Minocycline Prevents the Development of Mechanical Allodynia in Mouse Models of Vincristine-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

Vincristine is an antineoplastic substance that is part of many chemotherapy regimens, used especially for the treatment of a variety of pediatric cancers including leukemias and brain tumors. Unfortunately, many vincristine-treated patients develop peripheral neuropathy, a side effect characterized by sensory, motoric, and autonomic symptoms. The sensory symptoms include pain, in particular hypersensitivity to light touch, as well as loss of sensory discrimination to detect vibration and touch. The symptoms of vincristine-induced neuropathy are only poorly controlled by currently available analgesics and therefore often necessitate dose reductions or even cessation of treatment. The aim of this study was to identify new therapeutic targets for the treatment of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) by combining behavioral experiments, histology, and pharmacology after vincristine treatment. Local intraplantar injection of vincristine into the hind paw caused dose- and time-dependent mechanical hypersensitivity that developed into mechanical hyposensitivity at high doses, and lead to a pronounced, dose-dependent infiltration of immune cells at the site of injection. Importantly, administration of minocycline effectively prevented the development of mechanical hypersensitivity and infiltration of immune cells in mouse models of vincristine induce peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) based on intraperitoneal or intraplantar administration of vincristine. Similarly, Toll-like receptor 4 knockout mice showed diminished vincristine-induced mechanical hypersensitivity and immune cell infiltration, while treatment with the anti-inflammatory meloxicam had no effect. These results provide evidence for the involvement of Toll-like receptor 4 in the development of VIPN and suggest that minocycline and/or direct Toll-like receptor 4 antagonists may be an effective preventative treatment for patients receiving vincristine.

Antagonism of the proinflammatory and pronociceptive actions of canonical and biased agonists of protease-activated receptor-2.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diverse proteases cleave protease-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) on primary sensory neurons and epithelial cells to evoke pain and inflammation. Trypsin and tryptase activate PAR2 by a canonical mechanism that entails cleavage within the extracellular N-terminus revealing a tethered ligand that activates the cleaved receptor. Cathepsin-S and elastase are biased agonists that cleave PAR2 at different sites to activate distinct signalling pathways. Although PAR2 is a therapeutic target for inflammatory and painful diseases, the divergent mechanisms of proteolytic activation complicate the development of therapeutically useful antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: We investigated whether the PAR2 antagonist GB88 inhibits protease-evoked activation of nociceptors and protease-stimulated oedema and hyperalgesia in rodents. KEY RESULTS: Intraplantar injection of trypsin, cathespsin-S or elastase stimulated mechanical and thermal hyperalgesia and oedema in mice. Oral GB88 or par2 deletion inhibited the algesic and proinflammatory actions of all three proteases, but did not affect basal responses. GB88 also prevented pronociceptive and proinflammatory effects of the PAR2-selective agonists 2-furoyl-LIGRLO-NH2 and AC264613. GB88 did not affect capsaicin-evoked hyperalgesia or inflammation. Trypsin, cathepsin-S and elastase increased [Ca(2+) ]i in rat nociceptors, which expressed PAR2. GB88 inhibited this activation of nociceptors by all three proteases, but did not affect capsaicin-evoked activation of nociceptors or inhibit the catalytic activity of the three proteases. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GB88 inhibits the capacity of canonical and biased protease agonists of PAR2 to cause nociception and inflammation.

Pathway-selective antagonism of proteinase activated receptor 2.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Proteinase activated receptor 2 (PAR2) is a GPCR associated with inflammation, metabolism and disease. Clues to understanding how to block PAR2 signalling associated with disease without inhibiting PAR2 activation in normal physiology could be provided by studies of biased signalling. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: PAR2 ligand GB88 was profiled for PAR2 agonist and antagonist properties by several functional assays associated with intracellular G-protein-coupled signalling in vitro in three cell types and with PAR2-induced rat paw oedema in vivo. KEY RESULTS: In HT29 cells, GB88 was a PAR2 antagonist in terms of Ca(2+) mobilization and PKC phosphorylation, but a PAR2 agonist in attenuating forskolin-induced cAMP accumulation, increasing ERK1/2 phosphorylation, RhoA activation, myosin phosphatase phosphorylation and actin filament rearrangement. In CHO-hPAR2 cells, GB88 inhibited Ca(2+) release, but activated G(i/o) and increased ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In human kidney tubule cells, GB88 inhibited cytokine secretion (IL6, IL8, GM-CSF, TNF-α) mediated by PAR2. A rat paw oedema induced by PAR2 agonists was also inhibited by orally administered GB88 and compared with effects of locally administered inhibitors of G-protein coupled pathways. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: GB88 is a biased antagonist of PAR2 that selectively inhibits PAR2/G(q/11)/Ca(2+)/PKC signalling, leading to anti-inflammatory activity in vivo, while being an agonist in activating three other PAR2-activated pathways (cAMP, ERK, Rho) in human cells. These findings highlight opportunities to design drugs to block specific PAR2-linked signalling pathways in disease, without blocking beneficial PAR2 signalling in normal physiology, and to dissect PAR2-associated mechanisms of disease in vivo.

