Tissue- and liquid-biopsy based NGS profiling in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a real-world setting: the IMMINENT study.

Introduction: To date, for all non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases, it is recommended to test for driver alterations to identify actionable therapeutic targets. In this light, comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with next generation sequencing (NGS) has progressively gained increasing importance in clinical practice. Here, with the aim of assessing the distribution and the real-world frequency of gene alterations and their correlation with patient characteristics, we present the outcomes obtained using FoundationOne (F1CDx) and FoundationLiquid CDx (F1L/F1LCDx) NGS-based profiling in a nationwide initiative for advanced NSCLC patients. Methods: F1CDx (324 genes) was used for tissue samples, and F1L (70 genes) or F1LCDx (324 genes) for liquid biopsy, aiming to explore the real-world occurrence of molecular alterations in aNSCLC and their relationship with patients' characteristics. Results: Overall, 232 advanced NSCLC patients from 11 Institutions were gathered [median age 63 years; never/former or current smokers 29.3/65.9%; adenocarcinoma/squamous 79.3/12.5%; F1CDx/F1L+F1LCDx 59.5/40.5%]. Alterations were found in 170 different genes. Median number of mutated genes per sample was 4 (IQR 3-6) and 2 (IQR 1-3) in the F1CDx and F1L/F1LCDx cohorts, respectively. TP53 (58%), KRAS (22%), CDKN2A/B (19%), and STK11 (17%) alterations were the most frequently detected. Actionability rates (tier I and II) were comparable: 36.2% F1CDx vs. 34% ctDNA NGS assays (29.5% and 40.9% F1L and F1LCDx, respectively). Alterations in KEAP1 were significantly associated with STK11 and KRAS, so as TP53 with RB1. Median tumor mutational burden was 6 (IQR 3-10) and was significantly higher in smokers. Median OS from metastatic diagnosis was 23 months (IQR 18.5-19.5) and significantly lower in patients harboring ≥3 gene mutations. Conditional three-year survival probabilities increased over time for patients profiled at initial diagnosis and exceeded those of individuals tested later in their clinical history after 12 months. Conclusion: This study confirms that NGS-based molecular profiling of aNSCLC on tissue or blood samples offers valuable predictive and prognostic insights.

The importance of integrated therapies on cancer: Silibinin, an old and new molecule.

In the landscape of cancer treatments, the efficacy of coadjuvant molecules remains a focus of attention for clinical research with the aim of reducing toxicity and achieving better outcomes. Most of the pathogenetic processes causing tumour development, neoplastic progression, ageing, and increased toxicity involve inflammation. Inflammatory mechanisms can progress through a variety of molecular patterns. As is well known, the ageing process is determined by pathological pathways very similar and often parallel to those that cause cancer development. Among these complex mechanisms, inflammation is currently much studied and is often referred to in the geriatric field as 'inflammaging'. In this context, treatments active in the management of inflammatory mechanisms could play a role as adjuvants to standard therapies. Among these emerging molecules, Silibinin has demonstrated its anti-inflammatory properties in different neoplastic types, also in combination with chemotherapeutic agents. Moreover, this molecule could represent a breakthrough in the management of age-related processes. Thus, Silibinin could be a valuable adjuvant to reduce drug-related toxicity and increase therapeutic potential. For this reason, the main aim of this review is to collect and analyse data presented in the literature on the use of Silibinin, to better understand the mechanisms of the functioning of this molecule and its possible therapeutic role.

Clinical, Pathological and Prognostic Features of Rare BRAF Mutations in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): A Bi-Institutional Retrospective Analysis (REBUS Study).

Recently, retrospective analysis began to shed light on metastatic colorectal cancers (mCRCs) harboring rare BRAF non-V600 mutations, documenting a distinct phenotype and a favorable prognosis. This study aimed to confirm features and prognosis of rare BRAF non-V600 mCRCs compared to BRAF V600E and BRAF wild-type mCRCs treated at two Italian Institutions. Overall, 537 cases were retrospectively evaluated: 221 RAS/BRAF wild-type, 261 RAS mutated, 46 BRAF V600E and 9 BRAF non-V600. Compared to BRAF V600E mCRC, BRAF non-V600 mCRC were more frequently left-sided, had a lower tumor burden and displayed a lower grade and an MMR proficient/MSS status. In addition, non-V600 mCRC patients underwent more frequently to resection of metastases with radical intent. Median overall survival (mOS) was significantly longer in the non-V600 compared to the V600E group. At multivariate analysis, only age < 65 years and ECOG PS 0 were identified as independent predictors of better OS. BRAF V600E mCRCs showed a statistically significant worse mOS when compared to BRAF wild-type mCRCs, whereas no significant difference was observed between BRAF non-V600 and BRAF wild-type mCRCs. Our study corroborates available evidence concerning incidence, clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of BRAF-mutated mCRCs.

