ondansetron in the first 24 hours does not influence its efficacy. The use of oral maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed nausea and emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Ondansetron compared with dexamethasone and metoclopramide as antiemetics in the chemotherapy of breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.

BACKGROUND: Although ondansetron was found to be effective as an antiemetic in numerous clinical trials of highly emetogenic combination-chemotherapy regimens that included cisplatin, its role in milder emetogenic regimens has not been fully defined. To address its use with a widely used but less emetogenic regimen, we performed a double-blind, randomized clinical trial comparing ondansetron with dexamethasone and metoclopramide in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil. METHODS: A total of 165 women with breast cancer from 14 Canadian centers who were about to receive this chemotherapy for the first time were randomly assigned to receive either ondansetron (n = 85) or dexamethasone plus metoclopramide (n = 80), a widely used, standard antiemetic regimen. The patients recorded the incidence of nausea, emesis, and other side effects in diaries, and these data were compared in the two groups. RESULTS: The patients who received dexamethasone and metoclopramide had significantly less nausea during the first 24 hours after chemotherapy was begun. Otherwise, there were no statistically significant differences in efficacy between the regimens. The incidence of drowsiness and increased appetite was higher in the group given dexamethasone and metoclopramide. CONCLUSIONS: For women with breast cancer who are being treated with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil, the efficacy of dexamethasone and metoclopramide in controlling nausea and vomiting equaled or exceeded that of ondansetron.

A randomized, double-blinded study comparing six doses of batanopride (BMY-25801) with methylprednisolone in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Several agents in a new class of antiemetic compounds, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonists, have shown promise as effective antiemetics with fewer side effects than metoclopramide. One of these agents, batanopride, produced no severe toxicity at doses that prevented emesis due to chemotherapy in early Phase I trials. We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, 7 arm clinical trial to: (1) identify the presence of a dose-response for complete protection from emesis, and (2) compare batanopride with a standard antiemetic, methylprednisolone if a dose-response was found not to exist. Prior to chemotherapy, six patient groups each received a single intravenous dose of batanopride ranging from 0.2 to 6.0 mg/kg whereas a seventh group received methylprednisolone 250 mg intravenously. Chemotherapy-naïve cancer patients scheduled to receive moderately emetogenic chemotherapy were eligible. Primary treatment outcomes that were recorded and analyzed included the number of episodes of emesis, the time to the first episode of emesis as well as the frequency and severity of nausea. Two hundred and eight patients accrued between April 1989 and February 1990 were evaluable for response. A significant dose-response effect for complete protection from emesis was not seen over the first 24 hours after chemotherapy (p = 0.102). However, a linear dose-response effect for time to first emesis was evident in a multivariate analysis (p = 0.029). While the highest batanopride dose group was associated with a higher complete protection rate (CPR) than the control group, this group also exhibited a higher incidence of diarrhea (p = 0.013), hypotension, and electrocardiographic abnormalities.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Superiority of granisetron to dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Trials of selective 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonists have shown excellent antiemetic activity for chemotherapy containing cisplatin when compared with high-dose metoclopramide. There is little information about the efficacy of these new agents for chemotherapy other than for high-dose cisplatin. We performed a double-blind, randomized trial comparing a single dose of the 5-hydroxytryptamine3 receptor antagonist granisetron (BRL 43694A) as a single intravenous dose with dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in 152 patients receiving their first course of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (mainly doxorubicin- and cyclophosphamide-containing combinations). During the first 24 hours, there was a statistically significant advantage for the granisetron group in terms of the prevention of both nausea and emesis. There was no difference in the frequency of reported adverse events. We conclude that granisetron is more effective than dexamethasone plus prochlorperazine in patients who are receiving moderately emetogenic cytotoxic agents.

Levamisole and 5-fluorouracil therapy for resected colon cancer: a new indication.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits and risks of postoperative treatment with levamisole plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with colon cancer. DESIGN: Computerized searches of MEDLINE and CANCERLIT were performed, and the reference list of each retrieved article was checked. Only randomized trials of therapy with levamisole alone or combined with 5-FU for colon cancer without distant metastases were included. The studies were then evaluated with the use of four criteria. RESULTS: We reviewed six randomized trials, of which three satisfied our criteria. Two studies demonstrated a significant improvement in the survival rate with levamisole plus 5-FU among patients with colon cancer and pathologically confirmed metastases to adjacent lymph nodes (Dukes' stage C). A subgroup analysis in another study demonstrated a similar benefit. The toxic effects of the drugs were generally mild. The three other studies showed no difference in survival rates between the treatment groups; however, the samples were too small to detect a clinically or statistically important difference. CONCLUSIONS: Because many patients with colon cancer will suffer a relapse we recommend that they be offered the opportunity to participate in clinical trials of adjuvant therapy. For those with stage C disease not entering a clinical trial levamisole plus 5-FU is appropriate adjuvant therapy.

Modelling the risk of adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma in persons infected with human T-lymphotropic virus type I.

Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL), a malignancy of mature CD4-positive lymphocytes, has been etiologically linked to the human retrovirus HTLV-I. Although a long latent period is suggested from migrant studies, little prospective information on the risk of developing ATL among persons with HTLV-I infection is available. We present here a model for ATL risk based upon age- and sex-specific HTLV-I seroprevalence data from a cross-sectional survey of 13,000 Jamaicans and ATL incidence data from a 2 1/2-year case-control study. By examining the age-specific incidence of ATL relative to both adult and childhood-acquired seropositivity versus childhood-acquired seropositivity alone, we provide evidence in support of the hypothesis that childhood infection with HTLV-I is important to the development of ATL. Using this model, the cumulative lifetime risk of ATL for those infected before age 20 is estimated to be 4.0% for males and 4.2% for females. Under this hypothesis, HTLV-I-associated diseases with shorter latent periods, such as tropical spastic paraparesis, should have a higher incidence in adult females than in adult males.