Modulating human proteinase activated receptor 2 with a novel antagonist (GB88) and agonist (GB110).

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Many cells express proteinase activated receptor 2 (PAR2) on their plasma membrane. PAR2 is activated by proteolytic enzymes, such as trypsin and tryptase that cleave the receptor N-terminus, inititating signalling to intracellular G proteins. Studies on PAR2 have relied heavily upon activating effects of proteases and peptide agonists that lack stability and bioavailability in vivo. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: A novel small molecule agonist GB110 and an antagonist GB88 were characterized in vitro against trypsin, peptide agonists, PAR2 antibody, PAR1 agonists and flow cytometry,in seven cell lines using intracellular Ca(2+) mobilization and examined in vivo against PAR2- and PAR1-induced rat paw oedema. KEY RESULTS: GB110 is a potent non-peptidic agonist activating PAR2-mediated Ca(2+) release in HT29 cells (EC(50) ∼200 nM) and six other human cell lines, inducing PAR2 internalization. GB88 is a unique PAR2 antagonist, inhibiting PAR2 activated Ca(2+) release (IC(50) ∼2 µM) induced by native (trypsin) or synthetic peptide and non-peptide agonists. GB88 was a competitive and surmountable antagonist of agonist 2f-LIGRLO-NH(2), a competitive but insurmountable antagonist of agonist GB110, and a non-competitive insurmountable antagonist of trypsin. GB88 was orally active and anti-inflammatory in vivo, inhibiting acute rat paw oedema elicited by agonist GB110 and proteolytic or peptide agonists of PAR2 but not by corresponding agonists of PAR1 or PAR4. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The novel PAR2 agonist and antagonist modulate intracellular Ca(2+) and rat paw oedema, providing novel molecular tools for examining PAR2-mediated diseases.

Action potential afterdepolarization mediated by a Ca2+-activated cation conductance in myenteric AH neurons.

We investigated the nature of afterdepolarizing potentials in AH neurons from the guinea-pig duodenum using whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in intact myenteric ganglia. Afterdepolarizing potentials were minimally activated following action-potential firing under normal conditions, but after application of charybdotoxin (40 nM) or tetraethyl ammonium (TEA; 10-20 mM) to the bathing solution, prominent afterdepolarizing potentials followed action potentials. The whole-cell current underlying afterdepolarizing potentials (I(ADP)) in the presence of TEA (10-20 mM) reversed at -38 mV and was not voltage-dependent. Reduction of NaCl in the bathing (Krebs) solution to 58 mM shifted the reversal potential of the I(ADP) to -58 mV, suggesting that the current underlying the afterdepolarizing potential was carried by a mixture of cations. The relative contributions of Na(+) and K(+) to this current were estimated to be about 1:5. Substitution of external Na(+) with N-methyl D-glucamine blocked the current while replacement of internal Cl(-) with gluconate did not block the I(ADP). The I(ADP) was also inhibited when CsCl-filled patch pipettes were used. The I(ADP) was blocked or substantially decreased in amplitude in the presence of N-type Ca(2+) channel antagonists, omega-conotoxin GVIA and omega-conotoxin MVIIC, respectively, and was eliminated by external Cd(2+), indicating that it was dependent on Ca(2+) entry. The I(ADP) was also inhibited by ryanodine (10-20 microM), indicating that Ca(2+)-induced Ca(2+) release was involved in its activation. Niflumic acid consistently inhibited the I(ADP) with an IC(50) of 63 microM. Using antibodies against the pore-forming subunits of L-, N- and P/Q-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels, we have demonstrated that myenteric AH neurons express N- and P/Q, but not L-type voltage-gated Ca(2+) channels. We conclude that the ADP in myenteric AH neurons, in the presence of an L-type Ca(2+)-channel blocker, is generated by the opening of Ca(2+)-activated non-selective cation channels following action potential-mediated Ca(2+) entry mainly through N-type Ca(2+) channels. Ca(2+) release from ryanodine-sensitive stores triggered by Ca(2+) entry contributes significantly to the activation of this current.