Incidence of Adverse Cutaneous Reactions to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are routinely used in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, their use is associated with gastrointestinal and cutaneous toxicities, including acneiform eruptions, pruritus, xerosis, nail and hair changes. Aside from reducing patients' quality of life, such cutaneous reactions have a considerable impact on the oncologic treatment given that dose reduction or even drug discontinuation may be necessary, especially for the severe forms. OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence, impact on treatment and management of EGFR inhibitor-related cutaneous reactions in patients with NSCLC. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study on 87 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors from January to December 2019. Patients who developed mucocutaneous reactions were evaluated and treated by both oncologists and dermatologists, and underwent dermatologic follow-up until resolution of the cutaneous reaction. Demographic and clinical data were collected for each patient, and the severity of the cutaneous reaction was graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients (81.6%) developed cutaneous reactions. The number of cutaneous reactions per patient was 1 in 37%, 2 in 41% and 3 or more in 22%. The most common cutaneous reactions included acneiform eruptions (56.3%), xerosis ± asteatotic eczema (48.3%), nail changes (39.1%), mucositis (29.9%), pruritus (24.1%) and hair changes (12.6%). Afatinib was associated with a higher rate of nail changes and mucositis (p < 0.01 and p < 0.005, respectively) compared to other agents, while no patient-related predictive factors were identified. Dose reduction was performed in 18% of patients. Multidisciplinary management involving dermatologists allowed to resume the drug in all patients who had discontinued it due to the cutaneous reactions. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach to EGFR inhibitor-related cutaneous reactions is advantageous and can reduce the need to discontinue oncologic treatment.

Organisational challenges, volumes of oncological activity and patients' perception during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 epidemic.

BACKGROUND: On February 23rd, the 1st case of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was diagnosed at the University Hospital Trust of Verona, Italy. On March 13th, the Oncology Section was converted into a 22-inpatient bed coronavirus disease (COVID) Unit, and we reshaped our organisation to face the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic, while maintaining oncological activities. METHODS: We tracked down (i) volumes of oncological activities (January 1st - March 31st, 2020 versus the same period of 2019), (ii) patients' and caregivers' perception and (iii) SARS-CoV-2 infection rate in oncology health professionals and SARS-CoV-2 infection-related hospital admissions of "active"' oncological patients. RESULTS: As compared with the same trimester in 2019, the overall reduction in total numbers of inpatient admissions, chemotherapy administrations and specialist visits in January-March 2020 was 8%, 6% and 3%, respectively; based on the weekly average of daily accesses, reduction in some of the oncological activities became statistically significant from week 11. The overall acceptance of adopted measures, as measured by targeted questionnaires administered to a sample of 241 outpatients, was high (>70%). Overall, 8 of 85 oncology health professionals tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection (all but one employed in the COVID Unit, no hospital admissions and no treatment required); among 471 patients admitted for SARS-CoV-2 infection, 7 had an "active"' oncological disease (2 died of infection-related complications). CONCLUSIONS: A slight, but statistically significant reduction in oncology activity was registered during the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic peak in Verona, Italy. Organisational and protective measures adopted appear to have contributed to keep infections in both oncological patients and health professionals to a minimum.

Efficacy and safety of afatinib for non-small-cell lung cancer: state-of-the-art and future perspectives.

INTRODUCTION: Afatinib is a second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, acting as an irreversible and multitarget blocker of ErbB family members. Afatinib is currently approved for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring common and uncommon sensitizing EGFR mutations and for squamous NSCLC patients progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. AREAS COVERED: This review summarizes the efficacy and safety profile of afatinib compared with chemotherapy and other EGFR TKIs, in order to evaluate its characteristics and potential role in the increasingly complex treatment landscape of EGFR-mutant lung cancer. Future perspectives and innovative drug combinations are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: Afatinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy and quality of life compared with chemotherapy with a managed toxicity profile. However, in recent years, the increasing availability of different treatment options for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC has made the current treatment scenario more complicated, with an increasing need of new and deeper scientific data. In this light, the identification and validation of potential clinicopathological and/or molecular predictors of benefit, as well as the clarification of resistance mechanisms, may help to clarify the most appropriate treatment strategies and sequences for EGFR-mutant patients.

PD-L1 for selecting non-small-cell lung cancer patients for first-line immuno-chemotherapy combination: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: With the final aim to explore the first-line treatment options for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we performed a systematic review and literature-based meta-analysis of available clinical trials exploring immunotherapy in combination versus standard histology-based chemotherapy. Materials & methods: We evaluated interactions according to type of treatment-add-on strategy: immunotherapy in combination versus standard chemotherapy-based regimens. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were extracted and cumulated. Results: Seven trials (4278 patients) were included. The addition of immunotherapy to standard chemotherapy-based regimens significantly increased OS (HR 0.74; p = 0.001) and PFS (HR 0.61; p < 0.0001) compared with standard-of-care in NSCLC patients in first-line setting. Conclusion: Immunotherapy-based regimens constantly improved OS and PFS compared with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of nononcogene-addicted NSCLC.

[Current approaches to the first-line treatment of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma]. / Approccio al trattamento di prima linea del carcinoma renale a cellule chiare metastatico.

The medical treatment of renal cell carcinoma has been revolutionized in recent years, thanks to translation of our increasingly accurate knowledge on the molecular pathogenesis of this tumor, and of its clear cell histology in particular, into an accelerated drug development, and then into everyday's clinical practice. In this review, starting with the pathogenesis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, we shall address the results of the clinical trials that led to the registration of seven targeted agents for this disease once orphan of active treatments, taking into account the different prognostic groups in which the patients suffering from it can be divided. Finally, we shall discuss the complex and controversial issue of the ideal timing to start a systemic treatment, a critical and still highly debated topic. All major international guidelines agree on the standard first line therapeutic options, which are represented by sunitinib, bevacizumab (associated with interferon-α) and pazopanib for patients with good or intermediate risk features, and temsirolimus for poor-risk patients. All these agents proved able to prolong progression-free survival within randomized phase III trials. The use of an observation period, before starting a systemic treatment, seems also reasonable, at least in the more indolent tumors and in patients with a better prognosis, even if the topic is still controversial. Finally, the individualization of therapy and the proper conduct of the same is essential for a successful outcome of the treatment.