Molecular epidemiology of HTLV-I-associated non-Hodgkin's lymphomas in Jamaica.

As part of epidemiologic studies of human T-lymphotropic virus (HTLV)-I-associated malignancies in Jamaica, the authors evaluated 26 patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma for the presence of integrated HTLV-I provirus in their malignant cells. Fifteen of 26 patients had integrated provirus. All 15 also were HTLV-I antibody positive. Eleven patients did not have integrated provirus, and all 11 were antibody negative. All of the antibody-positive cases had onset of their disease in adulthood (age range, 21-57 years) as opposed to the broad age range of negative cases (4-66 years). Clinical features which were more common in provirus positive than negative patients included leukemic phase, skin involvement, and hypercalcemia, which are all features frequently seen in HTLV-I-associated adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL). The presence of skin involvement, circulating malignant cells, abnormal liver function tests, or the presence of two or more of these four features were statistically significantly different between virus-positive and virus-negative cases. Although the survival of positive cases (6 months) was shorter than that of negative cases (9 months), this was not statistically significant. The only significant determinant of survival was hypercalcemia, with those who developed hypercalcemia at some point in their disease course, independent of their HTLV-I status, surviving a mean of 5 months as compared to a mean of 17.5 months in those who never became hypercalcemic. The six HTLV-I-positive lymphomas that underwent cell typing were all primarily OKT4 positive, whereas two HTLV-I antibody-negative cases that were typed were B-cell lymphomas.

2'-Deoxycoformycin therapy in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma.

Six Caribbean patients with histologically and immunologically characterized adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL) were treated intravenously (IV) with 2'-deoxycoformycin (DCF) at a dose of 5 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 15, and 22 with four additional weekly doses to convert any partial responses (PR) to complete responses (CR). Patients were considered eligible for this study if refractory to or relapsed from combination chemotherapy, had a life expectancy of 4 weeks or more, a performance status greater than or equal to 50%, normal renal and hepatic function, and no chemotherapy within 4 weeks. Clinical characteristics of the patients in this study included lymphadenopathy in five patients, skin involvement in four patients, bone marrow infiltration in five patients, and central nervous system involvement in two patients. Circulating ATL cells were present in four patients, and three were hypercalcemic. Of five patients evaluable for response, there was one PR of 1 month, and two minor responses lasting 2 and 3 weeks. The median duration of survival for all treated patients was 3 weeks or more. The DCF was associated with moderate side effects, including conjunctivitis in three patients, nausea and vomiting in two patients, progressive hepatic insufficiency in one patient, and moderate myelotoxicity in three patients. Infections occurred in four patients, including two cases of oral candidiasis and two cases of fatal neutropenic sepsis in patients receiving concurrent intrathecal methotrexate. As a single agent, DCF appears to have limited activity in advanced refractory/relapsed ATL. Studies in the future should explore DCF in combination with other cytotoxic agents as initial therapy in better-risk patients.

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Jamaica and its relation to adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma.

Of 95 patients consecutively diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 52 (55%) had antibodies to human T-cell leukemia-lymphoma virus, type I. Antibody positivity was strongly associated with skin involvement, leukemia, and hypercalcemia (p less than 0.02). Two patients had systemic opportunistic infections. Neither meningeal nor lung infiltration was detected, and lymph node infiltration was diffuse in all patients. Of 36 patients who received immunophenotypic classifications, 30 had diseases that affected the T-cell system, and the cells of all tested patients with these diseases showed the helper/inducer (T4) phenotype. Twenty-seven of these thirty-six patients were found to have adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma, and of the 27, 24 had antibodies to HTLV-I. The median duration of survival in patients with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma was 17 weeks, but a subgroup of 9 patients had indolent courses and a median survival of 81 weeks, which suggests that the disease has differing expression with courses that range from smoldering and indolent to acute and rapidly fatal. Hypercalcemia was the most important prognostic determinant of adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma.

Molecular and immunologic analysis of a chronic lymphocytic leukemia case with antibodies against human T-cell leukemia virus.

The human T-cell leukemia virus type-I (HTLV-I) is a unique, exogenous, horizontally transmitted retrovirus which is T-cell tropic, and has been associated with a specific type of aggressive leukemia/lymphoma of mature T-cell origin. In a survey of lymphoid malignancies in Jamaica, antibodies to HTLV-I were also found in 6 of 17 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), raising the possibility of an etiologic relationship. Further studies were undertaken on one of these patients to clarify the nature of the disease and possible virus relationship. Cell surface marker analysis of her peripheral blood cells documented that the majority of circulating lymphocytes were B-cells. DNA-cloned probe analysis with a complete HTLV-I proviral genome of these peripheral malignant B-cells, was negative for integrated virus. A T-cell line was established in culture from her peripheral blood. The presence of HTLV-I in the cultured T-cell line was established by the detection of expressed viral specific gag protein p-19 and proviral DNA. Thus, a B-cell lymphoid malignancy can occur in the presence of HTLV-I infected T-cells, suggesting the possibility of an indirect leukemogenic mechanism.